open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked Rate Incarna, out of 5.
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]

Author Topic

Aldan Romar
Amarr
Imperial Academy
Posted - 2011.09.04 19:56:00 - [181]
 

Edited by: Aldan Romar on 04/09/2011 19:56:39

Originally by: Tippia
It's a disgusting, degrading and thoroughly unpleasant experience that reduces you from an unkillable god with the might to destroy millions of lives with a mere thought into a hunk of useless, worthless, weak and pitiful meat.

So no, they're not supposed to do it with any regularity if it can be at all avoided.

But I like to drink a nice Chardonnay after a hard day's work Sad

Barbelo Valentinian
Gallente
The Scope
Posted - 2011.09.04 20:01:00 - [182]
 

1/5

It's not all bad. Apart from the shading problems I quite like the CQ. Far from spectacular, but shows promise. However, if this doesn't become a multiracial multiplayer feature, with reasonably spectacular shared spaces soon, it's going to prove to have been a monumental waste of time.

But I hate, hate, hate the way CQ is forced on us and not an option as was promised. I hate the way casual decanting goes against the lore. I hate that Hangar, with its slick, easy functionality that was so ingrained it felt like "home", is gone.

Awful, awful mistake on CCP's part, that's only served to further alienate older players who've been turned off by the recent shenanigans.

Throatslitter
Posted - 2011.09.04 20:34:00 - [183]
 

I was going to give CQ 1/5 but it really doesnt look that bad, unplayable yes, but a step in the right direction.

But I switched CQ off after 5min, so it gets a 2/5 from me.

In almost 5 years of playing, this has to be one of the worst "expansions" for me.

Xyla Vulchanus
Amarr
Sarz'na Khumatari
Ushra'Khan
Posted - 2011.09.04 21:01:00 - [184]
 

An expansion that not only makes the game significantly worse, it has also been developed using resources that could have been poured into improvements. Incarna represents Eve's nadir since I have been playing.

1/5 (although it should be given a negative)

Trolls Troll
Posted - 2011.09.04 22:31:00 - [185]
 

Originally by: Tippia
Originally by: Aldan Romar
Originally by: Ethan Bejorn
Pod pilots are not supposed to leave thier pods. How is this immersive?
...
Pod pilots are not supposed to leave their pods? Laughing
It's a disgusting, degrading and thoroughly unpleasant experience that reduces you from an unkillable god with the might to destroy millions of lives with a mere thought into a hunk of useless, worthless, weak and pitiful meat.

So no, they're not supposed to do it with any regularity if it can be at all avoided.


SORRY TIPTOP BUT YOU ARE WRONG.....

Just yesterday I docked to get some ammo and I found myself out of pod on CQ balcony. I must be a fast runner because I appeared out of ship, got my ammo and was undocked within 30 secs.



Vyktor Abyss
The Abyss Corporation
Posted - 2011.09.04 22:38:00 - [186]
 

1

Bhuda Slash
Posted - 2011.09.04 22:42:00 - [187]
 

Since the true essence of Incarna is still missing, I reserve judgement on the release.

Jackson Brown
Posted - 2011.09.04 23:05:00 - [188]
 

Originally by: divanoo
5/5

some minor problems,which can be ironed it, but otherwise great! best update for some time


I wonder if there are really people out there who think this, or if this is just a troll. I can't imagine any person thinking this is the best expansion in a while, and that it is a 5/5. Seriously, it would be insane.

Paragon Renegade
Posted - 2011.09.04 23:17:00 - [189]
 

We'll have to wait until Incarna is actually released in full now won't we?

Nobody can honestly give a rating to something that isn't even released yet, but for the curret things, I can't really say I care much, if at all about it.

On one hand, loading the quarters is resource-heavy & rather time-consuming for when I just want to dock, but on the other hand, it's nice to see a "live" Human every now & then in a predominantly space-based game.

Not being a veteran, I can't say I fully understand their complaints with the vanity & "Play to Win", but since those are not even reality yet (P2W) & vanity is just that.........vanity, I can with a clear-conscious say 3.

"3" essentially means "I don't give a s-"

Tippia
Caldari
Sunshine and Lollipops
Posted - 2011.09.05 01:05:00 - [190]
 

Originally by: Trolls Troll
SORRY TIPTOP BUT YOU ARE WRONG.....
Not really, no…
Quote:
Just yesterday I docked to get some ammo and I found myself out of pod on CQ balcony. I must be a fast runner because I appeared out of ship, got my ammo and was undocked within 30 secs.
Like Ethan Bejorn said: it isn't particularly immersive — the game doesn't follow its own logic.

Trolls Troll
Posted - 2011.09.05 02:33:00 - [191]
 

Originally by: Tippia
Originally by: Trolls Troll
SORRY TIPTOP BUT YOU ARE WRONG.....
Not really, no…
Quote:
Just yesterday I docked to get some ammo and I found myself out of pod on CQ balcony. I must be a fast runner because I appeared out of ship, got my ammo and was undocked within 30 secs.
Like Ethan Bejorn said: it isn't particularly immersive — the game doesn't follow its own logic.



Um you just proved my point, how can be getting out of pod hard if I did it in 30 secs???????????????????????????

Krystal Flores
Amarr
Missions Mining and Mayhem
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2011.09.05 03:10:00 - [192]
 

+1 for a few things that was actually good, like no session change for switching ships.
doesn't count (+0)
-1 for removing ship spinning
-1 for maxing out my my video card (went over 100C the first time) that used to run max graphics pre incarna fine
-2 for the nex crap
-1 for having to make a new avatar instead of playing eve.
+1 for actually doing something they said they were going to.
+1 if they add that command room/ other rooms and station combat.

So 2/5 possible, time will tell

Mehrdad Kor-Azor
Amarr
Iure Divino
Posted - 2011.09.05 03:30:00 - [193]
 

1/5 right now.

If made optional and the establishments/corp offices/meeting rooms are put in, it would definitely make it to 5/5.

Richard C Hoagland
Posted - 2011.09.05 03:37:00 - [194]
 

I'm giving this demo-level verison of Incarna 1/5, with a potential for as high as 4/5 or even 5/5 once we get a more complete version of Incarna.

This initial iteration of Incarna was so incomplete that it made me seriously wonder what they've been doing with this entire idea for the last x years. How many prototypes were built and then thrown out? It seems that the development of what we actually got wasn't even started until shortly before we got it. That doesn't bode well for the pace at which we can expect future Incarna-related patches.


Nikodiemus
Caldari
Perkone
Posted - 2011.09.05 03:39:00 - [195]
 

2 of 5:
Walking in a room smaller than my bedroom is not new content. Hilmar needs to be replaced as CEO - his company is indulging in failing practices.

Joyana Dakota
Posted - 2011.09.05 05:01:00 - [196]
 

5

Trolls Troll
Posted - 2011.09.05 05:03:00 - [197]
 

Originally by: Joyana Dakota
0/5


FYP bro


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only