Posted - 2009.09.23 18:18:00 - [62]

 

Originally by: Dasfry

---

Edited by: Dasfry on 23/09/2009 18:07:29

It also adds a bit of tactics and fore thought requirement.

---

Oh like undock, warp to belt, go afk, shoot rat, mine rock?

Posted - 2009.09.23 20:40:00 - [64]

 

Originally by: Dasfry

---

Edited by: Dasfry on 23/09/2009 18:07:29
I support the idea of fuel, for cloaking.

You could make it something small.
I does not have to take up a lot of space m3.

It also adds a bit of tactics and fore thought requirement.

Do I have enough cloak-fuel to scout all the systems on my list?
Where would be my nearest refueling stop, in order to continue my objective?

---

CVA pet detected!

Posted - 2009.09.24 06:47:00 - [66]

 

Edited by: Hirana Yoshida on 24/09/2009 06:53:02

Originally by: darius mclever

---

[CVA pet detected!

---

Wrong forum, dear. I think you wanted COAD one tick up.

There is no need to introduce fuel for cloaks when we already have the capacitor to build on.

Make cloaks draw a constant amount while operating with CovOps drawing considerably less to allow for extended cloaked operations.
Combine it with capacitors not recharging while cloaked (including gate cloak) and people have to decloak once in a while to recharge.
No more cloaked Ravens, Capitals, AFK'ers .. with new probes the small window is more than adequate for a hit provided you have a general location of victim/client/hostile.

Removing local wouldn't make sense as CCP has used the gates internal communications as a reason for local in their WH fiction .. where gates exists, local exists.
Would be nice if null-sec was delayed though. A three to four minute delay applicable to all parties with a sovereignty holder able to online a module to cut it in half for "his side" .. not safe, but safer.

Posted - 2009.09.24 08:19:00 - [68]

 

Originally by: Ephemeron

---

I would support this idea if local channel was also removed

no more 23/7 intel

---

This and also remove local in highsec.

Posted - 2009.09.24 12:02:00 - [70]

 

Edited by: Tiger''s Spirit on 24/09/2009 12:03:38

Originally by: Uzuki Shootmenow

---

not supported. deal with cloakers. grow some balls.

---

Cloakers have balls ?
Everyone knows, the story is not the AFK cloak and everyone know the 0.0 players why dont wanna changes.
Who using them ? Pilots who using cloak for belt ratting, for anomaly, for plexing in 0.0. Cloak on Ishtar,Cloak on ceptor,cloak on everything lol in 0.0.
Oh yes. They using cloak and they cry a river against CCP and players who want to change the cloak MWD tricks, AFK cloak, cloak on not cloak user ship rules. Better if you don't speak from balls and don't speak the other 0.0 coward lurker.
This cloak rules need to change. Want to use cloak ? Do it! If you sit in covops or recon, but forget it, if you fly with a HAC.