open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked THE EFFING DOOR!!!!!
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic

Barbelo Valentinian
Gallente
The Scope
Posted - 2011.07.28 08:14:00 - [1]
 

Gaaah, I keep wanting to double-click on my g*dd*amn spaceship to open cargo bay, to drag and drop, etc., etc., etc., etc.

What effing idiot at CCP thought that effing reducing functionality would be an effing good idea?

J***s wept, wake the **** up CCP.

*Vents*

*Takes deep breaths*

Please do not evade the profanity filter. Zymurgist

dexington
Caldari
Baconoration
Posted - 2011.07.28 08:21:00 - [2]
 

at some point you learn from you mistakes and change you behavior...

Hired Assasin
Black Aces
Against ALL Authorities
Posted - 2011.07.28 08:29:00 - [3]
 

Agreed, +1

Valentina Valentia
Caldari
State War Academy
Posted - 2011.07.28 08:30:00 - [4]
 

Close your eyes... breath... then picture the door. It IS there.. the door IS REAL.

A voice: "You unlock this door with the key of imagination. Beyond it is another dimension - a dimension of sales, a dimension of sights, a dimension of mindlessness and insecurity. You're moving into a land of both smoke and mirrors, of shadows lacking substance, of virtual things, broken egos and failed ideas. You've just crossed over into the Vanity Zone.

Cool

Kembla
Posted - 2011.07.28 09:02:00 - [5]
 

Originally by: Arnar Hrafn Gylfason
The CSM helped CCP understand the emotional connection players had with „ship spinning". They vehemently demanded the return of the feature, which CCP committed to introduce in some form at a future date.
Source

Malcheus
Posted - 2011.07.28 09:08:00 - [6]
 

Originally by: Kembla
Originally by: Arnar Hrafn Gylfason
The CSM helped CCP understand the emotional connection players had with „ship spinning". They vehemently demanded the return of the feature, which CCP committed to introduce in some form at a future date.
Source


"Introduce" is a very strange term here, the correct term would be repair. I believe they can find the required programming in earlier versions of EVE, so I would believe repairing it would be no harder then copy-pasting the code. Furthermore, I do not think the EVE community wants ship spinning back "in some form", but instead wants it back completely.


Louis deGuerre
Gallente
Malevolence.
Posted - 2011.07.28 09:18:00 - [7]
 

Edited by: Louis deGuerre on 28/07/2011 09:18:39
At some future date...

NEVER EVER EVER HAHAHAHAHAHA !!!

Agrees with op.


Emperor Cheney
Celebrity Sex Tape
Posted - 2011.07.28 09:24:00 - [8]
 

I never imagined Walking in Stations would have such a drastic effect on making EVE ****tier.

That ****ing door.


djenghis jan
Amarr
Debiloff
Posted - 2011.07.28 09:40:00 - [9]
 

And then if you apply a little bit of imagination there are so much better choices for the desktop background that they use now, like a cam view showing what goes on outside the station or a traffic overview or whatever.

I wish they had just implemented a remote operable camera that you could use to inspect your ship or shown a more detailed view of your ship like an open cargo bay or something. Even switching between stills would have been fine. I find this door print really annoying.

Cailais
Amarr
Nasty Pope Holding Corp
Talocan United
Posted - 2011.07.28 09:43:00 - [10]
 

Dear Ms Valentinian,

Thank you for your forum post, we very much welcome feedback from our customers. Whilst we appreciate that you may have lost a little functionality in using your internet spaceship we think you will agree our improvements have made it much much easier to buy monocles and dresses.

We are sure that as a avid follower of fashion, keen to look great whatever the season, that you will appreciate the great new features that Incarna brings and that playing with internet spaceships is really a bit silly anyway.

With kind regards,

CCP Marketing & Sales (clothing department)

xxx x xx
Posted - 2011.07.28 10:06:00 - [11]
 

its just a static background people.
just imagine its a beautiful nude girl

Soi Mala
Whacky Waving Inflatable Flailing Arm Tubemen
Posted - 2011.07.28 12:07:00 - [12]
 

You know what really takes the biscuit? The option to not load station environment has been there for years, though most never noticed it.

Before, when you selected it, you'd still get a view of your hangar and ship (allbeit a static one) and it STILL had the doubleclick cargohold and drag and drop functionality..

So, CCP literally went out of their way to remove those features and actively made the option worse, in a rather ******ed attempt to make people use their WOD beta test.

****ing ***gots.


Meryl SinGarda
Caldari
Belligerent Underpayed Tactical Team
Posted - 2011.07.28 12:11:00 - [13]
 

Edited by: Meryl SinGarda on 28/07/2011 12:11:26
Originally by: Barbelo Valentinian
Gaaah, I keep wanting to double-click on my g*dd*amn spaceship to open cargo bay, to drag and drop, etc., etc., etc., etc.

What effing idiot at CCP thought that effing reducing functionality would be an effing good idea?

J***s wept, wake the **** up CCP.

*Vents*

*Takes deep breaths*

Please do not evade the profanity filter. Zymurgist


Open up your ship hangar and double click your ship. DERP.

Or, click your ship on one of the two holoscreens that it is available... oh wait you're using a 486!

Musashi IV
Posted - 2011.07.28 12:14:00 - [14]
 

I think if you click on the door it should open and give you the finger!

Sadayiel
Caldari
Inner Conflict
Posted - 2011.07.28 12:18:00 - [15]
 

Originally by: Barbelo Valentinian
Gaaah, I keep wanting to double-click on my g*dd*amn spaceship to open cargo bay, to drag and drop, etc., etc., etc., etc.

What effing idiot at CCP thought that effing reducing functionality would be an effing good idea?

J***s wept, wake the **** up CCP.

*Vents*

*Takes deep breaths*

Please do not evade the profanity filter. Zymurgist

know the feeling everytime i dock and my ship hangar it's not show (mostly due the items hangar being tabbed over it) make me waste like 1 sec of my life....

i mean c'mon CCP you are wasting my life ONE SECOND PER DOCKING TIME!!!

Mara Rinn
Posted - 2011.07.28 12:21:00 - [16]
 

There is also Alt+C to open cargo, Alt+N to open the hangar.

I know, not as interesting as interacting with the ship icons directly, but it's there.

The worst bit is that we aren't even facing anything we can interact with when we dock/decant/dress/stand on the balcony.

XGS Crimson
Posted - 2011.07.28 12:24:00 - [17]
 

Look at your comment. Back to mine. Back to yours NOW BACK TO MINE. Sadly, it isn't mine. But if you stopped trolling and started posting legitimate crap it could LOOK like mine. Look down, back up, where are you? You're scrolling through comments, finding the ones that your comment could look like. Back at mine, what is it? It's a highly effective counter-troll. Look again, MY COMMENT IS NOW DIAMONDS.

Anything is possible when you think before you comment or post.

I'm on a computer.

Black Dranzer
Caldari
Posted - 2011.07.28 12:30:00 - [18]
 

Originally by: CCP
The CSM helped CCP understand the emotional connection players had with „ship spinning". They vehemently demanded the return of the feature, which CCP committed to introduce in some form at a future date.

You know what's going to happen? I'll tell you.

CCP are going to design a new view that consumes 5 times the resources of old ship spinning, melts your graphics card, and doesn't let you open up your cargo bay with a double-click. If they're REALLY talented, it won't even show what ship you're currently using.

Then when the playerbase reacts with justified ire, CCP are going to be completely dumbfounded because they didn't realize that our attachment to ship spinning has nothing to do with an emotional childlike nostalgia but because IT BARELY USED UP ANY CPU OR GPU RESOURCES, DISPLAYED WHAT SHIP I WAS CURRENTLY FLYING, AND LET ME OPEN UP MY CARGO BAY BY DOUBLE CLICKING.

At some point, Aurum will be involved.

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron
Legion of xXDEATHXx
Posted - 2011.07.28 13:41:00 - [19]
 

Originally by: Barbelo Valentinian
Gaaah, I keep wanting to double-click on my g*dd*amn spaceship to open cargo bay, to drag and drop, etc., etc., etc., etc.

What effing idiot at CCP thought that effing reducing functionality would be an effing good idea?

J***s wept, wake the **** up CCP.

*Vents*

*Takes deep breaths*

Please do not evade the profanity filter. Zymurgist
I was there.

Kraven Stark
Caldari
Atavism Industries
Posted - 2011.07.28 13:41:00 - [20]
 

Originally by: Barbelo Valentinian
Gaaah, I keep wanting to double-click on my g*dd*amn spaceship to open cargo bay, to drag and drop, etc., etc., etc., etc.

What effing idiot at CCP thought that effing reducing functionality would be an effing good idea?

J***s wept, wake the **** up CCP.

*Vents*

*Takes deep breaths*

Please do not evade the profanity filter. Zymurgist


Technically they did not reduce functionality as you can still open the cargo, they changed the behavior.

Aprie
Posted - 2011.07.28 13:49:00 - [21]
 

Do not try and open the door. That's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth… there is no door!

Also, I wonder why so many are willing to deny the reality of the OP. It is what has been said many times. Which is, "Why make something that was so simple and direct more complicated?"

You don't make a product or game harder and more complicated for the customer. You make it easier and more enjoyable.

You also don't force said complication down the customer's throat. If CCP would learn that then they wouldn't have to make a new campaign about EVE being "real" and post pictures of their half baked features.

Cpt Greagor
Caldari
Liquid Relief
Posted - 2011.07.28 13:49:00 - [22]
 

Originally by: Kraven Stark
Technically they did not reduce functionality as you can still open the cargo, they changed the behavior.


You can't open it as quickly without changing tabs in the station window, which means to put anything in after you open your cargo, you have to go and change the tabs again to get back to your hangar.

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron
Legion of xXDEATHXx
Posted - 2011.07.28 13:49:00 - [23]
 

Originally by: Kraven Stark
Originally by: Barbelo Valentinian
Gaaah, I keep wanting to double-click on my g*dd*amn spaceship to open cargo bay, to drag and drop, etc., etc., etc., etc.

What effing idiot at CCP thought that effing reducing functionality would be an effing good idea?

J***s wept, wake the **** up CCP.

*Vents*

*Takes deep breaths*

Please do not evade the profanity filter. Zymurgist


Technically they did not reduce functionality as you can still open the cargo, they changed the behavior.
The fact that you had to add the word "technically" there speaks for itself.

Kraven Stark
Caldari
Atavism Industries
Posted - 2011.07.28 13:55:00 - [24]
 

Originally by: Razin
Originally by: Kraven Stark
Originally by: Barbelo Valentinian
Gaaah, I keep wanting to double-click on my g*dd*amn spaceship to open cargo bay, to drag and drop, etc., etc., etc., etc.

What effing idiot at CCP thought that effing reducing functionality would be an effing good idea?

J***s wept, wake the **** up CCP.

*Vents*

*Takes deep breaths*

Please do not evade the profanity filter. Zymurgist


Technically they did not reduce functionality as you can still open the cargo, they changed the behavior.
The fact that you had to add the word "technically" there speaks for itself.


Well just to be clear, I agree with the sentiment of the OP. My thinking is that if you are going to try and make an argument, being as accurate as possible is the best way, regardless of what Fox News has taught the masses.

It also helps not to be insulting, but people seem to be going absolutely insane over trivial things so I don't think that message will break through at all.

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron
Legion of xXDEATHXx
Posted - 2011.07.28 14:16:00 - [25]
 

Originally by: Kraven Stark
Originally by: Razin
Originally by: Kraven Stark
Originally by: Barbelo Valentinian
Gaaah, I keep wanting to double-click on my g*dd*amn spaceship to open cargo bay, to drag and drop, etc., etc., etc., etc.

What effing idiot at CCP thought that effing reducing functionality would be an effing good idea?

J***s wept, wake the **** up CCP.

*Vents*

*Takes deep breaths*

Please do not evade the profanity filter. Zymurgist


Technically they did not reduce functionality as you can still open the cargo, they changed the behavior.
The fact that you had to add the word "technically" there speaks for itself.


Well just to be clear, I agree with the sentiment of the OP. My thinking is that if you are going to try and make an argument, being as accurate as possible is the best way, regardless of what Fox News has taught the masses.

I see where you're coming from, though I think your worry is misplaced. The argument in question has been made numerous times on these forums in excruciating detail, so there is not really a need for more. IMO the OP is just venting.

Joe Skellington
Minmatar
Matari Legion Holding
Matari Legion
Posted - 2011.07.28 14:26:00 - [26]
 

Originally by: Louis deGuerre
Edited by: Louis deGuerre on 28/07/2011 09:18:39
At some future date...

NEVER EVER EVER HAHAHAHAHAHA !!!

Agrees with op.




Like when my boss smiles and says "We'll talk about it".

Basically "**** You".

Pierre Gallatoire
Posted - 2011.07.28 14:35:00 - [27]
 

I keep the CQ on in one client because I like it. The static image on the other is very ugly, though. At least have a few different images for different station types.

Wacktopia
Sicarius.
Legion of The Damned.
Posted - 2011.07.28 14:43:00 - [28]
 

On top of that is the un-docking in the wrong ship or in your pod because it's not that obvious which ship you have active at the moment.

I'm a fan of the WIS idea but CQ is just off for me at present because the whole thing is driving me nuts because of the above.

Hanger view back ftw.

Abdiel Kavash
Caldari
Paladin Order
Fidelas Constans
Posted - 2011.07.28 15:32:00 - [29]
 

Originally by: Kraven Stark
Technically they did not reduce functionality as you can still open the cargo, they changed the behavior.


Yes they did remove functionality. You can no longer make a different ship active by dragging its icon into the main view, neither in the CQ nor with the static image. This is 100% more annoying as one needs to hunt through slow-loading menus.

Second, in the static view, you can't tell at a glance which ship you are in. "You don't remember what you docked with a moment ago?" you say? Well, say this is on my alt I haven't played for a week or two, and I need him in the right ship NOW.

Soi Mala
Whacky Waving Inflatable Flailing Arm Tubemen
Posted - 2011.07.28 16:59:00 - [30]
 

Originally by: Soi Mala
You know what really takes the biscuit? The option to not load station environment has been there for years, though most never noticed it.

Before, when you selected not to load the station environment, you'd still get a view of your hangar and ship (allbeit a static one) and it STILL had the doubleclick cargohold and drag and drop functionality..

So, why change that? CCP literally went out of their way to remove those features and actively made the option worse, in a rather ******ed attempt to make people use their WOD beta test.

****ing ***gots.




Selfquoting, I'm THAT arrogant. But to me it says it all. CCP actively made this worse on purpose. The argument of "it's not that bad" fails to stand up to that point.

It was a fail attempt to make people use their ****ty barbie, but they underestimated just how ****ty their barbie was, and never thought people would STILL prefer to stare at a brown door than their poor attempt at an engine.



Pages: [1] 2 3

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only