open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked Time to put a cap on the subscriber base?
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic

Alowishus
the united
Negative Ten.
Posted - 2008.01.28 23:47:00 - [61]
 

Hi. You obviously have an MBA or Doctorate in economics.

What other ideas do you have for CCP? Maybe they will hire you.

Rolling Eyes

Cornette
Gallente
Solar Revenue Service
TAXU
Posted - 2008.01.29 00:03:00 - [62]
 

This is the best trolling thread I read today.

Radix Salvilines
legion industries ltd
AAA Citizens
Posted - 2008.01.29 00:19:00 - [63]
 

bwahaha... nice thread

better push the newcomers to the chineese server :P They pay and dont cause lag in here haha - now thats an idea!! Twisted Evil

Admiral Pelleon
White Shadow Imperium
Posted - 2008.01.29 00:47:00 - [64]
 

Wranglers replies made my day. Laughing

Fanjita
Posted - 2008.01.29 02:14:00 - [65]
 

Originally by: CCP Wrangler
The Need for Speed is an ongoing thing where we design everything with the goal of reducing lag, this is for both hardware and software.


so why is it getting worse? couple of years ago a 300 man battle was great and hardly laggy at all now you cant have a 100 man battle without crashing the servers?

Admiral Pelleon
White Shadow Imperium
Posted - 2008.01.29 02:19:00 - [66]
 

Originally by: Fanjita
Originally by: CCP Wrangler
The Need for Speed is an ongoing thing where we design everything with the goal of reducing lag, this is for both hardware and software.


so why is it getting worse? couple of years ago a 300 man battle was great and hardly laggy at all now you cant have a 100 man battle without crashing the servers?


Now instead of one 300 man battle, there's 10 100 man battles.

Fanjita
Posted - 2008.01.29 05:18:00 - [67]
 

Originally by: Admiral Pelleon
Originally by: Fanjita
Originally by: CCP Wrangler
The Need for Speed is an ongoing thing where we design everything with the goal of reducing lag, this is for both hardware and software.


so why is it getting worse? couple of years ago a 300 man battle was great and hardly laggy at all now you cant have a 100 man battle without crashing the servers?


Now instead of one 300 man battle, there's 10 100 man battles.


and with all the hardware upgrades 10 100 man fights in different places should be easily managable but no one single 300 man fight brings the WHOLE server to its knees which it didnt do a ferw years ago ccp are obviopusly doing something wrong, has anyone informed the prigrammers that 'need for speed' is aboutimproving the server and not making different nanoships?

Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS
IDLE EMPIRE
Posted - 2008.01.29 05:24:00 - [68]
 

Originally by: Alowishus
Hi. You obviously have an MBA or Doctorate in economics.

What other ideas do you have for CCP? Maybe they will hire you.

Rolling Eyes


nobel prize for uber database coding skills?

that one might actually help Laughing

i wish i could write a database that does thousands of transactions every second with 40k people at the same time with no latency Sad

Thomas Redux
Redux Command
Posted - 2008.01.29 05:32:00 - [69]
 

*moderated - GM Zhainius*

Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS
IDLE EMPIRE
Posted - 2008.01.29 05:34:00 - [70]
 

Originally by: Thomas Redux
Till the ccp *****es give up on their no sharding bull**** and shard eve, I'm gone. It was a good idea while eve was small but now the lagfest sucks ass. CCP needs to stop beating the meat and get a fuc.kin clue. Until they pull their thumbs out of their asses, Im keeping my 2 account fees. EVE used to be such a great game... now it's a big cryfest of ner***e.


any idea on how to do that?

oh and I'm still lag free

umop 3pisdn
Minmatar
Fnck the blob.
Posted - 2008.01.29 07:27:00 - [71]
 

Lag in eve is ever present.

A 5 v 5 lags, but isnt much, not normally enough to change the outcome of the fight.

The problem is the objectives of 0.0 alliances, they have to have goals, CCP keeps screwing this up royally.

They seem to have no idea what goes on, or they are so addicted to their grand vision that they dont care about making the game playable now.

Titans:
Anti blob weapon? Yes they are usefull against as many small ships as you can pack into a small area.

Does it take a lot of effort to build one? yes
Does this mean the alliance owning it will do everything to protect it? yes
Does this mean the opposition will have to do even more, including bring more ships to kill it? YES

Cyno jammers.
No cap ships for the attackers, so you need 40+ battleships and many man hours to take it out.

If the pos is properly defended then you're basically boned.

Carriers+fighters
Fighters cause lag, but are immune to it and just keep on killing, so causing lag actually benefits the side with a lot of carriers.

Sov...
Directly linked to pos's, no real limit on how many you can have up other than how many moons are in the system, each and every system is the same.
Stront timing as well as its own massive HP/regen/defences mean it will ALWAYS cause blob fights.

CCP know these things, they know that they have caused the blobs, they know that people want to win and will bring more anyway and so they do nothing.

EvE is on a pretty serious downward spiral in terms of large scale fights, and small scale PVP is being killed off by CCP for some reason (exploration, lets put the carebears somewhere you cant see and cant warp too without spending an age probing for, while leaving local alone, meaning they have ages to flee and hide)

They also want to remove static belts and add gate guns in 0.0 eventually... what do CCP want the left overs of eve to look like?

SiJira
Posted - 2008.01.29 18:43:00 - [72]
 

throttle the number of connections allowed on the server at one time to only 10000 and no system can have more than 80 people in it except jita that can have no more than 200 people in it


Pages: 1 2 [3]

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only