open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [Issue] Removal of 30-day and 90-day time cards
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.

Pages: first : previous : 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... : last (33)

Author Topic

Vash Nomet
Test Alliance Please Ignore
Posted - 2008.05.22 19:48:00 - [61]

Adding a 60 day option is cool, taking away 30 and 90 is not. Also not happy about paying more either Crying or Very sad

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force

Posted - 2008.05.22 19:49:00 - [62]

Removing the 30/90 and 50/100 day options is outrageous.
I don't really care about the price hike, just the removal of options.

If anything is to be changed, it should be the addition of other durations of GTCs, not removal... and whatever price changes are pertinent.

Posted - 2008.05.22 19:49:00 - [63]

Edited by: vcat on 29/05/2008 08:55:17

Lost Hamster
Hamster Holding Corp
Posted - 2008.05.22 19:50:00 - [64]


*reconsidering of closing one of his accounts*


Posted - 2008.05.22 19:50:00 - [65]

Captain Detech
Posted - 2008.05.22 19:51:00 - [66]

Common CCP, don't go down the route of other games companies...

Posted - 2008.05.22 19:53:00 - [67]

To be honest I reckon that most of the people worried about this, are not worried about the price hike and how it will affect them, but rather, are afraid that it will scare off other players and cause the game to collapse...

Well, perhaps they are just not aware of their thoughts... Laughing

Missions Mining and Mayhem
Cult of War
Posted - 2008.05.22 19:55:00 - [68]


Shionoya Risa
The Xenodus Initiative.

Posted - 2008.05.22 19:55:00 - [69]


Samuel Calvert
Posted - 2008.05.22 19:58:00 - [70]

/signed 2 accounts

NCN Corp
Posted - 2008.05.22 19:58:00 - [71]

Edited by: eV1LJoKeR on 22/05/2008 19:58:55

sorry i see all these posts falling on deaf ears tbo but you have my support

3 chars here

HUN Corp.
HUN Reloaded
Posted - 2008.05.22 19:59:00 - [72]

30 and 90 day are fine.

Gaius Xavier
Rage of Inferno
Burning Ambition
Posted - 2008.05.22 20:00:00 - [73]

This is a radical change to the current system. There are issues that must be addressed.

Posted - 2008.05.22 20:02:00 - [74]

No 30days is the main issue here if its just 30/60 that would be fine the price increase isnt that big a deal not to much. Just only haveing 60 days is rahter limiting.

Messerschmitt facility
Posted - 2008.05.22 20:02:00 - [75]

Signed, leave the 30 and 90 day alone

North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2008.05.22 20:04:00 - [76]

/signed -2 accounts being payed for if this goes thru

Dani Leone
Positively Idle

Posted - 2008.05.22 20:04:00 - [77]

Originally by: Akelorian
Edited by: Akelorian on 22/05/2008 19:27:48
Well I would hate to disagree with you guys on this one. For one, the expansions that have been put into eve cost man hours, They don't charge you for these expansions they are given to you for free.

No they are not free, they are charged at a regular monthly cost for continued access.

CSM People, lets have this on the agenda, even if as a 'business decision' CCP refuse to entertain discussion.

Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2008.05.22 20:09:00 - [78]


Who ever thought of this "Awesome" idea should be slapped in the face with a badger.

The Collective
Against ALL Authorities
Posted - 2008.05.22 20:10:00 - [79]

A new 60D option is nice. Removing 90 and particularly 30D is a slap in the face of multi account subscribers.

Moses Kiptanui
Posted - 2008.05.22 20:11:00 - [80]

I don't have a massive problem with a price hike, if that is what CCP wants to do, there has long been a disparity in price for people playing the game due to currency issues. However taking away the options of the customer for no clear reason seems to me to be a poor decision, and one that I am personally against.

Phocas Lebournes
Posted - 2008.05.22 20:12:00 - [81]


Decreasing the options while increasing the price? - Really can`t feel the love here. ugh

Trente Reznor
In terrorem
Shadow of xXDEATHXx
Posted - 2008.05.22 20:16:00 - [82]

Stupid idea on CCPs part.


Daelin Blackleaf
White Rose Society
Posted - 2008.05.22 20:18:00 - [83]


I'd like to know how little they think of us if they thought they could sneak a 35% price hike past us with flowery wording.

tbh I'm ****ing disgusted with the way this has been handled.

(Unless, of course, this is a ploy to get the CSM in to fix it thus making the council look effective and empowered, which sadly, wouldn't surprise me.)

AWE Corporation
Intrepid Crossing
Posted - 2008.05.22 20:18:00 - [84]


Posted - 2008.05.22 20:21:00 - [85]

<<< Alt vote.. yay democracy. Very Happy

Cereal Killor
Gallente Research Corporation

Posted - 2008.05.22 20:25:00 - [86]

I personally have 6 accounts, and I already pay a large chunk of isk. I don't relish the idea of having to pay more isk for less time. And when I get ETC's as gifts, those buying the ETC's for me are getting taken for a ride.

Deep Core Mining Inc.

Posted - 2008.05.22 20:26:00 - [87]

This was a bull headed move on CCP's part.

death from above..
Posted - 2008.05.22 20:26:00 - [88]

Heartily signed...

Cruoris Seraphim
Posted - 2008.05.22 20:29:00 - [89]

Edited by: mamolian on 22/05/2008 20:40:23
CCP please reconsider on the duration of the availible GTC's.. 90 days suits me perfectly.. I don't want to pay every 60 days! Let me worry about coming up with the cash to pay for the ****ing things!

Get your pitch forks men! Laughing

Blueprint Haus
Get Off My Lawn
Posted - 2008.05.22 20:33:00 - [90]

Edited by: Frelix on 22/05/2008 20:33:53

I'd like an explanation also. Buying GTC's shouldn't cost more than the subscription to the game itself..unless...

oh oh...subscription price increase coming up perhaps?

Pages: first : previous : 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... : last (33)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to

These forums are archived and read-only