open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [VOTE] All AGAINST The Nano-Nerf
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: first : previous : ... 65 66 67 68 [69] 70 71 72 73 ... : last (74)

Author Topic

GIJoeDirtbag
Caldari
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
Atlas.
Posted - 2008.10.12 05:27:00 - [2041]
 

Edited by: GIJoeDirtbag on 12/10/2008 05:27:15
I also think that it's absolutely laughable that a company so dedicated to roleplaying aspects of a game gives set laws of physics, forces everyone to get used to them, and then decides that they just want to arbitrarily change the laws of physics as if God would change the laws of gravity to make the olympics more fair for fat people.

Cornette
Gallente
Solar Revenue Service
TAXU
Posted - 2008.10.12 11:52:00 - [2042]
 

Edited by: Cornette on 12/10/2008 11:53:32
I am voting against the nerf of speeds even though I was for a nerf of ludicrous speeds in the beginning. Why? Because CCP seems unable to fix a broken aspect of the game without breaking others in the process. Nor do I like that they want to make the game easier for defenders and owners of space and drastically make "guerrilla warfare" less viable.

Nozh mentioned that the speed was fine in "2004" and that I believe is the problem. We have a dev with a "2004" mindset that want to drastically alter "2008".

And that's my reason why I can't vote "yes".


Edit: forgot to klick the support-idea-thingy.

Blind Jhon
Posted - 2008.10.12 12:19:00 - [2043]
 

just no

Sandrinne Mirterois
Minmatar
bulloxer
Posted - 2008.10.12 12:21:00 - [2044]
 

3 month skills for the vagabond.

now

1) 3 monts money back

2)3 months of skillpoint bonus i can cange, let's say for the deimos

3) stop nerfing everything

bigjava
Posted - 2008.10.12 12:28:00 - [2045]
 

nano nerf = roaming nerf

why not nerf antimatter?
why not nerf fof missiles?
why not nerf falcons?
why not nerf mitnal?
why not nerf stargates's sentries?
why not nerf concord bilboard?
why not nerf the dominix?
why not nerf tachions?
and why no nerf veldspar?

SAI Peregrinus
Caldari
Queens of the Stone Age
Supremacy.
Posted - 2008.10.13 08:58:00 - [2046]
 

I vote No.
I'd be fine with the suggestion to make MWDs turn off other modules like cloaks do, as long as ABs got a buff to help.

No ship should ever be invulnerable, but the nerf as described is doing it wrong.

Lady Bollocknose
Posted - 2008.10.13 18:09:00 - [2047]
 


lordjoel
Posted - 2008.10.14 06:55:00 - [2048]
 

i am completely against this change, and i almost never fly nano. It is easy enough to counter and harder to do than than the carebears would think. This change would also make it impossible to bump ships out of the docking radius of a station leading to ungodly amount of docking/undocking station games.

foxclaw
Posted - 2008.10.14 07:00:00 - [2049]
 

against this crap

Wolf Soldier
Minmatar
Griefer-B-Gone
Ushra'Khan
Posted - 2008.10.14 13:21:00 - [2050]
 


MaDeX
The Scope

Posted - 2008.10.14 21:18:00 - [2051]
 

I'm against the nano nerf

Innate Carnage
Rising Devils
Chain of Chaos
Posted - 2008.10.14 21:19:00 - [2052]
 

Yes way, stop this nerf!!

Jeffery Lebowskie
Gallente
Posted - 2008.10.14 21:26:00 - [2053]
 

AGAINST

Yeah no I don't think this a good idea at all,

PainMiester
Posted - 2008.10.14 22:18:00 - [2054]
 

i am against the nanno nerf- its not hard to kill a nano-vaga-or ishtar-- there are ships and tatics for that if ya cant handle that go back to carebear land---- if your gonna be in 0.0 grow some and stop crying--and o yea time to pay for your training muhahahahahShocked

the blender
Viper Intel Squad
Sons of Tangra
Posted - 2008.10.14 22:45:00 - [2055]
 

Edited by: the blender on 14/10/2008 23:20:48
I'm against the nano nerf cus'ummmmm I live in fountain which is conveniently placed for snake droppage and autumn walks, so long live the nano ***.

Piuro
GoonWaffe
SOLODRAKBANSOLODRAKBANSO
Posted - 2008.10.15 06:10:00 - [2056]
 

Dear CCP:

Brka
H A V O C
Against ALL Authorities
Posted - 2008.10.15 06:24:00 - [2057]
 

Edited by: Brka on 15/10/2008 06:26:09
Edited by: Brka on 15/10/2008 06:25:15
Voting NO against the nano nerf. Terrible idea. Too heavy handed.

Approach it differently. Removing a style of play instead of finding ideas and new roles (new ships) to counter blobs as well as nanos is more interesting and creative.

Again so far I see this as another bad idea from the devs. You guys need some civil or mechanical engineers on that dev squad I swear. 69 pages of no votes against 32 votes for the nerf. Yikes 2:1. Time to listen this time. Already accounts closing due to the GTC ( not whining just the truth) and now this? Where is a shark when when have the Fonz all ready for it.

Brka Brka Brka

Thargat
Caldari
Deep Core Mining Inc.

Posted - 2008.10.16 00:09:00 - [2058]
 

No nerf, no nerf, no nerf *brings torch and pichfork*

No seriously, a bit of fine tuning might be required tho.

Tyremis
The Perfect Storm
Random-Violence
Posted - 2008.10.16 00:32:00 - [2059]
 

Against the nerf if you can even call it a nerf. CCP has taken small gang warfare chopped it up into little pieces with a chainsaw and set it on fire. CCP YOU FAIL

Melegaunt Tanthul
Gallente
Aliastra
Posted - 2008.10.20 01:46:00 - [2060]
 

Against the nerf passionately. It kills close range combat, roaming gangs and renders fragile ships useless alpha fodder.

Paul99
Posted - 2008.10.20 11:27:00 - [2061]
 

AGAINST. So... if you have no ideea how to pvp just make a blob and win, yee for the lag that comes with numbers. I agree that Snakes schould be nerfed but the this is WAY TOO MUCH, that a noob in an insured bs stays and only activates modules. This is the pvp you wont???I certanly do not and WILL NOT.

Drad Lord
Posted - 2008.10.21 10:47:00 - [2062]
 

Against.

I fly minmatare ships more then half year mostly bs, if minmatare wouldnt have speed they die very quick even in pve...They now have useless arty, and only ac and speed may equivalent it with other race. Pitty why I canceled train my caldari character, then CCP boost missiles and they will be uber. Nerf web and all guns will be space trash.
Look at minmatares, all of them train ammarian ships. Do you know anyone from other race who want train minmatare ships? or projectile arty?
I like eve but CCP dont do it worst for people who want still stay with you.

Capt Jita
Posted - 2008.10.21 15:24:00 - [2063]
 

Totally against this move

I say Nerf the blob instead.

Raymond Sterns
Utopian Research I.E.L.
The ENTITY.
Posted - 2008.10.21 17:56:00 - [2064]
 

I say nerf them both. Nano***s and blobbers ruined this game.


Efrim Black
Gallente
Thanatos Industries
Posted - 2008.10.22 18:24:00 - [2065]
 

Originally by: Raymond Sterns
I say nerf them both. Nano***s and blobbers ruined this game.




QFT.

Caleb Lich
Posted - 2008.10.23 17:11:00 - [2066]
 

WHY DON'T YOU JUST NERF EVE ??

batmoth
Amarr
Cardinal Armada
Razakel.
Posted - 2008.10.23 18:02:00 - [2067]
 

im totally against this nano nerf. its a stupid idea and when it comes to stupid ideas some one should pay...

Matrix Skye
Caldari
State War Academy
Posted - 2008.10.23 18:19:00 - [2068]
 

Edited by: Matrix Skye on 23/10/2008 18:19:40
Originally by: Raymond Sterns
I say nerf them both. Nano***s and blobbers ruined this game.




It's only a blob if you're not in it. If you're in it it's a strategic fleet. Razz.

Conlin
Gallente
LangToun

Posted - 2008.10.23 18:36:00 - [2069]
 

Against ...... Nerf Carebears & CCP devs Razz

Blastil
Posted - 2008.10.23 23:20:00 - [2070]
 

I WANT MY GALLENTE DPS BOAT BACK YOU BASTARDS!


Pages: first : previous : ... 65 66 67 68 [69] 70 71 72 73 ... : last (74)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only