open All Channels
seplocked Crime and Punishment
blankseplocked Highsec ganks OOC
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic

Psidal
Posted - 2009.12.28 08:14:00 - [1]
 

Highsec ganks are getting out of control, you can't even manually pilot a tanked T1 hauler anymore without fear of a 1.0 security gate gank. There should be harsher penalties for this sort of criminal behavior, i.e. exponential sec status loss for unprovoked attacks in higher security space.
For instance, if would be criminals initiate an unprovoked attack(someone didn't steal from them, or shoot them first) and destroy a ship in a 1.0 security system they would lose 1.0 from their sec status down to only losing whatever is the current by destroying someone in a 0.5.
This only makes sense according to game mythos as well, considering the "Higher security areas" would have stricter rules and regulations regarding all aspects of space travel and combat.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this would still allow the asshats to be asshats and provide peace of mind for carebears and veterans alike.

iciingdeath
Posted - 2009.12.28 08:28:00 - [2]
 

no

Justin Vint
Posted - 2009.12.28 08:48:00 - [3]
 

welcome to eve online don't cry about campers in high sec... if u dont like it then quit live with it or don't ccp will not do anything to help you about this.... it's part of the game.

Ravenclaw2kk
Minmatar
Blue Republic
Posted - 2009.12.28 10:17:00 - [4]
 

Tank your hauler. don't haul small expensive items in a t1 industrial ship..
Easy

Lady Spank
Amarr
In Praise Of Shadows
Posted - 2009.12.28 10:56:00 - [5]
 

You can spoil their pathetic non-roleplay fun by swearing and screaming in character, thus thwarting their OOC efforts.

Millie Clode
Amarr
Insert Cool Name Here
Posted - 2009.12.28 11:11:00 - [6]
 

yeah CCP should make it so you can't lock another player in highsec or something

TITANONGRID
Posted - 2009.12.28 11:21:00 - [7]
 

moron flying a hauler afk alert

Boomershoot
Caldari
Suddenly Ninjas
Posted - 2009.12.28 12:54:00 - [8]
 

Sorry to spoil it for you OP, but the increased security status drop in higher security areas has been implemented well before dominion.

Hamano Walker
Posted - 2009.12.28 12:59:00 - [9]
 

OP, see last line of sig file for possible workaround. . .

Loqiel
Legio Fortunae
Everto Rex Regis
Posted - 2009.12.28 15:07:00 - [10]
 

Originally by: Psidal
Preeze maek EVE ezer! It iz two hard! I luv Tenderhart teh best!


I love this. Let's just make everything easy and safe and no-risk. While we're at it let's take missiles and guns and armaments out of the game and just have a hug-in. We can all wear pink and purple and sing Kumbaya and hold hands around campfires and make s'mores and pretend it's the 1960s again.

Or not.

Wayward Daughter
Minmatar
Posted - 2009.12.28 15:28:00 - [11]
 

Originally by: Loqiel
Originally by: Psidal
Preeze maek EVE ezer! It iz two hard! I luv Tenderhart teh best!


I love this. Let's just make everything easy and safe and no-risk. While we're at it let's take missiles and guns and armaments out of the game and just have a hug-in. We can all wear pink and purple and sing Kumbaya and hold hands around campfires and make s'mores and pretend it's the 1960s again.

Or not.
No free love for you.

Junko Togawa
Caldari
Posted - 2009.12.28 15:47:00 - [12]
 

Boring troll is boring. Srsly. This whine has been aired too much recently. Plz bring back the scanner nerf whine. It's aged enough, do want to sip at it moar.

Pistrik
Minmatar
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
Posted - 2009.12.28 15:53:00 - [13]
 

Originally by: Loqiel
Originally by: Psidal
Preeze maek EVE ezer! It iz two hard! I luv Tenderhart teh best!


I love this. Let's just make everything easy and safe and no-risk. While we're at it let's take missiles and guns and armaments out of the game and just have a hug-in. We can all wear pink and purple and sing Kumbaya and hold hands around campfires and make s'mores and pretend it's the 1960s again.

Or not.


I want s'mores Sad.

Onimar Synn
Red Federation
Posted - 2009.12.28 16:11:00 - [14]
 

Originally by: Pistrik
Originally by: Loqiel
Originally by: Psidal
Preeze maek EVE ezer! It iz two hard! I luv Tenderhart teh best!


I love this. Let's just make everything easy and safe and no-risk. While we're at it let's take missiles and guns and armaments out of the game and just have a hug-in. We can all wear pink and purple and sing Kumbaya and hold hands around campfires and make s'mores and pretend it's the 1960s again.

Or not.


I want s'mores Sad.



That or some nice stinky cheese, plz! ugh





Originally by: Boomershoot
Sorry to spoil it for you OP, but the increased security status drop in higher security areas has been implemented well before dominion.



Now to feed the troll (inside all of us) Twisted Evil......CCP implemented sliding scale sec hit last year. Sec loss is now based on system sec lvl you're in and the difference between piwate sec status and your pwnyarsebucket.


vOv

Eseay
Posted - 2009.12.28 16:33:00 - [15]
 

simple solution --> stop living in high sec

Discrodia
Gallente
Symbiosis International
Moose Alliance
Posted - 2009.12.28 16:42:00 - [16]
 

Burn in hell.

If you weren't moving expensive stuff in a hauler, no one would attack you.

I usually carry my expensive stuff in a buffer-tanked HAC or BC (At least 100k EHP). It's a novel idea, might wanna try it out.

Benedict Carol
Posted - 2009.12.28 16:56:00 - [17]
 

Originally by: Discrodia
Burn in hell.

If you weren't moving expensive stuff in a hauler, no one would attack you.

I usually carry my expensive stuff in a buffer-tanked HAC or BC (At least 100k EHP). It's a novel idea, might wanna try it out.


Honestly, I'm surprised the salvaging corps haven't latched onto this sort of thing - why there aren't more pilots out there flipping wreck loot and then hauling it away (and/or blowing the hauler alts to hell) is beyond me. It's not like the systems picked for this crap aren't well-known :)


War Kitten
Panda McLegion
Posted - 2009.12.28 17:06:00 - [18]
 

Originally by: Psidal
<whine>...

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this would still allow the asshats to be asshats and provide peace of mind for carebears and veterans alike.


You're wrong.

CCP boosted the sec status hit based on security status of the ganker and the gankee. They also boosted the hit based on system security level. They even adjusted TTC (Time-To-Concordokken) based on system security level.

And the asshats are still asshats, but the carebears have no peace of mind.

The veterans already know what they're doing and were unaffected.

FunzzeR
Legion of the Scottish Fold
Posted - 2009.12.28 17:25:00 - [19]
 

Carebears should never have peace of mind. Cool

Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
Posted - 2009.12.28 17:40:00 - [20]
 

Originally by: Lady Spank
You can spoil their pathetic non-roleplay fun by swearing and screaming in character, thus thwarting their OOC efforts.


I expected alot more replies of this kind.

Left thread disappointed. Crying or Very sad

Schwa88
The Priesthood
The 0rphanage
Posted - 2009.12.28 18:41:00 - [21]
 

Poasting in a troll thread!

Samuel Wess
Posted - 2009.12.28 18:46:00 - [22]
 

Ganking is OK, insurance pay for geting concorded is NOT. I can gank a t2 ship with a t1 insured, get all my isk back, collect modules and profit from salvaging the wrecks. If you mission a lot you can do this every week and have fun.

Mitsune Konno
Posted - 2009.12.28 18:53:00 - [23]
 

Originally by: FunzzeR
Carebears should never have peace of mind. Cool


PRAISE THE SCOTTISH FOLDS!

Nika Dekaia
Posted - 2009.12.28 19:07:00 - [24]
 


Kagan Storm
Caldari
Syndicated Systems
Posted - 2009.12.28 19:34:00 - [25]
 

why couldent the person in the 1st replay just write:

Transport ship that can warp cloaked + t2 cloak = I win button.


Would save us all this garble...

Mitsune Konno
Posted - 2009.12.28 19:57:00 - [26]
 

Originally by: Kagan Storm
why couldent the person in the 1st replay just write:

Transport ship that can warp cloaked + t2 cloak = I win button.


Would save us all this garble...

u forgot the +afk ap.

Shmeria
Posted - 2009.12.28 19:57:00 - [27]
 

Quote:
Ganking is OK, insurance pay for geting concorded is NOT.


This - it lowers the opportunity cost of ganking to nothing.

You .... you could have concord fire on theives if they happened to be in the area....




Dire Radiant
Posted - 2009.12.28 20:06:00 - [28]
 

simple solution, only allow pods in high sec.

Vigo Larcen
Dark Claw Raiders
Posted - 2009.12.28 20:10:00 - [29]
 

Originally by: Dire Radiant
simple solution, only allow pods in high sec.



Give me a full rack of 800s on my pod and you've got yourself a deal, mister!

Lithalnas
Amarr
Privateers
Privateer Alliance
Posted - 2009.12.28 20:11:00 - [30]
 

if you are SOOOOOOOO worried about getting your high value stuff ganked, why not use a frighter for big stuff, t2 for medium stuff, and a Rohk with expanded cargo and a passive buffer tank for the really expensive stuff(BPOs and stuff).

Honestly its not that hard to not get suicide ganked.


Pages: [1] 2 3

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only