open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [Issue] Votes of No Confidence in CSM Members
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6

Author Topic

Leandro Salazar
Quam Singulari
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:02:00 - [1]
 

Edited by: Leandro Salazar on 23/05/2008 08:03:24
In the case of clear ridicule and disrespect expressed towards the CSM and EVE as a whole by members of their alliance, as well as the stated intent to disrupt EVE as game by said alliance, I would like to see the two GoonSwarm members on the CSM removed and replaced by the top backups, because the only thing I am confident they will do is make the work of the council harder and do their best to hurt EVE as a game.

Express support or discuss criticism of this idea here. Thank you.

DISCLAIMER:
If you are not a Goon but intend to defend them, before you jump into this thread, brandishing your Sword of Righteousness +5, and defend the human rights of every Goon ever born and mark me as a rascist, fascist, murderer of democracy and public enemy #1, please note that this thread was a direct response to THIS one. Then think long and hard about the meaning of words like irony and parody...

LASER WATCHER
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:03:00 - [2]
 

/signed

Uzuki Shootmenow
Caldari
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:04:00 - [3]
 

I support this idea.

Mainly, because GoonSwarm has openly admitted to the fact that they want to grief players out of this game, take it over and conquer it using any possible methods.

Also, I dont feel that members of an alliance, that openly supports scamming, meta-gaming and disrespectful behaviour towards other fellow eve players should represent those said players on the CSM.

Erotic Irony
0bsession

Posted - 2008.05.22 16:04:00 - [4]
 

Edited by: Erotic Irony on 22/05/2008 16:04:24
Originally by: Leandro Salazar
Edited by: Leandro Salazar on 22/05/2008 16:02:44
In the case of clear ridicule and disrespect expressed towards the CSM and EVE as a whole by members of their alliance, as well as the stated intent to disrupt EVE as game by said alliance, I would like to see the two GoonSwarm members on the CSM removed and replaced by the top backups, because the only thing I am confident they will do is make the work of the council harder and do their best to hurt EVE as a game.

Express support or discuss criticism of this idea here. Thank you.


Would supporting this exclude me from supporting the goon thread at the same time? This CSM thing is kinda confusing.

Gorobom
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:10:00 - [5]
 

I'm so confused.

Claire Lacombe
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:11:00 - [6]
 

Subverting electoral systems by those who gain power seems like a good way to introduce credibility into such a fledgling system.

Moridrex
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:13:00 - [7]
 

Full love and support. I feel Goons, especially after Jihadswarm, should not be allowed to near game mechanics. Bug reporting is fine. ;)

And I must say props to the Goon who supported this maybe I'll have more respect for you guys. ;)

Galactic Overlord
The Fantastically Pantless Sporkmen
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:14:00 - [8]
 

Are goons annoying? Yes. Have they done more for the benefit of the game then any other alliance ever? Yes. If you don't believe it look past your bias and do some research, yeah the truth hurts.

NO SUPPORT

Bane Glorious
Ministry of War
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:15:00 - [9]
 

What a wonderful thread.

Nathan Stahn
State War Academy
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:16:00 - [10]
 

DO NOT SUPPORT

Academion
GoonSwarm
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:16:00 - [11]
 

Edited by: Academion on 22/05/2008 16:17:24
I would like to support this vote of no confidence, but append a vote of no confidence in the other CSM's and the alternate CSM's as well as in CCP in general and ask for their removal from the game's development.

Patripassion
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:17:00 - [12]
 

Originally by: Moridrex
Full love and support. I feel Goons, especially after Jihadswarm, should not be allowed to near game mechanics. Bug reporting is fine. ;)

And I must say props to the Goon who supported this maybe I'll have more respect for you guys. ;)


A good way to stop this might be to not let anybody with negative sec status have a vote in the CSM council or in this forum!

Dingi223
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:18:00 - [13]
 

Originally by: Academion
Edited by: Academion on 22/05/2008 16:17:24
I would like to support this vote of no confidence, but append a vote of no confidence in the other CSM's and the alternate CSM's as well as in CCP in general and ask for their removal from the game's development.


Posts like this, even sarcastic, make me support this vote, even though I know it'll never happen.

Proud American
Ministry of War

Posted - 2008.05.22 16:21:00 - [14]
 

Originally by: Academion
Edited by: Academion on 22/05/2008 16:17:24
I would like to support this vote of no confidence, but append a vote of no confidence in the other CSM's and the alternate CSM's as well as in CCP in general and ask for their removal from the game's development.

I am Mike Huckabee and I approve of this message.

Erotic Irony
0bsession
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:21:00 - [15]
 

Originally by: Patripassion
Originally by: Moridrex
Full love and support. I feel Goons, especially after Jihadswarm, should not be allowed to near game mechanics. Bug reporting is fine. ;)

And I must say props to the Goon who supported this maybe I'll have more respect for you guys. ;)


A good way to stop this might be to not let anybody with negative sec status have a vote in the CSM council or in this forum!


Yellow star to characterize these people at a distance would be appropriate as well.

schneirder
Viziam

Posted - 2008.05.22 16:21:00 - [16]
 

Members of Goonfleet have done nothing but damage this game, and I support this.

Shenko Minara
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:22:00 - [17]
 

Originally by: Leandro Salazar
Edited by: Leandro Salazar on 22/05/2008 16:02:44
In the case of clear ridicule and disrespect expressed towards the CSM and EVE as a whole by members of their alliance, as well as the stated intent to disrupt EVE as game by said alliance, I would like to see the two GoonSwarm members on the CSM removed and replaced by the top backups, because the only thing I am confident they will do is make the work of the council harder and do their best to hurt EVE as a game.

Express support or discuss criticism of this idea here. Thank you.


I was going to say the same thing only about Jade Constantine. Please take his CSM status away as given half a chance he will wreck this game for everyone that doesn't enjoy dressing up as orcs or anime characters.

Sergio Ling
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:26:00 - [18]
 

I wish there was a thumbs down option.

Goon candidates represent the Goon demographic, if nothing else.

Phrixus Zephyr
MEK Enterprises
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:28:00 - [19]
 

You clearly have no idea of what SA is like. Yes, alot of it is lolgoons, but they're more than capable of intelligent discussion.

See forums like D&D, instead of making rediculous statements based on alliance and hearsay.

(Yes, i am also well aware that the first person to smack me will proberbly be a Goon.)

Gorobom
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:35:00 - [20]
 

Originally by: Phrixus Zephyr
You clearly have no idea of what SA is like. Yes, alot of it is lolgoons, but they're more than capable of intelligent discussion.

See forums like D&D, instead of making rediculous statements based on alliance and hearsay.

(Yes, i am also well aware that the first person to smack me will proberbly be a Goon.)


He can just look at other posts in this very forum. He already signed some started by goons.

Phrixus Zephyr
MEK Enterprises
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:43:00 - [21]
 

Originally by: Gorobom
Originally by: Phrixus Zephyr
You clearly have no idea of what SA is like. Yes, alot of it is lolgoons, but they're more than capable of intelligent discussion.

See forums like D&D, instead of making rediculous statements based on alliance and hearsay.

(Yes, i am also well aware that the first person to smack me will proberbly be a Goon.)


He can just look at other posts in this very forum. He already signed some started by goons.

Yes and I can also form an opinion of a race/nation of people based on the actions of a few aswell.

Or, you can take my suggestion and go look at SA and find plenty of intelligent discusion that would put anything eve-o has on offer to shame.

Heartstone
Aliastra
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:46:00 - [22]
 

Votes have been cast. Don't like it? Vote for someone else next time. Didn't vote? STFU.


Treelox
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:52:00 - [23]
 

look mom....I'm posting in a CAOD thread....


ohh wait a second....


/me runs off confused and crying, in search of more belly button lint for meditation and contempation focus.

Myk Taison
Unknown Force
SOLAR WING
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:58:00 - [24]
 

Don't blame me, I voted for Daveydweeb.


Haha not really who would vote for that pubbie ***got.

Nexus Wolfguard
Posted - 2008.05.22 17:06:00 - [25]
 

DO NOT SUPPORT

I was surprised MORE goonswarm members weren't elected. Seeing as how they are the largest alliance in EVE, they represent a significant portion of the player base, and removing the members of the council would introduce unnecessary bias.

Seeing as how it is a ADVISEMENT council, I believe CCP will sort out which information to use, but having someone who wants to take over EVE on the council would definitely bring up some good points which would not otherwise enter discussion.

Gorobom
Posted - 2008.05.22 17:07:00 - [26]
 

Originally by: Phrixus Zephyr
Originally by: Gorobom
Originally by: Phrixus Zephyr
You clearly have no idea of what SA is like. Yes, alot of it is lolgoons, but they're more than capable of intelligent discussion.

See forums like D&D, instead of making rediculous statements based on alliance and hearsay.

(Yes, i am also well aware that the first person to smack me will proberbly be a Goon.)


He can just look at other posts in this very forum. He already signed some started by goons.

Yes and I can also form an opinion of a race/nation of people based on the actions of a few aswell.

Or, you can take my suggestion and go look at SA and find plenty of intelligent discusion that would put anything eve-o has on offer to shame.


You misunderstood me.

Yorda
Battlestars
GoonSwarm
Posted - 2008.05.22 17:10:00 - [27]
 

Originally by: Leandro Salazar
Edited by: Leandro Salazar on 22/05/2008 16:02:44
In the case of clear ridicule and disrespect expressed towards the CSM and EVE as a whole by members of their alliance, as well as the stated intent to disrupt EVE as game by said alliance, I would like to see the two GoonSwarm members on the CSM removed and replaced by the top backups, because the only thing I am confident they will do is make the work of the council harder and do their best to hurt EVE as a game.

Express support or discuss criticism of this idea here. Thank you.


Yes, clearly goon votes shouldn't count because you dont like them.

Avalira
Caldari
The Black Light Foundation
Posted - 2008.05.22 17:13:00 - [28]
 

Do not support.

I don't care whether they are in BoB, Goons, Minmatar gay-rights league or whatever. What is important is what the person advocates and that he sticks with his candidacy promises. We vote for the person behind the computer, not the character they play.

Cailais
Amarr
Nasty Pope Holding Corp
Talocan United
Posted - 2008.05.22 17:14:00 - [29]
 

Not supported - if you didnt want them in you should have mobilised the vote towards other candidates.

The votes complete - tough.

C.


Will Hunter
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2008.05.22 17:19:00 - [30]
 

Edited by: Will Hunter on 22/05/2008 17:20:56
Originally by: Leandro Salazar
Edited by: Leandro Salazar on 22/05/2008 16:02:44
In the case of clear ridicule and disrespect expressed towards the CSM and EVE as a whole by members of their alliance, as well as the stated intent to disrupt EVE as game by said alliance, I would like to see the two GoonSwarm members on the CSM removed and replaced by the top backups, because the only thing I am confident they will do is make the work of the council harder and do their best to hurt EVE as a game.

Express support or discuss criticism of this idea here. Thank you.


supporting this terrible empire pubbie idea (o_o)


Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only