open All Channels
seplocked Test Server Feedback
blankseplocked Mike C Multiple Podding
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions
Posted - 2010.03.30 09:13:00 - [31]
 

I always lol whenever ppl try to justify why pod killing is ok.

The rules are very clear. Enjoy your ban.

blade190
Posted - 2010.03.30 10:08:00 - [32]
 

no reason to get a ban. not his fault

Arec Bardwin
Posted - 2010.03.30 13:07:00 - [33]
 

Sisi drama, best drama Razz

ISellThingz
Posted - 2010.03.30 13:54:00 - [34]
 

Rotfl, the people screaming BAN BAN BAN remind me of those extremist Christians.

You guys are beyond stupid.

Fird
Posted - 2010.03.30 14:21:00 - [35]
 

First of all, i'm nobodys alt. Second of all, i had a considerable amount of lag at the time so warping out quickly wasn't an option. And lastly i warped in there expecting to be podded or at least lose my ship due to lag. Quitcher*****en, really man, get over it. Get a clone in Orvolle and be done with it. Getting Mike banned cause you are angry about not getting a titan kill is a bit ******ed. Oh and attacking his Avatar at a pos is also against the rules but i don't see you complaining about that one...i wonder why?

justin666
Posted - 2010.03.30 14:36:00 - [36]
 

justin666 gets more popcorn Very Happy

Fird
Posted - 2010.03.30 14:39:00 - [37]
 

Originally by: justin666
justin666 gets more popcorn Very Happy


I'm gonna go find some cheese...

Captian Conrad
Minmatar
Empyrean Warriors
Posted - 2010.03.30 15:46:00 - [38]
 

I got beer! Laughing

fab24
Gallente
Tax Fraud Corporation
Posted - 2010.03.30 15:58:00 - [39]
 

C'mon stop whining.

Mike C
Caldari
MicroFunks
Posted - 2010.03.30 17:11:00 - [40]
 

It seems many people don't understand that I didn't even know I podded anyone until someone with emotears posted here. THEN I looked in my combat log. In any case it's IT's fault (they warped to my friend's POS with their capital gang to engage me out of FFA too)

lot job
Posted - 2010.03.30 18:57:00 - [41]
 

I havn't seen one of these BAN BAN BAN threads go over a page before! Cool.

To be fair people seem to get podded around cap ships on sisi all the time since SBs are part of their standard fit.

If you didn't lose loads of SP and mike C doesn't DD every one station regularly or something I don't see what the big deal is...





Zarthanon
Posted - 2010.03.30 23:23:00 - [42]
 

Edited by: Zarthanon on 30/03/2010 23:23:23
You do realize that we merely warped in and LOLed at him "sprinting" his titan back into his POS shield right after we arrived. We didn't engage anything, in fact, we were repping the triage Chimera that was repping us. Nice try though. Any more failed accusations you'd like to throw out?

Fird
Posted - 2010.03.31 01:25:00 - [43]
 

"eat me" oh wait, that's not an accusation, my bad :P

Mike C
Caldari
MicroFunks
Posted - 2010.03.31 01:44:00 - [44]
 

I was already entering the POS (armor had been fully repped) when you guys came. If you had the velocity column open you would have known that. After you warped three nyx onto the pos all three locked me. If I hadn't been repped who knows what you would have done. It's not a false accusation, I believed and still believe you warped to me to try and kill me since I escaped with 15% hull. Also for the guy who said as long as I don't regularly DD everyone at station, I did accidently doomsday my alt in an orca there...

Lucifer's Ghost
Minmatar
Native Fishfood
Posted - 2010.03.31 03:30:00 - [45]
 

Edited by: Lucifer''s Ghost on 31/03/2010 03:56:34
Originally by: Marlona Sky
I always lol whenever ppl try to justify why pod killing is ok.

The rules are very clear. Enjoy your ban.



So is non consensual PVP in non FFA areas. Titan pilot was not in a FFA area and was being attacked while moving into a POS. I'd say the individuals that attacked the Titan pilot are the ones breaking and using the rules in a manner they were not intended for in the first place and are now trying to use those same rules to manipulate a ban on the titan pilot because they failed to get their 'kill' on a test server (which children, is the only place you could attempt to manage such a thing in the first place w/o losing your pretty little Nyx's to a support fleet and you know it).

Sorry, but the ones screaming Ban Ban, are trying to use the rules in a manner not intended by the devs when they were laid out.

I have seen more threads here about people pulling up to pilots smart bombing, and then screaming OMGODZOR U KEELED MAH POD! CCP BANZOR YOU!!!!

When the reality is, they pulled up to the pilot in a weak ship to deliberately try and force him/her to stop defending themselves once they were in their pod, so their friends could blow up the other pilots ship.

I didn't see anywhere anyone else saying they stopped attacking the Titan when their friends ended up in pods. Nope, what I see is they continued to attack the Titan pilot. Putting him in a situation where he has no choice but to continue to defend himself, or lose a ship that is NOT a 100 isk replacement delivered nicely to your hanger by CCP in the amount of time to click a button, but in fact a ship that takes as long (or longer) to build and replace on SISI, than it takes on Tranquility (I believe, if I am wrong, someone correct me please).

What I see is three Nyx's continuing to attack him with drones while pods are sitting next to him, they are as much responsible to stop attacking to allow the pods to warp away, as the Titan pilot btw. I see three players sitting up against a titan in pods, when they could have easily warped away (and at least one of them has stated he was attempting to save the titan), so all I see here is a group of people trying to use the test server rules to get people banned or force people to let them get a Titan kill otherwise.

So no, I am sorry, but the Titan pilot doesn't deserve a ban, the pilots who deliberately tried to use their pods to force a kill deserve a ban, not only from SISI, but from TQ as well, because if they show they will try to cheat to get a kill on SISI, they will do the same if they find an exploit they can use on TQ.


Lucifer's Ghost
Minmatar
Native Fishfood
Posted - 2010.03.31 04:47:00 - [46]
 

Edited by: Lucifer''s Ghost on 31/03/2010 05:14:21


This is basically the timeline I see here....

1) Titan Pilot was at a FFA zone, and escaped (left) the FFA after a nearly successful attack on his ship by other players.

2) Titan Pilot is at his friends POS repairing himself.

3) Multiple ships warp in, target him and begin to attack him, w/o his permission, in a non FFA zone (breaking the rules to begin with... rule 3) Combat by consent only, except at FFA beacons.)

4) Titan pilot turns on his SB to defend himself while he continues to move towards and into the POS of his friend.

5) 2 pilots move on top of the Titan (at 0) with weak, small ships and allow themselves to lose their ships, and rather than warp away, stay there (claiming more than what? 30 seconds of lag?).

6) 2 pilots lose their pods to the titan pilot.

7) A third pilot attempting to assist the titan pilot also loses his ship and pod (doesn't complain and in fact defends the titan pilot)

8) At no time during this attack on the Titan at the POS by the aggressors did they get permission from the Titan pilot to attack him. (see point 3, breaking the rules of NO Non-Consensual PVP in non FFA zones)

9) Titan escapes into POS.

10) Aggressor Pilots then come onto the forums screaming and yelling the Titan pilot podded them, Ban him.

See point 3 and point 8

The Initial fault should be with the aggressors for flagrantly breaking the rules in the first place. If they hadn't broke the rules in the first place, the Titan pilot would not have podded them while running his SB to defend himself from their NON CONSENSUAL attack.

The bans should go to all members of the Aggressor fleet, and if I were a GM, I would level an additional ban to them on Tranquility for 90 days for attempting to use the rules to get another player banned to hide their bad behavior in the first place.

Enjoy your Ban Aggressors. You were at fault, not the Titan Pilot defending his ship from non-consensual PVP that was CLEARLY against the rules you are so flagrantly waving around and screaming about to try and get HIM banned.

/end thread.

Citan
The Scope
Posted - 2010.03.31 06:30:00 - [47]
 

Edited by: Citan on 31/03/2010 06:32:45
Please visit your user settings to re-enable images.

Lucifer's Ghost
Minmatar
Native Fishfood
Posted - 2010.03.31 08:50:00 - [48]
 

Originally by: Citan
Edited by: Citan on 31/03/2010 06:32:45
Please visit your user settings to re-enable images.


That isn't a Llama, that is my sister!

Anile8er
Five Fat Soldiers
Posted - 2010.03.31 09:28:00 - [49]
 

Originally by: Lucifer's Ghost
Edited by: Lucifer''s Ghost on 31/03/2010 05:14:21


This is basically the timeline I see here....

1) Titan Pilot was at a FFA zone, and escaped (left) the FFA after a nearly successful attack on his ship by other players.

2) Titan Pilot is at his friends POS repairing himself.

3) Multiple ships warp in, target him and begin to attack him, w/o his permission, in a non FFA zone (breaking the rules to begin with... rule 3) Combat by consent only, except at FFA beacons.)

4) Titan pilot turns on his SB to defend himself while he continues to move towards and into the POS of his friend.

5) 2 pilots move on top of the Titan (at 0) with weak, small ships and allow themselves to lose their ships, and rather than warp away, stay there (claiming more than what? 30 seconds of lag?).

6) 2 pilots lose their pods to the titan pilot.

7) A third pilot attempting to assist the titan pilot also loses his ship and pod (doesn't complain and in fact defends the titan pilot)

8) At no time during this attack on the Titan at the POS by the aggressors did they get permission from the Titan pilot to attack him. (see point 3, breaking the rules of NO Non-Consensual PVP in non FFA zones)

9) Titan escapes into POS.

10) Aggressor Pilots then come onto the forums screaming and yelling the Titan pilot podded them, Ban him.

See point 3 and point 8

The Initial fault should be with the aggressors for flagrantly breaking the rules in the first place. If they hadn't broke the rules in the first place, the Titan pilot would not have podded them while running his SB to defend himself from their NON CONSENSUAL attack.

The bans should go to all members of the Aggressor fleet, and if I were a GM, I would level an additional ban to them on Tranquility for 90 days for attempting to use the rules to get another player banned to hide their bad behavior in the first place.

Enjoy your Ban Aggressors. You were at fault, not the Titan Pilot defending his ship from non-consensual PVP that was CLEARLY against the rules you are so flagrantly waving around and screaming about to try and get HIM banned.

/end thread.


Your time line is wrong...

Poddings happened in FFA2 while the attack was under way.

We warped 3 Nyxs and a rapier to the pos where the escaped Titan was. We locked him. We never engaged him at his POS.

So we broke no rules... and he podded 3 people.

Lucifer's Ghost
Minmatar
Native Fishfood
Posted - 2010.03.31 09:38:00 - [50]
 

Edited by: Lucifer''s Ghost on 31/03/2010 09:52:44
Originally by: Anile8er


Your time line is wrong...

Poddings happened in FFA2 while the attack was under way.

We warped 3 Nyxs and a rapier to the pos where the escaped Titan was. We locked him. We never engaged him at his POS.

So we broke no rules... and he podded 3 people.


If that is the case, then I still question why someone going into hull, knowing their going into hull, would stick around and risk being podded, unless they were doing so, in an attempt to use the no podding rule to force a pilot to stop defending their ship, so that their buddies could finish it off.

You guys have yet to address that other than to claim lag, for your pilots, or to claim they were multi boxing and didn't know their ships had exploded and they were sitting in pods.

I am sorry, but I don't buy your line at all. I multibox and have always been aware of what my ships are doing, even during combat. If I see a ship going into hull I start clicking warp because I have no desire to get podded. Standard combat practices no?

The only reason NOT to care if you get podded or not on SISI, is to try and use the no podding rule to force a pilot to stop defending themselves, and barring that, to try and get them banned when they pod you. Either way, the fact is you and your group are trying to use the no podding rule in a manner you know dang well it wasn't meant.

Any GM with half a brain will know this as well, and should ban you and your alliance from SISI for doing it, and level 90 day game bans on you as well.

Ok, maybe not your alliance, there is no need to punish others for your wrong doing, but you guys at the least because it is obvious you are trying to use the no podding rule in a manner not meant for by the Devs.

Anybody with at least 1/2 a brain and drooling on them selves can see that.

Anile8er
Five Fat Soldiers
Posted - 2010.03.31 10:23:00 - [51]
 

Originally by: Lucifer's Ghost
Edited by: Lucifer''s Ghost on 31/03/2010 09:52:44
Originally by: Anile8er


Your time line is wrong...

Poddings happened in FFA2 while the attack was under way.

We warped 3 Nyxs and a rapier to the pos where the escaped Titan was. We locked him. We never engaged him at his POS.

So we broke no rules... and he podded 3 people.


If that is the case, then I still question why someone going into hull, knowing their going into hull, would stick around and risk being podded, unless they were doing so, in an attempt to use the no podding rule to force a pilot to stop defending their ship, so that their buddies could finish it off.

You guys have yet to address that other than to claim lag, for your pilots, or to claim they were multi boxing and didn't know their ships had exploded and they were sitting in pods.

I am sorry, but I don't buy your line at all. I multibox and have always been aware of what my ships are doing, even during combat. If I see a ship going into hull I start clicking warp because I have no desire to get podded. Standard combat practices no?

The only reason NOT to care if you get podded or not on SISI, is to try and use the no podding rule to force a pilot to stop defending themselves, and barring that, to try and get them banned when they pod you. Either way, the fact is you and your group are trying to use the no podding rule in a manner you know dang well it wasn't meant.

Any GM with half a brain will know this as well, and should ban you and your alliance from SISI for doing it, and level 90 day game bans on you as well.

Ok, maybe not your alliance, there is no need to punish others for your wrong doing, but you guys at the least because it is obvious you are trying to use the no podding rule in a manner not meant for by the Devs.

Anybody with at least 1/2 a brain and drooling on them selves can see that.


Our onyx pilot got DD. Do you know what that is? It is when a titan instapops you with his special weapon, it doesn't show your ship dying slowly (a person with half a brain would know that). He was one of 3 HICs and was also accounting a carrier on grid. He wouldn't have known right away that his HIC pilot was going to be DD.

By the way only "one" of our pilots were podded. The other two I don't know about.

Thanks for looking stupid

Lucifer's Ghost
Minmatar
Native Fishfood
Posted - 2010.03.31 10:25:00 - [52]
 

Edited by: Lucifer''s Ghost on 31/03/2010 10:56:44
Edited by: Lucifer''s Ghost on 31/03/2010 10:55:45
Edited by: Lucifer''s Ghost on 31/03/2010 10:44:55
Originally by: Anile8er
Originally by: Lucifer's Ghost

Originally by: Anile8er


Your time line is wrong...

Poddings happened in FFA2 while the attack was under way.

We warped 3 Nyxs and a rapier to the pos where the escaped Titan was. We locked him. We never engaged him at his POS.

So we broke no rules... and he podded 3 people.


If that is the case, then I still question why someone going into hull, knowing their going into hull, would stick around and risk being podded, unless they were doing so, in an attempt to use the no podding rule to force a pilot to stop defending their ship, so that their buddies could finish it off.

You guys have yet to address that other than to claim lag, for your pilots, or to claim they were multi boxing and didn't know their ships had exploded and they were sitting in pods.

I am sorry, but I don't buy your line at all. I multibox and have always been aware of what my ships are doing, even during combat. If I see a ship going into hull I start clicking warp because I have no desire to get podded. Standard combat practices no?

The only reason NOT to care if you get podded or not on SISI, is to try and use the no podding rule to force a pilot to stop defending themselves, and barring that, to try and get them banned when they pod you. Either way, the fact is you and your group are trying to use the no podding rule in a manner you know dang well it wasn't meant.

Any GM with half a brain will know this as well, and should ban you and your alliance from SISI for doing it, and level 90 day game bans on you as well.

Ok, maybe not your alliance, there is no need to punish others for your wrong doing, but you guys at the least because it is obvious you are trying to use the no podding rule in a manner not meant for by the Devs.

Anybody with at least 1/2 a brain and drooling on them selves can see that.


Our onyx pilot got DD. Do you know what that is? It is when a titan instapops you with his special weapon, it doesn't show your ship dying slowly (a person with half a brain would know that). He was one of 3 HICs and was also accounting a carrier on grid. He wouldn't have known right away that his HIC pilot was going to be DD.

By the way only "one" of our pilots were podded. The other two I don't know about.

Thanks for looking stupid



So your saying it is a common practice for your pilots to be unaware of their "other" ships, and what is happening to them. This is good to know.

Thanks for proving my point.

p.s. I guess your carrier pilot that lost his onyx, also just happened not to have his own personal ships on the watch list? Golly, I was pretty sure that was a common practice.

So what you are really saying is, you guys suck so bad you have to exploit to get kills. Like I said, that is good to know.

p.s.s. Oh the other thing I want to know, is it a common practice of your pilots to place themselves at '0' on an enemy ship on Tranquility? Or do you only do that on Sisi so when their ships get destroyed their pods are right up against the ships hull, forcing the pilot to stop defending themselves, or risk podding them?

Ooops, didn't see that coming did you? Rolling Eyes


Anile8er
Five Fat Soldiers
Posted - 2010.03.31 11:00:00 - [53]
 

^^ you are a dumbass.

This OP is about a player podding multiple people on the test server which is a clear violation of the rules.

You are off topic by stating details of before and after the fight and coming up with all kinds of reasons why the podding happened and how it was the fault of the podded characters.

TBH I really haven't read most of what you have typed or any of what your last post was about.

Enough said.

Lucifer's Ghost
Minmatar
Native Fishfood
Posted - 2010.03.31 11:08:00 - [54]
 

Edited by: Lucifer''s Ghost on 31/03/2010 11:12:01
Originally by: Anile8er
^^ you are a dumbass.

This OP is about a player podding multiple people on the test server which is a clear violation of the rules.

You are off topic by stating details of before and after the fight and coming up with all kinds of reasons why the podding happened and how it was the fault of the podded characters.

TBH I really haven't read most of what you have typed or any of what your last post was about.

Enough said.


For being a 'dumbass' I have managed to point out the inconsistencies of your behavior on SISI clear enough that it is glaringly obvious to anyone that reads it, that what really happened is you and your group of buddies were attempting to exploit the rules of SISI to acquire a titan kill by attempting to force the Titan pilot to stop defending himself.

To do that you placed ships within SB range, allowed them to be destroyed (by DD or SB, either doesn't matter, you still allowed their destruction by their placement against the hull of the Titan when an orbit out of SB range would have been equally as effective.), and then continued to attack the titan, forcing the pilot to continue to defend himself, destroying those pods, or stop defending himself, and lose a ship that isn't readily replaceable on SISI.

You know what I am saying is the truth, so now "i'm a dumbass." and your done talking about it.

Refute what I am saying. Prove you and your group were not deliberately using the test servers rules to force a kill, and when that failed, resorted to trying to get the Titan pilot banned. Your pilots actions and behavior speak volumes all by themselves.


Zarthanon
Posted - 2010.03.31 11:30:00 - [55]
 

Edited by: Zarthanon on 31/03/2010 11:32:51
Lucifer, you were NOT there, nor does you have ANY clue what went on in this incident, proven by your completely made up "timeline". The TEST SERVER IS NOT TRANQUILITY. The loss of a single SHIP is not an issue, nor is anything about it being mentioned here.

All of our HICs were being randomly neuted and would lose point every couple minutes; they were in close to maintain their points. There is also a bumping factor involved, which cannot be done without being at 0 range. Not many people play on SiSi like they do on TQ for the simple fact (as stated above) that losing a ship generally means NOTHING. A couple hundred isk later and you're back out in the same ship.

We've killed quite a large number of capitals on the test server and have only ever been podded this once. It's quite clear that we don't sit in our pods next to other ships just waiting to make a big deal out of it. Mike C broke the "NO PODDING" rules three times in 5 minutes, and you still insist on defending him. We've made it very obvious we weren't responsible for his pressing of the Smartbomb button on his UI, he is, and he is responsible for any rules he breaks whilst using it. Your failure after failure of posts has proven that you have absolutely no idea and no right to make any sort of comment on this incident. Stop making yourself look like a dumbass and put the "Post Reply" button away.

Lucifer's Ghost
Minmatar
Native Fishfood
Posted - 2010.03.31 11:42:00 - [56]
 

Edited by: Lucifer''s Ghost on 31/03/2010 11:51:14
Originally by: Zarthanon
Edited by: Zarthanon on 31/03/2010 11:32:51
Lucifer, you were NOT there, nor does you have ANY clue what went on in this incident, proven by your completely made up "timeline". The TEST SERVER IS NOT TRANQUILITY. The loss of a single SHIP is not an issue, nor is anything about it being mentioned here.

All of our HICs were being randomly neuted and would lose point every couple minutes; they were in close to maintain their points. There is also a bumping factor involved, which cannot be done without being at 0 range. Not many people play on SiSi like they do on TQ for the simple fact (as stated above) that losing a ship generally means NOTHING. A couple hundred isk later and you're back out in the same ship.

We've killed quite a large number of capitals on the test server and have only ever been podded this once. It's quite clear that we don't sit in our pods next to other ships just waiting to make a big deal out of it. Mike C broke the "NO PODDING" rules three times in 5 minutes, and you still insist on defending him. We've made it very obvious we weren't responsible for his pressing of the Smartbomb button on his UI, he is, and he is responsible for any rules he breaks whilst using it. Your failure after failure of posts has proven that you have absolutely no idea and no right to make any sort of comment on this incident. Stop making yourself look like a dumbass and put the "Post Reply" button away.


You are correct I was not there. I did not see what happened. And I am surmising what has happened, based on what I am reading in this thread. If I am wrong, then I am wrong, and you have my apologies, but, can you deny that what has been posted so far can LOOK to be exactly what I have stated here?

Further, can you not see how using pods to exploit a kill would be possible, with the no podding rule on SISI if a pilot were to follow that rule to the letter and stop defending his ship against an attack, because a pod is up against his hull (and the very strong likely hood of people doing exactly that, in exactly the manner I have laid out, considering the type of people that play EVE)?

While you guys may very well be on the straight up, admit to yourselves at the least how fishy it looks from the point of view of a person looking in from the outside.

I will also freely acknowledge that I have little experience in null sec capital ship combat, the only time I have ever come against a capital ship, I flew up, said wow that looks so cool, and discovered my ship did little in the way of protecting me, shortly after I had some dudes staring down at me asking if my clone worked properly.Embarassed


blade190
Posted - 2010.03.31 23:28:00 - [57]
 

IT is your fault. YOU CAN NOT buy SUPER CAPS for 100 isk. You know that. You also said he was multi boxing. Use two monitors or run one. I had the chance to rep yourself also because U WERE IN A CARRIER. your pilot knew he was dieing. switch back warp out or log off and run one. He dd'd the oynx cause it was the only hic that was a threat. We had jam's. Also had the titan not been repped at the pos who know what you would have done. you had 3 mom and a rapier at that pos. You even locked us. You can not deny your pilot was multiuboxing. You can not deny he knew he was dieing. You can not deny he could have been repped by a carrier by taking point off for one second. You had 3 hics. one point off wont matter

Lucifer's Ghost
Minmatar
Native Fishfood
Posted - 2010.04.01 02:35:00 - [58]
 

Anyway all I am saying is...

If it looks like a Duck
Waddles like a Duck
Quacks like a Duck

Chances are, it's a Duck.

It looks like you were trying to exploit the server rules to force a kill
All the evidence points to that being the case

So from my experience with life in general, and the players of EVE in particular, it is most likely exactly what I have said it was and you guys just don't like that it has been pointed out.

But hey, I could always be wrong and the Duck could be a Horse that quacks, waddles, and is mutated to appear to be a duck.Rolling Eyes

Zarthanon
Posted - 2010.04.01 02:53:00 - [59]
 

Originally by: blade190
IT is your fault. YOU CAN NOT buy SUPER CAPS for 100 isk. You know that. You also said he was multi boxing. Use two monitors or run one. I had the chance to rep yourself also because U WERE IN A CARRIER. your pilot knew he was dieing. switch back warp out or log off and run one. He dd'd the oynx cause it was the only hic that was a threat. We had jam's. Also had the titan not been repped at the pos who know what you would have done. you had 3 mom and a rapier at that pos. You even locked us. You can not deny your pilot was multiuboxing. You can not deny he knew he was dieing. You can not deny he could have been repped by a carrier by taking point off for one second. You had 3 hics. one point off wont matter


1. There are no rules about "you must have two monitors", only, "NO PODDING"
2. He didn't know "he was dieing" because HE GOT DOOMSDAYED. It's instant, there's no chance, delay, noticeable issue until it actually happens.
3. Locking people and doing absolutely nothing to them is not grounds for any sort of QQ on your part.
4. You claim you had the other two HIC's jammed when he DDed the Onyx, yet you still go onto say that "on point off won't matter".

Thanks for making it easy.

blade190
Posted - 2010.04.01 03:06:00 - [60]
 

Edited by: blade190 on 01/04/2010 03:15:01
other 2 werent jammed till after guy got dd'd maybe 10-15 sec after. there is a delay of doomsday. once u use DD its a 5 sec delay maybe more before it actually explodes. no matter what u say u can miss a giant laser shooting a small target. He had time to switch. End of it


Pages: 1 [2] 3

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only