open All Channels
seplocked Test Server Feedback
blankseplocked Mass-test feedback - October 28
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic

CCP Habakuk

Posted - 2010.10.28 20:54:00 - [1]
 

Hi! If you participated in the masstest on the 28th October, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info

  • OS version:

  • CPU:

  • GPU:

  • RAM:


User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:

    • Zoomed in:

  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)

  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:


Sidus
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:11:00 - [2]
 

machine info:

OS Ver: Windows 7 64-bit
CPU: INtel E8500 3.2 GHZ core 2 duo
GPU: 1 x Nvidia GTX 260
RAM: 4GB

Average FPS: zoomed out 4-5...zoomed in 0.7
FPS perf 2

Amarr Citizen250120111442
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:12:00 - [3]
 

Edited by: ****fest on 28/10/2010 21:13:30
Windows Vista home premium

CPU: Intel core 2 duo (2.00Ghz)

GPU : Geforce 9600

RAM: 2792 MB

User Experience:

FPS: 7.9 (zoomed out)
0.5 (zoomed in)

Compared to TQ = 10 (this many capitals would crash my computer on TQ

Duren
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:15:00 - [4]
 

Machine Info

OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

CPU: Intel Core i7 930

GPU: NVIDIA 480 GTX x 2

RAM: 12 GB


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 12 - 18

Zoomed in: 6 - 12

On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? 5

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Very Lagged almost unplayable, some mods had messed up timers.

star cloud
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:17:00 - [5]
 

OS version: windows 7 64 bitt

CPU:amd phenom 9850 quad core

GPU:2x nvidia gtx 295 4 way sli

RAM:8 gig ddr2 dualchannel


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 15 fps

Zoomed in: 7 fps

On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)

4 havent been in any fight last month

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

2 weeks back in mass test evey thing was running way better then now.
fps was now lower and lot of dysinc on the guns.dint had that at all 2 weeks back

QPR0Q
Silver Snake Enterprise
Against ALL Authorities
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:17:00 - [6]
 

Machine Info

•OS version:
Windows 7 64-Bit

•CPU:
I7 860 @ 4.31GHZ


•GPU:
2x EVGA GTX260 Core 216

•RAM:
4GB GSkill Ripjaw


User Experience



•Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:
150-180 at 1080p max settings brackets off


◦Zoomed in:

90-120 max settings 1080p, brackets off

•On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)

7


•Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:


ccp banned my main account from sisi last night for sbu's so i had to use my battle charon!





Malarthi Behemoth
Gallente
Red Frog Freight
Red-Frog
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:17:00 - [7]
 

OS: Windows 7 Professional
CPU: Intel Core i7 2.67 GHz
GPU: NVidia GTX 285
Ram: 6GB DDR3

Average FPS: 30 zoomed out/ 25 zoomed in
I would rate this test at a 6
I was unable to launch drones several times with an error that I could not perform action "Drop" as I was already in a session change.
Additionally I crashed quite a few times until I reduced my number of clients from 3 to 2. After that, I no longer crashed.

Memran
Caldari
True Creation
The 0rphanage
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:18:00 - [8]
 

Machine Info

  • OS version: Windows XP SP3

  • CPU: Althon X2 4800+

  • GPU: Geforce 8800 GTS

  • RAM: 3GB


User Experience
FPS is low on my maching, but unlick the fleet fights I've been in on TQ, my modules were still functional after short delays.

FPS during fight with brackets on and zoomed in was 0.1 zoomed out 0.1
Brackets off zoomed in 4, zoomed out 8

Not fighting bracket on, zoomed in 16, zoomed out 30
Brackets off zoomed in 20, zoomed out 38


Hope this was helpful for you :D

Vega Vuf
Caldari
White Nova Industries
AAA Citizens
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:19:00 - [9]
 

OS: Windows 7 64bit
CPU: Intel core i5 (2.66Ghz)
GPU : Radeon 5770
RAM: 4GB

FPS: ~8 (zoomed out)
~1 (zoomed in)

Compared to TQ = 5

Clarius Folkar
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:23:00 - [10]
 

OS: Vista Ultimate
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad6600
GPU: Nvidia GForce 8800GT
RAM: 4GB

Avg FPS During Fight: 1FPS

Compared to TQ: 2 (Way slower)

Jump delays were excruciating. Controls and dmg monitor unresponsive.

Caldestis
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:23:00 - [11]
 

OS: Windows 7 64Bit
CPU:3.10GHZ
GPU:GeForce GTS 250 1GB
RAM:4GB

Average FPS:
Zoomed Out: 20FPS
Zoomed In: 12FPS
About a 4, never alot of problems on TQ but this was first large fleet fight

Beesha123
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:24:00 - [12]
 

Machine Info
* OS version: OpenSuSE 11.3
* CPU: Intel 2.0ghz Duo
* GPU:ATI Radeon HD3650
* RAM: 3gb

User Experience

* Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled

I had all effects disabled, brackets hidden and all settings set to low.

Zoomed Out: Average FPS was good throughout the whole event at around 25-30, the initial jump-in on the gate camp was the worst part slowing to around 1 for a good minute after jumping in.

Zoomed In: Prior to the combat, at the gates, the FPS was around 5-10, when engaging a target on the gate camp it slowed to 0.1-0.5 for the duration I was zoomed in.

* On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ?

6, but its been a while since I have been in a fleet battle that large,

* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

For me, the whole thing went smoothly. I did crash out once but that was due to using Wine and switching windows. The gate jumps were not that bad and the lag was OK apart from the first 60 seconds of the gate camp jump.

YARRRR!!

Teh Grapist
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:24:00 - [13]
 

Edited by: Teh Grapist on 28/10/2010 21:26:14
OS: Windows 7 Professional
CPU: AMD Phenom II X2 3.1 GHz
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
RAM: 4 GB

Zoomed out: 8fps
Zoomed in: 5 fps

about 4 or 5

Alexander Angelos
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:25:00 - [14]
 

OS: Windows XP: SP3
CPU: AMD Phenom™ X4. Model, 9550 (MHz 2200)
GPU: GeForce 9500 GT
RAM: 4 GB

FPS at the start was like 20-30, then near death and probably when i was podded it fell to 0.1, 0.0 (nice one)

Liu Ellens
Minmatar
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:28:00 - [15]
 

Edited by: Liu Ellens on 28/10/2010 21:29:45
* OS version: Windows XP SP 2, 32bit
* CPU: 2x AMD Opteron 2222 (= 4 cores, a 3.0 GHz)
* GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 (1GB)
* RAM: 4GB

* FPS (fight, no brackets)
** zoomed out: 4.4
** zoomed in: 3.5
* FPS performance:
** compared to TQ: 2
** compared to previous mass tests: 4

* Experience:
1st jump: fast, in first wave, no traffic control
2nd jump: came in last, right at command I got bumped to 3k - traffic control
3rd jump: got through fine, with first wave
poitot jump: first wave, traffic control until 2:17

In sum, it was quite nice; I even made it right in time (got issues with launcher), but will not want to come in a Mastodon again :P

OptimuzPR
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:28:00 - [16]
 

Machine Info

OS version: Windows 7 32-bit

CPU: Core 2 Quad @ 2.8

GPU: GeForce 9800GTX+

RAM: 3G


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 15-30

Zoomed in: 2-10

On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) - 7

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Lag was bad, but playable. Module timers were unreliable most times. On one ocacion guns wouldnt stop shooting after target death, but stopped when I canceled them. POS Bash was the laggiest moment, thankfuly it requiered the less player interaction Razz

Loreiisa
Gallente
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:28:00 - [17]
 

Machine Info
OS version: Win 7 64bit
CPU: Intel Core Quad Q6600
GPU: ATI Radeon HD4870
RAM: 4Gb DDR2-800

User Experience
Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled
Zoomed out: 8
Zoomed in: 6

How would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? 5

Bob Hawk
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:30:00 - [18]
 

Machine Info

  • OS version: Windows 7 - 64bit

  • CPU: I7 - 920 @2.93

  • GPU: ATI HD 5970

  • RAM: 6 gig


User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 34 - 44

    • Zoomed in: 7 - 19

  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 9

  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: - no comment today -



Gilbert Drillerson
Varorra
Knights of the Rising Phoenix
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:30:00 - [19]
 

machine info:

OS Ver: Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad CPU 2.4Ghz
GFX Nvidia 480GTX
RAM: 8GB

Average FPS: zoomed out 22...zoomed in 5
FPS perf 2

I did not disable bracket (i forgot how to do it)

I had two clients at the test, one of them (Gil) crashed twice while trying to change overview settings so I would only have non fleet members in overview.

This test does remind me of 1000+ member fleet battles on TQ, to be honest I am not really impressed.

latofi
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:31:00 - [20]
 

Edited by: latofi on 28/10/2010 21:43:57
Machine Info

OS version: Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT, 1Gb
RAM: 8Gb

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled -

Zoomed out: 10-20
Zoomed in: .3-10

Compared to TQ = 5

Don Dark
Amarr
x13
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:31:00 - [21]
 

Windows 7 32 bit
Intel T2300 dual core 1.66 Ghz
Nvidea Geforce Go 7300
1 Gb ddr3 ram

Average Fps was 9 during fights and 16 at the end

3 zoomed in 22 zoomed out

On a scale from 1-10 idd say 7 ( even with my Pc i dident crash during the test)

Percivs
Sebiestor Tribe
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:31:00 - [22]
 

OS Version:
* Windows 7, 32 bit
* Intel Core2 Quad CPU 2.66 GHz
* Dual-SLI NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX, 768 MB VRAM, split to run two monitors.
* 4 GB RAM (obviously I can't use it all with a 32bit OS)

User Experience:
* Zoomed In: Computer locked up hard, had to power off to recover
* Zoomed Out: 2-6 fps
* Compared to TQ: 2 worse

Rouksobada Micyba
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:32:00 - [23]
 

OS Version:
* Windows 7, 32 bit
* Intel Core2 Quad CPU 2.66 GHz
* Dual-SLI NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX, 768 MB VRAM, split to run two monitors.
* 4 GB RAM (obviously I can't use it all with a 32bit OS)

User Experience:
* Zoomed In: Computer locked up hard, had to power off to recover
* Zoomed Out: 2-6 fps
* Compared to TQ: 2 worse

Brynseldimer
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:32:00 - [24]
 

Machine Info

OS version: Windows 7 64-bit

CPU: Intel Core i7 2.67 GHz Quad-Core

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

RAM: 8 GB DDR3 SDRAM


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 20-30

Zoomed in: 8-12

On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: I've never been in a big fleet battle before, so my experience with this sort of stress on the servers is pretty much nonexistent.

Gaia Ma'chello
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:34:00 - [25]
 

OS: OSX 10.6.4
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo, 2.66 Ghz
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
Mem: 4GB
Graphics all set to low
All effects, ALL effects turned off
Audio: on
Brackets: off
FPS: zoomed out: 25
Zoomed in: 12

For this test I turned off all the effects to see what sort of FPS I could get. I usually get 2 to 4, and it made a big difference. I turned missle and turret effects back on for the POS bash, and the fps dropped to 3.

In the fight maybe one cycle in 4 of my guns resulted in a shot being fired.

Drones were slow, but controllable.

General experience: 5

Bug: I kept getting "you were logged out of audio chat" and as we were using it, I had to hit esc, toggle eve voice off and on, return to the game, and restart fleet voice. Over and over, maybe a dozen times.

SilenceHeart
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:35:00 - [26]
 

Machine Info


* OS version: Windows Vista Home Premium (Service pack 2)

* CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @3.00GHz 3.00 GHz

* GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

* RAM: 2.00 GB


User Experience


* Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 6.0 FPS

o Zoomed in: 5.0 FPS

* On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6 CLOSE TO SAME

* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: I only Froze a handful of times. mainly when there was alot of ships firing or pos exploding ect.

Elias Genvalo
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:36:00 - [27]
 


  • OS version: W7 64

  • CPU: 955 Phenom 2

  • GPU: Crossfire 5750 1GB

  • RAM: 4GB




  • Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled:

  • Zoomed out: 7 at gate; 12-18 at pos

  • Zoomed in: 7 at gate; 12 at pos


  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? 7.5

  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: 5 to 8 second module lag; more for grouped modules


Zero Yin
Gallente
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:36:00 - [28]
 

Machine Info


* OS version: Windows XP

* CPU: Intel Dual Core 1,6Ghz

* GPU: ASUS Extreme AX550

* RAM: 1 GB


User Experience


* Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 7-10

o Zoomed in: ~3

* On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5

* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
The second mass test without any crashes. Jumps and grid loading, however were slower than Oct.21. The fight had more FPS than the tower bashing; during tower shooting part the framatare droped to 2.3 per second, which was the lowest rate noticed during this test.
I'm only guessing, but much of the framerate is being killed by the light effects cynos and jumps produce. If option was introduced to disable those effects, the framerate could be graetly increased in mass campaigns such as this one.

Krezack
Rebirth.
THE GOD SQUAD
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:36:00 - [29]
 

Windows XP SP3
AMD Athlon Phenom II x2 550
ATI 5670 series 1
4 gig DDR3

Maxed Everything, Shaders high, 32 bit, 1920 resolution
zoomed in: 3-6 fps
zoomed out: 6-12 fps

Too many objects being rendered imo. As a graphic developer myself i would limit the amount of objects can be seen at one time depending on range. (Just a suggestion)

Surprised personally that i could play so well with what was on the screen.

Pesets
The Hunt Club
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:36:00 - [30]
 

Edited by: Pesets on 28/10/2010 21:38:39
Machine Info

  • OS version:

    Vista HP SP2 x64

  • CPU:

    Core 2 Duo 2x2.26GHz

  • GPU:

    GeForce 9600M GT

  • RAM:

    4Gb


User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled:

    • Zoomed out:

      6-8

    • Zoomed in:

      0.4-2

  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)

    3i (imaginary because i don't often participate in this kind of fights on TQ)

  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

    Got moved to FD- at step 5 i think (i'm 99% sure moveme channel was not open)


  • FPS and module lag felt considerably worse than during the last test (brackets were off)

    Did not crash though


Pages: [1] 2 3

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only