open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [ISSUE] Lowsec is Lowsec
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic

Boma Airaken
Seekers of a Silent Paradise
Posted - 2008.08.06 09:57:00 - [1]
 

I am sure I do not need to go into detail here. 0.4 is lowsec. Make it so. There is absolutely no reason why charters, standings, and anchoring activity should be any different than 0.3.


Treelox
Posted - 2008.08.06 10:27:00 - [2]
 

dont forget you cant get moon poo in a .4



I support this.

I do remeber someone once telling me that the RP explanation was that .4s were a sort of no mans land between high sec and low sec, so all the problems of both and non of the advantages. Not sure if that was the vision that CCP had, but I find 0.4s differences from a .3 silly.

Belmarduk
Amarr
Imperial Shipment

Posted - 2008.08.06 10:41:00 - [3]
 

/signed

Pwett
QUANT Corp.
QUANT Hegemony
Posted - 2008.08.06 15:26:00 - [4]
 

signed

Tchell Dahhn
Suddenly Ninjas
Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
Posted - 2008.08.06 15:29:00 - [5]
 

Edited by: Tchell Dahhn on 06/08/2008 15:29:12

Supporting in a thread where the words "moon poo" are used.

Very Happy

Korin Veecolectus
Caldari
Yurai-Tenshin Zaibatsu
Celestial Imperative
Posted - 2008.08.07 03:25:00 - [6]
 

Edited by: Korin Veecolectus on 07/08/2008 07:03:59
/signed

Rika I
Caldari
Tomoe Laboratories
Celestial Imperative
Posted - 2008.08.07 03:26:00 - [7]
 

Originally by: Boma Airaken
I am sure I do not need to go into detail here. 0.4 is lowsec. Make it so. There is absolutely no reason why charters, standings, moon mining, reactions, assigning fighters, and anchoring activity should be any different than 0.3.




Fixed Wink

Boma Airaken
Seekers of a Silent Paradise
Posted - 2008.08.07 04:09:00 - [8]
 

Yeah I forgot moon poo and reacting and fighters. To be honest I have this wall of tl;dr that I created in notepad cause I am all high tech and ****, but then I got strunk and said **** it because frankly I doubt this will get anyones attention.

The fact of the matter though is you can fart out all the RP reasons in the universe for 0.4 being different, but frankly, its still utterly ******ed.

GO LOWSEC!

Eternal Error
Exitus Acta Probant

Posted - 2008.08.07 05:35:00 - [9]
 

/signed

Myrhial Arkenath
Ghost Festival
Naraka.
Posted - 2008.08.07 07:06:00 - [10]
 

Has my support

Mecinia Lua
Galactic Express
Intrepid Crossing
Posted - 2008.08.07 10:15:00 - [11]
 

I support this.

Elhina Novae
HAMMER -N- SICKEL

Posted - 2008.08.07 11:35:00 - [12]
 

I can setup up a POS in 0.4 but...

I can't moon mine, I can get attacked by Dreadnaughts, I need standings and charts...

0.5 is better Laughing Or I will simply skip standings and go to a 0.1 - 0.3 system, atm 0.4 really has no benefit whatsoever to it.

Fully support

Aiko Intaki
Lodizal Shield Tek
Lodizal Conglomerate
Posted - 2008.08.07 20:15:00 - [13]
 

Agreed. It seems a silly limitation without explanation.

Grak Yarn
Minmatar
Placid Reborn
Coalition Of Empires
Posted - 2008.08.08 00:48:00 - [14]
 

Yes

Coeleth
Team JAVELIN
Tread Alliance
Posted - 2008.08.08 22:43:00 - [15]
 

I support this - long have we called for more reason to go to low-sec.. making 0.4 systems something other than a worthless place to probably die whilst getting poor is a start!

cianide pro
Posted - 2008.08.09 07:02:00 - [16]
 

yeah and drop also some bs size npc rats in the beltsLaughing

Zendoren
Aktaeon Industries
The Black Armada
Posted - 2008.08.09 08:48:00 - [17]
 

/signed

Jihrad Vir
Confederacy of Dreams
Celestial Imperative
Posted - 2008.08.11 23:02:00 - [18]
 

.4 has no gain to it at all, except for pirates that camp the gates for noobs that don't know the difference in security status yet

Felizardo
Caldari
The Ressabiators

Posted - 2008.08.11 23:20:00 - [19]
 

supported!

SencneS
Rebellion Against Big Irreversible Dinks

Posted - 2008.08.11 23:32:00 - [20]
 

If CONCORD are not going to save it because some Battleships are attacking it then there is no reason to have Charters..

Even if it's not "moon poo" minable, it shouldn't need chaters.

Inertial
Did I just do that
Test Alliance Please Ignore
Posted - 2008.08.12 08:31:00 - [21]
 

Agreeing!

Boma Airaken
Seekers of a Silent Paradise
Posted - 2008.11.01 03:50:00 - [22]
 

If you support this idea, it looks like your friendliest candidate is Garion Avarr.


Bunyip
Gallente
Center for Advanced Studies
Posted - 2008.11.01 05:17:00 - [23]
 

I have often wondered this myself. Apparently, the high-security groups (faction navies, Concord, customs, etc) won't set foot there, yet we still have to 'pay' them (using charters) for nothing. Signed.

Hesod Adee
Dark-Rising

Posted - 2008.11.01 07:23:00 - [24]
 


Dibsi Dei
Salamyhkaisten kilta
Posted - 2008.11.01 09:29:00 - [25]
 

Pretty sure this has something to do with 0.4 usually being right next to hi-sec.

Boma Airaken
Seekers of a Silent Paradise
Posted - 2008.11.01 09:56:00 - [26]
 

Originally by: Dibsi Dei
Pretty sure this has something to do with 0.4 usually being right next to hi-sec.


And?

Boma Airaken
Seekers of a Silent Paradise

Posted - 2008.11.01 10:09:00 - [27]
 

Edited by: Boma Airaken on 01/11/2008 10:09:49
Originally by: Bunyip
I have often wondered this myself. Apparently, the high-security groups (faction navies, Concord, customs, etc) won't set foot there, yet we still have to 'pay' them (using charters) for nothing. Signed.


You do realize all NPC corps will forever be KOS in my vision for the future right?

But back on track, I really don't see any reason why 0.4 is any different than 0.3. **** proximity to highsec. All that does is make it a battlefield over resources if it is ever fixed. More pew pew = more fun.


Akiba Penrose
The Praxis Initiative
Posted - 2008.11.01 10:44:00 - [28]
 


Slevra
Posted - 2008.11.06 05:30:00 - [29]
 

Edited by: Slevra on 06/11/2008 05:30:14
signed

Mynxee
Veto.
Veto Corp
Posted - 2008.11.06 13:36:00 - [30]
 

Definitely supported.


Pages: [1] 2 3

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only