open All Channels
seplocked Features and Ideas Discussion
blankseplocked The Osiris :: Ewar Battlecruiser
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

Tinkanium
Posted - 2011.03.25 13:00:00 - [1]
 

A battlecruiser which can do ewar is really the missing link in this role of ship, and I think Georg's (spelling?) on-stage design of the Osiris with the marginally useful input of the audience has a real shot of becoming this much needed ship.

Opinions?

Frau Klaps
Amarr
Posted - 2011.03.25 13:14:00 - [2]
 

**** ECM

Please do not bypass the profanity filter. Zymurgist

Raeza
Beyond Divinity Inc
Posted - 2011.03.25 13:16:00 - [3]
 

more ECM?! ugh

Pr1ncess Alia
Posted - 2011.03.25 13:23:00 - [4]
 

zero dps (no drone bay, no weapon hardpoints)



bonus to remote rep amount and reduced cap required
-bonus to racial ew, web and nos, range and strength

something like 8 highs/4-6 mids/ 1-3 lows
crappy cap capacity
maybe give it a salvage bonus too for lols

/idontreallycarejustgivemeablackhurricanidon'tcarewhatitdoes

Wendat Huron
Stellar Solutions
Posted - 2011.03.25 13:37:00 - [5]
 

Osiris, enough with the gay names, if you have to go egyptian lore then Anubis is the name you're looking for.

Alpheias
Euphoria Released
HYDRA RELOADED
Posted - 2011.03.25 13:39:00 - [6]
 

Edited by: Alpheias on 25/03/2011 13:39:22
FALCON \o/


Gavjack Bunk
Gallente
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
Posted - 2011.03.25 13:44:00 - [7]
 

Originally by: Raeza
more ECM?! ugh


I am presuming I am having my chain yanked. Because well... just because... more ECM Crying or Very sad

Flynn Fetladral
Royal Order of Security Specialists
Posted - 2011.03.25 14:10:00 - [8]
 

Ship was not floating my boat.

Deviana Sevidon
Gallente
Panta-Rhei
Butterfly Effect Alliance
Posted - 2011.03.25 14:13:00 - [9]
 

Originally by: Tinkanium
A battlecruiser which can do ewar is really the missing link in this role of ship, and I think Georg's (spelling?) on-stage design of the Osiris with the marginally useful input of the audience has a real shot of becoming this much needed ship.

Opinions?


I do not have anything nice to say about your idea of a ECM-BC.

Hannibal Ord
Minmatar
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
Posted - 2011.03.25 14:30:00 - [10]
 

The name was ****.

The fact that it looked a bit spiderish and the fact that we have the scorpion should have led the audience to go for the spider type names.

Your obsession with birds was tragic.

Night Epoch
Stimulus
Rote Kapelle
Posted - 2011.03.25 14:51:00 - [11]
 

Agreed that this ship should exist and that it should shoot Falcons from its turrets.

Hannibal Vexor
Posted - 2011.03.25 14:53:00 - [12]
 

Edited by: Hannibal Vexor on 25/03/2011 14:54:58
I hate the idea of a ECM BC. However with a few modifications that 'Osiris' ship was pretty good.

And I agree with the 'other' Hannibal ^ It should of been a spider name as it looked very much like a spider with it's 2 front legs raised and ready to strike.

Not sure what it could be specialised in... Maybe a blaster boat with 10% bonus to optimal and tracking to Medium blasters and 5% to Shield resists per BC lvl?

EDIT: OR IT COULD BE A ECCM BC! IE - 10% bonus to ECCM, make it ANTI ECM! A Falcon killer

Hannibal

Ebisu Kami
Posted - 2011.03.25 14:53:00 - [13]
 

Originally by: Tinkanium
A battlecruiser which can do ewar is really the missing link in this role of ship, and I think Georg's (spelling?) on-stage design of the Osiris with the marginally useful input of the audience has a real shot of becoming this much needed ship.

Opinions?


Missing link? To what? And why is it much needed? Is this some sort of troll?

Originally by: Deviana Sevidon
I do not have anything nice to say about your idea of a ECM-BC.


Please go ahead and write down your throughts, I think a lot of people are going to agree.

Tinkanium
Posted - 2011.03.25 16:19:00 - [14]
 

Not my idea but some folks discussing on mumble thought it was a good idea. Lots of them fly blackbirds and scorpions and thought a BC in between them would be interesting, so I agreed and posted. I personally did like the name recluse much better for the ship that was drawn. It of course needs a bit more concept refinement because the artist just whipped it up in a quick minute.

The point is, it's a start.

Ebisu Kami
Posted - 2011.03.25 16:28:00 - [15]
 

Originally by: Tinkanium
[...]

The point is, it's a start.


Actually more like an end.

Obsidian Hawk
RONA Corporation
RONA Directorate
Posted - 2011.03.25 16:36:00 - [16]
 

Dear trolls,


you are idiots. Just because ccp announces a ship with a bunch of stats does not mean that it is finalized yet. When it hits the test server and everyone molests it and puts in their own opinions ccp will change the stats accordingly.

Hannibal Vexor
Posted - 2011.03.25 16:39:00 - [17]
 

Originally by: Obsidian Hawk
Dear trolls,


you are idiots. Just because ccp announces a ship with a bunch of stats does not mean that it is finalized yet. When it hits the test server and everyone molests it and puts in their own opinions ccp will change the stats accordingly.


Pointing out that you are an idiot.

The ship has NOT been announced by CCP and has NO stats what so ever.

It was created at a democratic design show at Fanfest and there is not really a chance that it will becoome a real ship. We are just batting idea's around.

Please go buy a clue.

Hannibal

Akhmed TDT
Posted - 2011.03.25 17:57:00 - [18]
 

Because of Osiris

Sraik Doubter
Posted - 2011.03.26 02:43:00 - [19]
 

Originally by: Hannibal Vexor
Edited by: Hannibal Vexor on 25/03/2011 14:54:58
I hate the idea of a ECM BC. However with a few modifications that 'Osiris' ship was pretty good.

And I agree with the 'other' Hannibal ^ It should of been a spider name as it looked very much like a spider with it's 2 front legs raised and ready to strike.

Not sure what it could be specialised in... Maybe a blaster boat with 10% bonus to optimal and tracking to Medium blasters and 5% to Shield resists per BC lvl?

EDIT: OR IT COULD BE A ECCM BC! IE - 10% bonus to ECCM, make it ANTI ECM! A Falcon killer

Hannibal


Whether or not the ship is real; don't care. But THIS. I enjoy flying the falcon, but think that the world would be, generally, spicier if there was a specific role anti-ECM ship. It is a role that does not seem to currently exist. Might add some diversity to fights.

Nova Fox
Gallente
Novafox Shipyards
Posted - 2011.03.26 07:20:00 - [20]
 

The minmatar assault battleship from last year still hasnt shown up. the Haylcon i think it was named.

Jaik7
Posted - 2011.03.26 07:45:00 - [21]
 

Originally by: Hannibal Vexor
Originally by: Obsidian Hawk
you are idiots.


you are an idiot.


so long as we're all clear that everyone who does not agree with us are idiots. therefore, since nobody shares our exact set of ideas, everyone are idiots.

glad we cleared that up

Stan Lento
H A V O C
Posted - 2011.03.26 09:25:00 - [22]
 

Originally by: Frau Klaps
**** ECM

Please do not bypass the profanity filter. Zymurgist

IoWalker
Posted - 2011.03.26 11:35:00 - [23]
 

They should roll this out simultaneously with the anomaly change.

syphurous
Gallente
Center for Advanced Studies
Posted - 2011.03.26 11:44:00 - [24]
 

Yeah, just what Gallente need, another specialist ship to put Damps on,..

ECM wins the the EWAR war, unless you have more ships than ECM you can spend most the fight getting blown up.

As it is you need to put atleast two damps on any target to be any sort of affective. While a Falcon can take out a bunch of ships all at once.

Tinkanium
Posted - 2011.03.26 13:39:00 - [25]
 

Originally by: Hannibal Vexor
Originally by: Obsidian Hawk
Dear trolls,


you are idiots. Just because ccp announces a ship with a bunch of stats does not mean that it is finalized yet. When it hits the test server and everyone molests it and puts in their own opinions ccp will change the stats accordingly.


Pointing out that you are an idiot.

The ship has NOT been announced by CCP and has NO stats what so ever.

It was created at a democratic design show at Fanfest and there is not really a chance that it will becoome a real ship. We are just batting idea's around.

Please go buy a clue.

Hannibal


Exactly. I started the thread and tossed in the ECM idea, as I said from what I'd heard on mumble during the live stream. It's a discussion. Not a flame war. I think we have other forums in the world for that kind of behaviour? (4chan) I like the comments in favor of and against the ship, and the thoughts of what kinds of roles it should play. I'm very interested in the idea of having a role invented for anti-ECM as a ship benefitting friendlies in a way to protect against ECM.

Some great discussions. No Moar Flames TYVM

CCP Zymurgist


Gallente
C C P
Posted - 2011.03.26 13:54:00 - [26]
 

Moved from General Discussion.

Xarissa de Tolnos
Posted - 2011.03.26 17:04:00 - [27]
 

I'd really like to see an ECCM boat - or something to counter that races E-war boats...
so ECCM for caldari
target de-painters for minnie (target paining is their E-war right?)
capacitor de-neuter (cap transfer I guess...) for amarr
remote sensor boosting for gallente


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only