open All Channels
seplocked Ships and Modules
blankseplocked Rocket buff and T1 frigates. Inquisitor and breacher
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

E man Industries
Posted - 2011.08.29 20:28:00 - [1]
 

How has the rocket buff affected these ships?

the inquisitor looks like a solid contender now.
3 rocket launchers, nuet
AB, scram
suitcase, rep, 200mm plate
lacks a web compared to a rifter but wouldn't the inquisitor tank more and do more dmg?

Or a rockets still gimper or is the slower speed a huge hurdle?

Just never see these ships used.


Jude Lloyd
Heretic Army
B A N E
Posted - 2011.08.29 21:09:00 - [2]
 

Its funny you mention it... I haven't seen an inquisitor used for PVP until late last night. I 1v1'd one in Ama, it put up an okay fight, but the fit wasn't that spectacular.

Killmail

Jude Lloyd
Heretic Army
B A N E
Posted - 2011.08.29 21:15:00 - [3]
 

But if you want T1 frigs with rockets... use the merlin.

E man Industries
Posted - 2011.08.29 21:16:00 - [4]
 

Originally by: Jude Lloyd
Its funny you mention it... I haven't seen an inquisitor used for PVP until late last night. I 1v1'd one in Ama, it put up an okay fight, but the fit wasn't that spectacular.

Killmail


Thanks, @ work so no eft...looks like it is short on fittings...
it was also using the wrong missile type for pvp...it gets 25% more dmg with em than with what he was firing.


hmmm

Jude Lloyd
Heretic Army
B A N E
Posted - 2011.08.29 22:00:00 - [5]
 

Yeah I'd be curious to see how a properly fit Inquisitor would perform.

E man Industries
Posted - 2011.08.30 01:30:00 - [6]
 

[Inquisitor, New Setup 1]
Small 'Accommodation' Vestment Reconstructer I
200mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I
Damage Control II

Cold-Gas I Arcjet Thrusters
J5b Phased Prototype Warp Scrambler I

Rocket Launcher II, Caldari Navy Gremlin Rocket
Rocket Launcher II, Caldari Navy Gremlin Rocket
Rocket Launcher II, Caldari Navy Gremlin Rocket
150mm Light AutoCannon II, EMP S

Small Warhead Calefaction Catalyst I
Small Hydraulic Bay Thrusters I
Small Warhead Flare Catalyst I

meh eft gives it more dmg and a dps chart gives it higher dps than a rifter over the entire 0-11 distance range. but no web and a lesser resist hurt it.

Dorian Tormak
M0N0LITH
Posted - 2011.08.30 01:57:00 - [7]
 

Edited by: Dorian Tormak on 30/08/2011 01:58:22
People have been using Inquisitors forever now, they are like the anti-rifter, anti-incursus from what I've seen.

Also I was in the process of ripping a bong when I made that setup YARRRR!!

Edit: Breachers are stille ****; two lows, two mids... not a very good close range ship that's for sure.

E man Industries
Posted - 2011.08.30 04:12:00 - [8]
 

Originally by: Dorian Tormak
Edited by: Dorian Tormak on 30/08/2011 01:58:22
People have been using Inquisitors forever now, they are like the anti-rifter, anti-incursus from what I've seen.

Also I was in the process of ripping a bong when I made that setup YARRRR!!

Edit: Breachers are stille ****; two lows, two mids... not a very good close range ship that's for sure.

Ya saw that missing low....and no real upside to compensate.

was intrested as on paper it does more dmg even when factoring in movment...but the lack of web hurts..while still forcing you to be in web range.

Qorra Djembe
Posted - 2011.08.30 15:01:00 - [9]
 

I've never actually flown one because I usually use a Merlin, but how would a Kestrel compare to the inquisitor as a rocket boat?

Jaxley
The Tuskers
Posted - 2011.08.30 15:10:00 - [10]
 

Never flown an Inquisitor, but the problem I see with it is that it can't fit a web. Rockets are good, but need targets that aren't buzzing around at overheated AB speeds.

Guillame Herschel
Gallente
NME1
Posted - 2011.08.30 21:11:00 - [11]
 

Use it to teach Rifter pilots not to fit a MWD. Twisted Evil


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only