open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked LET CCP CHARGE 20$ FOR A SUB? X HERE!
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6

Author Topic

Smoking Blunts
Posted - 2011.06.26 02:08:00 - [121]
 

Originally by: SciWolf
This idea might save EvE as it is now. And i truly want it so.


**** ccp til they make incarna optional and say no to MT.

they wont do either so bye bye eve as we know it

Soji Kanagawa
Posted - 2011.06.26 02:10:00 - [122]
 

x
I would definitely pay more money per account if it would help keep Non Vanity MT out of EVE.

TomParad0x
Caldari
RogueNET
Posted - 2011.06.26 02:15:00 - [123]
 

No, this is stupid.

Just keep microtransactions with VANITY items only. No pay to win, or any kind of advantage.

I don't want to pay more for each account, that's stupid.

Kuronaga
Black Snake Syndicate
Posted - 2011.06.26 02:17:00 - [124]
 

They make a lot of money already, but it is true what is said.

They spread themselves too thin.

I am not going to pay more money just so they can fund their vampire MMO. This isn't going to Eve development clearly, so why keep feeding a beast that isn't my own?

No.

Zeg Quul
Posted - 2011.06.26 02:19:00 - [125]
 

No 20$ for megalomaniacs. Drop WoD or/and Dust. First fix Eve with our money, then expand.


HARRY WALTAN
Posted - 2011.06.26 09:10:00 - [126]
 

Originally by: SciWolf
But no RMT ingame and ****ty AURUM.

Who is for it - X HERE


XXXX

Enna Shendara
Posted - 2011.06.26 09:12:00 - [127]
 

X

I will happily pay more money for eve, both because I consider it worth it, and because I don't mind that they are expending. If an extra $5 a month will remove the need for sinister MT plans, by all means do it, and don't look back.

Aina O'Sinnor
Posted - 2011.06.26 09:14:00 - [128]
 

not going to happen. They named it Greed and greed it will be.

Haraldhardrade
Amarr
Pax Amarr
Posted - 2011.06.26 09:16:00 - [129]
 

Originally by: Ghoest
You realize youre offering to pay more money solely so they can develop other games instead of EVE.





Spookyjay
Caldari
Animosity.
Posted - 2011.06.26 09:17:00 - [130]
 

Originally by: Haraldhardrade
Originally by: Ghoest
You realize youre offering to pay more money solely so they can develop other games instead of EVE.







qftw

Cave Lord
Posted - 2011.06.26 09:17:00 - [131]
 

X

But of my 3 accounts, I'd only activate 1. The damage is already done.

A CSM member already had a poll on this, but I have no idea where it went or where it was.

Precusor
Posted - 2011.06.26 09:17:00 - [132]
 

i don't want my money wasted on some console game that will fail.

Chip Flux
Center for Advanced Studies
Posted - 2011.06.26 09:27:00 - [133]
 

Edited by: Chip Flux on 26/06/2011 09:29:15
yes

Noone likes it, but if the reality is money shortage, then this is honest

Laser Purification
Posted - 2011.06.26 09:38:00 - [134]
 

Edited by: Laser Purification on 26/06/2011 09:41:10
I think it's reasonable to pay based on the money they're investing in Eve (no, I don't care about your other games).

So a month sub of about $2.50 seems generous.

For the 41 *million* they're earning from current Eve subs they could only manage to produce one room and no gameplay?

Chikata Bangbang Stripper
Posted - 2011.06.26 09:40:00 - [135]
 

X if its promised in clear... explicit terms that NO ATTEMPT shall ever be made to cash-shop EVE for non vanity

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
Posted - 2011.06.26 09:45:00 - [136]
 

Originally by: SciWolf
But no RMT ingame and ****ty AURUM.

Who is for it - X HERE


No

Jennifer Starling
Imperial Navy Forum Patrol
Posted - 2011.06.26 09:45:00 - [137]
 

I for one would welcome SP for PLEX.

Sethose Olderon
Gryphon Chancellery
Gryphon League
Posted - 2011.06.26 09:48:00 - [138]
 

X - I would support this, but only after the necessity and reasoning behind its implementation were clearly and elaboratively explained, Also though, with a written contract (for the purposes of ethical and intellectual honesty) with the Eve Community that the current micro-transaction store be rolled back, and that no such future attempt will ever be made.

Tu Ko
Predator's Inc.
Posted - 2011.06.26 09:50:00 - [139]
 

Not that i'm dead set against a price hike, but the company is already profitable at this rate. The issue is that they are running overbudget making games that aren't Eve. Giving them more subscription money is not going to equal them developing content for Eve , they'll take that money and work on WoD with it. Once they've 'completed' WoD they'll go on to an entirely new project and still leave Eve on cruise control. Why do we want to reward them for not working on Eve?

Annie Anomie
Shadows Of The Federation
Posted - 2011.06.26 09:51:00 - [140]
 

I'd actually be fine with a sub fee increase.

Yeah.

X

Naughty Dread
Minmatar
Scicel Technology Unlimited
Posted - 2011.06.26 09:51:00 - [141]
 

i don't want pay more sub i don't want mt. I do want ur assets tho . Can i has them?

Mycheala Zanjoahir
Posted - 2011.06.26 10:09:00 - [142]
 

Sooooo...

If White Wolf was such a hot $h!t company, why are they not putting WW money into financing WoD?

Perhaps it is because Pen & Paper RP and CTG is as dead as a door nail and White Wolf would have been dead by now anyways? I live in a large market and Pen & Paper is so damn niche now it is disgusting. We have 4 million people here and that population base struggles to support 3 maybe 4 gaming shops that sell Pen and Paper.

I understand that CCP bought WW to get access to a company that had CTG experience for the EVE CTG (fail there...) and now they have to do something to get back the price of admission to the CCP / WW merger. But honestly, 3 ambitious games in developement at once is an epic fail waiting to happen.

Finish DUST514.

Shelve WoD. Sell off WW. It's dead anyways.

Stop bleading internet spaceships to build a world that has fukitol to do with internet spaceships.

Eve = $15.00 per month. MT = vanity items only.

Done.


LordInvisible
Gallente
Nova Ardour
Posted - 2011.06.26 10:12:00 - [143]
 

Nah, then they will do the same in two years time and subs will go up again.

Fu.ck that! Let them stop paying their devs for dust and WoD from profits they get from eve online players and the problem is solved.

We DONT need higher subs, game is not that amusing anyway.

I say no to higher subs! Its one of the expensive games already (since u need at least two accounts to be productive in eve anyway..).

Guys, dont be sheeps!!

Li FenTao
Posted - 2011.06.26 10:21:00 - [144]
 

Lol you realize that if they where not going to implent any win-items in nex shop, you guys are willing to spend more money for the same crap? ( i said IF ) Cause either way im not going to pay dust develop since i never play a shooter game on ps3 and even if i wouldnt pay lol

Scarlet des Loupes
Gallente
University of Caille
Posted - 2011.06.26 10:24:00 - [145]
 


Let them make EVE free to play instead.
PLEX will lose their use except for using the MT store! Cool

Aleria Angelis
Eleutherian Guard
Posted - 2011.06.26 10:27:00 - [146]
 

Oh alright then X

As long as this puts a stop to the MT store not in addition, don't want CCP getting any ideas.

Tobiaz
Spacerats
Posted - 2011.06.26 10:28:00 - [147]
 

Originally by: Scarlet des Loupes

Let them make EVE free to play instead.
PLEX will lose their use except for using the MT store! Cool



No.

F2P are for different games then EVE of a more casual nature.

As for $20 per month. Before Incarna I might have been ok with it. Now CCP can eat **** and die.

kardjaval
Posted - 2011.06.26 10:31:00 - [148]
 

were you just not here when plex were introduced??


please prey tell, how is buying aurem, RMT, i do not see a "purchase 3500 aurem for 19.95" button anywhere,


i do see a buy plex for 19.95 through, and that has been here since what, 03? if you guys trully dont want RMT, then get rid of plexes, get rid of changin characters to different accounts in the character bazaar for plex, etc etc, rmt has been in the game ever since plex weere first introduced, you can't just suddenly whine about it now, especially considering PLEX CAN BE BOUGHT FOR IN GAME ISK, you guys whine about pay to win ruining the game, your whining about this now when any rich kid can go and purchase 24 plexes, sell them all for 300mil isk, and purchase the very best gear available, yet you idiots don't see that as rmt, do you? it's only when CCP cuts out the middle man (this case the market/contrascts) and adds in a noble exchange for vanity items, that you guys start getting up in arms.


if you do not have a link to a post 5-7 years ago, showing how you don't want RMT (because f plexes) than honestly you are ****ing ******ed little snots, who just don't make any goddamn sense.

ALSO, a internal memo, and "private" email" is not proof of anything, no one outside ccp knows where the **** they are gonna go with NEW, so why the hell are you guys even talking about it?

C4LYP50
Solarwind Interstellar Mining and Production Ltd
Posted - 2011.06.26 10:34:00 - [149]
 

CCP have already proven they cannot be trusted to keep their word about MT in game. And you propose to negotiate with them, for something they are gonna RAM DOWN YOUR THROAT anyway, as soon as you've rolled over? You'll get your wish, my friends, but not the way you THINK you will.

Corrupt-A-Wish Thread is in OOPE. Go there with your crazy ideas.

They should be removing MT Aurum from the game NOW, and PROPOSING to increase the sub cost, in an HONEST, and TRANSPARENT meeting with CSM, unlike any they've had in the past.

Absolutely NO!


Markus Jome
Posted - 2011.06.26 10:41:00 - [150]
 

Edited by: Markus Jome on 26/06/2011 10:41:26
It's very theoretical, but if there was an option like 20 or MT, then

x


Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only