open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked 57 Bubbles.
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

Neurotica
Abh Empire
Posted - 2011.09.05 14:34:00 - [1]
 

Edited by: Neurotica on 05/09/2011 14:36:16

http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/6189/bubblesc.png

I'm sure a read somewhere there is a limit to the can or bubble spam you can deploy on one gate.

Was still fun to see.

So when is too many, too many?

Discrodia
Gallente
Symbiosis International
Moose Alliance
Posted - 2011.09.05 14:34:00 - [2]
 

Links are your friend

If you start lagging the server, it's too much.

Neurotica
Abh Empire
Posted - 2011.09.05 14:37:00 - [3]
 

Majority were large T1.

Tokyo Rose
Posted - 2011.09.05 14:38:00 - [4]
 

No limit to how many bubbles you want to spam.

Its cans and other junk that supposedly has a limit but its never enforced.

malaire
Posted - 2011.09.05 15:10:00 - [5]
 

Originally by: Tokyo Rose
No limit to how many bubbles you want to spam.

Its cans and other junk that supposedly has a limit but its never enforced.

It is enforced if someone reports it.

Tokyo Rose
Posted - 2011.09.05 15:14:00 - [6]
 

Originally by: malaire
Originally by: Tokyo Rose
No limit to how many bubbles you want to spam.

Its cans and other junk that supposedly has a limit but its never enforced.

It is enforced if someone reports it.
Any personal experience with that?

Reported a few camps literally choked with jet cans and abandoned t1 drones the campers placed in all the normal warp in spots after setting up the bubbles and nothing came of it.

Even had fraps of them doing it.

Nada.

malaire
Posted - 2011.09.05 15:18:00 - [7]
 

No personal experience, just what GM Homonoia was telling in this thread.

Tokyo Rose
Posted - 2011.09.05 15:20:00 - [8]
 

Originally by: malaire
No personal experience, just what GM Homonoia was telling in this thread.
Well to quote Hilmar himself words are nothing. Actions are the only thing that matter.

Those words might be there but I have never heard of it ever being enforced.

Dopehead en Marland
Posted - 2011.09.05 15:48:00 - [9]
 

I tried to click the wallet o.O

Misunderstood Genius
Posted - 2011.09.05 17:14:00 - [10]
 

Your char name + hiding the mods makes sense.

Feligast
Minmatar
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.09.05 18:17:00 - [11]
 

Oh, Bubble Island, how we love thee. <3

Tokyo Rose
Posted - 2011.09.05 18:19:00 - [12]
 

Originally by: Feligast
Oh, Bubble Island, how we love thee. <3
Hehe, I busted many of your bubble camps when I was active. <3

Feligast
Minmatar
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.09.05 18:20:00 - [13]
 

Originally by: Tokyo Rose
Originally by: malaire
No personal experience, just what GM Homonoia was telling in this thread.
Well to quote Hilmar himself words are nothing. Actions are the only thing that matter.

Those words might be there but I have never heard of it ever being enforced.


I have. Generally it takes BoB or IT Alliance to report it for anything to get done.

Richard Hammond II
Posted - 2011.09.05 18:26:00 - [14]
 

Originally by: malaire
Originally by: Tokyo Rose
No limit to how many bubbles you want to spam.

Its cans and other junk that supposedly has a limit but its never enforced.

It is enforced if someone reports it.


Or back in the day if your corp wasnt buddy buddy with CCP lol
Spamming stuff into a system to make it lag/crash was an old BoB tactic. Wasnt till everyone else started doing it that ppl started getting banned for it

Amsterdam Conversations
Posted - 2011.09.05 18:29:00 - [15]
 

P-Z isn't even the worst by far.

Tokyo Rose
Posted - 2011.09.05 18:34:00 - [16]
 

Originally by: Feligast
Originally by: Tokyo Rose
Originally by: malaire
No personal experience, just what GM Homonoia was telling in this thread.
Well to quote Hilmar himself words are nothing. Actions are the only thing that matter.

Those words might be there but I have never heard of it ever being enforced.


I have. Generally it takes BoB or IT Alliance to report it for anything to get done.
Well backyard bbq's have a pretty good influance on eve internal politics after all. Very Happy

Kengutsi Akira
Posted - 2011.09.05 18:36:00 - [17]
 

Originally by: Feligast
Originally by: Tokyo Rose
Originally by: malaire
No personal experience, just what GM Homonoia was telling in this thread.
Well to quote Hilmar himself words are nothing. Actions are the only thing that matter.

Those words might be there but I have never heard of it ever being enforced.


I have. Generally it takes BoB or IT Alliance to report it for anything to get done.


Yeah I remember hearing a lot of that about Goons getting banned for pulling the same stuff BoB/IT were at the time. It was OK for the goose but not the gander

Johann King
Posted - 2011.09.05 18:44:00 - [18]
 

WHY U STILL MAD ABOUT BOB?

Tokyo Rose
Posted - 2011.09.05 18:50:00 - [19]
 

Originally by: Johann King
WHY U STILL MAD ABOUT BOB?
Because bob was enjoying blatant ccp favoritism?

Remember when the goons pulled off the name steal? CCP cirmumvented its own rules to try to give it back to them.

Forum outrage reversed that bit of lulz. Alas that forum rage is now completely ignored.

Long live ccp!

Johann King
Posted - 2011.09.05 18:54:00 - [20]
 

Originally by: Tokyo Rose
Originally by: Johann King
WHY U STILL MAD ABOUT BOB?
Because bob was enjoying blatant ccp favoritism?


WHY U STILL BUTTHART?

Feligast
Minmatar
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.09.05 18:58:00 - [21]
 

Originally by: Kengutsi Akira
Originally by: Feligast
Originally by: Tokyo Rose
Originally by: malaire
No personal experience, just what GM Homonoia was telling in this thread.
Well to quote Hilmar himself words are nothing. Actions are the only thing that matter.

Those words might be there but I have never heard of it ever being enforced.


I have. Generally it takes BoB or IT Alliance to report it for anything to get done.


Yeah I remember hearing a lot of that about Goons getting banned for pulling the same stuff BoB/IT were at the time. It was OK for the goose but not the gander


True, Goons did, BoB didn't. Funny, eh?

Tokyo Rose
Posted - 2011.09.05 18:58:00 - [22]
 

Originally by: Johann King
Originally by: Tokyo Rose
Originally by: Johann King
WHY U STILL MAD ABOUT BOB?
Because bob was enjoying blatant ccp favoritism?


WHY U STILL BUTTHART?
I have no association with either bob or the goons.

But I can still see with my eyes. Smile

Simetraz
Posted - 2011.09.05 19:13:00 - [23]
 

57 Bubbles and nobody to guard them means 57 destroyed bubbles.

Took along time to put that many up.
Either someone was VERY board or they really don't want people in that system.
Either way hmmmmmm.

Feligast
Minmatar
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.09.05 19:20:00 - [24]
 

Originally by: Simetraz
57 Bubbles and nobody to guard them means 57 destroyed bubbles.

Took along time to put that many up.
Either someone was VERY board or they really don't want people in that system.
Either way hmmmmmm.



It's a dead end system way off the beaten path that a couple of alliance use for carrier ratting, so no, they REALLY don't want people in there. And if you blow them all up, they'll just put them back. Better to do what we've done.. shoot out the ones right on the gate, to the spawn ranges, then jump in a fleet and have the ones not bubbled starburst to the belts and sanctums and see what you get. They always think they have a minute or so before you burn out of the bubbles... ;)

Elyssa MacLeod
Posted - 2011.09.05 20:36:00 - [25]
 

Edited by: Elyssa MacLeod on 05/09/2011 20:37:11
Originally by: Johann King
Originally by: Tokyo Rose
Originally by: Johann King
WHY U STILL MAD ABOUT BOB?
Because bob was enjoying blatant ccp favoritism?


WHY U STILL BUTTHART?


why u butthurt?
CCP alt detected

and you dont ignore the BoB/IT thing cause if you do youll see it again and again and again etc


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only