open All Channels
seplocked EVE Technology Lab
blankseplocked [POLL] Do you want the ingame browser to become better
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: first : previous : ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 : last (17)

Author Topic

TheOldBrutos
Yarrbear Inc.
Posted - 2009.07.20 18:52:00 - [451]
 

Edited by: TheOldBrutos on 20/07/2009 18:53:30
There is bigger problems than this one, it is a waste of time Neutral

Definitively NO






Theocidic
Posted - 2009.07.21 03:44:00 - [452]
 

There are a couple of unfinished ideas and systems that need to be changed/updated in EVE. More and more levels are thrown onto CCP's skysc****r but sometimes without reinforcing the structure. Therefore this is one feature that needs working, but in my opinion not the most crucial. I don't agree that they should do this first, but it needs to be done. Even though I love all the cool stuff that comes with new expansions, it would be nice if CCP put a few extra guys on fixing bugs and reworking game mechanics.

Lord Fitz
Project Amargosa
Posted - 2009.07.27 15:06:00 - [453]
 

The problem with improving the IGB is that it's so bad at the moment, everyone I know uses windowed mode Eve and another browser anyway. Given it's probably not going to be improved to the point that it's an 'actual' browser with all the features you will find in other browsers (javascript / flash etc, improving it may actually be counter productive as there may actually then be pressure to write pages that work in-game because you know, people might use it....

Altierok
Posted - 2009.07.27 21:19:00 - [454]
 

I would love a faster IGB. Please, please make it faster!

Please and Thank you.

Altierok

Windryder
Posted - 2009.07.28 07:59:00 - [455]
 

I would love a better IGB.

BUT -

I don't want it to become a security hole that can be used to gank my box or my login data.


Rawbin Hood
Gallente
Center for Advanced Studies
Posted - 2009.07.28 16:35:00 - [456]
 

would be nice but... but let CCP deal with real problems first on a list of 10,000,000,000 i would rate this 45,000, and i've seen it work great when the coder of the page knows what to do.

besides **** makes you go blind... jk

No

Presidential
Posted - 2009.07.29 11:47:00 - [457]
 

Didn't read the whole thread, but I would love to see this improved. Would make playing eve a lot more enjoyable for me anyway. On my dual monitor desktop it's no biggie, but I also play on my netbook, where it would be really helpful.

Che Biko
Humanitarian Communists
Posted - 2009.07.29 19:41:00 - [458]
 

Yes....duh.

Kempeth
Gallente
Posted - 2009.08.05 09:08:00 - [459]
 

Edited by: Kempeth on 05/08/2009 09:09:39
*signed in blood*

Developing any kind of site for the IGB is more frustrating than for IE. On top of that the IGB is ridiculously slow making it useless for anything other than primitive lists and even there you're probably better off printing the stuff out...

It's been in this pityful state for years now. Please - If you can't make the existing browser run adequately then take some third party engine like webkit or gecko...

HunterVolCh SPb
Amarr
STAR CONTROL.
Posted - 2009.08.05 19:41:00 - [460]
 

Yes, we need it

DeMichael Crimson
Minmatar
Republic University
Posted - 2009.08.09 09:51:00 - [461]
 

Most definitely needs to be done ASAP.

My vote is a very loud YES.

Arcelios Lartont
Caldari
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
Posted - 2009.08.10 00:56:00 - [462]
 

Please, CCP? It would generate more web development aimed at the EVE IGB.

omgdutch2005
Gallente
Advanced Planetary Exports
Intergalactic Exports Group
Posted - 2009.08.10 22:03:00 - [463]
 

bring it up front at fanfest!

Jitabug
Caldari
Viva POS Pinata
Posted - 2009.08.13 18:41:00 - [464]
 

MOAR POWAH TO TEH BROWZAR CAP'N!

valorous warior
Amarr
Posted - 2009.08.14 09:33:00 - [465]
 

NO WE SHOULD ALL SUFFER THE CRA*Y IGB

Tonto Auri
Vhero' Multipurpose Corp
Posted - 2009.08.14 14:16:00 - [466]
 

Originally by: Shaun Klaroh
Improve or Replace the IGB. It's practically useless now.

Other options: Automatically append the "Shellexec:" portion to any URL (Dangerous!)


I'm more interested in allowing the shellexec: protocol to work with https and ftp links. Right now it only works with http, as i'm aware.

Originally by: Aastarius
Personally I'd just like the IGB removed.

Why develop something that is never going to be as featured as a true browser and is simply adding to DB bloat, and lag?

Originally by: Lady Doreen
NO

Using the ingame browser only means to increase the lag of the EVE client.

IMHO a separate browser offers more speed, reliability (also for the game) and features.

But I wouldn't want the internal to be removed, because for some things you still require it.



How could external browser be aware of your ingame character status, location - all other stuff IGB sends to trusted sites? Don't be stupid, will you?

Originally by: Mayobe
The IGB doesn't communicate with the EVE server at all. Also it is modular in nature and therefore does not cause lag or any other problems for the rest of the client.


You partly right, but that means you partly wrong at the same time. IGB, as any other window in EVE client, taking in threads of EVE client interface processing, it is by application design and this is not yet resolved. Nothing in interface rendering work asyncronously. This is most part that needs fix. I mean, how could adding simple layer (brackets) induce insane lags? It's so SIMPLE, it's ****in' single texture placed in front of scene... just unbelievable...

Tonto Auri
Vhero' Multipurpose Corp
Posted - 2009.08.14 14:18:00 - [467]
 

Originally by: Rawbin Hood
would be nice but... but let CCP deal with real problems first on a list of 10,000,000,000 i would rate this 45,000, and i've seen it work great when the coder of the page knows what to do.

besides **** makes you go blind... jk

No



Real problem is threading model in EVE client. IGB in itself not that bad, even if slow. But when it's speed taking over client speed, whole client became unresponsible.

CCP Explorer

Posted - 2009.08.14 22:40:00 - [468]
 


Rilwar
BlackStar Industrial
Posted - 2009.08.15 23:53:00 - [469]
 

Edited by: Rilwar on 25/10/2009 15:17:14
Originally by: CCP Explorer
Here are the plans and the discussion.
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO \o/

Vorononv Circut
The Maverick Navy
IT Alliance
Posted - 2009.08.16 06:27:00 - [470]
 

Yes, CCP, you guys are awesome.

Makhar
Independent Miners Guild
Guild Alliance
Posted - 2009.08.17 23:17:00 - [471]
 


Herr Esiq
Amarr
Cube Zombie Consortium
Posted - 2009.08.23 09:57:00 - [472]
 

Do want! /signed

Vinev
Minmatar
German Kings
Majesta Empire
Posted - 2009.08.26 17:24:00 - [473]
 

/signed

Holy Cheater
Monks of War
DarkSide.
Posted - 2009.08.27 14:32:00 - [474]
 

I'd be happy if it would be possible to open links in normal (OOG) browser just by clicking them.

Graul
Amarr
Lonely Maple Prospecting Group
Lonely Maple Conglomeration
Posted - 2009.09.02 16:15:00 - [475]
 


Sinaroma
Posted - 2009.09.05 00:46:00 - [476]
 

umm yea

Workin Gal
Posted - 2009.09.17 01:53:00 - [477]
 

This would help as long as it doesn't decrease client performance.

Originally by: Makhar
Please visit your user settings to re-enable images.

Dr BattleSmith
PAX Interstellar Services
Posted - 2009.09.17 04:08:00 - [478]
 

Edited by: Dr BattleSmith on 17/09/2009 04:13:15
I, like all internet users, prefer to use the browser of my choice.

Some choose IE, some choose FF, some torture themselves with Safari or Chrome.

They choose.

Seeing the IGB will always be crap, even with buying 3rd party tech... I'd prefer it was removed.

Instead greater flexibility would be gained by creating a shell extension "eve://" which
would pipe things like showinfo: from any browser into the eve client for display.

Instead of making us use a bad IGB, let us choose our favourite browser and use that instead.

Originally by: Tonto Auri
How could external browser be aware of your ingame character status, location - all other stuff IGB sends to trusted sites? Don't be stupid, will you?


Easy. oAuth.

Shared secret token based remote site auth that doesn't require your login credentials.


Kyrinth
Posted - 2009.09.18 17:56:00 - [479]
 

I agree, a better ingame browser would be great... especially if it could render advanced stuff with ajax features.

There are so many possibilities if this was done that currently can only be achieved in a regular browser or win32 app.

Dragonaire
Caldari
Corax.
PURgE Alliance
Posted - 2009.09.19 16:03:00 - [480]
 

For those of you that haven't caught up to the fact that they have already decided on what they are going to do at CCP you might want to look at this thread http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1180295
The whole should or shouldn't has already been decided and in general what is going to be included or not is also decided now they just want input and testers for what they are working on.


Pages: first : previous : ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 : last (17)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only