open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [VOTE] All AGAINST The Nano-Nerf
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: first : previous : ... 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 ... : last (74)

Author Topic

lib2
Posted - 2008.07.29 15:23:00 - [1141]
 

supported

Deckert
Caldari
Dark-Rising

Posted - 2008.07.29 15:24:00 - [1142]
 

Against. People really should know how to use webbifiers.

Bartho
Gallente
Dark-Rising

Posted - 2008.07.29 15:26:00 - [1143]
 

Edited by: Bartho on 29/07/2008 15:26:42
Against the nerf. Learn how to play.

Yaay
Fusion Enterprises Ltd
Posted - 2008.07.29 15:27:00 - [1144]
 

my god, 300 people and their 500 alts all voting against, go figure

THEDON1
Dark-Rising

Posted - 2008.07.29 15:32:00 - [1145]
 

Against. If you don't know how to play or sacrifice a med slot for a web then don't play the game whiners.

REV001
Caldari
VXR Heavy Industries

Posted - 2008.07.29 15:39:00 - [1146]
 

Against !!!

Sola Sun
X0 OPS
Posted - 2008.07.29 15:41:00 - [1147]
 

I am against speed nerf.

Damsel I
Posted - 2008.07.29 15:44:00 - [1148]
 

Against !!!!

WTB Dev's with some brains !!!


SHADEVIL
Posted - 2008.07.29 15:48:00 - [1149]
 

Definitely Against this ridiculous nerfing !!!


AdmiralFreeman
Rionnag Alba
Triumvirate.
Posted - 2008.07.29 15:52:00 - [1150]
 

Originally by: Yaay
my god, 300 people and their 500 alts all voting against, go figure


Think twice before speaking. You can only support the vote with one char per payed account.


vtocIII
Raptor Legion
Wildly Inappropriate.
Posted - 2008.07.29 15:54:00 - [1151]
 

Against !!!

MrauuSrauu
Posted - 2008.07.29 15:55:00 - [1152]
 

Totally against.

Dalej lama
Posted - 2008.07.29 15:56:00 - [1153]
 

WTF?! Again matar nerf. NEVER!

XrayZ
SandStorm.
The Babylon Consortium
Posted - 2008.07.29 15:57:00 - [1154]
 

Against !!!

SpaceSavage
Posted - 2008.07.29 16:00:00 - [1155]
 

AGAINST!

Evil or Very Mad

Ackaroth
Plundering Penguins
Anarchy.
Posted - 2008.07.29 16:06:00 - [1156]
 

I just think this isnt as well thought out as it could be. Nano gives people a chance to do guerilla warfare. EVE needs some way to do this, we cant all get 100 people together just to raid enemy space for a half hour.

diiidiiax
Amarr
Dark Entropy
G00DFELLAS
Posted - 2008.07.29 16:39:00 - [1157]
 

AGAINST!

Lydia Celestine
Garoun Investment Bank
Posted - 2008.07.29 16:40:00 - [1158]
 

AGAINST!

Karad Forsky
Caldari
Posted - 2008.07.29 16:42:00 - [1159]
 

Not in this form.

TERROZ HUN
Posted - 2008.07.29 16:57:00 - [1160]
 

Bring the noobs closer to highly skilled players,ahh how sweet,Do us all a favour and leave the game alone for a few years.........

TERROZ HUN
Posted - 2008.07.29 16:59:00 - [1161]
 

against

Steel Tigeress
Gallente
R0GUE ENTITY
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:04:00 - [1162]
 

Edited by: Steel Tigeress on 29/07/2008 17:04:45
Edited by: Steel Tigeress on 29/07/2008 17:04:13
Originally by: AdmiralFreeman
Originally by: Yaay
my god, 300 people and their 500 alts all voting against, go figure


Think twice before speaking. You can only support the vote with one char per payed account.




Wrong, the CSM's just have a way of seeing how many accounts accually voted, and not characters.

There is nothing that limits the number of characters you /sign in this thread with. Since there are 3 characters per account, it is perfectly feasable for there to only be 13 pages of actual votes against this nerf.

Judging from the ammount of alts I've spotted where 3 people in a row look the exact same, or 2-3 in a row have the same name with different spellings. I'ld say this thread actually only has around 20 somthing pages of actual votes.

Jenna Trueman
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:07:00 - [1163]
 

AGAINST!

Ilovepoasting
Richard Cheese dedication corp
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:10:00 - [1164]
 

Originally by: Yaay
my god, 300 people and their 500 alts all voting against, go figure


ohey Mr bs ops for life!

Kurt Hetfield
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:12:00 - [1165]
 

Against!

Jade Constantine
Gallente
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:15:00 - [1166]
 

Originally by: Steel Tigeress
Edited by: Steel Tigeress on 29/07/2008 17:04:45
Edited by: Steel Tigeress on 29/07/2008 17:04:13
Originally by: AdmiralFreeman
Originally by: Yaay
my god, 300 people and their 500 alts all voting against, go figure


Think twice before speaking. You can only support the vote with one char per payed account.




Wrong, the CSM's just have a way of seeing how many accounts accually voted, and not characters.

There is nothing that limits the number of characters you /sign in this thread with. Since there are 3 characters per account, it is perfectly feasable for there to only be 13 pages of actual votes against this nerf.

Judging from the ammount of alts I've spotted where 3 people in a row look the exact same, or 2-3 in a row have the same name with different spellings. I'ld say this thread actually only has around 20 somthing pages of actual votes.


Of course thats going to be exactly the same for the pro nerf thread as well so its something of a null argument.

sajberk
Cutting Edge Incorporated
RAZOR Alliance
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:29:00 - [1167]
 

Edited by: sajberk on 29/07/2008 17:33:44
no speed nerf pls!

Red Raider
Caldari
Caldari Provisions
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:34:00 - [1168]
 

Originally by: Jade Constantine

Of course thats going to be exactly the same for the pro nerf thread as well so its something of a null argument.



I only voted once their Jade. Though I don't agree with some of the parts of the nerf the Dev mentioned I agree a change needs to be made.

Will Rose
Caldari
Deep Core Mining Inc.

Posted - 2008.07.29 17:36:00 - [1169]
 

I am not against a reduction in the effectiveness of Nano ships - for the longest time I did my best to make do without a 'nano' ship in small gang PVP and was quickly educated in just how impossible they were to do without.
There are counters to nano, yes - but they are particularly resource intensive in terms of specific skills, modules and ships - much more so nanoing - they only lead down the slippery slope towards blobsville, which is not a place I want to go.

What is needed isn't a broad nerf of everything nano, what is needed is a balanced consideration of what the problems are with the tracking, explosion radius system etc. as well as the more extreme ends of the Nano scale, and a proper rebalancing.
Perhaps consider modules like webification fields, or remote area webs, just as there are remote area ECM mods.

I support the principle of the thing - ridiculous speeds need to be brought back into line (or weapons need to be properly worked out so that they still have some effect at speeds), but not the scale of the proposed nerfs, so I vote against.

Jade Constantine
Gallente
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:37:00 - [1170]
 

Originally by: Red Raider
Originally by: Jade Constantine

Of course thats going to be exactly the same for the pro nerf thread as well so its something of a null argument.



I only voted once their Jade. Though I don't agree with some of the parts of the nerf the Dev mentioned I agree a change needs to be made.


I imagine plenty of perfectly honest players only voted in this thread once too. Point was that extreme frothers on both sides of the argument will multiple post with their alts as a general rule.


Pages: first : previous : ... 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 ... : last (74)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only