open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked Enough with all the NANO figs?
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6

Author Topic

LongHong Dong
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:08:00 - [1]
 

Edited by: LongHong Dong on 28/05/2008 01:08:37


Is there not anything else?

Why so popular?


It is easymode, I believe I have figured it out.

Ecky X
SniggWaffe
FREE KARTTOON NOW
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:09:00 - [2]
 

Nano is current the best tank. Why not talk about it?

Nikita Alterana
Kumiho's Smile
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:11:00 - [3]
 

nano is not the best tank. Its a decent tank, but you can't nano everything and expect to win, just like you can't armor tank a raven.
The only problem with Nano's are that people are too lazy to use the counters CCP has put in. They refuse to adapt so they die.

LongHong Dong
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:12:00 - [4]
 

Originally by: Nikita Alterana
nano is not the best tank. Its a decent tank, but you can't nano everything and expect to win, just like you can't armor tank a raven.
The only problem with Nano's are that people are too lazy to use the counters CCP has put in. They refuse to adapt so they die.



What counters?

Christari Zuborov
Amarr
Ore Mongers
BricK sQuAD.
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:13:00 - [5]
 

Edited by: Christari Zuborov on 28/05/2008 01:14:46
Everyone repeat after me:

Nano ships are for skirmishing warfare, tanked ships are for fleets.

A mixed fleet armed with both + ewar equals pwn.

Originally by: LongHong Dong


What counters?


Oh Christ, now you've done it, NOW YOU'VE DONE IT! Rolling Eyes

LongHong Dong
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:15:00 - [6]
 

Originally by: Christari Zuborov
Edited by: Christari Zuborov on 28/05/2008 01:14:46
Everyone repeat after me:

Nano ships are for skirmishing warfare, tanked ships are for fleets.

A mixed fleet armed with both + ewar equals pwn.

Originally by: LongHong Dong


What counters?


Oh Christ, now you've done it, NOW YOU'VE DONE IT! Rolling Eyes


wait for their transversal to reach 400?

LongHong Dong
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:18:00 - [7]
 

Originally by: LongHong Dong
Originally by: Christari Zuborov
Edited by: Christari Zuborov on 28/05/2008 01:14:46
Everyone repeat after me:

Nano ships are for skirmishing warfare, tanked ships are for fleets.

A mixed fleet armed with both + ewar equals pwn.

Originally by: LongHong Dong


What counters?


Oh Christ, now you've done it, NOW YOU'VE DONE IT! Rolling Eyes


wait for their transversal to reach 400?


I think webs need to be looked at and taking into effect that most Nano fitted ships go above 11k..

So what is 8% of 11k? 900ish ms?

Please fix this CCP ,if a nano fitted ships gets webbed they need to slow to a 200ms crawl.

Spaztick
Terminal Impact
Kairakau
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:20:00 - [8]
 

Edited by: Spaztick on 28/05/2008 01:20:32
This or this or did you mean this?

Originally by: LongHong Dong
Originally by: LongHong Dong
Originally by: Christari Zuborov
Edited by: Christari Zuborov on 28/05/2008 01:14:46
Everyone repeat after me:

Nano ships are for skirmishing warfare, tanked ships are for fleets.

A mixed fleet armed with both + ewar equals pwn.

Originally by: LongHong Dong


What counters?


Oh Christ, now you've done it, NOW YOU'VE DONE IT! Rolling Eyes


wait for their transversal to reach 400?


I think webs need to be looked at and taking into effect that most Nano fitted ships go above 11k..

So what is 8% of 11k? 900ish ms?

Please fix this CCP ,if a nano fitted ships gets webbed they need to slow to a 200ms crawl.
Who doesn't double web in anything that isn't nanoed?

Hannobaal
Gallente
Punic Corp.
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:23:00 - [9]
 

Originally by: LongHong Dong

I think webs need to be looked at and taking into effect that most Nano fitted ships go above 11k.


Not even most interceptors go above that speed, let alone most speed fitted tech 2 cruisers.

LongHong Dong
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:23:00 - [10]
 

Edited by: LongHong Dong on 28/05/2008 01:23:38
Originally by: Spaztick
Edited by: Spaztick on 28/05/2008 01:20:32
This or this or did you mean this?

Originally by: LongHong Dong
Originally by: LongHong Dong
Originally by: Christari Zuborov
Edited by: Christari Zuborov on 28/05/2008 01:14:46
Everyone repeat after me:

Nano ships are for skirmishing warfare, tanked ships are for fleets.

A mixed fleet armed with both + ewar equals pwn.

Originally by: LongHong Dong


What counters?


Oh Christ, now you've done it, NOW YOU'VE DONE IT! Rolling Eyes


wait for their transversal to reach 400?


I think webs need to be looked at and taking into effect that most Nano fitted ships go above 11k..

So what is 8% of 11k? 900ish ms?

Please fix this CCP ,if a nano fitted ships gets webbed they need to slow to a 200ms crawl.
Who doesn't double web in anything that isn't nanoed?


So people have to waste an extra mid slot just to even combat nanoships?

Sounds to me as if nanos need to be toned down. Make webbifiers a high slot module and I will shut up.

DubanFP
Caldari
Caldari Provisions
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:24:00 - [11]
 

Originally by: LongHong Dong
Sounds to me as if nanos need to be toned down. Make webbifiers a high slot module and I will shut up.

Yeah it's totally unfair that someone should have to waste an extra midslot to render a ship totally useless.

Efdi
The Illuminati.
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:24:00 - [12]
 

Originally by: LongHong Dong

most Nano fitted ships go above 11k..



No. They don't.

Vaal Erit
Science and Trade Institute
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:25:00 - [13]
 

I hate nano figs too. I have thusly chopped down my nano fig tree. It was hard but I used a nano-axe to do it.

Lol at anyone above who is not a troll, this thread is terrible.

LongHong Dong
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:25:00 - [14]
 

Originally by: DubanFP
Originally by: LongHong Dong
Sounds to me as if nanos need to be toned down. Make webbifiers a high slot module and I will shut up.

Yeah it's totally unfair that someone should have to waste an extra midslot to render a ship totally useless.


They are never alone .... So thats alot ships that need to waste alot extra mid slots.

DubanFP
Caldari
Caldari Provisions
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:26:00 - [15]
 

Edited by: DubanFP on 28/05/2008 01:26:51
Originally by: LongHong Dong
Originally by: DubanFP
Originally by: LongHong Dong
Sounds to me as if nanos need to be toned down. Make webbifiers a high slot module and I will shut up.

Yeah it's totally unfair that someone should have to waste an extra midslot to render a ship totally useless.


They are never alone .... So thats alot ships that need to waste alot extra mid slots.

So now you should be able to beat them 3 v 1 or more? Sorry, but this sounds like a "nerf them, buff me" post.

LongHong Dong
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:29:00 - [16]
 

Edited by: LongHong Dong on 28/05/2008 01:30:22
Originally by: DubanFP
Edited by: DubanFP on 28/05/2008 01:26:51
Originally by: LongHong Dong
Originally by: DubanFP
Originally by: LongHong Dong
Sounds to me as if nanos need to be toned down. Make webbifiers a high slot module and I will shut up.

Yeah it's totally unfair that someone should have to waste an extra midslot to render a ship totally useless.


They are never alone .... So thats alot ships that need to waste alot extra mid slots.

So now you should be able to beat them 3 v 1 or more? Sorry, but this sounds like a "nerf them, buff me" post.



Nanos do not need to be nerfed? LOL

I will lose that question because they are so FOTM and overpowered everyone flys one :D

Actualy FOTM (Flavor of the month) was a bad choice , I meant FOTY(flavor of the year) because that is how long it takes or more for CCP to even notice an issue.

DubanFP
Caldari
Caldari Provisions
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:33:00 - [17]
 

Edited by: DubanFP on 28/05/2008 01:36:38
Originally by: LongHong Dong


Nanos do not need to be nerfed? LOL

I will lose that question because they are so FOTM and overpowered everyone flys one :D


Nanos are not super-powerful. Basically they're the best way for someone who's going to throw a few hundred million isk into a ship to protect the investment. Nanoships are actually surprizingly weak in straitfoward power for such a high cost. The main strength of them is the abillity to run when they're outnumbered or overpowered which will happen. The equivilent cost on a normal ship would just be killed by superior numbers.

Anyways I fly a huginn and let me tell you. Fly/fit the right thing and spend an equivilent amount and nanoships drop like flies.

Lady Karma
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:33:00 - [18]
 

If it was easy mode then you could fly them after 1 month and make 20mil an hour.

Oh sorry, that's cloaking macro ravens

Sloppy Podfarts
Posted - 2008.05.28 01:41:00 - [19]
 

omg my nano-hoarder pwns

Faife
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
Posted - 2008.05.28 02:23:00 - [20]
 

Edited by: Faife on 28/05/2008 02:29:53
i nanoed my vaga but now i can't find it :(

cause it's really small... it's a nanovaga... um... small.


very small.

Kinkie Yuuki
Posted - 2008.05.28 03:26:00 - [21]
 

Originally by: Faife
Edited by: Faife on 28/05/2008 02:29:53
i nanoed my vaga but now i can't find it :(

cause it's really small... it's a nanovaga... um... small.


very small.


OMFGWTFROTFLLOLWTF BABAHHAHAHHAHAHHHHHAHHAHAHHAHAHA

I GET IT!!

Imperator Jora'h
Posted - 2008.05.28 03:44:00 - [22]
 

Originally by: Spaztick
Who doesn't double web in anything that isn't nanoed?


Most any Amarr ship (which are frankly lucky to fit the Holy Trinity most times anyway)

TempSniper
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2008.05.28 03:56:00 - [23]
 

Originally by: Nikita Alterana
nano is not the best tank. Its a decent tank, but you can't nano everything and expect to win, just like you can't armor tank a raven.
The only problem with Nano's are that people are too lazy to use the counters CCP has put in. They refuse to adapt so they die.


I've used my rapier to counter nannofaaag gangs and I am usually met with two things, 1)They run, 2) they log off....

kinda funny being a industrist's to watch the likes of failstain to do that for a rapier.

Tob Seayours
Minmatar
Habitual Euthanasia
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2008.05.28 03:57:00 - [24]
 

If you can't counter nano, it's you that's broken. Not the game.

Pithecanthropus
Posted - 2008.05.28 04:11:00 - [25]
 

Originally by: Tob Seayours
If you can't counter nano, it's you that's broken. Not the game.

nano = muppet = lame

Imperator Jora'h
Posted - 2008.05.28 04:19:00 - [26]
 

Originally by: Tob Seayours
If you can't counter nano, it's you that's broken. Not the game.


I think the issue is that for small gang warfare nano seems the only way to go. Don't bother showing up in anything else.

Generally in EVE it is nice to think any ship can be useful. Yes, setups vary and sometimes you have the wrong setup vs. the other guy and get owned but it should not be a matter of just forget the ship entirely if it cannot nano well.

What's more, in EVE, the notion of committing to a fight is well established. Nano ships are almost pure get of of jail free cards. Yes, some ships can ruin them but unless the nano pilot is brain dead he'll almost certainly get away if he sees one of the handful of ships that can hurt him on the field.

Just wait till FW comes and it all becomes nano for the whines to really hit.

Beaverid Machinist
Posted - 2008.05.28 04:20:00 - [27]
 

Nano goes after target. Targets buddy realises that he doesnt need to hump targets tail pipes. Buddy warps in at 100km and has less turret traversing to do. Buddy pops the undertanked speed freak. Isn't that simple?

Mahn AlNouhm
The Bastards
The Bastards.
Posted - 2008.05.28 04:24:00 - [28]
 

Originally by: Pithecanthropus
Originally by: Tob Seayours
If you can't counter nano, it's you that's broken. Not the game.

nano = muppet = lame


QFT. And you thought muppets in space was just a kids movie.

Imperator Jora'h
Posted - 2008.05.28 04:24:00 - [29]
 

Edited by: Imperator Jora''h on 28/05/2008 04:26:18
Originally by: Beaverid Machinist
Nano goes after target. Targets buddy realises that he doesnt need to hump targets tail pipes. Buddy warps in at 100km and has less turret traversing to do. Buddy pops the undertanked speed freak. Isn't that simple?


Buddy warps in at 100km. Nano can close that range to zero in 20 seconds (actually more like 16 seconds because he does not want to get to zero range)

Nano zooms towards Buddy.

Buddy takes 12 seconds to lock target.

Nano now 4 seconds out.

Buddy gets one shot off.

Nano now circling Buddy ruing his traversal. Buddy gets owned.

Simple.

Beaverid Machinist
Posted - 2008.05.28 04:26:00 - [30]
 

Then wouldnt it be the original targets chance to fire? lol


Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only