open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked Patch Deployment Delayed, Patch Notes Available- Updated 25 Aug
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic

Xssassin
Caldari
Exploration Inc
Posted - 2005.08.23 08:32:00 - [61]
 

Originally by: MrJordanIOI
Edited by: MrJordanIOI on 22/08/2005 16:35:21
Can you pretty please add this

http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=214284
"PLEASE-can we get some indicator when the own ship is being SCRAMBLED?"
to the list ?

A great deal of people would appreciate it.

Thank you in advance,
IOI



I agree, make it happen now!
And show us what ship it is so I can shoot the f***er.Twisted Evil

Arud
Rampage Eternal
Ka-Tet
Posted - 2005.08.23 09:00:00 - [62]
 

aaannnnd about two years later
Quote:
Large collidable objects and asteroids can no longer be locked by auto targeting modules.

about timeYARRRR!!

Grey Area
Caldari
Posted - 2005.08.23 13:37:00 - [63]
 

Edited by: Grey Area on 23/08/2005 13:37:53
PLEASE in this patch can we have more info on missile launchers when loaded on a ship? Turrets give rate of fire, optimal, falloff, tracking and damage modifier, all updated for skills and other fitted modules.

Launchers give...rate of fire. If you want any more, you have to right click your ship, choose "show info", choose the modules tab, scroll dwon to the missiles, right click the missile, choose "show info", select the attributes tab, scroll down....Sad PLUS the effect of ballistic control units (the ONLY modifier we currently have) is not included.

As if we aren't punished enough for using missiles already!

Please! Put the following info on the "show info" tab for the launchers when fitted in space;

Flight time
Velocity
Edit - would it be too much to ask it to work out the effective range for us fom the above?
Ammo loaded
Damage
Explosion radius (updated to include skills like Guided Missile Precision)

This is no different to what turret users have enjoyed for years...

call mebtch
Posted - 2005.08.23 14:50:00 - [64]
 

can u do somthing about the fonts for the chat windows i cant read them sence the last patch ?

elFarto
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Posted - 2005.08.24 12:10:00 - [65]
 

Originally by: "The Patch Notes"
Minmatar Service Outpost refinary has had its efficiancy increased to 35%


That'll make a certain alliance happy.

Regards
elFarto

MrJordanIOI
Minmatar
The Lantern Mining Corporation
Posted - 2005.08.24 13:45:00 - [66]
 

Originally by: Xssassin
Originally by: MrJordanIOI
Edited by: MrJordanIOI on 22/08/2005 16:35:21
Can you pretty please add this

http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=214284
"PLEASE-can we get some indicator when the own ship is being SCRAMBLED?"
to the list ?

A great deal of people would appreciate it.

Thank you in advance,
IOI



I agree, make it happen now!
And show us what ship it is so I can shoot the f***er.Twisted Evil



Actually Xssassin - can you go to
http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=214284
and sign the thread too ;) ?

The more the merrier and hopefully also taken more seriously by the devs...

IOI

Diss Champ
Amarr
VentureCorp
Posted - 2005.08.24 15:24:00 - [67]
 

Haven't seen a fix for the refines without taking standings into account
bug in the list yet, put in a bug report for that long time back. Aside
from the new lag issues, that's one of the more annoying bugs, and one
that is likely to bite new players who don't know which stations are newly
refiners particularly hard.

CCP kieron

Posted - 2005.08.24 18:51:00 - [68]
 

'Client lag when receiving an EVE-mail should be significantly reduced' has been added to the Patch Notes for deployment on Tuesday.

Xelios
Minmatar
Broski Enterprises
-Mostly Harmless-
Posted - 2005.08.24 20:08:00 - [69]
 

Originally by: MrJordanIOI
Originally by: Xssassin
Originally by: MrJordanIOI
Edited by: MrJordanIOI on 22/08/2005 16:35:21
Can you pretty please add this

http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=214284
"PLEASE-can we get some indicator when the own ship is being SCRAMBLED?"
to the list ?

A great deal of people would appreciate it.

Thank you in advance,
IOI



I agree, make it happen now!
And show us what ship it is so I can shoot the f***er.Twisted Evil



Actually Xssassin - can you go to
http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=214284
and sign the thread too ;) ?

The more the merrier and hopefully also taken more seriously by the devs...

IOI

I doubt it the devs don't appreciate petition threads, they've said that before. Constructive posting is much more helpful to the devs than less than 1% of the EVE population voting on an idea with 4 or 5 pages of "/signed" spam.

Seleene
Body Count Inc.
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2005.08.25 10:01:00 - [70]
 

I just wanna be able to set standings by alliance instead of corp. Crying or Very sad

ArmEagle
Gallente
Posted - 2005.08.25 12:37:00 - [71]
 

Hmm really a pitty. I started a trial account a few days ago and am experiencind the win98/ME timeclass issues.

No I am not using win98/ME but play on linux using Cedega, which enables me to play windows games on my system. It simply has the same lacking functionality as win98/ME.

This game looks so good, world and interface, I wish i could play without the hickups right away.

Pitty CCP didn't want to put some critical fixes in a small patch and release that. I'm just unlucky to have started the trial now.

CCP kieron

Posted - 2005.08.25 18:06:00 - [72]
 

More changes and updates have been added to the Patch Notes. They include:

-Providence cargo bonus increase by skill level works properly.
-Minmatar Service Outpost factories are open for business.
-The Gith X-Type Ballistic Deflection Field has been renamed to Gist X-Type Ballistic Deflection Field.
-The length of the Market tutorial was reduced and the Assets tutorial was modified.
-Amarr Navy Slicer gave a 5% increase in cap usage and 10% increase in rof per level, it should be a decrease of 10% cap usage and increase of 5% damage per level. This has been fixed and the description has been updated.
-Minor typos to the Patch Note text have been fixed and clarifications made.

Basileus
Posted - 2005.08.25 19:19:00 - [73]
 

Originally by: Patch Notes
Running Eve on Windows 98 works again

Wo0t?! Someone actually tries to run Eve with Win '98?? Nice...

ArmEagle
Gallente
Posted - 2005.08.25 19:29:00 - [74]
 

Originally by: Basileus
Originally by: Patch Notes
Running Eve on Windows 98 works again

Wo0t?! Someone actually tries to run Eve with Win '98?? Nice...


Nope.. I am playing on Linux, using Cedega.
Luckily a player wrote a small windows DLL and program for win98/ME which fixes the problem until CCP patches it.
And I figured out how I could use that to get rid of exactly the same problem on Linux too http://transgaming.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3719.

So now CCP can wait with their patch as long as they want ;)

MAN it is so relaxing without the hickups, i really appreciate that fix!

vinnymcg
Glukkons
Posted - 2005.08.25 23:53:00 - [75]
 

I read the patch notes and it siad nothing about bring back the abality to delete corp mails, so i went and tried it on the test server hopeing that someone had just forgot to type it in. Unfortunately i couldn'tSad. Please god tell me this is some horrible joke and it is being fixedMad

Sveldt
Posted - 2005.08.26 02:20:00 - [76]
 

There are a couple things I'd like to see added(if possible) that haven't been mentioned yet...

1)ships *actually having full cap when undocking
2)ability to see alliance-set standing when viewing a specific character's info

Number two would likely require a fourth field under 'relationship' so I don't really expect it, but I'll suggest it nonetheless.

Aktivus
Gallente
Power and Production
DarkStorm Enterprises
Posted - 2005.08.26 10:55:00 - [77]
 

Regarding corporate hangar arrays: patch notes state they will have to be online for items to be added; so nothing will happen to those items that are already inside them (and they will be accessible after onlining), right ?
Please confirm, otherwise our corp will have to move 1 million m3 in a hurry....

Summersnow
Posted - 2005.08.26 17:10:00 - [78]
 

Mining Crystals now have a lifespan based a potential damage over time used formula. They do not last indefinitely.

FOF missiles can no longer be fired from Rocket Launcher II's.


Good job CCP.

One toon has spent the last two weeks training to use t2 strips, which may have just got screwed ( mind giving us some indication HOW LONG they last or would that be too obvious of a concern for you to address in the patch notes? ), instead of working towards barge V.

The other toon has been training rockets IV & V to give my AC jag some standoff range against those damned irritating wingmen & webifiers that like to hang just at the edge of ac range. ( let alone the isk spent on near worthless RL-II's now )

All this in the same week I lose a cyclone to lag & CCP's inability to inform its customeers that there ship is scrambled really makes me unhappy with CCP.

Its especially agravating because if they had patched as per schedule two weeks ago I'd have known and NOT made the wasteful training choices I did.

Cyleth
Black Nova Corp
IT Alliance
Posted - 2005.08.26 20:43:00 - [79]
 

Dear Devs
I had to read the notes two times just that I didnt miss anything and I didnt find what I was looking for.


OVERVIEW!
I can't believe its not fixed. There has been tons of threads about it, how its totally screwed and how ppl shoot wrong targets because of it. Yet you have fixed the more important things, like EULA button, Jukebox volume, Chat character avatar pictures... really important stuff indeed... gimme a break.

And what about 'filtering neutral ships ships from overview' feature which was promised few months ago???

Those two are not really asked a much. You have said its easy to do the neutral thingie on overview, but yet there's some jukebox tuning on the patch which seems to be more important. I really hope you can look into overview since I can guarantee, im not the only one suffering from it.Wink

Altaireus
Minmatar
Fernitech
Posted - 2005.08.26 20:47:00 - [80]
 

Edited by: Altaireus on 26/08/2005 20:47:52
Originally by: Summersnow
The other toon has been training rockets IV & V to give my AC jag some standoff range against those damned irritating wingmen & webifiers that like to hang just at the edge of ac range. ( let alone the isk spent on near worthless RL-II's now )


You didnt find it odd having to train rockets 5 to be able to fire FOF missiles from rocket launchers?
It was clearly not intended that RL II's should be able to fire FOF, seeing as RL I's cant.

Pottsey
Enheduanni Foundation
Posted - 2005.08.26 21:17:00 - [81]
 

I found another gang assist module bug.
I assume targeted armour repair systems means remote amour rapier systems? Or am I reading that wrong?

“Increases the speed of the gang's personal
and targeted armor repair systems.”

Yet when using the gang assist models both the modules don’t work/effect the remote amour repair modules.

Any chance this bug will be fixed in the patch or is it to late now?

Derron Bel
Amarr
Imperial Academy
Posted - 2005.08.27 05:20:00 - [82]
 

Edited by: Derron Bel on 27/08/2005 05:31:19
Quote:

Amarr Navy Slicer gave a 5% increase in cap usage and 10% increase in rof per level, it should be a decrease of 10% cap usage and increase of 5% damage per level. This has been fixed and the description has been updated.



Shocked
Laughing

Summersnow, AFAIK the mining crystals have always been slated to be volatile.

R3aliti
Posted - 2005.08.27 07:45:00 - [83]
 

Edited by: R3aliti on 27/08/2005 07:59:53
The Succubus description has been fixed. The Damage and RoF bonuses for Lasers and Missiles were reversed.

OK, So is it still going to fly backwards? Confused

One other thing that concerns me - tracking every cycle that the Tech II Mining Crystals are in use, in order to calculate damage is not going to cause lag for the player or server overhead for such a trivial feature? If I remember at one time we tried this for the standard miners and gave it up due to lag....Confused

Mangus Thermopyle
Divine Retribution
Daisho Syndicate
Posted - 2005.08.29 14:52:00 - [84]
 

I just want a HUD that clearly displays what happens in a battle. Is that to much to ask for?

The current HUD with its fast disappearing message boxes has to be the worst HUD ever in a space game. Its a pity such a easy-to-fix issue hasnt been solved in what? 5 years?

Take a look at this thread for some ideas.


Pages: 1 2 [3]

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only