open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked Topics seemingly not discussed
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

Sub Prime
Posted - 2011.07.02 18:16:00 - [1]
 

Why have we not recieved any information on the following:

Inefficieny of using CQ interface over old hangar interface.
Lack of resource in resolving historic bugs within EVE.
Lack of resource in creating 'in-space' enhancements to EVE.
The issue regarding CCP developing 2 other titles and using EVE as a 'golden goose'.

I'm astounded that the CSM didn't raise these topics.

RougeOperator
Posted - 2011.07.02 18:17:00 - [2]
 

Originally by: Sub Prime
Why have we not recieved any information on the following:

Inefficieny of using CQ interface over old hangar interface.
Lack of resource in resolving historic bugs within EVE.
Lack of resource in creating 'in-space' enhancements to EVE.
The issue regarding CCP developing 2 other titles and using EVE as a 'golden goose'.

I'm astounded that the CSM didn't raise these topics.



Did you think the CSM actually represented players.

Arias Dren
Posted - 2011.07.02 18:19:00 - [3]
 

Originally by: RougeOperator
Originally by: Sub Prime
Why have we not recieved any information on the following:

Inefficieny of using CQ interface over old hangar interface.
Lack of resource in resolving historic bugs within EVE.
Lack of resource in creating 'in-space' enhancements to EVE.
The issue regarding CCP developing 2 other titles and using EVE as a 'golden goose'.

I'm astounded that the CSM didn't raise these topics.



Did you think the CSM actually represented players.



Hahahaha.


PS: Really enjoying the attitude on the forums right now. Everyone is in such a cynical, acerbically comedic mood.

Diomedes Calypso
Aetolian Armada
Posted - 2011.07.02 18:19:00 - [4]
 

I'm astounded too, and astounded that the CCP statements wouldn't have at the very very least paid lip service to ~ being a creative game company with a focus on always bettering the game we all love which is surely the core of attracting and retaining future customers. .

Bad Messenger
draketrain
Posted - 2011.07.02 18:23:00 - [5]
 

Also they did not discuss about my coronation to King of Caldari

Xercodo
Amarr
Xovoni Directorate
Posted - 2011.07.02 18:24:00 - [6]
 

Originally by: Sub Prime

Inefficieny of using CQ interface over old hangar interface.


mkay, granted...
Originally by: Sub Prime

Lack of resource in resolving historic bugs within EVE.


Team BFF
Originally by: Sub Prime

Lack of resource in creating 'in-space' enhancements to EVE.


Now that the tech framework for incarna is in place they can spend less time developing incarna and the art guys can just add content to it. Plus they have two dedicated teams for both FiS and WiS, they will always have guys working on space
Originally by: Sub Prime

The issue regarding CCP developing 2 other titles and using EVE as a 'golden goose'.


So? It's a sound business plan, and they aren't dropping EVE either

waltari
Caldari
SKEET ELITE
Posted - 2011.07.02 18:27:00 - [7]
 

I think they were discussing consequences of the recent events - aka emoragespree in jita, over 5k lolzers canceling accounts etc etc, hence CSM Emergency Meeting .. to calm down current situation .. just guessing though

Sub Prime
Posted - 2011.07.02 18:27:00 - [8]
 

Originally by: Xercodo
Originally by: Sub Prime

Inefficieny of using CQ interface over old hangar interface.


mkay, granted...
Originally by: Sub Prime

Lack of resource in resolving historic bugs within EVE.


Team BFF
Originally by: Sub Prime

Lack of resource in creating 'in-space' enhancements to EVE.


Now that the tech framework for incarna is in place they can spend less time developing incarna and the art guys can just add content to it. Plus they have two dedicated teams for both FiS and WiS, they will always have guys working on space
Originally by: Sub Prime

The issue regarding CCP developing 2 other titles and using EVE as a 'golden goose'.


So? It's a sound business plan, and they aren't dropping EVE either


You've done exactly what CCP/CSM have done - failed to answer the points. Well done!

Sub Prime
Posted - 2011.07.02 18:29:00 - [9]
 

Originally by: waltari
I think they were discussing consequences of the recent events - aka emoragespree in jita, over 5k lolzers canceling accounts etc etc, hence CSM Emergency Meeting .. to calm down current situation .. just guessing though


If you bothered to read the forum over the last week you might have realised that 'golden ammo' and ship spinning weren't the only topics players were unhappy with. Honestly, why post at all if you can't be bothered to read?

jackaloped
Posted - 2011.07.02 18:31:00 - [10]
 

Originally by: Sub Prime
Why have we not recieved any information on the following:

Inefficieny of using CQ interface over old hangar interface.
Lack of resource in resolving historic bugs within EVE.
Lack of resource in creating 'in-space' enhancements to EVE.
The issue regarding CCP developing 2 other titles and using EVE as a 'golden goose'.

I'm astounded that the CSM didn't raise these topics.



It was certainly a missed opportunity.

Instead they had a few drinks, accepted what ccp offered, told the players to "nevermind those leaked memos" and flew back home.

Captain Futur3
Posted - 2011.07.02 18:32:00 - [11]
 

I too asked that question several times now. Thread locked and not answered.

WHEN WILL WE GET PROPER EXPANSIONS INSTEAD OF DUST TRAILERS?

RougeOperator
Posted - 2011.07.02 18:33:00 - [12]
 

Originally by: jackaloped
Originally by: Sub Prime
Why have we not recieved any information on the following:

Inefficieny of using CQ interface over old hangar interface.
Lack of resource in resolving historic bugs within EVE.
Lack of resource in creating 'in-space' enhancements to EVE.
The issue regarding CCP developing 2 other titles and using EVE as a 'golden goose'.

I'm astounded that the CSM didn't raise these topics.



It was certainly a missed opportunity.

Instead they had a few drinks, accepted what ccp offered, told the players to "nevermind those leaked memos" and flew back home.


Nice summation of what happened.

Xercodo
Amarr
Xovoni Directorate
Posted - 2011.07.02 18:34:00 - [13]
 

Originally by: Sub Prime


You've done exactly what CCP/CSM have done - failed to answer the points. Well done!


that's cause apart form the first one all i had to do was give you reasons why they don't matter/need ot be asked in the first place...

Arminas Montello
Gallente
The Scope
Posted - 2011.07.02 18:36:00 - [14]
 

Originally by: Sub Prime

The issue regarding CCP developing 2 other titles and using EVE as a 'golden goose'.



This should be vary obvious to many and yet people ask this question.

CCP's income come's from Eve. Where would u suggest CCP get money to fund other projects. Look at any other game developer out there they all do this.

To do R&D for other titles and IP's u have to pull funds from existing sources. And since the only source is from Eve. That is what they are going to use.

Captain Futur3
Posted - 2011.07.02 18:42:00 - [15]
 

Originally by: Arminas Montello
Originally by: Sub Prime

The issue regarding CCP developing 2 other titles and using EVE as a 'golden goose'.



This should be vary obvious to many and yet people ask this question.

CCP's income come's from Eve. Where would u suggest CCP get money to fund other projects. Look at any other game developer out there they all do this.

To do R&D for other titles and IP's u have to pull funds from existing sources. And since the only source is from Eve. That is what they are going to use.


But the way CCP is doing it is fail. They simply tried too much. One extra titel would be good, but now we have the situation where CCP realized that they cant fund two extra titels and therefore we have MT (no one ever asked for them) and where expansions for the game we all play, become simple patches with broken and unfinished content.

Sadayiel
Caldari
Inner Conflict
Posted - 2011.07.02 18:45:00 - [16]
 

Edited by: Sadayiel on 02/07/2011 18:50:17


Originally by: Sub Prime
Why have we not recieved any information on the following:

Inefficieny of using CQ interface over old hangar interface.
Lack of resource in resolving historic bugs within EVE.
Lack of resource in creating 'in-space' enhancements to EVE.
The issue regarding CCP developing 2 other titles and using EVE as a 'golden goose'.

I'm astounded that the CSM didn't raise these topics.


1:efficiency it's the same the old Ui quick buttons still there
2:some of those historic bugs are there due an old and buggy/hard to code base framework, guess what this carbon deployed with incarna is?
3:check point 2, get a new base framework for the whole EVE so it can evolve means more and more things and even NEw things to be added instead find themselves stagnant due lack of posibilities (just compare old FPS gamves vs today ones. freelook it's quite an advancement isn it?)
4:EVE it's the main title of a company, the company can use whatever earnings from their projects o titles to whatever they desire, everytime any kiddo buy a CoD/madden/starcraft/mass effect game, they aren;t helping the company to develop just those titles/series but also any other made by those companies.

Originally by: Bad Messenger
Also they did not discuss about my coronation to King of Caldari


Such thing never happened dear monocle overlord, all those peasant will serve to me after CCP adds my Lorgnettes!!


Kitty Strokum
Posted - 2011.07.02 18:48:00 - [17]
 

OR the current financial situation @ CCP.
It has come to light in recent weeks that CCP does not look financially stable.
What about that?
What is being done to address this issue?

Sadayiel
Caldari
Inner Conflict
Posted - 2011.07.02 18:52:00 - [18]
 

Originally by: Kitty Strokum
OR the current financial situation @ CCP.
It has come to light in recent weeks that CCP does not look financially stable.
What about that?
What is being done to address this issue?



unless you own some shares/control over the company they answer it's STFU, you can doa little empyrical test just next time you go to some kind of supermarket try asking about their financial situation since you are a devoted buyer there, then tell me how it goes.

jackaloped
Posted - 2011.07.06 14:17:00 - [19]
 

Were any of these topics covered in the press conference?

RaTTuS
BIG
Gentlemen's Agreement
Posted - 2011.07.06 14:26:00 - [20]
 

the only real problem is the inability to ignore people with no facesWink


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only