open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked Yet another portrait website
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8

Author Topic

Moriela
Posted - 2011.02.08 15:31:00 - [181]
 

Originally by: Crystal Avalon
Originally by: Moriela
Hello Crystal Avalon.

Can you pls change gender for this person? I suppose smb input him in with wrong gender
http://204.74.223.75/incarna/?q=StarFobos

I changed it :)

thx you :)

Kaity Shtoll
Posted - 2011.02.09 01:43:00 - [182]
 

http://204.74.223.75/incarna/?q=Large+Collidable+Object

Should it really be there?

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
Posted - 2011.02.09 01:52:00 - [183]
 

Pfft, SO low ? Laughing
Currently ranked: #9056 ; Total number of submissions: 9747
Heh. OUCH.

Sturmwolke
Posted - 2011.02.09 02:10:00 - [184]
 

Your avatar's literally a she-man, what did you expect? Twisted Evil

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
Posted - 2011.02.09 02:18:00 - [185]
 

Originally by: Sturmwolke
Your avatar's literally a she-man, what did you expect? Twisted Evil

She grows on you in time Razz

Hai Boiz
Posted - 2011.02.09 04:04:00 - [186]
 

Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: Sturmwolke
Your avatar's literally a she-man, what did you expect? Twisted Evil

She grows on you in time Razz


You are a fresh canvas, Akita T.

Just waiting for the artists touch. A little eyeliner, a hint of color on the cheeks and a light frosting of lip gloss. You will be a sight to behold.

Perhaps a more classic and less imposing presence for the camera will soften the harsh edges as well.

XX

Inir Ishtori
Perkone
Posted - 2011.02.09 04:17:00 - [187]
 

Originally by: Akita T
Pfft, SO low ? Laughing
Currently ranked: #9056 ; Total number of submissions: 9747
Heh. OUCH.


well, at least your avatar is refreshingly different from others Razz. you could have tried for more seductive look, though Wink

Irulan Corinno
Caldari
714th SQN - Snowflakes
Posted - 2011.02.09 06:53:00 - [188]
 

Edited by: Irulan Corinno on 09/02/2011 06:53:50
Originally by: Astalda
Well, mb it's me but I could not manage to make my Civire look young. :) Can we exchange our bloodlines?

Hey I'm not looking old?! Neutral

INTACTized
Gallente
MAFIA
Posted - 2011.02.09 10:04:00 - [189]
 

I endorse this product.

Skareon
Minmatar
Sebiestor Tribe
Posted - 2011.02.09 10:12:00 - [190]
 

Hey great website. I love the feature of being able to vote on a scale of 1 to 10. Because sometimes it's hard to tell if I simply like or dislike. But the 1 to 10 scale feature solves that problem. Keep up the good work and thanks for the fun website. cheers Very Happy

Astalda
Posted - 2011.02.09 14:41:00 - [191]
 

Originally by: Irulan Corinno
Hey I'm not looking old?! Neutral


No, not old, dear. Just... mmm... mature :)

Isan'na
Malicious Destruction
Posted - 2011.02.09 18:02:00 - [192]
 

Edited by: Isan''na on 09/02/2011 20:04:34
I seem to be at -99.99 somehow. >.<

Edit: and now I'm just confused as to what's going on with the rating I had.

Brit Green
Posted - 2011.02.09 23:45:00 - [193]
 

Please look into this.

I was in first place decimal with around 45 votes this morning. I am now in 29th place with 134 votes 10 hours later.

Somethings not right here.

Brit

Ivana Drake
Caldari
Posted - 2011.02.10 00:33:00 - [194]
 

Originally by: Brit Green
Please look into this.

I was in first place decimal with around 45 votes this morning. I am now in 29th place with 134 votes 10 hours later.

Somethings not right here.

Brit


you got a little lucky in your first 45 votes and shot to #1, but then things averaged out as more people voted

Brit Green
Posted - 2011.02.10 01:59:00 - [195]
 

Edited by: Brit Green on 10/02/2011 02:05:53
Originally by: Ivana Drake
Originally by: Brit Green
Please look into this.

I was in first place decimal with around 45 votes this morning. I am now in 29th place with 134 votes 10 hours later.

Somethings not right here.

Brit


you got a little lucky in your first 45 votes and shot to #1, but then things averaged out as more people voted


I don't have a problem with where I fall in the ranking, if it's legit. But it seems a little odd that it took 4 days to get the first fifty votes and then only 10 hours to more than double it. That may very well be what happened. Perhaps 50 or so people logged in today that just happened to have the opposite view of the first fifty.

I'm not making accusations. I'm asking the site manager to look into it.

Or I could be completely wrong and I'm thinking of one of my other entrants. I suppose that as few as twenty voting 1/10 might bring me down that much. But I don't see that as a very likely voting scenario.

Brit

Crystal Avalon
Posted - 2011.02.10 10:24:00 - [196]
 

Originally by: Brit Green
Please look into this.

I was in first place decimal with around 45 votes this morning. I am now in 29th place with 134 votes 10 hours later.

Somethings not right here.

Brit

There were some fraudulent votes which have been removed :)

Kaity Shtoll
Posted - 2011.02.10 12:56:00 - [197]
 

Originally by: Crystal Avalon
There were some fraudulent votes which have been removed :)


Are you sure it fixed? Because now I see on my screen for Brit

"143 total votes from decimal voting
-55.65 average rating from decimal voting
"

Anne Civre
Posted - 2011.02.10 15:18:00 - [198]
 

Edited by: Anne Civre on 10/02/2011 15:31:21
Yes someone is having some fun.

I seem to have moved from the top 2 to 141st spot in about 10 votes. Ouch!


Edit: And just jumped to 161 .

More headaches for Crystal. Sorry hon, could you have a look please?


Kaity Shtoll
Posted - 2011.02.10 17:02:00 - [199]
 

It might sound crazy and as hell of a work but... If every character had some kind of graphical statistic, you could always see a sadden pick or a gap in voting. Hence, easily track cheating.

Crystal Avalon
Posted - 2011.02.10 17:10:00 - [200]
 

Originally by: Anne Civre
Edited by: Anne Civre on 10/02/2011 15:31:21
Yes someone is having some fun.

I seem to have moved from the top 2 to 141st spot in about 10 votes. Ouch!


Edit: And just jumped to 161 .

More headaches for Crystal. Sorry hon, could you have a look please?



I'll send you a mail with explanation :)

Anne Civre
Posted - 2011.02.10 18:23:00 - [201]
 

Originally by: Crystal Avalon
Originally by: Anne Civre
Edited by: Anne Civre on 10/02/2011 15:31:21
Yes someone is having some fun.

I seem to have moved from the top 2 to 141st spot in about 10 votes. Ouch!


Edit: And just jumped to 161 .

More headaches for Crystal. Sorry hon, could you have a look please?



I'll send you a mail with explanation :)


Thanks for the mail. I have sent a few back.

I see I have clawed my way back to 59 rank. Fingers crossed for a few more good votes :)

Iris Saavedra
Posted - 2011.02.10 21:00:00 - [202]
 

Edited by: Iris Saavedra on 10/02/2011 21:13:30
Originally by: Emma Hewitt

I didn't know its a hot-or-not vote. Im voting on the character creation. Im voting on if the avatar looks, realistic, lighting, background, uniqueness, creation options used, did they stray off the path of the 'default looks' etc. Im not voting if its 'hot or not'. I think that's why you have such weird results with these because your taking an subjective opinion and wanting a objective result. This just isn't going to happen...well with the current setup anyways. Hot-or-not on a animation portrait is to broad of a opinion. You get massive mixed results as you can see.

I'm more or less approaching the same way Emma is. It's not on the same level as the normal "Hot-Or-Not" because we have an active role in creating these characters, and we can make them look as attractive or expressive as we want.

I've settled into a system that looks a little bit like this:

For female portraits:
Attractiveness - An attractive character can go as high as 7 on attractiveness alone. Anything higher requires that I see expressiveness or personality in the character, along with a well-done portrait. A not-as-attractive but decent-looking character will get a 4.
Sunglasses, scowls, silly expressions, bad hair, or off-looking smirks will draw the score down. White eyes, clown makeup, or focus on large breasts (for females) will generally not score above 3.
Males appearing in female voting and non-portraits score 1.

For male portraits:
Attractiveness - The look of the character can go as high as 7 with no other factors. Expressiveness, personality, and portrait quality will drive the score higher.
Scowls, white eyes, sunglasses, and hoods will draw the score down. White-eyes or characters trying too hard to look badass or intimidating will generally not score above 3. Dark Lords of the Sith and non-portraits score 1 automatically.

Crucis is probably the most exceptional portrait I've seen. It's a well-done portrait of a what appears to me to be a distinguished and experienced starship captain.
Attractiveness 6 (he probably didn't have any trouble with the ladies when he was young).
Personality +1 (He looks decisive and distinguished but not heartless, a commander you wouldn't want to cross but would follow).
Portrait +2 (It reminds me of a military biography photo, done with a great deal of professional pride).

Revan Neferis
Amarr
Propaganda Due
Posted - 2011.02.11 14:44:00 - [203]
 

Very nice website and lots of beautiful portraits! I hope to see many of you at the IGS 2 bill isk prizes event with us!

only 20 spots left now!

Dr Kelda
Anarchistic Carebears
Bloodbound.
Posted - 2011.02.15 12:48:00 - [204]
 

Thanks for the votes guys Very Happy

Didn't even realise how well liked my pic was until someone contacted me ingame last night about it...makes me feel warm and fuzzy inside.

Violet Varannar
Minmatar
EVE University
Posted - 2011.02.15 19:20:00 - [205]
 

Originally by: Dr Kelda
Thanks for the votes guys Very Happy

Didn't even realise how well liked my pic was until someone contacted me ingame last night about it...makes me feel warm and fuzzy inside.


The way you composed it is beautiful and you look shy! :) I don't think you can even compose a portrait like this anymore due to the changes they made in zooming out.

Sayaka
Amarr
Ministry of War
Posted - 2011.02.22 19:50:00 - [206]
 

I'm suspicious that theres some cheating going on, or non-legitimate voting.
People pressing "no" just to get to the next picture, and not legitimately voting.

Some of these pictures only score 50% of likes, or less, and they are damn good.

Perhaps you can develop a fail-safe, so that if people vote too fast, or if they consistently vote "no" that it will delete all their recent votes, and lock them out for 30 seconds.

Or maybe simply have a cool-down of 5 seconds between votes, to discourage spamming, and encourage actually looking at the picture.

Kaity Shtoll
Posted - 2011.02.27 17:51:00 - [207]
 

Something is wrong there. This is the top avatar in decimal voting http://204.74.223.75/incarna/?q=

no portrate at all :)

Tatikome
Posted - 2011.03.06 13:10:00 - [208]
 


WhiteGhostBear
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
Posted - 2011.03.12 19:16:00 - [209]
 

Quote:
You have a unnatural voting pattern, voting has been disabled for you for a while.
I'm unnatural? What did I do? Sad

Numance
Posted - 2011.05.08 16:47:00 - [210]
 

Very simple and nice idea,, i sent you a mail ingame about the possibility to get the code you used , want to do something similar but with out of the game sci-fi pictures

regards


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only