open All Channels
seplocked Jita Park Speakers Corner
blankseplocked CSM candidates - QUICK REFERENCE CARDS and spreadsheet - V.1.2
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic

Vio Geraci
Amarr
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2008.05.07 09:10:00 - [31]
 


[0] Please enter the number of people who you believe are actually going to read these arbitrary, meaningless numbers

[0] Rate the amount of useful information about candidates that you feel this thread contains

Blazing Fire
Interstellar Operations Incorporated
Posted - 2008.05.07 09:43:00 - [32]
 

Originally by: Vio Geraci

[0] Please enter the number of people who you believe are actually going to read these arbitrary, meaningless numbers

[0] Rate the amount of useful information about candidates that you feel this thread contains



I red most of them.

What I expect from Akita is to put summarize that info in more easy to compare format.


Blazing Fire
CEO
Interstellar Operations Incorporated
Corp web site

Recruitment
Looking for PvPeers in 0.0 space
Looking for Hulk and Mackinaw pilots. We pay for the Ore


Services
[Service] Killboard hosting
[Service] Forum hosting
[Service] Web site hosting
[Service] Obelisk for rent
[Service] Alliance Creation

Siigari Kitawa
Gallente
Perditus Peregrinus
Posted - 2008.05.07 09:45:00 - [33]
 

I'm not a candidate but I think it'd be cool to let the forums know how I feel on certain issues as I would really like to run for this eventually, and now is the best time to generate a buzz.

Things in red mean I am very adamant about it in one way or another, and will explain below.

Name: David Pietz
Country of Origin: United States, Oregon

[9] Rate your own free time in the real life (what's left after work, school, other obligation)
[0] Do you wish you didn't have to travel to Iceland for CSM meetings ?
[9] Rate your own forum reading presence
[9] Rate your own forum posting presence
[9] Rate your own ingame presence
[9] Rate your own PvP activity level
[7] Rate your own PvE activity level
[8] Rate your own industry/science/trade activity level
[3] Number of most accounts you ever had active at the same time
[0] Lowsec mining needs a boost
[0] Highsec mining needs a boost
[0] We need larger mining ships
[0] Rorquals should be allowed to use stargates like jump freighters
[0] Allow capital ships in highsec (cyno in highsec)
[0] Jump freighters need a big boost (extra cargo, extra hitpoints/resists, maybe even module/rig slots, whatever)
[8] Lowsec mission-running needs a boost
[3] Highsec mission-running needs a nerf
[9] Bring back nexus chip NPC buy orders
[0] L5 missions need to be available in highsec too
[0] L4 missions need to be available in lowsec only
[9] No insurance for CONCORD kills
[9] No insurance for 0.0 kills
[0] No insurance for Battlecruisers and above
[0] No insurance for Battleships and above
[3] Dysprosium situation is just fine, adapt or die
[4] Moon mining needs a total revamp
[0] Allow moon mining in 0.4
[0] Allow moon mining in highsec
[1] Input T1 BPC levels need to influence output T2 BPC levels
[0] You should be able to research levels on BPCs in POS mobile labs
[9] Mobile lab slots need to be allowed to become public

[0] You should be able to build outposts in any system that have no stations at all (no sov requirements)
[1] Local should be replaced with constellation chat
[0] Local should be replaced with region chat
[0] Local must go away completely
[0] Non-covops cloaks need stronger drawbacks/penalities (lock time, lock range, etc)
[6] Stealth bombers need a boost
[9] Black ops need a boost
[0] Marauders need a boost
[0] HICtors need a nerf
[0] You should be able to probe non-covops cloaked ships
[0] You should be able to probe all cloaked ships
[0] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for all ships (less overall speed)
[3] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for the larger ships only (BS speed much lower, BC speed lower, cruiser speed a bit lower)
[0] Active shield tanking needs a nerf
[0] Active armor tanking needs a nerf
[0] Passive shield tanking needs a nerf
[0] Armor/hull buffer tanking needs a nerf
[9] Web drones need a boost
[9] Painter drones need a boost
[0] ECM drones need a nerf
[0] ECMs need a nerf
[0] RSDs need a nerf

[0] Carriers need a nerf
[0] Motherships need a nerf
[0] Titans need a nerf
[0] Focus fire needs a nerf
[5] Rigs on small ships need to cost less than rigs on large ships
[0] T1 rigs are too expensive
[0] T2 rigs are too expensive
[3] Abandoned wrecks should be scannable via probes
[0] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of aggression
[9] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of aggression
[0] Older characters should be expelled from NPC corps in single-man corps
[0] Wardec fees are way too low for corps
[9] Wardec fees are way too low for alliances
[0] People should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced corp until war ends
[0] Corps should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced alliance until war ends
[9] More PVE content for small groups
[9] More PVP content for small groups
[9] Transferable killrights or other bounty system revamps
[0] Add additional rewards for killing outlaws
[0] Total revamp of Sci&Ind interface
[0] Remove all T2 BPOs
[1] Add ways to get new T2 BPOs

[9] RSDs need a BOOST

Siigari Kitawa
Gallente
Perditus Peregrinus
Posted - 2008.05.07 09:54:00 - [34]
 

Edited by: Siigari Kitawa on 07/05/2008 09:58:56
Okay now allow me to explain myself, again I have no campaign but I'd like to ring in on these issues.

Capital ships should never ever be allowed to cyno INTO highsec. Capital ships by nature (every capital ship there is an ever will be) are restricted by ingame rules that CONCORD has placed into effect stating NO CYNOS IN HIGHSEC. EVER. Capitals are powerhouses that need to be left where there is risk.

Lowsec mission running needs a boost because as it is right now the rewards are equal to rewards found in highsec. Lowsec = more risk, so it should include greater rewards. Note however then I put that highsec missions do not need to be located in lowsec only. This is because if you move them all to lowsec, people will start grinding the next best thing or finding a new way to make money. MOVING missions around is not the answer. Adding significant rewards to more dangerous ones is.

BPCs are copies. You cannot research a copy because the person that sold it to you sold it "as-is" and you have to deal with it. If you could research copies then the price of a researched copy would have no value.

I believe that we should have a way to allow the public to use our labs, however the location of the lab should be masked somehow. You must have scientific networking trained to 5 in order to see public labs (as a reward for training it to level 5, you are now allowed to see regional public AND regional corporation labs for rent.)

Covert ops ships and normal ships alike have perfectly reasonable bonuses/penalties to their cloaks right now. I believe it should remain this way because changing how cloaks work will cause huge drawbacks to normal play where having cloaks can create a lot of entertaining situations such as ambushes, getting away from someone, etc.

ECM drones are fine the way they are. If you don't like ECM drones jamming you, have your friend blow them up. EVE is a team game. If you are by yourself you do not have my pity.

ECM modules do not need a nerf, as they work as they should on their specialized ships.

RSDs most assuredly do not need a nerf. They are nerfed beyond good use right now, and their specialized ships have barely the bonuses to overcome their paltry abilities.

RSDs however do need a BOOST. The fact that any module isn't all that great on non-specialized ships is fairly commonplace, however on specialized ships all RSDs receive is a simple bonus to strength. 5% per level. No cap reduction bonus, no additional strength bonus, just an extra 25% on a module that STACKS. Remote Sensor Dampeners are the only targeting-based electronic warfare module that has a stacking penalty (note I said targeting-based EW, target painters and tracking disruptors do not disrupt your ability to lock a target.)


When I see people refusing nerfs, I often must point out that the opposite may be necessary. RSDs have that need.

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
Posted - 2008.05.07 12:26:00 - [35]
 

Originally by: Blazing Fire
Originally by: Vio Geraci
[0] Please enter the number of people who you believe are actually going to read these arbitrary, meaningless numbers
[0] Rate the amount of useful information about candidates that you feel this thread contains

I red most of them.
What I expect from Akita is to put summarize that info in more easy to compare format.


I'd be happy if 1000 people that would have otherwise not bothered to even try to find out anything about the candidates would actually take a look at this. Worst case scenario, they still vote "abstain". What harm CAN it do ?
As for the "amount of useful info"... yeah, sure, it might NOT be the "most useful thing one could possibly have".
I don't see YOU TRYING to do anything better.
So, again, at worst, this is a waste of 10-15 minutes of a candidate's time (as opposed to wasting hours on end trying to respond to the question of INDIVIDUAL people one at a time in various other threads), and getting some minor exposure to the public.
If you decide to "not fill the quick reference card", good for you... I don't care. I OFFERED help. Wether you think it's worth taking or not is your problem. Waste of time ? Don't participate, YOUR loss. Or no loss, if you think nobody would read it.


As for the "info summary"... so far we have 20 out of 64 (actually, a lot less since several have dropped out officially, and others didn't even bother posting much, if at all in here)... soon enough, there will be (hopefully) enough to warrant some form of summarisation that's easy to look at, "at a glance".
I'll see what I can do then Wink

steejans nix
Amarr
Black Core Federation
Posted - 2008.05.07 12:51:00 - [36]
 

Edited by: steejans nix on 07/05/2008 12:51:56
Found it most helped a lot personally and i'm not even good with numbers !!

Shame Akita not run herself though as would be a good "all round" canditate, seems to be aware of all aspects of game.

*edit speeling

Veryez
Posted - 2008.05.07 13:29:00 - [37]
 

Originally by: Vio Geraci

[0] Please enter the number of people who you believe are actually going to read these arbitrary, meaningless numbers

[0] Rate the amount of useful information about candidates that you feel this thread contains



Rather foolish on your part, actually thank you Akita T for this poll. While I don't have to read every entry, I do read every entry for people whom I am thinking of voting for. I don't expect a candidate to agree with all my ideas, but I'd rather vote for one who isn't strongly opposed to them. Some have even surprised me with their opinions - which makes my decision even harder.

Eima Nalt
Posted - 2008.05.07 17:29:00 - [38]
 

In game, I hear a lot about nano-f----try from vairous pilots in various alliances but I notice that almost all of the responding candidates disagree with either of the statements about nerfing speed tanking.

Is this a serious disconnect between candidate views and subscriber concerns? Is democracy broken?

Discuss.

Nickaelhoop
Minmatar
Concordance Extraction Corporation
Posted - 2008.05.07 21:19:00 - [39]
 

Edited by: Nickaelhoop on 07/05/2008 21:22:03
Edited by: Nickaelhoop on 07/05/2008 21:21:42
CANDIDATE NAME : Nicholas White
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : Scotland - United Kingdom

[6] Rate your own free time in the real life (what's left after work, school, other obligation)
[5] Do you wish you didn't have to travel to Iceland for CSM meetings ?
[7] Rate your own forum reading presence
[5] Rate your own forum posting presence
[8] Rate your own ingame presence
[6] Rate your own PvP activity level
[8] Rate your own PvE activity level
[9] Rate your own industry/science/trade activity level
[0] Number of most accounts you ever had active at the same time
[8] Lowsec mining needs a boost
[4] Highsec mining needs a boost
[7] We need larger mining ships
[7] Rorquals should be allowed to use stargates like jump freighters
[7] Allow capital ships in highsec (cyno in highsec)
[5] Jump freighters need a big boost (extra cargo, extra hitpoints/resists, maybe even module/rig slots, whatever)
[8] Lowsec mission-running needs a boost
[4] Highsec mission-running needs a nerf
[6] Bring back nexus chip NPC buy orders
[9] L5 missions need to be available in highsec too
[4] L4 missions need to be available in lowsec only
[8] No insurance for CONCORD kills
[5] No insurance for 0.0 kills
[2] No insurance for Battlecruisers and above
[2] No insurance for Battleships and above
[5] Dysprosium situation is just fine, adapt or die
[7] Moon mining needs a total revamp
[9] Allow moon mining in 0.4
[9] Allow moon mining in highsec
[5] Input T1 BPC levels need to influence output T2 BPC levels
[8] You should be able to research levels on BPCs in POS mobile labs
[7] Mobile lab slots need to be allowed to become public
[6] You should be able to build outposts in any system that have no stations at all (no sov requirements)
[7] Local should be replaced with constellation chat
[2] Local should be replaced with region chat
[0] Local must go away completely
[6] Non-covops cloaks need stronger drawbacks/penalities (lock time, lock range, etc)
[] Stealth bombers need a boost
[5] Black ops need a boost
[5] Marauders need a boost
[3] HICtors need a nerf

[8] You should be able to probe non-covops cloaked ships
[7] You should be able to probe all cloaked ships
[3] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for all ships (less overall speed)
[1] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for the larger ships only (BS speed much lower, BC speed lower, cruiser speed a bit lower)
[2] Active shield tanking needs a nerf
[2] Active armor tanking needs a nerf
[2] Passive shield tanking needs a nerf
[2] Armor/hull buffer tanking needs a nerf
[4] Web drones need a boost
[5] Painter drones need a boost
[6] ECM drones need a nerf
[2] ECMs need a nerf
[5] RSDs need a nerf
[2] Carriers need a nerf
[2] Motherships need a nerf
[1] Titans need a nerf
[4] Focus fire needs a nerf
[7] Rigs on small ships need to cost less than rigs on large ships
[3] T1 rigs are too expensive
[6] T2 rigs are too expensive
[7] Abandoned wrecks should be scannable via probes
[2] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of agression
[0] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of agression
[3] Older characters should be expelled from NPC corps in single-man corps
[4] Wardec fees are way too low for corps
[6] Wardec fees are way too low for alliances
[1] People should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced corp until war ends
[1] Corps should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced alliance until war ends
[8] More PVE content for small groups
[8] More PVP content for small groups
[9] Transferable killrights or other bounty system revamps
[8] Add additional rewards for killing outlaws
[9] Total revamp of Sci&Ind interface
[3] Remove all T2 BPOs
[7] Add ways to get new T2 BPOs

My own thread has been updated to reflect this, please comment here: My Thread

Dierdra Vaal
Caldari
Veto.
Veto Corp
Posted - 2008.05.07 21:43:00 - [40]
 

[7] Rate your own free time in the real life (what's left after work, school, other obligation)
[0] Do you wish you didn't have to travel to Iceland for CSM meeting ? - NOTE: it is only 1 meeting
[8] Rate your own forum reading presence
[3] Rate your own forum posting presence
[7] Rate your own ingame presence
[6] Rate your own PvP activity level
[6] Rate your own PvE activity level
[2] Rate your own industry/science/trade activity level
[1] Number of most accounts you ever had active at the same time
[7] Lowsec mining needs a boost
[0] Highsec mining needs a boost
[4] We need larger mining ships
[0] Rorquals should be allowed to use stargates like jump freighters
[2] Allow capital ships in highsec (cyno in highsec)
[5] Jump freighters need a big boost (extra cargo, extra hitpoints/resists, maybe even module/rig slots, whatever)
[8] Lowsec mission-running needs a boost
[2] Highsec mission-running needs a nerf
[7] Bring back nexus chip NPC buy orders
[4] L5 missions need to be available in highsec too
[0] L4 missions need to be available in lowsec only
[9] No insurance for CONCORD kills
[0] No insurance for 0.0 kills
[0] No insurance for Battlecruisers and above
[0] No insurance for Battleships and above
[4] Dysprosium situation is just fine, adapt or die
[5] Moon mining needs a total revamp
[5] Allow moon mining in 0.4
[4] Allow moon mining in highsec
[7] Input T1 BPC levels need to influence output T2 BPC levels
[7] You should be able to research levels on BPCs in POS mobile labs
[6] Mobile lab slots need to be allowed to become public
[2] You should be able to build outposts in any system that have no stations at all (no sov requirements)
[2] Local should be replaced with constellation chat
[2] Local should be replaced with region chat
[4] Local must go away completely
[0] Non-covops cloaks need stronger drawbacks/penalities (lock time, lock range, etc)
[7] Stealth bombers need a boost
[6] Black ops need a boost
[6] Marauders need a boost
[4] HICtors need a nerf
[7] You should be able to probe non-covops cloaked ships
[6] You should be able to probe all cloaked ships
[4] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for all ships (less overall speed)
[4] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for the larger ships only (BS speed much lower, BC speed lower, cruiser speed a bit lower)
[3] Active shield tanking needs a nerf
[3] Active armor tanking needs a nerf
[2] Passive shield tanking needs a nerf
[3] Armor/hull buffer tanking needs a nerf
[5] Web drones need a boost
[5] Painter drones need a boost
[4] ECM drones need a nerf
[4] ECMs need a nerf
[4] RSDs need a nerf
[4] Carriers need a nerf
[4] Motherships need a nerf
[4] Titans need a nerf
[4] Focus fire needs a nerf
[3] Rigs on small ships need to cost less than rigs on large ships
[3] T1 rigs are too expensive
[7] T2 rigs are too expensive
[6] Abandoned wrecks should be scannable via probes
[7] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of agression
[3] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of agression
[0] Older characters should be expelled from NPC corps in single-man corps
[7] Wardec fees are way too low for corps
[7] Wardec fees are way too low for alliances
[0] People should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced corp until war ends
[0] Corps should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced alliance until war ends
[7] More PVE content for small groups
[8] More PVP content for small groups
[8] Transferable killrights or other bounty system revamps
[8] Add additional rewards for killing outlaws
[7] Total revamp of Sci&Ind interface
[0] Remove all T2 BPOs
[4] Add ways to get new T2 BPOs

Goumindong
SniggWaffe
Posted - 2008.05.07 22:56:00 - [41]
 

Edited by: Goumindong on 08/05/2008 00:02:51
Originally by: Eima Nalt
In game, I hear a lot about nano-f----try from vairous pilots in various alliances but I notice that almost all of the responding candidates disagree with either of the statements about nerfing speed tanking.

Is this a serious disconnect between candidate views and subscriber concerns? Is democracy broken?

Discuss.


The issue is a very complex one. It may be that they do not think that fast ships specifically should be nerfed but that counters should be added or that a more neutral speed change should be implemented that keeps the value of the tank high, but reduces the ability to disengage.

ed: Feel free to stop by my thread and ask a question, or start another thread on the topic and i would be happy to reply.

Saloris Nighthawke
Caldari
Dynaverse Corporation
Sodalitas XX
Posted - 2008.05.07 23:10:00 - [42]
 

I just want to thank Akita T for doing this. I know the candidates don't HAVE to fill this out but I will say that I will certainly spend more time thinking about a candidate that does take the time to do this.

That said it is a shame that CCP themselves did not provide a better platform for the candidates to let themselves and thier views known. Alas, as always, the players themselves step up and fill in the blanks left by CCP.

so....

o7 Akita T

Andargor theWise
Collateral Damage Unlimited
Posted - 2008.05.08 00:12:00 - [43]
 

Edited by: Andargor theWise on 12/05/2008 23:29:06
Edited by: Andargor theWise on 08/05/2008 22:35:53
Edited by: Andargor theWise on 08/05/2008 22:17:51

Nice initiative, didn't know who to vote for.

Here's my contribution, a scorecard to pick candidates.

Self-explanatory, done really quickly, so no guarantee on accuracy, etc etc. Feel free to adjust and repost.

EDIT: Updated URL
EDIT2: Fixed Max and Noghri Embarassed
EDIT3: Added Grey Shadow

b0ksah
Minmatar
Nomads
Nulli Secunda
Posted - 2008.05.08 09:22:00 - [44]
 

Edited by: b0ksah on 08/05/2008 09:25:22
CANDIDATE NAME : Peter Juul Jensen
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : Denmark

[7] Rate your own free time in the real life (what's left after work, school, other obligation)
[2] Do you wish you didn't have to travel to Iceland for CSM meetings ?
[6] Rate your own forum reading presence
[5] Rate your own forum posting presence
[8] Rate your own ingame presence
[7] Rate your own PvP activity level
[4] Rate your own PvE activity level
[4] Rate your own industry/science/trade activity level
[12] Number of most accounts you ever had active at the same time
[6] Lowsec mining needs a boost
[0] Highsec mining needs a boost
[7] We need larger mining ships
[4] Rorquals should be allowed to use stargates like jump freighters
[0] Allow capital ships in highsec (cyno in highsec)
[4] Jump freighters need a big boost (extra cargo, extra hitpoints/resists, maybe even module/rig slots, whatever)
[9] Lowsec mission-running needs a boost
[0] Highsec mission-running needs a nerf
[5] Bring back nexus chip NPC buy orders
[5] L5 missions need to be available in highsec too
[0] L4 missions need to be available in lowsec only
[5] No insurance for CONCORD kills
[0] No insurance for 0.0 kills
[0] No insurance for Battlecruisers and above
[0] No insurance for Battleships and above
[3] Dysprosium situation is just fine, adapt or die
[4] Moon mining needs a total revamp
[7] Allow moon mining in 0.4
[0] Allow moon mining in highsec
[9] Input T1 BPC levels need to influence output T2 BPC levels
[6] You should be able to research levels on BPCs in POS mobile labs
[4] Mobile lab slots need to be allowed to become public
[2] You should be able to build outposts in any system that have no stations at all (no sov requirements)
[0] Local should be replaced with constellation chat
[0] Local should be replaced with region chat
[0] Local must go away completely
[8] Non-covops cloaks need stronger drawbacks/penalities (lock time, lock range, etc)
[4] Stealth bombers need a boost
[5] Black ops need a boost
[3] Marauders need a boost
[2] HICtors need a nerf
[9] You should be able to probe non-covops cloaked ships
[0] You should be able to probe all cloaked ships
[3] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for all ships (less overall speed)
[3] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for the larger ships only (BS speed much lower, BC speed lower, cruiser speed a bit lower)
[0] Active shield tanking needs a nerf
[0] Active armor tanking needs a nerf
[0] Passive shield tanking needs a nerf
[0] Armor/hull buffer tanking needs a nerf
[9] Web drones need a boost
[6] Painter drones need a boost
[2] ECM drones need a nerf
[0] ECMs need a nerf
[0] RSDs need a nerf
[0] Carriers need a nerf
[2] Motherships need a nerf
[7] Titans need a nerf
[0] Focus fire needs a nerf
[9] Rigs on small ships need to cost less than rigs on large ships
[3] T1 rigs are too expensive
[7] T2 rigs are too expensive
[6] Abandoned wrecks should be scannable via probes
[0] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of agression
[4] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of agression
[8] Older characters should be expelled from NPC corps in single-man corps
[6] Wardec fees are way too low for corps
[6] Wardec fees are way too low for alliances
[7] People should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced corp until war ends
[7] Corps should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced alliance until war ends
[9] More PVE content for small groups
[9] More PVP content for small groups
[9] Transferable killrights or other bounty system revamps
[9] Add additional rewards for killing outlaws
[8] Total revamp of Sci&Ind interface
[0] Remove all T2 BPOs
[7] Add ways to get new T2 BPOs

[9] Add more ways to roleplay you charather !!

The Chaplain sighs and smiles.

"That would have to do."

ork chief
Posted - 2008.05.08 11:20:00 - [45]
 

CANDIDATE NAME : Kirill Koban
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : Ukraine

[5] Rate your own free time in the real life (what's left after work, school, other obligation)
[1] Do you wish you didn't have to travel to Iceland for CSM meetings ?
[5] Rate your own forum reading presence
[2] Rate your own forum posting presence
[7] Rate your own ingame presence
[6] Rate your own PvP activity level
[7] Rate your own PvE activity level
[7] Rate your own industry/science/trade activity level
[6] Number of most accounts you ever had active at the same time
[9] Lowsec mining needs a boost
[0] Highsec mining needs a boost
[7] We need larger mining ships
[7] Rorquals should be allowed to use stargates like jump freighters
[7] Allow capital ships in highsec (cyno in highsec)
[7] Jump freighters need a big boost boost (extra cargo, extra hitpoints/resists, maybe even module/rig slots)
[9] Lowsec mission-running needs a boost
[0] Highsec mission-running needs a boost
[5] Bring back nexus chip NPC buy orders
[5] L5 missions need to be available in highsec too
[0] L4 missions need to be available in lowsec only
[1] No insurance for CONCORD kills
[0] No insurance for 0.0 kills
[0] No insurance for Battlecruisers and above
[0] No insurance for Battleships and above
[7] Dysprosium situation is fine
[2] Moon mining needs a total revamp
[9] Allow moon mining in 0.4
[9] Allow moon mining in highsec
[5] Input T1 BPC levels need to influence output T2 BPC levels
[5] You should be able to research levels on BPCs in POS mobile labs
[5] Mobile lab slots need to be allowed to become public
[1] You should be able to build outposts in any system that have no stations at all (no sov requirements)
[2] Local should be replaced with constellation
[2] Local should be replaced with region
[0] Local must go away completely
[9] Non-covops cloaks need stronger drawbacks/penalitiessee * for specifics
[6] Stealth bombers need a boost
[8] Black ops need a boost
[2] Marauders need a boost
[0] HICtors need a nerf
[9] You should be able to probe non-covops cloaked ships *
[9] You should be able to probe all cloaked ships *
[6] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for all ships (less overall speed)
[6] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for the larger ships only (BS speed much lower, BC speed lower, cruiser speed a bit lower)
[0] Active shield tanking needs a nerf
[0] Active armor tanking needs a nerf
[0] Passive shield tanking needs a nerf
[0] Armor/hull buffer tanking needs a nerf
[5] Web drones need a boost
[5] Painter drones need a boost
[5] ECM drones need a nerf
[5] ECMs need a nerf
[0] RDSs need a nerf they need to be fixed
[5] Carriers need a nerf
[7] Motherships need a nerf
[9] Titans need a nerf
[0] Focus fire needs a nerf
[9] Rigs on small ships need to cost less than rigs on large ships kinda
[4] T1 rigs are too expensive kinda
[4] T2 rigs are too expensive
[6] Abandoned wrecks should be scannable via probes
[5] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of agression
[0] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of agression
[4] Older characters should be expelled from NPC corps in single-man corps
[0] Wardec fees are way too low for corps
[0] Wardec fees are way too low for alliances
[0] People should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced corp until war ends
[0] Corps should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced alliance until war ends
[7] More PVE content for small groups
[9] More PVP content for small groups
[9] Transferable killrights or other bounty system revamps
[7] Add additional rewards for killing outlaws
[5] Total revamp of Sci&Ind interface
[2] Remove all T2 BPOs
[7] Add ways to get new T2 BPOs

Shatana Fulfairas
Gallente
Celestial Horizon Corp.
Posted - 2008.05.08 11:35:00 - [46]
 

CANDIDATE NAME : <Leanna Jane Evelyn Fulford>
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : <United Kingdom>

[6] Rate your own free time in the real life (what's left after work, school, other obligation)
[8] Do you wish you didn't have to travel to Iceland for CSM meetings ?
IMHO travel to iceland to meet with those who are trying to help the game is essential for all candidates on this
[7] Rate your own forum reading presence
[5] Rate your own forum posting presence
[8] Rate your own ingame presence
[5] Rate your own PvP activity level
[7] Rate your own PvE activity level
[9] Rate your own industry/science/trade activity level
As ive stated on my blog of this i have 1 pure pvp char and one pure industry char in game
[3] Number of most accounts you ever had active at the same time
[8] Lowsec mining needs a boost
[4] Highsec mining needs a boost
[5] We need larger mining ships
I belive we need a ship between the rorqual and the hulk atm as w jump staright from a hulk into a capital ship..
[8] Rorquals should be allowed to use stargates like jump freighters
[4] Allow capital ships in highsec (cyno in highsec)
[6] Jump freighters need a big boost (extra cargo, extra hitpoints/resists, maybe even module/rig slots, whatever)
[5] Lowsec mission-running needs a boost
[5] Highsec mission-running needs a nerf
[4] Bring back nexus chip NPC buy orders
[4] L5 missions need to be available in highsec too
[4] L4 missions need to be available in lowsec only
[8] No insurance for CONCORD kills
I agree with this becaus
[0] No insurance for 0.0 kills
[3] No insurance for Battlecruisers and above
[5] No insurance for Battleships and above
[3] Dysprosium situation is just fine, adapt or die
[8] Moon mining needs a total revamp
[7] Allow moon mining in 0.4
[3] Allow moon mining in highsec
[8] Input T1 BPC levels need to influence output T2 BPC levels
[3] You should be able to research levels on BPCs in POS mobile labs
[3] Mobile lab slots need to be allowed to become public
[6] You should be able to build outposts in any system that have no stations at all (no sov requirements)
[4] Local should be replaced with constellation chat
[4] Local should be replaced with region chat
[4] Local must go away completely
[3] Non-covops cloaks need stronger drawbacks/penalities (lock time, lock range, etc)
[5] Stealth bombers need a boost
[5] Black ops need a boost
[5] Marauders need a boost
[4] HICtors need a nerf
[3] You should be able to probe non-covops cloaked ships
[3] You should be able to probe all cloaked ships
[5] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for all ships (less overall speed)
[6] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for the larger ships only (BS speed much lower, BC speed lower, cruiser speed a bit lower)
[4] Active shield tanking needs a nerf
[4] Active armor tanking needs a nerf
[4] Passive shield tanking needs a nerf
[3] Armor/hull buffer tanking needs a nerf
[7] Web drones need a boost
[6] Painter drones need a boost
[3] ECM drones need a nerf
[3] ECMs need a nerf
[] RSDs need a nerf
[1] Carriers need a nerf
[1] Motherships need a nerf
[5] Titans need a nerf
[4] Focus fire needs a nerf
[6] Rigs on small ships need to cost less than rigs on large ships
[6] T1 rigs are too expensive
[8] T2 rigs are too expensive
[5] Abandoned wrecks should be scannable via probes
[2] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of agression
[2] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of agression
[1] Older characters should be expelled from NPC corps in single-man corps
[6] Wardec fees are way too low for corps
[7] Wardec fees are way too low for alliances
[5] People should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced corp until war ends
[5] Corps should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced alliance until war ends
[7] More PVE content for small groups
[7] More PVP content for small groups
[4] Transferable killrights or other bounty system revamps
[6] Add additional rewards for killing outlaws
[9] Total revamp of Sci&Ind interface
[1] Remove all T2 BPOs
[7] Add ways to get new T2 BP

Andargor theWise
Collateral Damage Unlimited
Posted - 2008.05.08 22:17:00 - [47]
 

Edited by: Andargor theWise on 12/05/2008 23:29:46


Originally by: Andargor theWise
Nice initiative, didn't know who to vote for.

Here's my contribution, a scorecard to pick candidates.

Self-explanatory, done really quickly, so no guarantee on accuracy, etc etc. Feel free to adjust and repost.


A little update. Put in weights and stuff, added the last candidates, corrected a smal calc error, and credited Akita Embarassed.


Max Torps
Nomadic Conglomerate
Posted - 2008.05.08 22:22:00 - [48]
 

Originally by: Andargor theWise
A little update. Put in weights and stuff, added the last candidates, corrected a smal calc error, and credited Akita Embarassed.




Hi
Not all candidates in the thread are on there I'm afraid.

Andargor theWise
Collateral Damage Unlimited
Posted - 2008.05.08 22:37:00 - [49]
 

Edited by: Andargor theWise on 12/05/2008 23:30:24
Originally by: Max Torps
Originally by: Andargor theWise
A little update. Put in weights and stuff, added the last candidates, corrected a smal calc error, and credited Akita Embarassed.




Hi
Not all candidates in the thread are on there I'm afraid.


Sorry, I somehow missed you and Noghri. Embarassed

Fixed

(edited your quote too with the new URL)

Kayscha
Posted - 2008.05.08 23:36:00 - [50]
 

I'm shocked at how many candidates strongly feel that older (solo player) characters such as myself ought to be kicked out of NPC corps into one man corps. Hey, what have I ever done to you? :O
Besides the small problem that I wouldn't have any skills to manage my own corp, I'd very much hate what this does to my role-playing attempts as a long-time NPC corp member. If this is about griefers hiding in NPC corps whenever the turf gets hot, I suggest you'd better address NPC corps as a whole instead and add the following option for candidates:

[9] restrict membership to NPC corps to players with a certain minimum standing towards corp and empire as well as a minimum sec rating

and

[9] let players/corps/alliances declare war on NPC corps - at the cost of becoming hostile to that corp's NPCs and stations as well, and likely to their closest friends too (say, that empire's other corps).

oh, and why not

[9] make all NPC corps joinable, coupled with certain requirements as well as specific advantages and drawbacks, and a meaningful way to interact with them.

Don't forget, NPC corps are in the game, so it should follow that they have an actual role in the game as well.

Inanna Zuni
Minmatar
The Causality
Electus Matari
Posted - 2008.05.09 09:14:00 - [51]
 

Edited by: Inanna Zuni on 09/05/2008 09:49:58
CANDIDATE NAME : Alison Wheeler
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : London, England, UK

First up, a comment that this, like all box-tick and assign-a-value surveys without open answers can give misleading results because of the different standpoints of the person asking the questions, the one answering, and the readers. Make your own conclusions or, even better, read my positions on many of these elsewhere.

As regards nerfs and boosts for individual ships, that is something that pilots will *always* be arguing about and, like many of the other issues raised by these questions, isn't something for the Council to decide themselves but for each of the members of the CSM to canvas opinion from the wider number of EVE pilots, miners, industrialists, pirates and traders. I concur that a number of the newer ship types need tweaking though. I have published opinions on many of these already and those discussions are more useful to pilots making their voting decision than a list of numbers. Q&A threads are the way to go imho.

As regards forum presences, etc. I read as many different threads as I can, but I'm not into AOL posting; if I have something useful to add that hasn't already been said by many others I will comment, not otherwise. Unlike some pilots I believe that the *quality* of posts matters way more than the *quantity* you get by responding to absolutely every thread with a "yay, I agree too!"

IZ

Goumindong
SniggWaffe
Posted - 2008.05.09 10:05:00 - [52]
 

Originally by: Kayscha
I'm shocked at how many candidates strongly feel that older (solo player) characters such as myself ought to be kicked out of NPC corps into one man corps. Hey, what have I ever done to you? :O
Besides the small problem that I wouldn't have any skills to manage my own corp, I'd very much hate what this does to my role-playing attempts as a long-time NPC corp member. If this is about griefers hiding in NPC corps whenever the turf gets hot, I suggest you'd better address NPC corps as a whole instead and add the following option for candidates:

[9] restrict membership to NPC corps to players with a certain minimum standing towards corp and empire as well as a minimum sec rating

and

[9] let players/corps/alliances declare war on NPC corps - at the cost of becoming hostile to that corp's NPCs and stations as well, and likely to their closest friends too (say, that empire's other corps).

oh, and why not

[9] make all NPC corps joinable, coupled with certain requirements as well as specific advantages and drawbacks, and a meaningful way to interact with them.

Don't forget, NPC corps are in the game, so it should follow that they have an actual role in the game as well.


Why i do not really support kicking these players out it would take all of 10 minutes and 20,000 isk to train up Corporation Management 1 for an older player. I started out with 5 charisma and it would take me 10 minutes, 17 seconds with no implant in.

Managing a corp is essentially free.

Xaen
Caldari
Aperture Harmonics
K162
Posted - 2008.05.09 19:29:00 - [53]
 

Originally by: Akita T
Edited by: Akita T on 06/05/2008 09:49:52
CANDIDATE NAME : <Your Real Name Here - as listed on the voting page>
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : <as listed on the voting page>
<snip>

Version : 1.2[/yellow]

No mention of the godawful state of the UI despite the 11 page ~2 year old thread I have about it in Features and Ideas Discussion.

You sir, fail. And nobody inserted it, so I'm not voting for any of you!

Goumindong
SniggWaffe
Posted - 2008.05.09 19:35:00 - [54]
 

Originally by: Xaen
Originally by: Akita T
Edited by: Akita T on 06/05/2008 09:49:52
CANDIDATE NAME : <Your Real Name Here - as listed on the voting page>
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : <as listed on the voting page>
<snip>

Version : 1.2[/yellow]

No mention of the godawful state of the UI despite the 11 page ~2 year old thread I have about it in Features and Ideas Discussion.

You sir, fail. And nobody inserted it, so I'm not voting for any of you!


its in my manifesto :(

Xaen
Caldari
Aperture Harmonics
K162
Posted - 2008.05.09 19:46:00 - [55]
 

Originally by: Goumindong
Originally by: Xaen
Originally by: Akita T
Edited by: Akita T on 06/05/2008 09:49:52
CANDIDATE NAME : <Your Real Name Here - as listed on the voting page>
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : <as listed on the voting page>
<snip>

Version : 1.2[/yellow]

No mention of the godawful state of the UI despite the 11 page ~2 year old thread I have about it in Features and Ideas Discussion.

You sir, fail. And nobody inserted it, so I'm not voting for any of you!


its in my manifesto :(

But you didn't feel it was important enough to add.

Also we disagree strongly here:
[9] You should be able to probe non-covops cloaked ships *
[9] You should be able to probe all cloaked ships *
[9] Non-covops cloaks need stronger drawbacks/penalitiessee * for specifics

And I won't elaborate here because this isn't the thread to discuss it in.

Goumindong
SniggWaffe
Posted - 2008.05.09 20:05:00 - [56]
 

Edited by: Goumindong on 09/05/2008 20:05:23
Go ahead and ask in my thread, I'd be happy to explain.

ED: Also, i think i am out of space on my post to add more

Grey Shadow
KIA Corp
KIA Alliance
Posted - 2008.05.09 20:15:00 - [57]
 

Edited by: Grey Shadow on 09/05/2008 20:15:25
CANDIDATE NAME : Andy Ody
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : UK (Scotland)
Version : 1.2

[4] Rate your own free time in the real life (what's left after work, school, other obligation)
[0] Do you wish you didn't have to travel to Iceland for CSM meetings ?
[7] Rate your own forum reading presence
[4] Rate your own forum posting presence
[7] Rate your own ingame presence
[5] Rate your own PvP activity level
[4] Rate your own PvE activity level
[3] Rate your own industry/science/trade activity level
[2] Number of most accounts you ever had active at the same time
[8] Lowsec mining needs a boost
[3] Highsec mining needs a boost
[7] We need larger mining ships
[3] Rorquals should be allowed to use stargates like jump freighters
[2] Allow capital ships in highsec (cyno in highsec)
[6] Jump freighters need a big boost (extra cargo, extra hitpoints/resists, maybe even module/rig slots, whatever)
[7] Lowsec mission-running needs a boost
[3] Highsec mission-running needs a nerf
[5] Bring back nexus chip NPC buy orders
[4] L5 missions need to be available in highsec too
[4] L4 missions need to be available in lowsec only
[9] No insurance for CONCORD kills
[0] No insurance for 0.0 kills
[2] No insurance for Battlecruisers and above
[1] No insurance for Battleships and above
[4] Dysprosium situation is just fine, adapt or die
[6] Moon mining needs a total revamp
[6] Allow moon mining in 0.4
[4] Allow moon mining in highsec
[7] Input T1 BPC levels need to influence output T2 BPC levels
[2] You should be able to research levels on BPCs in POS mobile labs
[6] Mobile lab slots need to be allowed to become public
[4] You should be able to build outposts in any system that have no stations at all (no sov requirements)
[8] Local should be replaced with constellation chat
[8] Local should be replaced with region chat
[9] Local must go away completely
[1] Non-covops cloaks need stronger drawbacks/penalities (lock time, lock range, etc)
[7] Stealth bombers need a boost
[7] Black ops need a boost
[8] Marauders need a boost
[4] HICtors need a nerf
[4] You should be able to probe non-covops cloaked ships
[2] You should be able to probe all cloaked ships
[4] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for all ships (less overall speed)
[4] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for the larger ships only (BS speed much lower, BC speed lower, cruiser speed a bit lower)
[3] Active shield tanking needs a nerf
[3] Active armor tanking needs a nerf
[2] Passive shield tanking needs a nerf
[2] Armor/hull buffer tanking needs a nerf
[6] Web drones need a boost
[7] Painter drones need a boost
[4] ECM drones need a nerf
[3] ECMs need a nerf
[4] RSDs need a nerf
[5] Carriers need a nerf
[5] Motherships need a nerf
[5] Titans need a nerf
[3] Focus fire needs a nerf
[7] Rigs on small ships need to cost less than rigs on large ships
[4] T1 rigs are too expensive
[3] T2 rigs are too expensive
[6] Abandoned wrecks should be scannable via probes
[4] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of agression
[3] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of agression
[7] Older characters should be expelled from NPC corps in single-man corps
[5] Wardec fees are way too low for corps
[7] Wardec fees are way too low for alliances
[4] People should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced corp until war ends
[5] Corps should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced alliance until war ends
[6] More PVE content for small groups
[5] More PVP content for small groups
[7] Transferable killrights or other bounty system revamps
[8] Add additional rewards for killing outlaws
[7] Total revamp of Sci&Ind interface
[4] Remove all T2 BPOs
[6] Add ways to get new T2 BPOs


Andy

SencneS
Rebellion Against Big Irreversible Dinks
Posted - 2008.05.09 21:56:00 - [58]
 

Did all the Candidates actually read the scale correctly?

0 = completely disagree
9 = completely agree

Now re-read these two statements carefully...

[ ] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of aggression
[ ] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of aggression

If you said a high number for both, you are saying - I think salvaging a wreak is aggression but looting it is OK.

I'm actually kind of concerned that something like this can be so easily overlooked by some candidates, Although I am also assuming they actually meant to say 9/0 instead.

Here is a tip for the rest of the candidates.

[9] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of aggression
[0] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of aggression
Means you want to be able to kill anyone even looking at the wreak. YARRRR!!

[0] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of aggression
[9] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of aggression
Means you want to salvage and loot, free of risk. ugh

[0] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of aggression
[0] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of aggression
Mean you want it the way it currently. Cool

[9] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of aggression
[9] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of aggression
Mean you want it the exact opposite from what it is now, Salvage is aggression, but looting is not. Shocked

Siigari Kitawa
Gallente
Perditus Peregrinus
Posted - 2008.05.10 03:09:00 - [59]
 

Originally by: SencneS
[0] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of aggression
[9] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of aggression
Means you want to salvage and loot, free of risk. ugh

WRECKS, not cans.

If you loot somebody's can yeah, you're open game.

But when you think about it, looting somebody's wreck is what causes half of highsec mission runner grief anyway. Additionally, if they don't loot and leave it's public.

Wrecks are not cargo containers.

Ki An
Gallente
The Really Awesome Players
Posted - 2008.05.10 09:14:00 - [60]
 

Read this thread after I voted. Seems I chose the right candidate even without this info. Nevertheless, good initiative.


Pages: 1 [2] 3

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only