open All Channels
seplocked Jita Park Speakers Corner
blankseplocked MYNXEE FOR CSM5
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6

Author Topic

The Bastards
Posted - 2010.05.05 20:50:00 - [91]

While I'd be more interested in "Can (and Should) Blob Tactics Be Discouraged?", I think that'd be 6:00 AM for me, which is EARLY for a Sunday, but if you need anyone for, "What Will Breathe Life Into Low Sec?" I should be free.

Es and Whizz
Posted - 2010.05.05 20:55:00 - [92]

X me up for the Bringing Life to Lowsec session.

Also, vote Mynxee you scurvy dogs! (Or even you nutritionally-balanced and well-fed dogs.)


Owen Drakkar
Posted - 2010.05.05 21:48:00 - [93]

I voted for you. Gl.

The Black Rabbits
The Gurlstas Associates
Posted - 2010.05.05 22:43:00 - [94]

Mynxww, my dear,

since the my first option crashed and burned in C&P, you have my vote, and I will be getting my alliance to support you too

good luck and see you in space :-)

Veto Corp
Posted - 2010.05.06 01:27:00 - [95]

Focus Group schedule update: I had to change the time of the Sunday 9 May "blobs" Focus Group to a few hours later due to a RL obligation that shifted. Sorry and hope this actually makes it possible for more folks to consider participating in that one.

I really appreciate all the support, both in this thread and in the evemails, in-game channels, and other venues.

Posted - 2010.05.06 05:30:00 - [96]

Edited by: Xydros on 06/05/2010 05:31:14
Would be down for the Low Sec focus group if you wanted me.


Would sit in on the ECM panel, but I can only speak to the use of ECM from an FC's POV and not from the boat itself.

Posted - 2010.05.06 19:05:00 - [97]

I'll admit that I like the idea of quicker communication from CCP in terms to widespread player reactions. How do you see the CSM becoming more involved in this?

Posted - 2010.05.06 20:08:00 - [98]

You don't know me (at least not under this character), but you have both of my votes :)

captain foivos
Posted - 2010.05.06 21:40:00 - [99]

I was looking down the list, flitting through pointless n33bcake candidacies, wondering where I'd find the Noir. candidate.

You have my vote, Carole Mynxee, if only for being one of the few competent women on the Internetz (a serious business).

Marquis Zenas
I.X Research
Posted - 2010.05.06 21:41:00 - [100]

Edited by: Marquis Zenas on 06/05/2010 21:41:26
Two votes flying over your way!

Selene D'Celeste
The D'Celeste Trading Company
Posted - 2010.05.06 22:28:00 - [101]

Vote for Mynxee =D

Native Freshfood
Posted - 2010.05.06 22:36:00 - [102]

Edited by: Rananka on 06/05/2010 23:14:07
Mynxee is cool. Your vote won't get wasted on her..
+3 from me.

captain foivos
Posted - 2010.05.07 02:36:00 - [103]

I might've voted for you again.

claire xxx
Veto Corp
Posted - 2010.05.07 06:07:00 - [104]

Voted, all accounts.

Veto Corp
Posted - 2010.05.07 06:24:00 - [105]

Thanks for all the support and votes, folks! Your posts here, your evemails, and convos all mean a lot. The support is very gratifying.

Please note that I've added another Focus Group to the schedule. The topic for this one is the Mercenary profession. We'll discuss issues, challenges, where the profession is heading, and what tools or game changes might be made to support that profession. Although the merc profession is not a specific issue on my campaign platform, it is affected by some of the ones that are. Since I'm in the merc environment and there was interest from my colleagues, I decided it would be fun to discuss as a group.

Excellent Roze
Winged Victory Corporation
Intrepid Crossing
Posted - 2010.05.07 10:38:00 - [106]

You have my vote aswell.

although I don't actually do most of the stuff you support, I do agree that it does need some attention and fine tuning. To that end I will support you.

Muad' Dib
Posted - 2010.05.07 12:11:00 - [107]

Generally speaking those that Lark has supported were never a bad choice - him included in CSM ... whatever.

I do not agree fully with RR-ing. Part because i use it, part because i want to use it a bit more and part because you did not mention what will happen with the sec status penalty you get when you RR outlaws.

Hope you find more blob penalties.

There is someone else i would vote for, but it is better to vote for a recent ex-pirate than for a long-time-ago ex-pirate. :)

Posted - 2010.05.07 12:25:00 - [108]


Veto Corp
Posted - 2010.05.07 15:14:00 - [109]

Originally by: Britanni
I'll admit that I like the idea of quicker communication from CCP in terms to widespread player reactions. How do you see the CSM becoming more involved in this?

Arrow By urging--if they don't already have one--a CCP policy for responding quickly and with useful information to soothe nerves and put out fires in escalating rage threads about exploits or other similarly serious issues.

Arrow By encouraging CCP to work with the CSM to aid in responding to the community and managing players' expectations.

Although they've gotten better about it lately, CCP is still often slower to respond to volatile broke-game, exploit, cheating and other "big issue" threads than reasonable players would prefer. Even given NDA and internal policy considerations that likely affect the timing and content of such responses, I'm convinced there is room for improvement.

Kelli Sunweaver
New Matari Industries
Posted - 2010.05.07 15:24:00 - [110]


I have followed your blog and your CSM run. So far I am impressed. I was wondering in your "quest" to improve low sec if you would think about giving the idea's brought forth from the 09 Vegas meet and concideration. The overview can be found here.

Note sorry for the poor spelling I am writing this at work and i hear my boss looking for me. Surprised

Archon Grimnir
Capital Construction Research
Pioneer Alliance
Posted - 2010.05.07 15:42:00 - [111]

you got my vote. +1

also, dont forget to defend your noble suicide ganking brethren in highsec. (we still want our insurance payouts) & bomb launchers in low-sec would be fantastic.

and thwart ankh at every possible turn. we dont take kindly to her. damn super carebear.

The Bastards
Posted - 2010.05.07 16:16:00 - [112]

Edited by: Arrhidaeus on 07/05/2010 16:16:19
Since you've changed the time,

X for Blob Tactics Focus Group
Un-X for Low-Sec Focus Group

The Bastards
The Bastards.
Posted - 2010.05.07 16:22:00 - [113]

Sounds great but would love to attend the 'breathing life into low-sec' but I have a prior engagement. Would love to hear how it all goes, will it be recorded?


Veto Corp
Posted - 2010.05.07 17:20:00 - [114]

@Kelli: I've added a link for the TTH post to the OP, as well as links to the Outlaw Expansion proposal and Lana Torrin's Bounty System thread.

@Flashfresh: It will be recorded, but as stated I don't plan to release the recordings publicly. This is mainly to avoid putting off folks who might not be comfortable with that. However, if all the participants in a given session don't mind me releasing their recording, I will. At a minimum, I will be reporting on the discussion in a blog post and linking to that from here, or vice versa.

Continued thanks for everyone's support! Do want more participants for the focus groups, please! It's a great chance to explore one issue with a small group in a hopefully productive way.

Dierdra Vaal
Veto Corp
Posted - 2010.05.07 21:13:00 - [115]

hi mynxee - I'd like to confirm my attendance at the ECM focus group.

If possible I would also like to attend the low sec focus group - but if you have more experienced low seccers I wouldnt mind listening in at least :)

Veto Corp
Posted - 2010.05.09 12:42:00 - [116]

Just a reminder that my Blob Issues focus group is scheduled for 15:00 EVE time today.

Yesterday, focus groups on Low Sec and ECM Balance were conducted. Both sessions were excellent, with in-depth discussion about real and perceived problems, potential solutions, and in the case of the Low Sec discussion, an exciting proposal idea. The proposal idea fits exactly with my vision for how low sec should be addressed. Suffice to say that it involves boosters. Within a couple of days, I will have the discussions summarized and make the raw audio available (because participants said they do not object to that). The draft of our proposal is in the works; as soon as the focus group participants have had a chance to vet it, one of us will publish it on Assembly Hall. Watch this thread -- I'll post when stuff is published.

Also would like to thank the following folks (among others) for endorsing me for CSM on their blogs: Nashh Kadavr, Larz Smith, Myhrial Arkenath, Ahnog, Yriellevandis, Aiden Mourn, Cirocke, and Flashfresh.

Posted - 2010.05.10 19:14:00 - [117]

Edited by: RipperZane on 10/05/2010 19:16:15
Originally by: claire xxx
Voted, all accounts.


Ok done Very Happy
>may you spill about the blood of your enemies<

Francais Tempest
White Knights Imperius
Posted - 2010.05.10 22:06:00 - [118]

You have my vote, if only for being the only candidate (that I know of) that actually answers questions instead of criticizing.

Mind you, I only know of 3 candidates, but still...Very Happy

Gareth d'Orkney
Posted - 2010.05.11 00:46:00 - [119]

Hi Mynxee,
This guy hydrostatic Capsule has some interesting ideas about both the UI, and perhaps more importantly, the way in which pilots should be given warnings when a certain number of jumps happen through a certain gate at a time. I think (as does he) that this would make larger blobs less effective due to the warning that pilots would have before they were attacked.

The blog explains it far better than I could, but I was wondering what you think of the idea.

Posted - 2010.05.11 14:58:00 - [120]

if you support a revamping of the drugs system then il give you 3 votes

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to

These forums are archived and read-only