Posted - 2009.06.14 12:31:00 - [542]

 

signed 100%

Posted - 2009.06.15 02:08:00 - [544]

 

Edited by: Syberbolt8 on 15/06/2009 02:08:27

Originally by: SiliconWolf

---

This thread started out as a request to update graphics, but also sneak some functionality upgrades in. And then went off on several tangents.

I see three main groups, and they've all posted.
We've heard from the "it makes my computer slow" people, the "it looks too ugly" people, and the "new FUNCTIONALITY, not just graphics" group.

Would someone please delete this thread and start two new ones? I'd be happy to sign the new "functionality" thread, although I've personally set up 5 POSs and my wish list only has on it: powergrid booster modules, CPU booster modules, and silos that can be accessed without being offlined.

I won't sign the graphic petition because I don't really care what they look like.

---

If you had read the first page of the OP then you would know the poster didnt intend for it to be purely a gfx change

http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=391410&page=1#24


oh, also bump from the bottom of page one :)

Posted - 2009.06.15 12:20:00 - [546]

 

/signed again, and its on the wrong page.

Posted - 2009.06.16 18:27:00 - [548]

 

/signed again, and free bump

Posted - 2009.06.17 17:02:00 - [550]

 

CSM we are asking you to take this back, and represent it correctly, In the official manner it should have been taken to CCP to start with.

Posted - 2009.06.18 13:38:00 - [552]

 

/signed

Posted - 2009.06.18 17:23:00 - [554]

 

/signed

Posted - 2009.06.21 07:28:00 - [556]

 

/me Signs this.


Just curious how you guys put a thumbs up under your char.


D...

Posted - 2009.06.22 20:54:00 - [558]

 

I gave this a thumbs up three pages back. Subsequently I've read all of the CSM input in this thread and I have some choice words. Poppy****. Uttery poppy****.

Since "Dead Horse" appeared their have been changes to the code base, Drones have been revised completley as have missiles, nano modules and so on. Let us NOT forget that "Dead Horse" predates Trinity and the later move to a SM2/SM3 only engine in Apoc'.

"CCP say it's too difficult". I don't believe you, I don't believe them. Because they have already taken on much larger projects with regards to overhauling elements of EVE than this would require. You seriously want me to accept that rewriting the whole graphics engine AND redesigning all art assets is smaller than migrating the current half-finished joke of POSes to this system?

In a word. No.
Will you please get this on the table. Not as "funky POS thing" but as the actual debate that's been going on for 3 years+. Just because CSM1 were fobbed off I see no reason for CSM2 and CSM3 to stick their fingers in their respective ears and go "lalalalala I can't hear you".

Posted - 2009.06.23 17:35:00 - [560]

 

Edited by: Silwar Naiilo on 23/06/2009 18:08:49
/signed

The current POS system is extremely disappointing. Permissions are convoluted, the actual POSes just look like floating junk, and the majority of modules are worthless.

There's 41 pages of support on the original idea thread. Tells you something.

Posted - 2009.06.24 22:55:00 - [562]

 

Edited by: Syberbolt8 on 24/06/2009 22:55:37

Originally by: Zastrow J

---

When I go face to face with CCP later this year you can be sure that I will share some choice words about POS with them

---

When you do, if you bring up this idea, and I hope you do, could you please name it something other then the funky pos idea??

Posted - 2009.06.26 02:24:00 - [564]

 

page one again, Best idea for pos revamp since 2006

Posted - 2009.06.27 16:04:00 - [566]

 

Originally by: Zastrow J

---

When I go face to face with CCP later this year you can be sure that I will share some choice words about POS with them

---

Don't let them railroad you, because they love to do that. And I hope you would not fall into a trap like rest of the CSM where the trip to Iceland and a circle-jerk at CCP, plus their own petty concerns, have outweighed the needs of the community, or had them turn blind eye to something asked, begged, and demAnded for almost 4 years now.

I am a very private person, do not want anyone digging around my life, or have copies of my passports, or anything like that, otherwise I would have ran for CSM myself on the sole premise of fixing POS - thats it. One main issue as a focus. Oh well.

Posted - 2009.07.01 21:29:00 - [568]

 

I approve this topic

Posted - 2009.07.02 02:46:00 - [570]

 

The CSM already brought this to CCP and they said it was not going to be done. Why do you keep bringing it up?