open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [Issue] Faction Warfare lag needs fixing NOW
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic

Foolish Bob
Caldari
The Dirty Rotten Scoundrels
HYDRA RELOADED
Posted - 2009.05.14 14:57:00 - [1]
 

With yet another 20 vs 20 fight lagged to buggery, I call shenanigans! This was supposed to have been fixed months ago, and now since the last patch but one it seems it's back every bit as bad as before. Reporting it in issues goes un-noticed apparently so make your marks here if you're fed up with this.

Foolish Bob
Caldari
The Dirty Rotten Scoundrels
HYDRA RELOADED
Posted - 2009.05.14 14:57:00 - [2]
 


Vedro M
Posted - 2009.05.14 15:00:00 - [3]
 


Laerise
Amarr
PIE Inc.

Posted - 2009.05.14 15:00:00 - [4]
 

Supported, seriously, you can fix it in 0.0, fix in lowsec as well. Neutral

Astrum Latito
Posted - 2009.05.14 15:02:00 - [5]
 

I agree whole heartedly, it's sad when tactics etc are nul and void because you have to relog to get rid of lag issues in the middle of the battle.

Anon Amarr
Amarr
Project Orchid
Posted - 2009.05.14 15:05:00 - [6]
 

Signed. less than 50 ships shouldnt be "too much"

Veshta Yoshida
Amarr
PIE Inc.

Posted - 2009.05.14 15:07:00 - [7]
 

Lag in the warzones is beyond ludicrous levels. Something definitely has to be done.

Billatron
The Imperial Fedaykin

Posted - 2009.05.14 15:07:00 - [8]
 

Needs to be fixed - supported

Fallen Aurora
Posted - 2009.05.14 15:09:00 - [9]
 

Totally agree this amount of lag in small 20 vs 20 engagements is un workable. Please fix it. I love FW but the lag hurts :(

Jadetiger1
Posted - 2009.05.14 15:11:00 - [10]
 

I agree, totally bull****. And keep Capital ships out of FW.

Nur AlHuda
Amarr
Callide Vulpis
Posted - 2009.05.14 15:13:00 - [11]
 

This was not the first time it happened and lags is working against big and also small fleets. Evil or Very Mad


Dr Bjerring
Absinthe Brothers
Posted - 2009.05.14 16:39:00 - [12]
 

Lag in the warzones is beyond ludicrous levels. Something definitely has to be done

BattleStar Crusader
Amarr
Absinthe Brothers

Posted - 2009.05.14 16:39:00 - [13]
 

Fix it or alot of people will quite eve. Thise proves that you lack the abilitiy to help you customers. bad customer services and worthy of report to the authorities.

Colaxais
Vae Victis.
Posted - 2009.05.14 16:39:00 - [14]
 

Signed.

Astria Tiphareth
Caldari
24th Imperial Crusade

Posted - 2009.05.14 16:41:00 - [15]
 

Agreed. Signing on principle. That said, this thread does highlight that they're aware of the problem.

Zenton Karvash
Amarr
Ryn Incorporated
Posted - 2009.05.14 16:42:00 - [16]
 

Agreed

macsimum
24th Imperial Crusade

Posted - 2009.05.14 16:43:00 - [17]
 

signed.

lucifers widow
United Front Alliance renting corp

Posted - 2009.05.14 22:14:00 - [18]
 

Originally by: Foolish Bob
With yet another 20 vs 20 fight lagged to buggery, I call shenanigans!


Same here, seemed to be fixed for a week or so then reverted back again, they trying to make all leave fw for 0.0 combat ( they pretty much said so themselves ).

Surely at the least they can re-enforce they busier fw systems ie Kourm-Auga-Dal-Rens-Ammake-Vard etc on the Amarr Vs Min and pets (Sf) war

fishblades
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2009.05.14 23:07:00 - [19]
 

I dont get it, how is faction warfare any different than 0.0 PvP. We have fights in the 200-300 range and its playable.

Erick Voliffe
Wrath of Fenris

Posted - 2009.05.25 15:50:00 - [20]
 

If i remember correctly lag wasn't this bad when FW started and the fleets were bigger. What happen the hardware running the zones degrade badly or something? I can't believe ccp is letting something really good for the average player fade away.

Serpens Sol
Posted - 2009.05.25 16:22:00 - [21]
 

/signed

Hun Jakuza
We Are So Troubled Everyone Runs Screaming
Posted - 2009.05.26 07:34:00 - [22]
 

/Signed

CCP move their server capacity of 95% to 0.0 space.
High and low sec unplayable when the fleets reach 40+ members.
We want playing too 20 vs 20 fight,so we need more few nods to FW spaces.

Lissome Elan
Gunship Diplomacy

Posted - 2009.05.26 09:07:00 - [23]
 

Signed.

Ankhesentapemkah
Gallente
Posted - 2009.05.26 10:33:00 - [24]
 

Raised this issue a month ago, and it was voted down by the current CSM, as they didn't consider it important enough.

Once Erik gets elected, I'm sure he'll make a second issue of this and take it with him to Iceland though, if it doesn't get voted down by ignorant CSM again. Rolling Eyes

Tiger's Spirit
Caldari
Posted - 2009.05.26 10:38:00 - [25]
 

Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
Raised this issue a month ago, and it was voted down by the current CSM, as they didn't consider it important enough.

Once Erik gets elected, I'm sure he'll make a second issue of this and take it with him to Iceland though, if it doesn't get voted down by ignorant CSM again. Rolling Eyes


Lol. CSM against FW support ?
What a hell ? Why ? Because FW fix need hardwares from 0.0 ????
I guess CSM work for players not for against.

And yes +1 signed against FW lag.

Ankhesentapemkah
Gallente
Posted - 2009.05.26 10:53:00 - [26]
 

Originally by: Tiger's Spirit
Lol. CSM against FW support ?
What a hell ? Why ? Because FW fix need hardwares from 0.0 ????
I guess CSM work for players not for against.

And yes +1 signed against FW lag.

Because none of the other CSM have much of a clue about FW besides what I told them, and because they believe it when CCP said "we're working on fixing the lag", despite FW players seeing no results for the past 5 months.

The thing that bothers me is that some FW still don't want to vote for the CSM (Erik and Heartstone are the FW candidates, with Erik having my preference) and thus yet another batch of 0.0 hobo's are likely to get voted in. Don't expect any FW issues to be raised if that happens.

Dr BattleSmith
PAX Interstellar Services

Posted - 2009.05.27 02:22:00 - [27]
 

FW is where it's at!

Wake up CCP!

Becq Starforged
Minmatar Ship Construction Services
Ushra'Khan
Posted - 2009.05.27 02:27:00 - [28]
 

I think it's more accurate to say that FW is where it could be ... if CCP paid more attention to the unfortunate problems that currently plague it.

Erik Finnegan
Gallente
Polytechnique Gallenteenne

Posted - 2009.05.30 06:55:00 - [29]
 

FW needs boost. I am baffled to what lengths we are willing to go in the struggle to "fix" FW. Now we are suggesting CCP the right server layout ? Oh my God. You know, if CCP were attributing the right level of attention to FW then they would well be able to fix hardware issues related to FW.

What I want the other CSM, and eventually CCP, to understand is the end-game potential which FW has. Once the vision is big enough and shared, resources will flow to it.

Thumbs up to every FW issue on the board!

TraininVain
Posted - 2009.05.30 08:39:00 - [30]
 

Thumbs up.

I dunno if this has been worked on (I think I've seen less desyncs) or if it's just a general low-sec issue but w/e it still gets unacceptably laggy when anything resembling a fight happens.


Pages: [1] 2

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only