open All Channels
seplocked Jita Park Speakers Corner
blankseplocked I'm running for CSM! Vote for me!!!
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

Emo TJ
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Posted - 2010.04.17 13:00:00 - [1]
 

Hi.

My main goal will be getting CCP to fix exploits and balance of ships to get rid of the 'FOTM' stuff. I will also be looking to balance invasions. Currently all things give attackers an unfair advantage. Sad

Another focus will be on helping miners vs. attackers. Currently mining needs a boost. +2 warp core strength to all mining vessels are in order.

So please vote for me. Smile

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions
Posted - 2010.04.17 13:24:00 - [2]
 

Laughing

NightmareX
Nomads
Nulli Secunda
Posted - 2010.04.17 21:40:00 - [3]
 

I rather vote my self to quit EVE and delete my character and pay all of my isk to a random noob in Jita and never come back to EVE before i vote you to be a CSM with your extremely stupid ideas.

I rather see EA buy up CCP before i want to see you as a CSM to.

Herschel Yamamoto
Agent-Orange
Nabaal Syndicate
Posted - 2010.04.18 07:29:00 - [4]
 

Originally by: Marlona Sky
Laughing

Emo TJ
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Posted - 2010.04.18 10:17:00 - [5]
 

Originally by: NightmareX
I rather vote my self to quit EVE and delete my character and pay all of my isk to a random noob in Jita and never come back to EVE before i vote you to be a CSM with your extremely stupid ideas.

I rather see EA buy up CCP before i want to see you as a CSM to.


You hatred is funny.

Funny you should mention Electronic Arts. They are a great company to work for. Been there for several years now.

Oh, and don't be mad if CCP comes under our company umbrella. We have been taking a serious look at them.

If it's in the game!

Dirty Wizard
Posted - 2010.04.18 15:49:00 - [6]
 

Edited by: Dirty Wizard on 18/04/2010 15:53:39
Originally by: Emo TJ
Hi.

My main goal will be getting CCP to fix exploits and balance of ships to get rid of the 'FOTM' stuff. I will also be looking to balance invasions. Currently all things give attackers an unfair advantage. Sad

Another focus will be on helping miners vs. attackers. Currently mining needs a boost. +2 warp core strength to all mining vessels are in order.

So please vote for me. Smile
Wow. What I find ironic is that joke candidates like Emo TJ are still better than some of the serious candidates running for CSM.

You've got my vote. Mainly to help keep the legitimate idiots out.


Emo TJ
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Posted - 2010.04.18 17:42:00 - [7]
 

Another goal of mine is to help balance the CSM in terms of agendas. Currently there are many CSM's that are there and only push the topics that their alliance/power block wants to help them out. There is not enough balance.

I will be there to represent the new people to this game. If you are tired of the bitter old vets that hate new players, vote for me. Very Happy

Lykouleon
Wildly Inappropriate
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2010.04.18 20:19:00 - [8]
 

Get out.

Kephael
Caldari
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2010.04.18 22:46:00 - [9]
 

How do you propose you fix mining? Would you like to reduce drone mineral loot and mission loot?

Avalloc
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2010.04.18 23:08:00 - [10]
 

Originally by: Emo TJ
Another goal of mine is to help balance the CSM in terms of agendas. Currently there are many CSM's that are there and only push the topics that their alliance/power block wants to help them out. There is not enough balance.



You should give some examples of this imbalance you are claiming exists. Otherwise it is just an assumption or even worst a horrible misconception on your part.

darius mclever
Posted - 2010.04.19 12:44:00 - [11]
 

Originally by: Emo TJ
Another goal of mine is to help balance the CSM in terms of agendas. Currently there are many CSM's that are there and only push the topics that their alliance/power block wants to help them out. There is not enough balance.

I will be there to represent the new people to this game. If you are tired of the bitter old vets that hate new players, vote for me. Very Happy


ok ... every time something bad happens to NC you come to the assembly hall and cry for nerf (or buff) to help your side. how are you any different?

just to give a wrap up
- only sov holders and their allies should be able to use bombs
- lower sigradius of fighters and fighter bombers to make them less vulnerable to bombs after bombers decimate your fighter bombers
- drake nerf
- cry for dramiel nerf because people harass your ratter with them. (and some MM was stupid enough to loose a carrier! to a frig gang)

you are contradicting yourself.

zealottk
Posted - 2010.04.19 13:31:00 - [12]
 

quick question for you in reguards to balance issues. With Gallente ships you have to be in range to shoot with blasters, you have to be able to take a few hits to get up close. The problem is that your tank suffers from speed and visa-versa. If you don't tank you won't make it to your target as you'll die. If you tank, you simply won't make it to your target. How do you think you would fix this problem?

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions
Posted - 2010.04.19 16:09:00 - [13]
 

Originally by: zealottk
quick question for you in reguards to balance issues. With Gallente ships you have to be in range to shoot with blasters, you have to be able to take a few hits to get up close. The problem is that your tank suffers from speed and visa-versa. If you don't tank you won't make it to your target as you'll die. If you tank, you simply won't make it to your target. How do you think you would fix this problem?


Oh yes, please great and wise Emo TJ, how would you fix Gallente?

T'Amber
Garoun Investment Bank
Posted - 2010.04.20 13:38:00 - [14]
 

Edited by: T''Amber on 14/05/2010 21:12:00

im a gimp.


Emo TJ
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Posted - 2010.04.21 07:12:00 - [15]
 

Currently there are a couple CSM who seem to be pro-attack in 0.0

Defenders should always have the advantage as we can see from all aspects of history. So I will be there to make sure some issues that push for attacking being more powerful than defending never reaches CSM Summits.

One example that was whined about and pushed for that sent the ship insanely overboard for invaders was bombers. Stealth bombers were perfectly fine when they had cruise missiles. One could rat and one volley other frigates with them. Now they are abused left and right. Just an example of one thing I will fight for to get fixed.

Lani Sun
Posted - 2010.04.22 11:56:00 - [16]
 

Originally by: Emo TJ
Hi.

My main goal will be getting CCP to fix exploits and balance of ships to get rid of the 'FOTM' stuff. I will also be looking to balance invasions. Currently all things give attackers an unfair advantage. Sad

Another focus will be on helping miners vs. attackers. Currently mining needs a boost. +2 warp core strength to all mining vessels are in order.

So please vote for me. Smile
Great, now i know NOT to vote for you!

darius mclever
Posted - 2010.04.22 15:37:00 - [17]
 

Originally by: Emo TJ
Currently there are a couple CSM who seem to be pro-attack in 0.0

Defenders should always have the advantage as we can see from all aspects of history. So I will be there to make sure some issues that push for attacking being more powerful than defending never reaches CSM Summits.

One example that was whined about and pushed for that sent the ship insanely overboard for invaders was bombers. Stealth bombers were perfectly fine when they had cruise missiles. One could rat and one volley other frigates with them. Now they are abused left and right. Just an example of one thing I will fight for to get fixed.


We feel really sorry for you. honestly sorry. need a tissue?

Lady Spank
Amarr
In Praise Of Shadows
Posted - 2010.04.24 00:46:00 - [18]
 

What a joke. Get out.

Emo TJ
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Posted - 2010.05.14 20:07:00 - [19]
 

THERE IS STILL TIME TO VOTE MY FELLOW EVE CAPSULEERS. IF VOTED IN I WILL PURSUE SUBJECT LIKE BETTER PROTECTION FOR MISSION RUNNERS ALONG WITH BALANCING OF SHIP CLASSES. ALSO ON MY AGENDA IS SOVEREIGNTY AND GETTING SOME LEVEL 5 AGENTS INTO HIGH SEC.

I AM WORKING ON A NEW PROPOSAL THAT WILL MAKE PLAYERS THAT PROBE OUT MISSION RUNNERS HAVE TO HAVE GOOD STANDINGS WITH THAT AGENT THEY ARE RUNNING AND HAVE HACKING SKILLS ALONG WITH CERTAIN NEW MODULES THEY HAVE TO FIT IN ORDER TO USE THE GATES.

THIS IS JUST A FEW OF THE MANY THINGS MY EXPERIENCE WITH THIS GAME I CAN BRING TO THE TABLE.

Ore Mut
M.E.P.A.L.S. LLC.
Posted - 2010.05.14 20:58:00 - [20]
 

Emo will call for thread lock in

3...
2...
1...

Ran Khanon
Amarr
Swords Horses and Heavy Metal
Posted - 2010.05.15 10:44:00 - [21]
 

For a nice background story on this candidate: read this


Associated killmail + some convo's.


Methinks you should ask for a buff to fotm ships if anything ^_^

Axel Jangorai
Posted - 2010.06.01 19:31:00 - [22]
 

L5 missions in high sec?
Give bears more ways to farm isk

wheres the proposed nerf to any ship that fits a scram has its mass massively increased, its EHP halved and can only lock 1 target at a time.

Go lose mroe Dramiels to Badgers and rage some more

captain foivos
Posted - 2010.06.01 21:52:00 - [23]
 

Y'all got trolled. The real Emo TJ got biomassed and then almost immediately reincarnated by another devious capsuleer.

Hence, the lack of bold and all caps in his posts. Also, the reasonably understandable grammar.


Just sayin'.


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only