open All Channels
seplocked Ships and Modules
blankseplocked T2 warp jammers anyone?
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

hylleX
Herrow Inc
Posted - 2005.10.13 22:02:00 - [1]
 

With the upcoming gank nerf, alot of people will use their now free low slots for fitting even more stabs, since u cant make a decent tank out of a few slots. We need T2 warp dis/scrams now! and pls no frickin T2 stabs mmkay

Drew Peacock
Posted - 2005.10.13 22:25:00 - [2]
 

Look, if you want to fight brainless targets that don't have the sense to leave a fight, then you will find plenty of them in the belts. The show up as red crosses.

Don't know what bugs me more, the whining carebears or the whining PvPers. Would you all please just STFU. mkay.

Ortu Konsinni
KIA Corp
KIA Alliance
Posted - 2005.10.13 22:28:00 - [3]
 

I suspect that, if they ever introduce T2 warp scramblers (and webbers), it will come along with the introduction of racial propulsion jamming... And it's unlikely that will come anytime soon.

Sky Hunter
0NE
Posted - 2005.10.13 23:11:00 - [4]
 

Racial Propulsion jamming was in plans to be implemented but got cancelled i thought?

Ah and btw, if you cant catch your target wich is using WCS, consider other methods like flying in group or using a bubble(if in 0.0 and camping gate for example).


danneh
Amarr
V0LTA
Posted - 2005.10.13 23:42:00 - [5]
 

Yes, i was camping today in my battleship and i had 2 intys with me, 2 ravens had atleast 4 stabs each.

Just fkn stupid.

Shaemell Buttleson
Posted - 2005.10.14 03:39:00 - [6]
 

Originally by: danneh
Yes, i was camping today in my battleship and i had 2 intys with me, 2 ravens had atleast 4 stabs each.

Just fkn stupid.


Irritating it's true if you cant catch them but why couldn't your inti gang members have more than -4 scrambling strength between them? Wink

Fungus Amongus
Caldari
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Posted - 2005.10.14 03:52:00 - [7]
 

Originally by: Shaemell Buttleson

Irritating it's true if you cant catch them but why couldn't your inti gang members have more than -4 scrambling strength between them? Wink


we've had 6 points on a ship and it warped off. 4 points doesnt do much these days it seems. WCSs are fair, but not when a BS has loaded all of its low slots with em imo. you shouldnt have to load up all of a BBs mid slots just to warp one ship.

Gabby05
Amarr
Doomheim
Posted - 2005.10.14 04:56:00 - [8]
 

Originally by: Fungus Amongus
Originally by: Shaemell Buttleson

Irritating it's true if you cant catch them but why couldn't your inti gang members have more than -4 scrambling strength between them? Wink


we've had 6 points on a ship and it warped off. 4 points doesnt do much these days it seems. WCSs are fair, but not when a BS has loaded all of its low slots with em imo. you shouldnt have to load up all of a BBs mid slots just to warp one ship.



I think you should be able to, otherwise make it so the more in your gang the less effective your ships turrets will be Laughing

BoinKlasik
Senkei Jin
Posted - 2005.10.14 04:58:00 - [9]
 

I still dont think that your jammers should be able to counteract half of my low slots whilst you only sacrifice a med slot apiece ;) But im sure ill get shot down at that. gimmie a t2 WCS :P

Zungen
Gallente
Thunderwaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2005.10.14 07:11:00 - [10]
 

Gang wcs bonus anyone? :P

Arti K
Invicta.
Posted - 2005.10.14 07:25:00 - [11]
 

Edited by: Arti K on 14/10/2005 07:26:53
I want interdictors from Star Wars. Force everyone to fight Very Happy

And ppl complaining "oh but the gate camps" yeah, they're gate camps, look at the map and avoid them, or enjoy the pyrotechnics.

In fact I don't think we should even be able to make safespots, we should just all fight everyone all the time. It'll be just like highschool, whoever has the most friends is better.


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only