I admit i've wondered about this for many months, not a nerf the nano craze idea, for pimped bs.
E.G This tii disruptor does 1 point at 24km
Tobias disruptor does 2 points at 40km
Please remember of course that it need 4000 pg to fit instead of 1 pg
This tii webifier does 90% at 10km
Tobias webifier does 75% at 40km
Remember it takes 2400 pg to fit of course
Now we all know that webs were out of whack a few months back, when ccp had to adjust the values of the tii ones to 90% because they were inferior to fleetings. What some ppl may not be aware of is the devs are looking at altering webs as a counter to nanoed shisp, while officer webs arn't wide spread enough to do that it does make sence to flag them while ccp are poking around with web in general.
The point Barthezz so succinctly put forward is, as you can see, officer disruptor's over and above superior range and obscene fitting while officer webs offer inferior strength with the the increased range and fitting. Perhaps it was an oversight, perhaps it was deliberate (wouldn't it be nice if a dev confirmed which
) but regardless, nice as they are it's odd.
I'm not saying they should be more powerful like disruptor's, although domination web batteries do
web more than standards one, i'm just say they should at least be on par with the strength of tii webs, unless of course there is a very good reason not to, considering the rarity, difficulty of fitting and cost of the modules.