open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked No subject
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

Nuela
Posted - 2008.08.29 18:19:00 - [1]
 

Edited by: Nuela on 29/08/2008 18:19:35
Deleted

Benco97
Gallente
Terraprobe Dynamics
Posted - 2008.08.29 18:20:00 - [2]
 

Incoming Forum-Crabs! (You know who you are)

Jim McGregor
Posted - 2008.08.29 18:20:00 - [3]
 

Edited by: Jim McGregor on 29/08/2008 18:21:24
Originally by: Nuela
Edited by: Nuela on 29/08/2008 18:19:35
Deleted


No its not. Wink

Jana Clant
New Dawn Corp
New Eden Research.
Posted - 2008.08.29 18:22:00 - [4]
 

Originally by: Benco97
Incoming Forum-Crabs! (You know who you are)


Sad

Crumplecorn
Gallente
Eve Cluster Explorations
Posted - 2008.08.29 18:28:00 - [5]
 

Having arrived in this thread I find that the original poster has, through mistake or intentional act, given it neither a title nor text. Given this, one's first reaction is to believe this a pointless thread which should simply be ignored, or perhaps looked in on from time to time lest the original poster return and edit their original post to reflect the intended content, assuming (per the above caveat) that any content was indeed intended at any time.

However, having followed repetitively the pattern of following a chain of discussion started by the content in the original post to the point where there is a near Pavlovian response when faced with a new thread to bring to mind the relevant ideas and thoughts, I find that being faced with a contentless original post brings to mind only a sense of freedom to discuss whatever passing thought might come to mind at this particular moment.

So, contrary to the original inclination to ignore or merely infrequently revisit this thread, I instead feel compelled to post a response related to the myriad disconnected thoughts brought to mind by the sudden exposure to a hitherto directionless thread.

On this particular occasion the first thought to come to my mind was the suggestion by another poster, whose name I regrettably cannot recall at this time, in another thread which suggested that the forum populace should be restricted through force of moderation to detailed constructive posts, which would be of no less than one sentence and containing content valid enough to be deemed acceptable by aforementioned moderators.
The reason that this particular memory came to mind is that, in my experience, threads lacking an opening post, such as this one, are frequently subjected to responses which fail to meet one or even both of these criteria, more so even than the standard threads which typically appear within General Discussion. It was due to this that I considered: what would be the result if someone were to, rather than posting a typical succinct reply, obey these suggested regulations as if they were actually being enforced?

Unfortunately, it is unlikely there will be time to consider the ramifications of such an act, as threads lacking content in the opening post violate forum regulations which currently are very much in effect, and so I predict that in the near future a moderator will appear and close this thread to prevent the continuation of the previously discussed unwanted responses to an empty opening post.

Benco97
Gallente
Terraprobe Dynamics
Posted - 2008.08.29 18:31:00 - [6]
 

Originally by: Crumplecorn
Having arrived in this thread I find that the original poster has, through mistake or intentional act, given it neither a title nor text. Given this, one's first reaction is to believe this a pointless thread which should simply be ignored, or perhaps looked in on from time to time lest the original poster return and edit their original post to reflect the intended content, assuming (per the above caveat) that any content was indeed intended at any time.

However, having followed repetitively the pattern of following a chain of discussion started by the content in the original post to the point where there is a near Pavlovian response when faced with a new thread to bring to mind the relevant ideas and thoughts, I find that being faced with a contentless original post brings to mind only a sense of freedom to discuss whatever passing thought might come to mind at this particular moment.

So, contrary to the original inclination to ignore or merely infrequently revisit this thread, I instead feel compelled to post a response related to the myriad disconnected thoughts brought to mind by the sudden exposure to a hitherto directionless thread.

On this particular occasion the first thought to come to my mind was the suggestion by another poster, whose name I regrettably cannot recall at this time, in another thread which suggested that the forum populace should be restricted through force of moderation to detailed constructive posts, which would be of no less than one sentence and containing content valid enough to be deemed acceptable by aforementioned moderators.
The reason that this particular memory came to mind is that, in my experience, threads lacking an opening post, such as this one, are frequently subjected to responses which fail to meet one or even both of these criteria, more so even than the standard threads which typically appear within General Discussion. It was due to this that I considered: what would be the result if someone were to, rather than posting a typical succinct reply, obey these suggested regulations as if they were actually being enforced?

Unfortunately, it is unlikely there will be time to consider the ramifications of such an act, as threads lacking content in the opening post violate forum regulations which currently are very much in effect, and so I predict that in the near future a moderator will appear and close this thread to prevent the continuation of the previously discussed unwanted responses to an empty opening post.


Have I ever told you I love you?.. Embarassed

Nuela
Posted - 2008.08.29 18:32:00 - [7]
 

OMG I've created a monster!

Jim McGregor
Posted - 2008.08.29 18:45:00 - [8]
 

Originally by: Nuela
OMG I've created a monster!


If you have five dollars and Chuck Norris has five dollars, Chuck Norris has more money than you.

There is no 'ctrl' button on Chuck Norris's computer. Chuck Norris is always in control.

Apple pays Chuck Norris 99 cents every time he listens to a song.

Chuck Norris can sneeze with his eyes open.

Chuck Norris can eat just one Lay's potato chip.

Chuck Norris is suing Myspace for taking the name of what he calls everything around you.

Chuck Norris destroyed the periodic table, because he only recognizes the element of surprise.

Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one bird.

Benco97
Gallente
Terraprobe Dynamics
Posted - 2008.08.29 18:48:00 - [9]
 

Originally by: Jim McGregor
Chuck Norris destroyed the periodic table, because he only recognizes the element of surprise.


I actually winced as I read this line.

Sheriff Jones
Amarr
Clinical Experiment
Posted - 2008.08.29 20:09:00 - [10]
 

Edited by: Sheriff Jones on 29/08/2008 20:11:35
Originally by: Nuela
OMG I've created a monster!


...cuz nobody wants to see Jones no more they want Teddy, I'm delicacy liver.
well if you want Teddy, this is what I'll give ya.
A little bit of drop mixed with some quafe liquor,
some blue pills that'll jumpstart my POD quicker then a
shock when I get shocked at the FO by the FC when I'm not cooperating,
when I'm warping around while he's operating! Hey!

You posted this long, now stop debating cuz I'm back,
I'm on the KB and letterspewing.
I know that you got a problem Ms. Trolling, but your husbands fleet problem's complicating!
So the FC see? Wont let me be, or let me be me, so let me see.
they tried to ban me out on the G.D. but it feels so empty without me!

So come on to my ship, gun on my hips, **** that,
bring all your ships and lemme have grips,
and get ready cuz, this drone's about to get heavy,
I just finished all my mission so **** YOU MINNIES!

(chorus)
Now this looks like a thread for me,
so everybody, just qoute on me.
cuz we need a little controversy,
cuz it feels so empty without me! Very Happy

(simple quote got a bit out of hand Embarassed)

Dirk Magnum
Blue Republic
RvB - BLUE Republic
Posted - 2008.08.29 20:13:00 - [11]
 

Have to post in every one of these threads.

Lothros Andastar
Gallente
Posted - 2008.08.29 20:16:00 - [12]
 

This was a triumph.
I'm making a note here:
HUGE SUCCESS.
It's hard to overstate
my satisfaction.
Aperture Science
We do what we must
because we can.
For the good of all of us.
Except the ones who are dead.
But there's no sense crying
over every mistake.
You just keep on trying
till you run out of cake.
And the Science gets done.
And you make a neat gun.
For the people who are
still alive.


I'm not even angry.
I'm being so sincere right now.
Even though you broke my heart.
And killed me.
And tore me to pieces.
And threw every piece into a fire.
As they burned it hurt because
I was so happy for you!
Now these points of data
make a beautiful line.
And we're out of beta.
We're releasing on time.
So I'm GLaD. I got burned.
Think of all the things we learned
for the people who are
still alive.

Go ahead and leave me.
I think i prefer to stay inside.
maybe you'll find someone else
to help you.
maybe Black Mesa...
THAT WAS A JOKE, HA HA, FAT CHANCE.
Anyway this cake is great.
It's so delicious and moist
look at me still talking when theres science to do
when i look out there
it makes me glad I'm not you
i've experiments to run
there is research to be done
on the people who are
still alive.


and believe me I am still alive
I'm doing science and I'm still alive
i feel fantastic and I'm still alive
while your dying ill be still alive
and when your dead i will be still alive
still alive
still alive

Syringe
Incura
Posted - 2008.08.29 20:27:00 - [13]
 

Originally by: Nuela
Edited by: Nuela on 29/08/2008 18:19:35
Deleted


Hmm... I see your point there.

Dirk Magnum
Blue Republic
RvB - BLUE Republic
Posted - 2008.08.29 21:11:00 - [14]
 

Posting again to see my awesome new corp ticker. Cool

Jana Clant
New Dawn Corp
New Eden Research.
Posted - 2008.08.29 22:05:00 - [15]
 

Originally by: Dirk Magnum
Posting again to see my awesome new corp ticker. Cool


Corp tickers don't show on forums, you silly, only corp names.Razz

Dirk Magnum
Blue Republic
RvB - BLUE Republic
Posted - 2008.08.29 22:07:00 - [16]
 

Edited by: Dirk Magnum on 29/08/2008 22:06:58
Yeah whatever I've had just about enough of people pointing out the egregious falsehoods and inaccuracies that I post on an hourly basis tbh. Mad

Blane Xero
Amarr
The Firestorm Cartel
Posted - 2008.08.29 22:43:00 - [17]
 

Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Nuela
OMG I've created a monster!


If you have five dollars and Chuck Norris has five dollars, Chuck Norris has more money than you.

There is no 'ctrl' button on Chuck Norris's computer. Chuck Norris is always in control.

Apple pays Chuck Norris 99 cents every time he listens to a song.

Chuck Norris can sneeze with his eyes open.

Chuck Norris can eat just one Lay's potato chip.

Chuck Norris is suing Myspace for taking the name of what he calls everything around you.

Chuck Norris destroyed the periodic table, because he only recognizes the element of surprise.

Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one bird.
~

Chuck Norris can Slam revolving Doors

Chuck Norris can punch a Cyclops between the eyes.

Jana Clant
New Dawn Corp
New Eden Research.
Posted - 2008.08.29 23:26:00 - [18]
 

Originally by: Dirk Magnum
Edited by: Dirk Magnum on 29/08/2008 22:06:58
Yeah whatever I've had just about enough of people pointing out the egregious falsehoods and inaccuracies that I post on an hourly basis tbh. Mad


*giggles*


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only