open All Channels
seplocked Jita Park Speakers Corner
blankseplocked [Petition ] Reverse changes to Supercarrier
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: first : previous : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... : last (11)

Author Topic

Jon Brutor
Minmatar
Brutor Tribe
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:39:00 - [31]
 

/signed

Seneram
Caldari
Macabre Votum
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:39:00 - [32]
 

If this includes the titan Changes and POSSIBLY the new SB/TSU system for SOV aswell then ill sign

/signed

Grekken
Caldari
Reaper Industries
Eternal Rapture
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:40:00 - [33]
 

/signed

Banlish
Gallente
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
Atlas.
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:40:00 - [34]
 

/Signed.

Please, we need something past carriers and dreads worth flying that don't cost 60b...

malet
FinFleet
Raiden.
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:41:00 - [35]
 

signed

Jula fo'machid
Atlas Holdings
Atlas Alliance
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:42:00 - [36]
 

/Signed!

PolePuffer
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:43:00 - [37]
 

/Signed

HunterHH
Caldari
Macabre Votum
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:43:00 - [38]
 

/signed

Dastycakes
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:43:00 - [39]
 

Wait isnt it supposed to be a SUPER CARRIER? With the price change, it costs 3-4 times more than a dread. In theory it should then do 3-4 times the damage. The ewar bonus is almost useless with how many dictors and heavy dictors there are in eve. I cant tell you the last time my thanatos wasnt stuck in a bubble during a fight.

Also will the current mothership pilots be reimbursed the 10 billion extra they payed for the ship? I think this would be fair and NO i am not a mothership pilot. I was hopeing to be one day but you have succesfully killed that dream aswell as many others i had.

Dominion was supposed to give us hope, now it gives us a reason to quit this game.

Von Seth
Gallente
Burning Napalm
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:44:00 - [40]
 

/signed

ElvenLord
4S Corporation
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:44:00 - [41]
 

/signed

Intense Thinker
Minmatar
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:44:00 - [42]
 

Nerf em!!! Nerf em harder!!!!

Sarah Norbulk
Dawn of a new Empire
The Initiative.
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:45:00 - [43]
 

/signed

Protesting changes on the test server to the CSM rather than the Devs who can actually change it.

Zanthar Eos
Caldari
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:45:00 - [44]
 

/signed

Jaquen H'gar
Mothers of EVE
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:45:00 - [45]
 

/signed

Lord Iluvatar
4S Corporation
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:45:00 - [46]
 

/signed

Lord Vaevictis
Destructive Influence
IT Alliance
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:45:00 - [47]
 

/Signed

This sucks....

KUNG'FU BOSANAC
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:46:00 - [48]
 

/signed

ED209
Science Experts
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:47:00 - [49]
 

/signed

GregorEisenhorn
Amarr
Khanid Secret Service
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:47:00 - [50]
 

Edited by: GregorEisenhorn on 12/11/2009 22:47:54
/signed


Also, this.
"Dominion was supposed to give us hope, now it gives us a reason to quit this game."

P.S.: Attention CCP; locking a relevant thread for irrelevance is a *edit*STUPID move. FYI a petition against momship nerf is FEEDBACK in the TESTSERVER CHANGES because it tells you how many of us are effing *edit*ANGRY at your incompetence. You continue to disappoint us with your terribad customer service. Have a nice day burning in hell with the Vista programmers.

Saul Reaver
Oberon Incorporated
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:49:00 - [51]
 

Edited by: Saul Reaver on 12/11/2009 22:49:48
/Signed. CCP, I urge you not to go through with this change.
There will be no point in owning a "Supercarrier" with these changes.
I may aswell just go buy a carrier. Much cheaper with same DPS.

SamtheDog
Singularity.
Talon Alliance
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:49:00 - [52]
 

For a new role to be designed to be a capital killer, this seems incredibly short-sighted and ill thought out. Nerfing the ships will only result in the same tactics of old w/o the realm of other aspects of pvp. I can see a whole gang of motherships in the future being nearly unstoppable, but what can you expect from a user base with an above average IQ?

We will adapt of course, but in a compromise, if they refuse to give us +3 fighters...perhaps +2 would be acceptable. To be on par with a common carrier is somewhat insulting.

Sam

Rockhead Rumple
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:50:00 - [53]
 

Edited by: Rockhead Rumple on 12/11/2009 22:50:01
Originally by: Dastycakes
Wait isnt it supposed to be a SUPER CARRIER? With the price change, it costs 3-4 times more than a dread. In theory it should then do 3-4 times the damage.



Oh yes while we're at it, shouldn't my Raven do 2500 times the damage of my Cormorant??? DO IT OR ELSE I'LL SMEAR VERBAL DIARRHEA ALL OVER THE FORUM KTHX

Kris Longknife
The Arrow Project
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:51:00 - [54]
 

Signed

Save Ferris

Mundem Pashdale
Sacred Templars
Black Star Alliance
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:51:00 - [55]
 

/signed

Gimora
Minmatar
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:52:00 - [56]
 

/signed

Galen Zarek
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:55:00 - [57]
 

/signed

Ceirah
SniggWaffe
GoonSwarm
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:55:00 - [58]
 

/Signed

Jonathan Dawnchaser
Caldari
Profit Chasing llc
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:55:00 - [59]
 

Originally by: SamtheDog
For a new role to be designed to be a capital killer, this seems incredibly short-sighted and ill thought out. Nerfing the ships will only result in the same tactics of old w/o the realm of other aspects of pvp. I can see a whole gang of motherships in the future being nearly unstoppable, but what can you expect from a user base with an above average IQ?

We will adapt of course, but in a compromise, if they refuse to give us +3 fighters...perhaps +2 would be acceptable. To be on par with a common carrier is somewhat insulting.

Sam
I was trying to not get involved with this thread because it should've been posted to the Assembly Hall.

1. A nerf to Fighter dps doesn't nerf a Carrier's/Supercarrier's ability to kill capital ships anymore. CCP is introducing new Fighter Bombers (Bomber Fighters? Bombers?) for that purpose.

2. My suspicion is that the adjustments to Fighters is going to be accompanied by more tracking so that they can better engage cruisers. In this way Fighters are for sub caps and bombers are for caps.

Adam Ridgway
Minmatar
Posted - 2009.11.12 22:55:00 - [60]
 

Better yet, "[Issue] CCP stop being jerks and play your game/listen to playerbase"? Or "[Issue] Devs too incompetent, time to fire em"? Not only supercap changes are stupid, but a lot of the changes/additions in new sov & upgrade system, is moronic.

/signed.


Pages: first : previous : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... : last (11)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only