open All Channels
seplocked Crime and Punishment
blankseplocked The Hatchery shared accounts stolen.
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4

Author Topic

Karah Serrigan
Posted - 2011.04.25 01:28:00 - [61]
 

Originally by: Iam Widdershins
Originally by: Azelor Delaria
Originally by: Iam Widdershins
Originally by: KwarK uK
Widders, why you so mad all the time? :(
You be jelly.

This ****ty out-of-context meme brought to you by the man who permabanned someone from his public forums for posting an image macro.


This butthurt nerdrage brought to you by a guy who's ****ed about being permabanned from a forums.

I could mention it wasn't me who got banned for this.

I just joined their forums to chat with them while we were at war, because they claimed to be very cool with that sort of thing. Evidently they are 90% comprised of ragey xenophobic miscreants, and could not grasp the distinction between a "griefer" who uses "exploits" to attempt to destroy them and everything they stand for, and someone they can't manage to kill even when they form up and is constantly blowing up their missioners.

I'd have the same words for anyone guilty of such shameful account-sharing. It's a despicable and bannable offense in EVE, and when they flaunt as if they are as immune to the rules here as they are on their own cloistered forums I honestly believe something should be done about it.

You so mad, its not even funny m8.
You came to our forum to brag about how superior you are during fights when you cry on teamspeak for the neutral logs to undock against drake drake raven dps on your bhaal. Almost every single post was about how we cant kill you and hwo you keep killing our missionrunners and how we should hunt you and all, but at the same time you just dock up when a superior fleet huts you because its not clever to fight a superior fleet because you actually might die herpderp.
We gotta keep our forum mad free, so you got banned, went to 10 differnet mods crying about the ban, dont even try to deny that lol.

Do i have to mention that you joined a ghostcorp that weve been at war with for weeks with absolutely 0 activity to kill a golem? Do i have to mention that were still decced by one of your ghost corps (its 8 weeks now with absolutely 0 activity).
You are incredibly bad at this game. After more than 3 years the only thing you can do is kill highsec newbies that are unprepared.

Loraine Gess
Posted - 2011.04.25 03:24:00 - [62]
 

Originally by: Karah Serrigan
[
I could mention it wasn't me who got banned for this.

I just joined their forums to chat with them while we were at war, because they claimed to be very cool with that sort of thing. Evidently they are 90% comprised of ragey xenophobic miscreants, and could not grasp the distinction between a "griefer" who uses "exploits" to attempt to destroy them and everything they stand for, and someone they can't manage to kill even when they form up and is constantly blowing up their missioners.

I'd have the same words for anyone guilty of such shameful account-sharing. It's a despicable and bannable offense in EVE, and when they flaunt as if they are as immune to the rules here as they are on their own cloistered forums I honestly believe something should be done about it.

You so mad, its not even funny m8.
You came to our forum to brag about how superior you are during fights when you cry on teamspeak for the neutral logs to undock against drake drake raven dps on your bhaal. Almost every single post was about how we cant kill you and hwo you keep killing our missionrunners and how we should hunt you and all, but at the same time you just dock up when a superior fleet huts you because its not clever to fight a superior fleet because you actually might die herpderp.
We gotta keep our forum mad free, so you got banned, went to 10 differnet mods crying about the ban, dont even try to deny that lol.

Do i have to mention that you joined a ghostcorp that weve been at war with for weeks with absolutely 0 activity to kill a golem? Do i have to mention that were still decced by one of your ghost corps (its 8 weeks now with absolutely 0 activity).
You are incredibly bad at this game. After more than 3 years the only thing you can do is kill highsec newbies that are unprepared.



So let me get this straight: He's bad because you have unsubstantiated claims about his posting, but he's able to kill your ******ed missioning golems while avoiding a fight he can't win and that makes him bad at this game?


I suppose a fleet that chooses when to engage is bad at this game as well? Anybody who uses the mechanics to their advantage is a tosser, amirite?

SolusLunes
Caldari
2plus2isfive
BricK sQuAD.
Posted - 2011.04.25 07:09:00 - [63]
 

Originally by: Loraine Gess
So let me get this straight: He's bad because you have unsubstantiated claims about his posting, but he's able to kill your ******ed missioning golems while avoiding a fight he can't win and that makes him bad at this game?


I suppose a fleet that chooses when to engage is bad at this game as well? Anybody who uses the mechanics to their advantage is a tosser, amirite?


Goddamn right they are.

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis
Moar Tears
Posted - 2011.04.25 09:17:00 - [64]
 

Originally by: Karah Serrigan

You so mad, its not even funny m8.
You came to our forum to brag about how superior you are during fights when you cry on teamspeak for the neutral logs to undock against drake drake raven dps on your bhaal. Almost every single post was about how we cant kill you and hwo you keep killing our missionrunners and how we should hunt you and all, but at the same time you just dock up when a superior fleet huts you because its not clever to fight a superior fleet because you actually might die herpderp.
We gotta keep our forum mad free, so you got banned, went to 10 differnet mods crying about the ban, dont even try to deny that lol.

Do i have to mention that you joined a ghostcorp that weve been at war with for weeks with absolutely 0 activity to kill a golem? Do i have to mention that were still decced by one of your ghost corps (its 8 weeks now with absolutely 0 activity).
You are incredibly bad at this game. After more than 3 years the only thing you can do is kill highsec newbies that are unprepared.

I didn't brag on your forums, I gave you guys good advice, and good information about ways to fight other than the way you do it (i.e. only linked nanodrakes and nanocanes with suicide point rifters... nothing else). I never claimed to be better at the game than anyone else. Just about every single post was asking you guys to stop being ****ers and just have a normal conversation instead of attacking me and my every action like I'm cheating or something.

Yes, I appealed my ban, which was escalated to: none other than KwarK UK, the man who banned me originally (for being an enemy of your corp, which I was at war with, and he is CEO of).

I never had to cry on teamspeak for reps. I had people convoing ME when they saw who I was fighting, offering reps for free. Everything else was just friends who were also online and willing to help out. Yes, I avoided engaging in fights where it was likely I would lose my ship. I leave it to the observer to decide whether or not I am bad at this game.

I'm still waiting for a post where a Hatchery member says something more intelligent than "u mad about getting banned from our forums".

Karah Serrigan
Posted - 2011.04.25 11:07:00 - [65]
 

Edited by: Karah Serrigan on 25/04/2011 11:10:57
Originally by: Iam Widdershins
Originally by: Karah Serrigan

You so mad, its not even funny m8.
You came to our forum to brag about how superior you are during fights when you cry on teamspeak for the neutral logs to undock against drake drake raven dps on your bhaal. Almost every single post was about how we cant kill you and hwo you keep killing our missionrunners and how we should hunt you and all, but at the same time you just dock up when a superior fleet huts you because its not clever to fight a superior fleet because you actually might die herpderp.
We gotta keep our forum mad free, so you got banned, went to 10 differnet mods crying about the ban, dont even try to deny that lol.

Do i have to mention that you joined a ghostcorp that weve been at war with for weeks with absolutely 0 activity to kill a golem? Do i have to mention that were still decced by one of your ghost corps (its 8 weeks now with absolutely 0 activity).
You are incredibly bad at this game. After more than 3 years the only thing you can do is kill highsec newbies that are unprepared.

I'm still waiting for a post where a Hatchery member says something more intelligent than "u mad about getting banned from our forums".

I thought thats exactly your level of conversation? At least in local it was, sorry m8.
Im still waiting for a post where you said something intelligent on our forums.

Originally by: Loraine Gess

So let me get this straight: He's bad because you have unsubstantiated claims about his posting, but he's able to kill your ******ed missioning golems while avoiding a fight he can't win and that makes him bad at this game?

I suppose a fleet that chooses when to engage is bad at this game as well? Anybody who uses the mechanics to their advantage is a tosser, amirite?

Our forums are public, feel free to look up his posts, i cba to do it for you :)
But let me get this straight: yes hes bad, because all he can do is norisk highsec pvp. In a big corp, especially one that accepts people without requirements, there will always be newbies that he can kill. Even more if he waits till the marauder is probed down, then switches to the deccing corp for a surprise.
From the first engagement:
[23:07:54] Iam Widdershins > you guys can't even kill a shield bhaalgorn
[23:08:00] Iam Widdershins > you're so good at this game
In that fight we had 2 Drakes and a raven as dps, with a scorpion jamming him and about 5 rifters scrambling him. As soon as he saw he was ****ed 3 neutral logis undocked and we disengaged, because we knew we cant kill that anymore, the situation changed.
He then went to our forums and made comments about how we should kill their logis. Yes, because logis cant just dock up when theyre jammed/capempty/about do die and undock with 100%. Makes perfectly sense.
In other fights, when he had no logi support he decided to just dock up.
So let me get this straight as well: Were bad because we cant kill a guy who docks up as soon as a fleet that could potentionally kill him assembles, but hes good because he can click the dock button? Dat makes so much sense m8!

tofucake prime
The Hatchery
Posted - 2011.04.25 18:59:00 - [66]
 

You're all idiots.

Rasz Lin
Caldari
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
Posted - 2011.04.25 19:09:00 - [67]
 

Im still waiting for news who got banned from EVE for SHARING ACCOUNTS .....

Ifly Uwalk
Caldari
Concentrated Evil
Posted - 2011.04.25 21:17:00 - [68]
 

Originally by: Rasz Lin
Im still waiting for news who got banned from EVE for SHARING ACCOUNTS .....

this tbh

Im Jed
Posted - 2011.04.25 22:52:00 - [69]
 

Originally by: Iam Widdershins
Originally by: Karah Serrigan

You so mad, its not even funny m8.
You came to our forum to brag about how superior you are during fights when you cry on teamspeak for the neutral logs to undock against drake drake raven dps on your bhaal. Almost every single post was about how we cant kill you and hwo you keep killing our missionrunners and how we should hunt you and all, but at the same time you just dock up when a superior fleet huts you because its not clever to fight a superior fleet because you actually might die herpderp.
We gotta keep our forum mad free, so you got banned, went to 10 differnet mods crying about the ban, dont even try to deny that lol.

Do i have to mention that you joined a ghostcorp that weve been at war with for weeks with absolutely 0 activity to kill a golem? Do i have to mention that were still decced by one of your ghost corps (its 8 weeks now with absolutely 0 activity).
You are incredibly bad at this game. After more than 3 years the only thing you can do is kill highsec newbies that are unprepared.

I didn't brag on your forums, I gave you guys good advice, and good information about ways to fight other than the way you do it (i.e. only linked nanodrakes and nanocanes with suicide point rifters... nothing else). I never claimed to be better at the game than anyone else. Just about every single post was asking you guys to stop being ****ers and just have a normal conversation instead of attacking me and my every action like I'm cheating or something.

Yes, I appealed my ban, which was escalated to: none other than KwarK UK, the man who banned me originally (for being an enemy of your corp, which I was at war with, and he is CEO of).

I never had to cry on teamspeak for reps. I had people convoing ME when they saw who I was fighting, offering reps for free. Everything else was just friends who were also online and willing to help out. Yes, I avoided engaging in fights where it was likely I would lose my ship. I leave it to the observer to decide whether or not I am bad at this game.

I'm still waiting for a post where a Hatchery member says something more intelligent than "u mad about getting banned from our forums".



Molden Heath is where we are at, should stop by and say hi!

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis
Moar Tears
Posted - 2011.04.26 01:17:00 - [70]
 

Originally by: Im Jed

Molden Heath is where we are at, should stop by and say hi!

Anybody who happens across one of your copious amounts of lossmails knows exactly where you live.

You guys are the only ones so far that think not suiciding into fleets when you are in a 1v50 wardec makes me a bad player, btw.


Originally by: Ifly Uwalk
Originally by: Rasz Lin
Im still waiting for news who got banned from EVE for SHARING ACCOUNTS .....

this tbh


Please visit your user settings to re-enable images.

Loraine Gess
Posted - 2011.04.26 02:06:00 - [71]
 

Originally by: Karah Serrigan

But let me get this straight: yes hes bad, because all he can do is norisk highsec pvp. In a big corp, especially one that accepts people without requirements, there will always be newbies that he can kill. Even more if he waits till the marauder is probed down, then switches to the deccing corp for a surprise.



Is this supposed to be a good thing? That just means that you're ****, especially if the golem isn't blitzing missions...

Quote:
From the first engagement:
[23:07:54] Iam Widdershins > you guys can't even kill a shield bhaalgorn
[23:08:00] Iam Widdershins > you're so good at this game
In that fight we had 2 Drakes and a raven as dps, with a scorpion jamming him and about 5 rifters scrambling him. As soon as he saw he was ****ed 3 neutral logis undocked and we disengaged, because we knew we cant kill that anymore, the situation changed.
He then went to our forums and made comments about how we should kill their logis. Yes, because logis cant just dock up when theyre jammed/capempty/about do die and undock with 100%. Makes perfectly sense.
In other fights, when he had no logi support he decided to just dock up.
So let me get this straight as well: Were bad because we cant kill a guy who docks up as soon as a fleet that could potentionally kill him assembles, but hes good because he can click the dock button? Dat makes so much sense m8!


He arranged for logistics, you failed to arrange anything to counter that sort. His fleet composition was better than your fleet composition, and he was able to determine when to fight. You're an idiot if you think that isn't proper PVP. It's not about getting into battle lines and making sure your e-honor isn't infringed upon, it's about getting close, stabbing the other mother****er in the throat, and watching (and possibly screaming wildly) as his blood drains from his body.

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis
Moar Tears
Posted - 2011.04.26 03:26:00 - [72]
 

Originally by: Loraine Gess

He arranged for logistics, you failed to arrange anything to counter that sort. His fleet composition was better than your fleet composition, and he was able to determine when to fight. You're an idiot if you think that isn't proper PVP. It's not about getting into battle lines and making sure your e-honor isn't infringed upon, it's about getting close, stabbing the other mother****er in the throat, and watching (and possibly screaming wildly) as his blood drains from his body.

Definitely with the screaming. Certain pants may or may not have been torn asunder.

We have no comment at this time.

I wasn't even at war when they tried to kill my Bhaal that time. It took them over an hour to form up, and I had to renew my aggro with cans over three times and drift alone off the station by over 50km before they even considered doing anything. I also killed their hurricane. And never broke 50% shields.

Caelum Terra
Posted - 2011.04.26 04:19:00 - [73]
 

Originally by: Iam Widdershins
Originally by: Loraine Gess

He arranged for logistics, you failed to arrange anything to counter that sort. His fleet composition was better than your fleet composition, and he was able to determine when to fight. You're an idiot if you think that isn't proper PVP. It's not about getting into battle lines and making sure your e-honor isn't infringed upon, it's about getting close, stabbing the other mother****er in the throat, and watching (and possibly screaming wildly) as his blood drains from his body.

Definitely with the screaming. Certain pants may or may not have been torn asunder.

We have no comment at this time.

I wasn't even at war when they tried to kill my Bhaal that time. It took them over an hour to form up, and I had to renew my aggro with cans over three times and drift alone off the station by over 50km before they even considered doing anything. I also killed their hurricane. And never broke 50% shields.


We've had our fair amounts of disagreements about what PvP is and what isnt. Risk free PvP is still PvP, I will admit that it is, lets just state for the record that its not my cup of tea though and I prefer going for fights where the odds are against me, but I wont judge you for going only for the sure ganks (lets not call it fights, i can admit youre doing pvp, but killing missionrunners is not a ''fight'').

My only issue with you is that you always lie, I dont know what it is about your ego, but it looks like you always have to put more creaming on top of what really happened just to look better.

As far as our corp goes, yes we do have a good amount of lossmails, we are still maintaining 85% efficiency as pirates in low sec. You might not like that way of living, and 85% might not be the greatest efficiency Ive ever seen, but until you show your face in an environment where you actually put yourself at risk I dont see the point of arguing about whos better. (You definately have more SP and more alts to do very well what you do in highsec, ill give you that one.)

Have a nice evening.
your bff
caelum terra

Karah Serrigan
Posted - 2011.04.26 10:30:00 - [74]
 

Originally by: Iam Widdershins
Originally by: Im Jed

Molden Heath is where we are at, should stop by and say hi!

Anybody who happens across one of your copious amounts of lossmails knows exactly where you live.

You guys are the only ones so far that think not suiciding into fleets when you are in a 1v50 wardec makes me a bad player, btw.


Ahaha, nice try m8. What i said: The fact that your character is more than 3 years old and all you can do is gank and grief missionrunner/s/corps in highsec with multiple neutral logis, makes you a bad player.

Originally by: Loraine Gess

He arranged for logistics, you failed to arrange anything to counter that sort. His fleet composition was better than your fleet composition, and he was able to determine when to fight. You're an idiot if you think that isn't proper PVP. It's not about getting into battle lines and making sure your e-honor isn't infringed upon, it's about getting close, stabbing the other mother****er in the throat, and watching (and possibly screaming wildly) as his blood drains from his body.

Did you read what you wrote? Thats a pretty nice double standard youre showing here. When he docks up because our fleet is too big and he doesnt want to take the risk, that makes him a good player ya? But if we do the same we just fail to arrange a good enough fleet? Jaja. We have less bc pilots in our corp than he has neutral logis :)

Originally by: Iam Widdershins

I wasn't even at war when they tried to kill my Bhaal that time. It took them over an hour to form up, and I had to renew my aggro with cans over three times and drift alone off the station by over 50km before they even considered doing anything. I also killed their hurricane. And never broke 50% shields.

Cause people cant be afk, i know i know.

This is getting out of hand and way too stupid now. You try to twist my words to your favor instead of answering the original question: Y U so mad.

Firebolt145
The Hatchery
Posted - 2011.04.26 14:14:00 - [75]
 

There needs to be a 'block yourself from viewing this topic' button somewhere, each time I read this I feel sad. :( We had a crappy war with lots of disagreements and no real good fights. Can we pretend it never happened and move on?

I'm such a goody goody, my personality is terrible for EvE.

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis
Moar Tears
Posted - 2011.04.26 16:04:00 - [76]
 

Originally by: Karah Serrigan

Did you read what you wrote? Thats a pretty nice double standard youre showing here. When he docks up because our fleet is too big and he doesnt want to take the risk, that makes him a good player ya? But if we do the same we just fail to arrange a good enough fleet? Jaja. We have less bc pilots in our corp than he has neutral logis :)

You seem to have some serious misapprehensions about the nature of warfare in EVE.

How to bait??


Originally by: Caelum Terra
We've had our fair amounts of disagreements about what PvP is and what isnt. Risk free PvP is still PvP, I will admit that it is, lets just state for the record that its not my cup of tea though and I prefer going for fights where the odds are against me, but I wont judge you for going only for the sure ganks (lets not call it fights, i can admit youre doing pvp, but killing missionrunners is not a ''fight'').

My only issue with you is that you always lie, I dont know what it is about your ego, but it looks like you always have to put more creaming on top of what really happened just to look better.

As far as our corp goes, yes we do have a good amount of lossmails, we are still maintaining 85% efficiency as pirates in low sec. You might not like that way of living, and 85% might not be the greatest efficiency Ive ever seen, but until you show your face in an environment where you actually put yourself at risk I dont see the point of arguing about whos better. (You definately have more SP and more alts to do very well what you do in highsec, ill give you that one.)


That wasn't risk free PVP. I nearly lost my ship several times. The fights where I engaged you while riding on 3 logistics ships plus local tank were not nearly as guaranteed as you seem to want to think. I took 70,000 damage in 2 minutes through 75% resists in one fight, while my various logistics were intermittently jammed. (yeah, none of that counts as actual 'pvp' or fighting. yeah. too bad, if you'd bothered to bring fights like that more maybe you wouldn't have lost so many missioners to my boredom.)

As far as I know, I haven't lied or said anything inaccurate or exaggerated in this thread whatsoever. You, on the other hand, claiming that the Hatchery has an 85% efficiency... well, you might get that on a good week, but in general it's more like 70-75%. Which is good enough to rank you as a PVP corp, but not stellar or anything.

And the fact that I mostly stick to highsec is only symptomatic of my background and playstyle, not the level of guts I have. If it weren't so time-consuming to deal with sec standing losses, I'd be all over that. As it is, I avoid constantly going GCC for the same reason that I avoid missioning as a source of income, as it keeps me from going into systems I could otherwise freely travel through.

What bothers me most about you guys is the egotistical approach you take to the game, wherein any time you have an engagement where you end up winning, you blow up like blimps and rabble rabble about how you elite StarCraft experts outplayed all these EVE scrubs (see here). When you lose though, well, that particular pilot is just an idiot, but you are still awesome beyond this particular terrestrial realm.

Loraine Gess
Posted - 2011.04.26 16:52:00 - [77]
 

Originally by: Karah Serrigan
[quote=Loraine Gess


He arranged for logistics, you failed to arrange anything to counter that sort. His fleet composition was better than your fleet composition, and he was able to determine when to fight. You're an idiot if you think that isn't proper PVP. It's not about getting into battle lines and making sure your e-honor isn't infringed upon, it's about getting close, stabbing the other mother****er in the throat, and watching (and possibly screaming wildly) as his blood drains from his body.

Did you read what you wrote? Thats a pretty nice double standard youre showing here. When he docks up because our fleet is too big and he doesnt want to take the risk, that makes him a good player ya? But if we do the same we just fail to arrange a good enough fleet? Jaja. We have less bc pilots in our corp than he has neutral logis :)




The problem isn't that you disengaged, it's that you're complaining on the forums about it.

SolusLunes
Caldari
2plus2isfive
BricK sQuAD.
Posted - 2011.04.26 19:08:00 - [78]
 

Originally by: Loraine Gess
Originally by: Karah Serrigan
[quote=Loraine Gess


He arranged for logistics, you failed to arrange anything to counter that sort. His fleet composition was better than your fleet composition, and he was able to determine when to fight. You're an idiot if you think that isn't proper PVP. It's not about getting into battle lines and making sure your e-honor isn't infringed upon, it's about getting close, stabbing the other mother****er in the throat, and watching (and possibly screaming wildly) as his blood drains from his body.

Did you read what you wrote? Thats a pretty nice double standard youre showing here. When he docks up because our fleet is too big and he doesnt want to take the risk, that makes him a good player ya? But if we do the same we just fail to arrange a good enough fleet? Jaja. We have less bc pilots in our corp than he has neutral logis :)




The problem isn't that you disengaged, it's that you're complaining on the forums about it.


Are they banned yet?

Owen Drakkar
Bad...Karma
Posted - 2011.04.26 19:38:00 - [79]
 

Sup~

Caelum Terra
Posted - 2011.04.26 21:56:00 - [80]
 

Originally by: Iam Widdershins
Originally by: Karah Serrigan

Did you read what you wrote? Thats a pretty nice double standard youre showing here. When he docks up because our fleet is too big and he doesnt want to take the risk, that makes him a good player ya? But if we do the same we just fail to arrange a good enough fleet? Jaja. We have less bc pilots in our corp than he has neutral logis :)

You seem to have some serious misapprehensions about the nature of warfare in EVE.

How to bait??


Originally by: Caelum Terra
We've had our fair amounts of disagreements about what PvP is and what isnt. Risk free PvP is still PvP, I will admit that it is, lets just state for the record that its not my cup of tea though and I prefer going for fights where the odds are against me, but I wont judge you for going only for the sure ganks (lets not call it fights, i can admit youre doing pvp, but killing missionrunners is not a ''fight'').

My only issue with you is that you always lie, I dont know what it is about your ego, but it looks like you always have to put more creaming on top of what really happened just to look better.

As far as our corp goes, yes we do have a good amount of lossmails, we are still maintaining 85% efficiency as pirates in low sec. You might not like that way of living, and 85% might not be the greatest efficiency Ive ever seen, but until you show your face in an environment where you actually put yourself at risk I dont see the point of arguing about whos better. (You definately have more SP and more alts to do very well what you do in highsec, ill give you that one.)


That wasn't risk free PVP. I nearly lost my ship several times. The fights where I engaged you while riding on 3 logistics ships plus local tank were not nearly as guaranteed as you seem to want to think. I took 70,000 damage in 2 minutes through 75% resists in one fight, while my various logistics were intermittently jammed. (yeah, none of that counts as actual 'pvp' or fighting. yeah. too bad, if you'd bothered to bring fights like that more maybe you wouldn't have lost so many missioners to my boredom.)

As far as I know, I haven't lied or said anything inaccurate or exaggerated in this thread whatsoever. You, on the other hand, claiming that the Hatchery has an 85% efficiency... well, you might get that on a good week, but in general it's more like 70-75%. Which is good enough to rank you as a PVP corp, but not stellar or anything.

And the fact that I mostly stick to highsec is only symptomatic of my background and playstyle, not the level of guts I have. If it weren't so time-consuming to deal with sec standing losses, I'd be all over that. As it is, I avoid constantly going GCC for the same reason that I avoid missioning as a source of income, as it keeps me from going into systems I could otherwise freely travel through.

What bothers me most about you guys is the egotistical approach you take to the game, wherein any time you have an engagement where you end up winning, you blow up like blimps and rabble rabble about how you elite StarCraft experts outplayed all these EVE scrubs (see here). When you lose though, well, that particular pilot is just an idiot, but you are still awesome beyond this particular terrestrial realm.


As stated in my post if you actually took the time to read, weve gotten 85% efficiency as pirates, aka, since weve been pirating in lowsec, we have 85% efficiency (every week).

As far as the rest of your blabla I wont even bother answering(as I wont be answering any more to this topic), since for once I came out open and didnt blast you, while you still keep sperging lies to boost your ego.

And yes, you do risk-free pvp.

Have a nice day and stop stalking, its getting creepy

Rasz Lin
Caldari
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
Posted - 2011.04.26 22:53:00 - [81]
 

Originally by: SolusLunes

Are they banned yet?


!!

jimmyjam
Gallente
Sinner Among Saints
Exquisite Malevolence
Posted - 2011.04.26 23:31:00 - [82]
 

This thread has so many tears it made **** in my pod.

debbie harrio
Posted - 2011.04.27 14:42:00 - [83]
 



Hi sec wardecs, neutral logistics, killing mission runners, proper PVP.

Something doesn't quite add up here.

Keep it up guys I'm quite enjoying the Egos in here, chuckling away.

Nadia Gallen
Posted - 2011.04.27 19:33:00 - [84]
 

Originally by: Caelum Terra

As stated in my post if you actually took the time to read, weve gotten 85% efficiency as pirates, aka, since weve been pirating in lowsec, we have 85% efficiency (every week).

As far as the rest of your blabla I wont even bother answering(as I wont be answering any more to this topic), since for once I came out open and didnt blast you, while you still keep sperging lies to boost your ego.

And yes, you do risk-free pvp.

Have a nice day and stop stalking, its getting creepy


http://teamliquid.killmail.org/?a=home&m=2&y=2011

far below 85%.. that didn't take long to prove wrong, anything else you want to alter in your statements before we rip them appart ?

tofucake prime
The Hatchery
Posted - 2011.04.27 21:00:00 - [85]
 

Originally by: Nadia Gallen
Originally by: Caelum Terra

As stated in my post if you actually took the time to read, weve gotten 85% efficiency as pirates, aka, since weve been pirating in lowsec, we have 85% efficiency (every week).

As far as the rest of your blabla I wont even bother answering(as I wont be answering any more to this topic), since for once I came out open and didnt blast you, while you still keep sperging lies to boost your ego.

And yes, you do risk-free pvp.

Have a nice day and stop stalking, its getting creepy


http://teamliquid.killmail.org/?a=home&m=2&y=2011

far below 85%.. that didn't take long to prove wrong, anything else you want to alter in your statements before we rip them appart ?
You will kindly notice that only 3 of us had moved out to MH in February, while the rest of corp was either over in Aral tearing **** up, or ****ing around in highsec being bad. Also, we didn't move out to MH until the 27th. Please go to March (which is when we started living in MH for realzies) if you want accurate statistics.

Nadia Gallen
Posted - 2011.04.27 22:02:00 - [86]
 

Originally by: tofucake prime
Originally by: Nadia Gallen
Originally by: Caelum Terra

As stated in my post if you actually took the time to read, weve gotten 85% efficiency as pirates, aka, since weve been pirating in lowsec, we have 85% efficiency (every week).

As far as the rest of your blabla I wont even bother answering(as I wont be answering any more to this topic), since for once I came out open and didnt blast you, while you still keep sperging lies to boost your ego.

And yes, you do risk-free pvp.

Have a nice day and stop stalking, its getting creepy


http://teamliquid.killmail.org/?a=home&m=2&y=2011

far below 85%.. that didn't take long to prove wrong, anything else you want to alter in your statements before we rip them appart ?
You will kindly notice that only 3 of us had moved out to MH in February, while the rest of corp was either over in Aral tearing **** up, or ****ing around in highsec being bad. Also, we didn't move out to MH until the 27th. Please go to March (which is when we started living in MH for realzies) if you want accurate statistics.


Certainly, however he said how successfull you were in Lowsec being pirates.

I didn't have to go futher back than 2 months to see how ****ty your efficiency was back then, and I still see kills and losses in MH region, so you were obviously there at that time. No matter how numberous you are in the area, your efficiency during that period speaks for itself.

Valenius Cato
Posted - 2011.04.27 22:56:00 - [87]
 

Edited by: Valenius Cato on 27/04/2011 23:11:42
Originally by: Nadia Gallen
Originally by: tofucake prime
Originally by: Nadia Gallen
Originally by: Caelum Terra

As stated in my post if you actually took the time to read, weve gotten 85% efficiency as pirates, aka, since weve been pirating in lowsec, we have 85% efficiency (every week).

As far as the rest of your blabla I wont even bother answering(as I wont be answering any more to this topic), since for once I came out open and didnt blast you, while you still keep sperging lies to boost your ego.

And yes, you do risk-free pvp.

Have a nice day and stop stalking, its getting creepy


http://teamliquid.killmail.org/?a=home&m=2&y=2011

far below 85%.. that didn't take long to prove wrong, anything else you want to alter in your statements before we rip them appart ?
You will kindly notice that only 3 of us had moved out to MH in February, while the rest of corp was either over in Aral tearing **** up, or ****ing around in highsec being bad. Also, we didn't move out to MH until the 27th. Please go to March (which is when we started living in MH for realzies) if you want accurate statistics.


Certainly, however he said how successfull you were in Lowsec being pirates.

I didn't have to go futher back than 2 months to see how ****ty your efficiency was back then, and I still see kills and losses in MH region, so you were obviously there at that time. No matter how numberous you are in the area, your efficiency during that period speaks for itself.


Because nobody ever has any sort of learning period for a game? Sadly, we didn't all jump into 50m SP Characters with amazing game knowledge. You can read through any of the 'earlier' reports from our site to see that. Our current (Since actually getting most of the corp into lowsec "pvp" instead of only a few being involved, save for the odd roam) efficiency for the last month or two has been up around 83-84%.. which is why that value was given. Two month's ago, we never seriously claimed to be particularly good at the game. Hell, I consider myself now to still be ridiculously awful at this game. Apart from the odd fight where we actually do it nicely, We actually generally slate ourselves for messing up a lot.

As for being 'successful' as pirates. How would you define 'successful'? I'd say we have a lot of fun down there, and sometimes end up winning fights that we really shouldn't have won. If worrying all the time about killboard statistics, and only going into un-loseable fights is someones definition of successful.. then no we aren't successful. However, we do have a hell of a lot of fun doing what we do now, regardless of whether it's successful in the eyes ofpeople on a forum.

0Lona 0ltor
Posted - 2011.04.28 00:52:00 - [88]
 

I dislike the hatchery because of this. I tried to ninja gank 1 of their canes while he was carebearing in a mission.

http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=12496844

(Yes, I was new to game and now know 30 day chars should not fly 300 million isk faction fit pirate cruisers. No I don't buy ISK or sell PLEX's. <I make 20 to 100 million per hour farming isk in my own little way>). Any way this kill still made me cry because farming sucks... and I thought I was going to win because the Phantasm has Spines.

But today I spoke to one of their guys who told me that they had 7 bans and a few billion isk seized by CCP, 27 B I think he said. I can't confirm so maybe its 100% bull.

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis
Moar Tears
Posted - 2011.04.28 01:18:00 - [89]
 

Originally by: 0Lona 0ltor

But today I spoke to one of their guys who told me that they had 7 bans and a few billion isk seized by CCP, 27 B I think he said. I can't confirm so maybe its 100% bull.



Well, I'm pretty sure that's false or at least greatly exaggerated; I do, however, know someone who actually did steal 27 billion isk and got off with it. No bans involved, and yes, I saw the loot myself.

Loraine Gess
Posted - 2011.04.28 08:39:00 - [90]
 

Stealing isk in-game is different from stealing from other accounts, which is against the EULA. The former is perfectly acceptable, the latter will get you a ban.


Pages: 1 2 [3] 4

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only