open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [VOTE] All AGAINST The Nano-Nerf
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: first : previous : ... 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 ... : last (74)

Author Topic

Princess 02
Posted - 2008.08.01 23:31:00 - [1561]
 

NO SUPPORT!!!

This is a typical example why DEMOCRACY can be a joke... hence NOT the BEST way of doing things...

Jonny Damordred
Moira.
Rote Kapelle
Posted - 2008.08.01 23:51:00 - [1562]
 

A vote against the nerf is a vote for small-gang pvp. Down with the blob.

Cheers,
Jonny D.

Bacchanalian
Stimulus
Rote Kapelle
Posted - 2008.08.02 01:04:00 - [1563]
 

Originally by: Jonny Damordred
A vote against the nerf is a vote for small-gang pvp. Down with the blob.

Cheers,
Jonny D.


What this brilliant man has said.

Xaiah Darlis
Posted - 2008.08.02 01:07:00 - [1564]
 

And of course, I agree as well.

DasDizzy
Beyond Divinity Inc
Posted - 2008.08.02 01:30:00 - [1565]
 

Adapt or die you ****tards

Ephemeron
Caldari Provisions
Posted - 2008.08.02 01:41:00 - [1566]
 

Originally by: DasDizzy
Adapt or die you ****tards

- Brought you by people who failed to adapt to nanos

BlackMoon Thrawn
Stimulus

Posted - 2008.08.02 01:53:00 - [1567]
 

While I support a nerf of polycarbs, snakes and a stacking penalty on all speed mods I oppose everything else being implemented. If some minor tweaks don't solve the problem revisit it a couple months down the road.

Jim Linger
Rionnag Alba
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2008.08.02 02:28:00 - [1568]
 

CPP putting their pistol in their mouth again.

Make the right choice.

evilphoenix
Gods of War LLC

Posted - 2008.08.02 02:30:00 - [1569]
 

I disagree with the nerf.

Insertclevernamehere
Posted - 2008.08.02 02:38:00 - [1570]
 

S

W

G

Pheonix Kanan
Caldari
D00M.
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2008.08.02 02:48:00 - [1571]
 

Originally by: Ephemeron
Originally by: DasDizzy
Adapt or die you ****tards

- Brought you by people who failed to adapt to nanos


TRUTH!

BobMoo22
Endless Destruction
Legiunea ROmana
Posted - 2008.08.02 03:26:00 - [1572]
 

/signed

Yorku
Wounded in space
Posted - 2008.08.02 03:30:00 - [1573]
 

I say the nano nerf should not happpen. It's only planned because people complain about how nano ships are overpowered. After all, that is bull. They are not overpowered, people just cant adapt to how people fit their ships. Ok - if you spend a billion isk on faction fitting of a nano ship and all your skills are maxed to 5, and you have a gang with perfect nano bonuses, then you are nearly untouchable. But I think in that case you deserve to live anyways. Webs exist in the game for a reason. (This also means the web nerf would not work.) The nerf needs to be revised.

/signed

Sylthi
Minmatar
Coreward Pan-Galactic
Holy Empire of The Unshaven
Posted - 2008.08.02 05:35:00 - [1574]
 

Originally by: Jade Constantine

This issue counts as the most popular public issue for the coming August 3rd meeting so we will be discussing it. I've certainly done some testing myself on SISI and I'd advise as many people as possible to do that too. Go there, form up nano gangs and anti nano gangs and see if its possible now for speed to escape 0.0 bubble gamps. Make sure the BH's and devs get to see for themselves what happens. Basically - having a huge ass thread like this is good for highlighting the issue and now thats certainly been done - but its now time to get testing on SISI and coming up with some specific proposals for how to improve the changes suggested in the devblog.



This. Get to it people. Give the devs in game examples of why all of these changes are a bad thing or they are going to blatently ignore popular demand like always. I, for one, am doing my part, have you done yours gentle reader?


Molicious
Caldari
coracao ardente
Triumvirate.
Posted - 2008.08.02 05:58:00 - [1575]
 

AGAINST THE NERF!!!

I was right, once they did the testing on sisi they needed to nerf missiles again cus people whined, and probably going to look at ecm and neuts again. when is it going to stop???? OH NO I DIED pls make pvp damage 1/5 of pve damage like wow!!!

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!

TripleDistilled Pownage
Posted - 2008.08.02 07:55:00 - [1576]
 

Edited by: TripleDistilled Pownage on 02/08/2008 08:03:01
think before you act ccp, nerfing nano should be done EXTREMELY CAREFULLY, one thing at a time. your proposing to much to fast, as many ppl have said already do one or 2 changes, see how it goes, and proceed from there. and seriously, 5 hours? 5 whole hours you thought about this and you release that blog? dont they see the rammifications of even the slightest nerf to nano? pull your heads out of your asses and look around. **** im not even against a nano nerf, having bs's fly around at 4-5km/s is ludicurous but you need not destroy nano'ing as a tactic because some people have found a loophole in a system YOU designed. your system needs some fine tunning, maybe having mass reduction work on an exponential scale, meaning the heavier the ship is, it is exponentially harder to make is go faster by reducing its mass, thats just my opinion

Jita Johnny
Posted - 2008.08.02 08:10:00 - [1577]
 

Quite possibly the worst set of proposed changes I have ever seen from CCP.

Kolmogorow
Freedom Resources
Posted - 2008.08.02 11:14:00 - [1578]
 

No Nerf!

Tar Sonn
Caldari
Emo Rangers
Electric Monkey Overlords
Posted - 2008.08.02 11:20:00 - [1579]
 

Against

chopsypaul
Posted - 2008.08.02 11:22:00 - [1580]
 

No to nano nerf

Darc Kaahar
Gallente
Cruoris Seraphim
Exalted.
Posted - 2008.08.02 11:54:00 - [1581]
 

Edited by: Darc Kaahar on 02/08/2008 11:54:04
Originally by: Xaiah Darlis
And of course, I agree as well.


I agree with you. I love you.

Against o7 o7 o7

Karentaki
Gallente
Oberon Incorporated
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2008.08.02 12:45:00 - [1582]
 

Originally by: Jonny Damordred
A vote against the nerf is a vote for small-gang pvp. Down with the blob.

Cheers,
Jonny D.


QFT

Callie Nefarious
NibbleTek
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2008.08.02 12:55:00 - [1583]
 

We dont need that kind of nerfs.
/signed

Pheleus
Habitual Euthanasia
Posted - 2008.08.02 13:06:00 - [1584]
 

As much as i support this topic CCP will just do whatever they want so it is really not that worth while.


Gregorius Decimus
Caldari
Blackwater Company
Green Alliance
Posted - 2008.08.02 13:09:00 - [1585]
 

Edited by: Gregorius Decimus on 02/08/2008 14:24:21
Definitively against! YARRRR!!

D Martyr
Posted - 2008.08.02 13:54:00 - [1586]
 

Just,
Don't.

Boris Butterfield
Royal Hiigaran Navy
SCUM.
Posted - 2008.08.02 14:18:00 - [1587]
 

Edited by: Boris Butterfield on 02/08/2008 14:21:59
Just to annoy my corp members. I really dont want to go back to bs being the only cost effective ships to pvp in again, but I can I guess.

Edit: And if the changes are reverted I say keep the scram changes to effect MWD just for more strategy and give gal recons a bit of a side boost.

Diana Dettmar
Posted - 2008.08.02 14:51:00 - [1588]
 

Until I see some credible evidence that 'guerilla warfare remains viable' I vote against this nerf. Right now it looks like the only viable option is to bring a bigger blob if you want to take on an established 0.0 alliance in their own territory. Anything else is simply going to die to the blob that gets jump-bridged in behind them after a few minutes of roaming.

By all means rebalance polycarbons and snakes, but the changes currently on Sisi will just push Eve further towards being all about big fat boring lagged-out blobs.

Evolyze
Caldari Provisions
Posted - 2008.08.02 15:13:00 - [1589]
 

Support for this i like killing paper tigers

Jackal79
Posted - 2008.08.02 17:01:00 - [1590]
 

If the nano nerf goes through the future of pvp in eve is tank and spank. **** that.


Pages: first : previous : ... 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 ... : last (74)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only