open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [VOTE] All AGAINST The Nano-Nerf
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: first : previous : ... 63 64 65 66 [67] 68 69 70 71 ... : last (74)

Author Topic

Lady Izabell
Posted - 2008.09.02 15:32:00 - [1981]
 

HELL YEAH!!! AGAINST!!!!!!!!!

Jane Blacke
Posted - 2008.09.02 15:33:00 - [1982]
 

against

Cacorka
Posted - 2008.09.02 15:37:00 - [1983]
 

Edited by: Cacorka on 02/09/2008 15:37:30
Against

ViTkoo
Posted - 2008.09.02 17:34:00 - [1984]
 

AGAINST!!!

Ley Lee
Posted - 2008.09.02 17:36:00 - [1985]
 

Against.

Whole idea is good - invulnerability "nano" must die, but by other methods.

CCP, think twice more strongly - I beliEVE in the best way ! :)

SpecialGrade Cyborg
Posted - 2008.09.02 21:17:00 - [1986]
 

Against.

Lolos Amarr
Posted - 2008.09.05 01:47:00 - [1987]
 

Mebe.....

Rudebwoy
Minmatar
Masuat'aa Matari
Ushra'Khan
Posted - 2008.09.05 01:52:00 - [1988]
 


Umberto Tann
NibbleTek
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2008.09.05 07:25:00 - [1989]
 

Against

Rethyl
Valkyries of Night

Posted - 2008.09.05 18:59:00 - [1990]
 

I think some minor nano nerf is OK, but if the nerf is implemented as described in the dev blog, it would totally throw the balance of the whole game out of whack.

Montmorency
Viziam
Posted - 2008.09.05 20:10:00 - [1991]
 

Against

And just a thought that I think could end all the nerfs Laughing

Swap the Amarr and Minmatar Recon Bonus'

They are fighting each other.... so why the hell are their ships designed against each other rather then against the opposite race???

Minmatar = Speed and Web.... wtf
Amarr = Tank and Neut...... wtf

Give the Minmatar the Neut Bonus' and the Amarr the web bonus.... the curse's value will drop slightly but it will balance EVERYTHING!!

Gramtar
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
Posted - 2008.09.06 20:21:00 - [1992]
 

Against the speed changes that were on sisi, as they constituted a huge buff (more to heavy missiles than anything) to caldari and nerf to the two benefits for flying minmatar (webs and speed tanking).

A proper speed adjustment would be to the effectiveness of certain implants (primarily high grade snakes), and perhaps extending a portion of the minmatar recon/eas web range bonus to a T1 ship like the Bellicose. In addition, two particularly overpowered ships could have their base speed and agility adjusted downward, the Sacriledge and Ishtar, as their bonuses permit them to do significant damage without tracking issues. Of these two, the Sacriledge is more overpowered than the Ishtar.

Daikir
Amarr
Bushwhackers
Posted - 2008.09.07 01:42:00 - [1993]
 

Against. Fix the nano problem without throwing the whole game off balance. These changes affect everyone, in special blasterboats too much.

freed0m rus
Brotherhood.
Death or Glory
Posted - 2008.09.08 15:57:00 - [1994]
 

/against.


Steamroll McGee
Aliastra

Posted - 2008.09.09 10:22:00 - [1995]
 


Gluecksbaerchi
Quantar Swords
Posted - 2008.09.09 10:29:00 - [1996]
 

supporting the op. CCP basicly says no to 5k-hacs which is achieved by snake sets, hardwirings and faction items. Obvious how to balance that, at least to me.

also dictors sub-5k aren't working, if you have a problem with the sabre, change the slot layout.

aSacHorYu
Black Nova Corp
Posted - 2008.09.09 10:35:00 - [1997]
 


Pyro Explorer
Posted - 2008.09.09 13:12:00 - [1998]
 

o.0

Ellohem
Amarr
EXTERMINATUS.
Atlas Alliance
Posted - 2008.09.10 12:03:00 - [1999]
 

Edited by: Ellohem on 10/09/2008 12:05:47
*double post* laggy inet

Ellohem
Amarr
EXTERMINATUS.
Atlas Alliance
Posted - 2008.09.10 12:05:00 - [2000]
 

/signed

Mutius
Minmatar
Tribal Liberation Force
Posted - 2008.09.10 12:36:00 - [2001]
 

against

too much nerf, too little balance.

Tallis Reomain
Posted - 2008.09.10 19:00:00 - [2002]
 

I'm against the nano nerf. Yes, there should be a way to stop nano ships, BUT killing all speed related ships is not the way to do it.

Azzail
Posted - 2008.09.10 21:23:00 - [2003]
 

Signed

JacKDynne
Fairlight Corp
Rooks and Kings
Posted - 2008.09.11 14:14:00 - [2004]
 

AGAINST.

T'aun
Callum's Hobos and Holes
Interstellar Hobos
Posted - 2008.09.11 17:52:00 - [2005]
 

Against

This game is too reliant on blob warfare as it is

Northern Fighter
Posted - 2008.09.11 20:22:00 - [2006]
 

Against

ThaDollaGenerale
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2008.09.12 04:28:00 - [2007]
 

against

Havohej
Du'uma Fiisi Integrated Astrometrics
Posted - 2008.09.12 07:06:00 - [2008]
 

I wonder if the fact that this thread has twice as many supports as the other thread will actually serve to influence anything.

Not trying to naysay the whole Assembly Hall/CSM scheme, I just really wonder.

Chenrezig
Caldari
School of Applied Knowledge

Posted - 2008.09.13 20:56:00 - [2009]
 

/against
Exclamation

Kanagawa
Posted - 2008.09.14 18:07:00 - [2010]
 

against


Pages: first : previous : ... 63 64 65 66 [67] 68 69 70 71 ... : last (74)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only