open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked Roll back NOS -- we want are Nos back ..
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic

Tagg'net
Posted - 2007.09.12 04:51:00 - [1]
 

Amarr cruiser 5.. no longer needs to be trained it seems.. I dont care for neuts , I want a nos curse :(

bring back the nos domi! bring back NOS!!

do ya hear me! :)

Haffrage
Regeneration
Posted - 2007.09.12 04:52:00 - [2]
 

Jesus ****ing christ no.

agent apple
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2007.09.12 04:58:00 - [3]
 

Originally by: Haffrage
Jesus ****ing christ no.


This

RedLion
Caldari
State Constructions
Posted - 2007.09.12 04:58:00 - [4]
 

I want it, but we won't get it

Captian Internet
Lead Bricks
Posted - 2007.09.12 04:59:00 - [5]
 

You nos *****s are all the same all suck and no style

Kazuma Saruwatari
Posted - 2007.09.12 04:59:00 - [6]
 

wow, it took people this long to whine about the Nos change?

Seriously, Nos needed the nerf so bad it wasnt funny. Be thankful they didnt remove Nos entirely.

Nyphur
Pillowsoft
Posted - 2007.09.12 05:02:00 - [7]
 

My nosdomi works just fine. In fact, it works BETTER since the patch because it's immune to counternos.

Feng Schui
Minmatar
Cruor Evertum Dominicus
Posted - 2007.09.12 05:19:00 - [8]
 

the curse works fine, the pilgrim however Evil or Very Mad

aUTOKILL
Gallente
No.Mercy
Merciless.
Posted - 2007.09.12 05:25:00 - [9]
 

Originally by: Haffrage
Jesus ****ing christ no.

Draygo Korvan
Merch Industrial
GoonSwarm
Posted - 2007.09.12 06:28:00 - [10]
 

I say re-nerf it (undo the nerf and then nerf it more appropriately)

The current nerf is pretty terrible from the stand point that it doesnt interact with other game mechanics and that better ship setups (higher cap recharge rate, higher cap capacity) benifit much less from nos.

Nos should act on sig radius, not cap % compared to your own. Making it less effective if your opponents cap starts getting low is fine, but your cap level should have nothing to do with that. The max drain needs to be based on the sig radius of ships so that a heavy nos cant sap a frigate to nothing in one pull.

Essentially in my opinion, it wasnt that nos didnt need to be nerfed, it was nerfed in the wrong way.

fire 59
Destructive Influence
KenZoku
Posted - 2007.09.12 06:31:00 - [11]
 

Nah it's great now, needed a fix and it is now fixed. Simple as


Haffrage
Regeneration
Posted - 2007.09.12 06:55:00 - [12]
 

Originally by: Draygo Korvan
I say re-nerf it (undo the nerf and then nerf it more appropriately)

The current nerf is pretty terrible from the stand point that it doesnt interact with other game mechanics and that better ship setups (higher cap recharge rate, higher cap capacity) benifit much less from nos.

Nos should act on sig radius, not cap % compared to your own. Making it less effective if your opponents cap starts getting low is fine, but your cap level should have nothing to do with that. The max drain needs to be based on the sig radius of ships so that a heavy nos cant sap a frigate to nothing in one pull.

Essentially in my opinion, it wasnt that nos didnt need to be nerfed, it was nerfed in the wrong way.
If you have a high cap recharge rate and can sustain cap...you don't need a ****ing nos. If you're fitting it to kill someone's cap get a neut. If you're fitting it to sustain your own cap use a nos. If your cap can sustain you don't need nos.

It's pretty simple ugh

anister
Black Omega Security
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2007.09.12 06:56:00 - [13]
 

*our

omiNATION
Gallente
TBC
VENOM Alliance
Posted - 2007.09.12 07:09:00 - [14]
 

Originally by: Draygo Korvan
I say re-nerf it (undo the nerf and then nerf it more appropriately)

The current nerf is pretty terrible from the stand point that it doesnt interact with other game mechanics and that better ship setups (higher cap recharge rate, higher cap capacity) benifit much less from nos.

Nos should act on sig radius, not cap % compared to your own. Making it less effective if your opponents cap starts getting low is fine, but your cap level should have nothing to do with that. The max drain needs to be based on the sig radius of ships so that a heavy nos cant sap a frigate to nothing in one pull.

Essentially in my opinion, it wasnt that nos didnt need to be nerfed, it was nerfed in the wrong way.


I like this idea, but still doesn't stop full on Domi NOS fleets nosing their way through nossingham... nos.

I admit, took a bit more teeth out of the NOS than it should have tho, they're practically useless, even as a defensive tool. Maybe if they crippled your target's recharge rate too. So it doesn't take more cap than you have, but it prevents them from regaining cap.

Cornucopian
Gallente
Federal Defence Union
Posted - 2007.09.12 07:14:00 - [15]
 

Originally by: Captian Internet
You nos *****s are all the same all suck and no style


for ONCE I actually agree with you megatroll!!! QFT!

Bellum Eternus
Gallente
The Scope
Posted - 2007.09.12 07:18:00 - [16]
 

Originally by: Cornucopian
Originally by: Captian Internet
You nos *****s are all the same all suck and no style


for ONCE I actually agree with you megatroll!!! QFT!


Yep. Can you hear that? It's the sound of ice forming in the streets of Hell lol...

MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
Posted - 2007.09.12 07:32:00 - [17]
 

no thanks

Kalazar
Amarr
Veto.
Veto Corp
Posted - 2007.09.12 07:45:00 - [18]
 

Definitely not. Nos was just too overpowered in it's previous incarnation. Now maybe smaller ships will stand a chance against larger ships once more... Without having the severe dampener of being insta-drained by the standard 3-4 heavy nos battleship setups.

Amuko
Amarr
Reverentia
Illuminati.
Posted - 2007.09.12 08:07:00 - [19]
 

People who used NOS sucked, in two ways...

tla gnillortmurof
Minmatar
Republic Military School
Posted - 2007.09.12 08:25:00 - [20]
 

Adapt more, whine less.

Lord WarATron
Amarr
Shadow Warri0rs
Posted - 2007.09.12 08:30:00 - [21]
 

Neuts are the new NOS. Also, I hear these Launcher Slots on a Curse is fun as well.....

Granmethedon III
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
Posted - 2007.09.12 08:33:00 - [22]
 

Originally by: omiNATION

I admit, took a bit more teeth out of the NOS than it should have tho, they're practically useless, even as a defensive tool. Maybe if they crippled your target's recharge rate too. So it doesn't take more cap than you have, but it prevents them from regaining cap.

I disagree, I think nos now is excellent, especially for small ships both to preotec them from a large nos draining them completely, and for them using it too.

Fit something like a Jaguar with a nos and MWD and you have a pretty good heavy tackler, and using nos in the way I think its intended; leeching cap from a larger ship to sustain your own, but without ever really completely draining your target.

Sirial Soulfly
Posted - 2007.09.12 08:36:00 - [23]
 

The public has spoken, now off with his head! Shocked

Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2007.09.12 08:41:00 - [24]
 

No?

MOS DEF
0utbreak
Posted - 2007.09.12 08:47:00 - [25]
 

It got way more scary out there in space now that people who nosed switched over to neuts really.
Adapt or die.

Najenna
Minmatar
Minmatar and Gallente Association
Posted - 2007.09.12 08:55:00 - [26]
 

IdeaQFT
Can i have your stuffQuestion

Zephyr Zhang
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Posted - 2007.09.12 08:57:00 - [27]
 

Nos is workign great now cause it aint :)
Means that smaller ships are coming into there own

Sinder Ohm
Demonic Corp
G00DFELLAS
Posted - 2007.09.12 09:20:00 - [28]
 

NONONONO!!!

Suck it up dont play

Jennai
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
Posted - 2007.09.12 09:29:00 - [29]
 

Originally by: Granmethedon III
I disagree, I think nos now is excellent, especially for small ships both to preotec them from a large nos draining them completely, and for them using it too.

Fit something like a Jaguar with a nos and MWD and you have a pretty good heavy tackler, and using nos in the way I think its intended; leeching cap from a larger ship to sustain your own, but without ever really completely draining your target.


also it adds some depth to cap boosters - if you're in a cruiser with like 1100 total cap and you're using 800s, a nos boat is going to grab a good bit of that before you can use it. if you're using 400s, your cap/second isn't as high but you won't lose as much to nos.

Jadiin
Mindstar Technology
The Kano Organisation
Posted - 2007.09.12 11:30:00 - [30]
 

Originally by: Tagg'net
Amarr cruiser 5.. no longer needs to be trained it seems.. I dont care for neuts , I want a nos curse :(

bring back the nos domi! bring back NOS!!

do ya hear me! :)


What's this "we" business? I like nos the way it is tyvm.


Pages: [1] 2

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only