open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [VOTE] All AGAINST The Nano-Nerf
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: first : previous : 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 ... : last (74)

Author Topic

Val Heru
Pink Bunnies
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:06:00 - [121]
 

against!!

Ding Zhan
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:08:00 - [122]
 

alt

Enchura C
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:08:00 - [123]
 

3 times against!

Ling Zhan
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:08:00 - [124]
 

altalt

Ting Zhan
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:09:00 - [125]
 

altaltalt

dkt
Xenobytes
Stain Empire
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:09:00 - [126]
 

Against!

Marcellus Corteaz
Alt Corp
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:09:00 - [127]
 

ching chong wing wong

VOOOBLA
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:09:00 - [128]
 

Against!

Zaphod Beerox
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:10:00 - [129]
 

Fully supporting. Nano nerf will result in more blobs.

Kravek
Lamb Federation Navy
C0VEN
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:11:00 - [130]
 

Edited by: Kravek on 26/07/2008 17:14:37
Planed changes are good.

Um Nik
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:11:00 - [131]
 

Against

xHedgEx
Warriors tribe
Red Alliance
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:14:00 - [132]
 

CCP send please your drugs which smoke.

ArmT Zero
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:14:00 - [133]
 

Against

ia bystryi
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:14:00 - [134]
 

Against

Ever Red
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:14:00 - [135]
 

Against

Nerf blob laaggs and cloak better...

Pagey
GoonFleet
Band of Brothers
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:15:00 - [136]
 

why not reduce armor and shield amount of non-nano ships while you're at it

Trash Monster
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:16:00 - [137]
 

/signed

CCP will kill pilot mastery!
I don't wanna be mooooo!

WooooHooo
Federal Navy Academy
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:16:00 - [138]
 

Edited by: WooooHooo on 26/07/2008 17:16:11

Abadonna
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:16:00 - [139]
 

Signed

ArmaGrenddon
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:17:00 - [140]
 


Jeyra
Xenobytes
Stain Empire
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:17:00 - [141]
 

Edited by: Jeyra on 26/07/2008 17:17:02
signed.

benny boi
Pink Bunnies
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:21:00 - [142]
 

signed

Miamoto Mataky
Gallente
Godot Shipyards
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:21:00 - [143]
 

oh, i'm against

Alayna Xaviere
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:22:00 - [144]
 

no nerf meh blasterbots

Elektrea
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:23:00 - [145]
 


Eternal Error
Exitus Acta Probant

Posted - 2008.07.26 17:26:00 - [146]
 

Against.

GROZAVICA
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:28:00 - [147]
 

AGAINST !!!

Windjammer
Gallente
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:42:00 - [148]
 

Against the nuclear nerf. Four guys spent five hours and came up with crap as can be expected by such a small allocation of resource to such a complex and difficult problem. This colossal nerf affects so much more than speed, it's not the least bit funny.

On a positive note; if they release this nerf onto Tranquility, there will be far less of a lag problem. Fewer people playing = less lag. As for myself, I won't have to put up with any lag at all.........or EVE or CCP.

Windjammer

Alex Kosh
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:53:00 - [149]
 

CCP nerf the lags!!!
against the nano nerf.

Sofia Roseburn
Caldari
Lone Star Exploration
Posted - 2008.07.26 17:58:00 - [150]
 

What an utterly idiotic suggestion CCP. It'd be nice if you actually took PVP seriously once in a while.

Against.


Pages: first : previous : 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 ... : last (74)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only