open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked Poll - X here is you don't load Station Environment
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.

Pages: first : previous : ... 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 ... : last (53)

Author Topic

Norian Lonark
Black Thorne Corporation
Black Thorne Alliance
Posted - 2011.06.22 22:38:00 - [871]

Originally by: Mukinin
X - feels like I'm a vampire with all the dim lighting. Oh wait..


x - I like the idea but its just easier using the old UI at the moment, also when its less muggy and my GPU fan isnt going at 70%

Posted - 2011.06.22 22:39:00 - [872]

Originally by: Brujo Loco
Originally by: Daemonspirit
Edited by: Daemonspirit on 22/06/2011 22:19:09
Originally by: Bosquit
Always have it on running on full settings and my computer just hums along like it usually does. I like how maybe 60-100 people dislike an expansion and then get all there alts together and post on the forum to make it look like everyone hates the expansion. Grow up losers this is what CCP had in mind for Eve all along. If you don't like it just leave like you always threaten to do. No one needs whiners.

No - it is *NOT* what CCP had in mind all along, dolt. I defy you to go back to 2003, 2004 or 2005 and find any posts that indicate that. In 2003 CCP had not a clue about how big Eve would ever get.

Incarna was something that came up long after eve was coded/released.

This is true, Bosquit, you are severely deluded or a CCP ALT/Fanboi that can't understand Incarna was just something completely new they decided to implement out of the blue. CCP never ever thought they would get this big and decided to aim the game in a new direction that has nothing to do with their main core of business SPACESHIP PEW PEW.

Honestly I give a **** about Incarna, they can make Big sized Bleeding STOMA that pukes filth all over the CQ for all I care, I just want them to acknowledge that in the sandbox you are free to play the game as you like and not try to force feed me the Incarna environment everytime I dock. They can practically create SADISTVILLE with Zoophiliac HENS in the CQ and charge you premium for that, but give me the choice to opt out for a smoother experience in the docking bay. Also if they decided to re balance issues existing on the game already regarding SPACESHIP PEW PEW and not Barbie dolls jerkily moving around like automatons it would be a plus.

I dont hate Incarna, I HATE THE LACK OF CHOICE. I know Incarna will bring up good stuff in the FAR FAR FUTRUE, but give us a choice to keep enjoying the game in the way we used to, change, evolve morph incarna, but keep imrpoving EVE , not turn it into a weird WoWZergfest of Blasphemy. You are angry at the whiners, well, I'm angry at people that fail to see this pretty much simple point.

If you still dont see it, well sir, we will continue this debate ad nauseam through infinitum

What the problem is is that you want advancement while still keeping old features. Eve would be a piece of garbage if they did that. Accept it, the ship views gonna be gone for good and you will be left CQ. If you don't like it your always free to leave.

Emiko P'eng
Posted - 2011.06.22 22:40:00 - [873]

X - Turned off as my ATI 5850 recorded 71.5 deg C in CQ after 5 mins, The fan was running so hard I thought the PC was going to fly faster than my ship! Even the 'Crysis' engined 'Aion' my Son plays on this PC only gets the card to 58 deg C with max Quality settings ugh?????

Esternia Celsian
Posted - 2011.06.22 22:49:00 - [874]


give me back those sweet ship carousels from old dock!

Lorentzian Traversable Corporation
Posted - 2011.06.22 22:50:00 - [875]

X - Used to run 2 clients with full HDR and effects on this laptop (it's a good 'un too) .. Logged on with 1 client and the station environment .. My fan ended up sounding like it was pleading with me .. lowered all the settings (thanks for no separate settings, my ship looks awful now .. still fan a go go) .. OFF (With a hammer) .. Make this violation of a user interface required and I'll unsub (actually I will just wait until my plex runs out by you get the jist) ..

P.S. That weird 3d interface doesn't work .. I kept clicking on "sit" and he politely ignored me ..

Posted - 2011.06.22 22:51:00 - [876]


Posted - 2011.06.22 23:05:00 - [877]

X - must be the most universaly disliked feature of any expansion, please let me opt out as i do not have a 'navidia' graphics card.

P.S i like spinning ships too and think the CQ should be somthing you walk into rather than start off in.

Pretenders Inc
Posted - 2011.06.22 23:11:00 - [878]


Posted - 2011.06.22 23:26:00 - [879]

x - turned off

I know of another MMO company that didn't listen to its subscriber base.... Sony (swg)

I believe its fairly obvious that a large chunk of your customers DO NOT want incarna or at least want the ability to completely disable it including the overhead associated with it and its engine (see still loading hardware up even when disabled threads)

not saying remove it though because sure some people will like it and yes it may well attract new players but for the existing subscriber base i'd say a large % do not want it

Mnemonic Enterprises
Dark Matter Coalition
Posted - 2011.06.22 23:28:00 - [880]


Lee Jong
Posted - 2011.06.22 23:39:00 - [881]


Captain Mastiff
Posted - 2011.06.22 23:42:00 - [882]

Yesterday I was impressed, 5 minutes later I wasn't impressed with the lack of function and features.

Today I no longer load station environment.

Posted - 2011.06.22 23:45:00 - [883]

X-Bring back the old hangar

Posted - 2011.06.22 23:45:00 - [884]


Test Alliance Please Ignore
Posted - 2011.06.22 23:49:00 - [885]

x 1gb ram to idle in station get out

Temper Fi
EVE University
Posted - 2011.06.22 23:57:00 - [886]

x - Thank god u can turn off that thingie, turning off NOW

Doesn't Afraid Of Anything
Posted - 2011.06.22 23:57:00 - [887]

Straight up!

Althus Treefingers
Tribal Liberation Force
Posted - 2011.06.22 23:59:00 - [888]


Posted - 2011.06.23 00:12:00 - [889]

X -- Give us a button to CHOOSE to go to CQ ! ! ! MY ALTS HATE YOU ! ! !

Geminus Gateway
Posted - 2011.06.23 00:16:00 - [890]

Edited by: Ianus on 23/06/2011 00:17:35
[X] - And first post complaining since I started playing (2004), so this can't be good.

My feelings on this have already been neatly described in Akita T's post:

Originally by: Akita T

(...) the boarding of a pod and subsequent exit from it is supposed to be a relatively slow process, and you're not supposed to look exactly tidy (all covered in pod goo and naked) the moment you get out of a pod, so getting out of it every time you dock makes very little sense.

Keeping the current station environment alongside CQ should not be such a big deal (I mean, how hard it can be NOT to delete something), and it would go a long way towards appeasing some people that don't even know yet that they'll be annoyed by its absence (...)

There are alot of problems with CQ in its present state, namely lighting quality and general optimization (not to mention it's pointless for now). But the biggest problem is without a doubt that it is mandatory. It makes no sense whatsoever to enter CQ every time you dock to complete a mission or even just to change fittings. I mean, seriously...

Interstellar Waste Management Committee
Posted - 2011.06.23 00:22:00 - [891]

X - give me a damn option to turn it on or go to ship spinny hangar.

damn you ccp

Herping yourDerp
Posted - 2011.06.23 00:43:00 - [892]

oh hey i'l never use cq

Miklas Laces
Posted - 2011.06.23 00:48:00 - [893]

All we want is spinning ship.

Adhocracy Incorporated
Posted - 2011.06.23 00:51:00 - [894]

Looks like it could be cool once they iron out the bugs (example: my character is neon yellow and the room's walls and furniture are translucent so it's impossible to navigate around, can't form any sense of depth).

For now, it is off

Posted - 2011.06.23 00:52:00 - [895]

x, another useless patch. can the next patch reset the gameplay like a year?

Mirime Nolwe
Posted - 2011.06.23 01:05:00 - [896]

X plus account sub canceled

Not only because of this expansion failure but mainly because the direction that CCP is leading EVE for the last 1 year, not addressing the real issues of the game (botting ruining 0.0 politics and market inflation, Low sec, sov mechanics, etc) might lead the game to his "doom" playerbase wise, let's see if we don't face a new SWG failure.

Brujo Loco
Brujeria Teologica
Posted - 2011.06.23 01:18:00 - [897]

Originally by: Mirime Nolwe
X plus account sub canceled

Not only because of this expansion failure but mainly because the direction that CCP is leading EVE for the last 1 year, not addressing the real issues of the game (botting ruining 0.0 politics and market inflation, Low sec, sov mechanics, etc) might lead the game to his "doom" playerbase wise, let's see if we don't face a new SWG failure.

Apparently, we all are haters for implying this and we all need to cry moar. Seems, we are bound to wait for the official dev response coming "Soon" regarding the rage currently happening here in GD. I can't say I'm eagerly awaiting what they will say though.

Beyond Divinity Inc
Posted - 2011.06.23 01:18:00 - [898]


Sol Maxis
Posted - 2011.06.23 01:27:00 - [899]

X-optional=best of both worlds.

Surely it can't be that difficult, can it?

Rebel Inc
Posted - 2011.06.23 01:33:00 - [900]

Pages: first : previous : ... 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 ... : last (53)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to

These forums are archived and read-only