open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked Hilmar or Zulu: the question and why no answer - UPDATED
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

Author Topic

Elienore
Posted - 2011.06.26 18:45:00 - [91]
 

Phew, sure do hope they gained a bit on the trust-part to calm down people a bit.

Also, good to get an answer of sorts about it.

Carli Zandrya
Caldari Provisions
Posted - 2011.06.27 01:00:00 - [92]
 

Originally by: Shadow XII

Me too. I'm sort of in denial about it. I want to stick by CCP until the bitter end.


I'm glad you came around Shadow.

Like I said the silence here is deafening.

Kalle Demos
Amarr
Helix Protocol
Posted - 2011.06.27 01:03:00 - [93]
 

Did you guys not read the blob, CCP are going to have a word with CSM in a week about this, most likely to discuss what is considered 'Play2Win'.

Carli Zandrya
Caldari Provisions
Posted - 2011.06.27 01:13:00 - [94]
 

Yea just saw it.

It's 2 days late and a few bucks short imo. The gag order over the past few days did more damage than the MT problem itself. I respect CCPZ's response, it shows he is human, but you know so are we.

Quote:
Therefore we have asked the CSM to join us in Iceland for an extraordinary meeting June 30th and July 1st to discuss the events of past week, to help us define and address the real underlying concerns, and to assist us in defining and iterating on our virtual goods strategy. The result of this meeting should be mutual agreement of how virtual goods and services will evolve in EVE.


Why wasn't this done before rollout? Isn't this the tail wagging the dog?

Quote:
Due to the volatility of the topic we want to refrain from any further comments on this matter until after meeting with the CSM.


The only thing worse than bad communication is NO communication.

Namura Kautsuo
Posted - 2011.06.27 01:14:00 - [95]
 

Edited by: Namura Kautsuo on 27/06/2011 01:14:26
Originally by: Shadow XII
Edited by: Shadow XII on 26/06/2011 16:58:17
Edited by: Shadow XII on 26/06/2011 06:58:04
Edited by: Shadow XII on 26/06/2011 06:49:20
Edited by: Shadow XII on 26/06/2011 06:45:23
Edited by: Shadow XII on 26/06/2011 06:23:35
Edited by: Shadow XII on 26/06/2011 06:22:55
Originally by: Da Gooch


Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items?



CCP ZULU DO YOU SEE THE QUESTION ABOVE?

CAN YOU READ IT? GOOD, NOW LISTEN UP.. WE DONT CARE ABOUT THE PRICE OF YOUR STUPID HELLO KITTY ****

WE WANT AN ANSWER TO THE QUESTION ABOVE IN YELLOW, CAN YOU COMPREHEND MY ENGLISH??? IF NOT PLEASE REPLY AND I WILL TRY MAKE IT MORE TOWARDS A 5YEAROLDS MENTALITY.




Answer the question, guys. Do not give us your old evading-the-issue tricks. Yes, or no. You can end this ****storm in a flash - why aren't you?

I am trying to be supportive of CCP but this is making it exceedingly difficult.


Yes they are moving beyond vanity items. Deal with it or get out. ugh

Shadow XII
Posted - 2011.06.27 18:31:00 - [96]
 

Originally by: Namura Kautsuo
Yes they are moving beyond vanity items. Deal with it or get out. ugh


I'll be out if they do.

Okay so they're having a meeting with CSM... this tells me they WERE planning on doing it, otherwise why not just come out and say 'No.'?

Also, a week? Seriously?

Shadow XII
Posted - 2011.06.27 20:21:00 - [97]
 

People are ****ed off and grieving because they think EVE is dying now, from a cause that can be completely averted with liberal application of the phrase "No, we are not."

Prince Kobol
Posted - 2011.06.27 20:24:00 - [98]
 

What would you do if CCP say

"At this current time there are no plans to introduce Non-Vanity Items in the near future"

I am completely against Non-Vanity Items however i would believe a statement like this then a

"No we are never going to introduce Non-Vanity Items as long as Eve exist" because an answer like that is complete *******s.

No one knows what will happen in the future, nobody.


Allyde
Amarr
Clan Hyena
Posted - 2011.06.27 20:28:00 - [99]
 

+1

Their silence speaks volumes.

Shadow XII
Posted - 2011.06.27 20:34:00 - [100]
 

Originally by: Prince Kobol
What would you do if CCP say

"At this current time there are no plans to introduce Non-Vanity Items in the near future"

I am completely against Non-Vanity Items however i would believe a statement like this then a

"No we are never going to introduce Non-Vanity Items as long as Eve exist" because an answer like that is complete *******s.

No one knows what will happen in the future, nobody.


Nobody would accept that answer now because they've been silent for so long.

Prince Kobol
Posted - 2011.06.27 20:37:00 - [101]
 

Originally by: Shadow XII
Originally by: Prince Kobol
What would you do if CCP say

"At this current time there are no plans to introduce Non-Vanity Items in the near future"

I am completely against Non-Vanity Items however i would believe a statement like this then a

"No we are never going to introduce Non-Vanity Items as long as Eve exist" because an answer like that is complete *******s.

No one knows what will happen in the future, nobody.


Nobody would accept that answer now because they've been silent for so long.


In which case CCP can not win if you will not take either answer

Kin Dahl
Posted - 2011.06.27 21:08:00 - [102]
 

answer the question please

Xan So'Sarian
Posted - 2011.06.27 21:13:00 - [103]
 

Originally by: Da Gooch


Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items?



CCP ZULU DO YOU SEE THE QUESTION ABOVE?

CAN YOU READ IT? GOOD, NOW LISTEN UP.. WE DONT CARE ABOUT THE PRICE OF YOUR STUPID HELLO KITTY ****

WE WANT AN ANSWER TO THE QUESTION ABOVE IN YELLOW, CAN YOU COMPREHEND MY ENGLISH??? IF NOT PLEASE REPLY AND I WILL TRY MAKE IT MORE TOWARDS A 5YEAROLDS MENTALITY.




Answer the question, guys. Do not give us your old evading-the-issue tricks. Yes, or no. You can end this ****storm in a flash - why aren't you?

I am trying to be supportive of CCP but this is making it exceedingly difficult.

Sergeant Spot
Galactic Geographic BookMark Surveying Inc.
Posted - 2011.06.27 21:16:00 - [104]
 

Originally by: Shadow XII
Edited by: Shadow XII on 26/06/2011 16:58:17
Originally by: Da Gooch


Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items?



CCP ZULU DO YOU SEE THE QUESTION ABOVE?

CAN YOU READ IT? GOOD, NOW LISTEN UP.. WE DONT CARE ABOUT THE PRICE OF YOUR STUPID HELLO KITTY ****

WE WANT AN ANSWER TO THE QUESTION ABOVE IN YELLOW, CAN YOU COMPREHEND MY ENGLISH??? IF NOT PLEASE REPLY AND I WILL TRY MAKE IT MORE TOWARDS A 5YEAROLDS MENTALITY.




Answer the question, guys. Do not give us your old evading-the-issue tricks. Yes, or no. You can end this ****storm in a flash - why aren't you?

I am trying to be supportive of CCP but this is making it exceedingly difficult.


Still waiting for a SOLID and COMPREHENSIVE answer.

Shadow XII
Posted - 2011.06.27 23:44:00 - [105]
 

Bumping fo' answer.

Benri Konpaku
Posted - 2011.06.27 23:50:00 - [106]
 

Originally by: Shadow XII

Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items?



CCP ZULU DO YOU SEE THE QUESTION ABOVE?

CAN YOU READ IT? GOOD, NOW LISTEN UP.. WE DONT CARE ABOUT THE PRICE OF YOUR STUPID HELLO KITTY ****

WE WANT AN ANSWER TO THE QUESTION ABOVE IN YELLOW, CAN YOU COMPREHEND MY ENGLISH??? IF NOT PLEASE REPLY AND I WILL TRY MAKE IT MORE TOWARDS A 5YEAROLDS MENTALITY.




QFT.



But considering how easy it would've been simply saying "NO. We will not add any P2W, game enhancing items whatsoever. It will be only vanity items with no effect on gameplay." there's only one conclusion anyone would make. So just brace for impact once CCP hits structure.

Shadow XII
Posted - 2011.06.28 00:08:00 - [107]
 

Bumping for updated links.

Shadow XII
Posted - 2011.06.28 03:33:00 - [108]
 

BOMP!


Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only