open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked deactivated modules after ship change, messed up aggression timers???
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

Kristina Vanszar
Caldari
Posted - 2011.09.03 14:46:00 - [1]
 

Hello everyone,

i wanted to ask if i am the only one having problems with deactivated modules after a ship change in station? It seems like the mods are deactivated becouse the unpiloted ship has not enough powergrid for all of them .

Also agression Timers, i got troubles with Gallente Navy, but i had an Standing of -3,16 with gallente, isn't the navy supposed to attack only under -5 ??

Br,
and thanks all

Mr Kidd
Posted - 2011.09.03 14:53:00 - [2]
 

The official word from CCP is "We are aware of the issue", which given CCP's track record translates to either "So, what?" or "Deal with it!". Your choice.

Kristina Vanszar
Caldari
Posted - 2011.09.03 14:54:00 - [3]
 

ok, i just wanted to make sure that i had not too much beer... so they've messed up again.

thanks

Othran
Brutor Tribe
Posted - 2011.09.03 14:56:00 - [4]
 

Originally by: Mr Kidd
The official word from CCP is "We are aware of the issue", which given CCP's track record translates to either "So, what?" or "Deal with it!". Your choice.


On this instance it doesn't, hard as it is to believe (and I'm not being sarcastic).

Tuxford actually engaged with the forum users and now he knows what is wrong.

Thread is HERE

Kristina Vanszar
Caldari
Posted - 2011.09.03 15:04:00 - [5]
 

Originally by: Othran
Originally by: Mr Kidd
The official word from CCP is "We are aware of the issue", which given CCP's track record translates to either "So, what?" or "Deal with it!". Your choice.


On this instance it doesn't, hard as it is to believe (and I'm not being sarcastic).

Tuxford actually engaged with the forum users and now he knows what is wrong.

Thread is HERE


Thanks for the info,

and whats about the aggression timers?
Isn't the navy supposed to engage players with a standing lower then -5 ?

Othran
Brutor Tribe
Posted - 2011.09.03 15:13:00 - [6]
 

Originally by: Kristina Vanszar

and whats about the aggression timers?
Isn't the navy supposed to engage players with a standing lower then -5 ?


Did you go GCC at all? If so then remember you have multiple timers running and landing on-grid with a faction npc (sentry gun) will reset the faction timer so it can last a lot longer than 15 mins.

I assume you already knew that but I haven't heard anyone else complaining so I dunno really :)

Denidil
Gallente
The Graduates
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2011.09.03 15:28:00 - [7]
 

Originally by: Mr Kidd
The official word from CCP is "We are aware of the issue", which given CCP's track record translates to either "So, what?" or "Deal with it!". Your choice.


they're already fixed one of the common causes of the module offlining issue, and isolated another. stop you're trolling jackass.

Othran
Brutor Tribe
Posted - 2011.09.03 16:24:00 - [8]
 

Originally by: Denidil
Originally by: Mr Kidd
The official word from CCP is "We are aware of the issue", which given CCP's track record translates to either "So, what?" or "Deal with it!". Your choice.


they're already fixed one of the common causes of the module offlining issue, and isolated another. stop you're trolling jackass.


You got a lot to learn about CCP matey. He's really NOT trolling Neutral

Rediculous Grammer
Posted - 2011.09.03 16:28:00 - [9]
 

Originally by: Denidil
Originally by: Mr Kidd
The official word from CCP is "We are aware of the issue", which given CCP's track record translates to either "So, what?" or "Deal with it!". Your choice.


they're already fixed one of the common causes of the module offlining issue, and isolated another. stop you're trolling jackass.


Module offline problems have been on SiSi for MONTHS and still went live. The only ones trolling are you and CCP.

Denidil
Gallente
The Graduates
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2011.09.03 16:48:00 - [10]
 

Originally by: Rediculous Grammer
Originally by: Denidil
Originally by: Mr Kidd
The official word from CCP is "We are aware of the issue", which given CCP's track record translates to either "So, what?" or "Deal with it!". Your choice.


they're already fixed one of the common causes of the module offlining issue, and isolated another. stop you're trolling jackass.


Module offline problems have been on SiSi for MONTHS and still went live. The only ones trolling are you and CCP.


and he explained how that happened. they had fixed the cause of the original reports, then it got broken again near the last minute and they thought the reports they saw were stale (from the previously fixed break).

why don't you go read Tuxford's comments.

Rediculous Grammer
Posted - 2011.09.03 17:05:00 - [11]
 

Originally by: Denidil
Originally by: Rediculous Grammer
Originally by: Denidil
Originally by: Mr Kidd
The official word from CCP is "We are aware of the issue", which given CCP's track record translates to either "So, what?" or "Deal with it!". Your choice.


they're already fixed one of the common causes of the module offlining issue, and isolated another. stop you're trolling jackass.


Module offline problems have been on SiSi for MONTHS and still went live. The only ones trolling are you and CCP.


and he explained how that happened. they had fixed the cause of the original reports, then it got broken again near the last minute and they thought the reports they saw were stale (from the previously fixed break).

why don't you go read Tuxford's comments.


You believe anything CCP says, don't you. I highly doubt after months of reports they "fixed it but then it broke right before release!" again...when this happens constantly with huge bugs reported on SiSi that still go live.

Xercodo
Amarr
Xovoni Directorate
Posted - 2011.09.03 17:42:00 - [12]
 

Edited by: Xercodo on 03/09/2011 17:43:11
Originally by: Rediculous Grammer

You believe anything CCP says, don't you. I highly doubt after months of reports they "fixed it but then it broke right before release!" again...when this happens constantly with huge bugs reported on SiSi that still go live.


considering what has happened to me with code before, yes, this could very much happen, especially cause of the complexity of EVE

If anything I sympathize with them over how frustrating it must be to have fixed something only for it to break again with ppl like you breathing down their backs

Denidil
Gallente
The Graduates
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2011.09.03 17:44:00 - [13]
 

Originally by: Rediculous Grammer

You believe anything CCP says, don't you. I highly doubt after months of reports they "fixed it but then it broke right before release!" again...when this happens constantly with huge bugs reported on SiSi that still go live.


i'm a software engineer, and i saw a reasonable explanation. just because you that thinks everyone is always dishonest doesn't mean ****.

Kristina Vanszar
Caldari
Posted - 2011.09.03 17:53:00 - [14]
 

Originally by: Denidil
Originally by: Rediculous Grammer

You believe anything CCP says, don't you. I highly doubt after months of reports they "fixed it but then it broke right before release!" again...when this happens constantly with huge bugs reported on SiSi that still go live.


i'm a software engineer, and i saw a reasonable explanation. just because you that thinks everyone is always dishonest doesn't mean ****.


it's funny how everyone is a software engeneer when it comes to questions like that.

you'll learn it mate.


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only