open All Channels
seplocked Features and Ideas Discussion
blankseplocked fittable Fighters
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

Sports Bet
Posted - 2011.08.23 11:05:00 - [1]
 

Edited by: Sports Bet on 23/08/2011 11:21:36
Edited by: Sports Bet on 23/08/2011 11:11:24
Using Dragonfly as example:

Dragonfly:
3 High Slots
3 Missile Hardpoints
1 Midslot
2 Lowslots

Velocity: 600 m/s
Mass: 12.000.000 kg
Inertia: 0,4

PG: 543
CPU: 200

Their 'standard' fit, as they are now so to speak, would be:
3x Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II's
1x MicroWarpDrive II
2x NanoFiber II's

This would give tbem:
Optimal of about 8 KMs, which is the current optimal+falloff
DPS potential of about 60 DPS, with rage missiles, compared to current 50 DPS flat.
Normal velocity of 656 m/s, MWD velocity of 3886 m/s (compared to 650/3800 now)

The worst abuse it can have is 2x Medium Energy Neuts in the highs, meaning a lot (20 Medium Energy Neuts considering a carrier pilot with max carrier skill) of neuting (Actually, it can drain a Cruiser within about 4 seconds). I think the meds are balanced because they lose their ability to MWD if they have anything else, making it easier to pick them off.

Sports Bet
Posted - 2011.08.23 12:07:00 - [2]
 

Einherji:
4 High Slots
4 Gun Hardpoints
1 Midslot
3 Lowslots

15% bonus to Medium Autocannon Damage

Velocity: 300 m/s
Mass: 10.000.000 kg
Inertia: 0,4

PG: 517
CPU: 126

Their 'standard' fit, as they are now so to speak, would be:
4x Dual 180mm Autocannons II
1x MicroWarpDrive II
3x NanoFiber II's

This would give tbem:
Optimal of about 1 KMs, which is the current optimal
Falloff of 8 km, extending their current 5km range a bit.
DPS potential of about 60 DPS, with Hail M, compared to current 50 DPS flat.
Normal velocity of 400 m/s, MWD velocity of 2356 m/s (compared to 300/2500 now)

Vice Admiral Spreadsheet
Caldari
Posted - 2011.08.23 13:14:00 - [3]
 

I can has active-hull, smartbombing fighters?

Sports Bet
Posted - 2011.08.23 13:18:00 - [4]
 

Originally by: Vice Admiral Spreadsheet
I can has active-hull, smartbombing fighters?


Hmm you could fit 2 smartbombs...

Maybe should take a look at decreasing the Capacitor (or the cap recharge) so it's possible to fit, but not viable to use.

Nyarlothotep
The Blue Dagger Mercenery Agency
Posted - 2011.08.23 14:11:00 - [5]
 

Would be easier to create fighter only modules. Each ship would get 1 high, 1 medium, 1 low, and 2 tank slots.

The high slot would determine the weapon system. Long range and low tracking or short range and high tracking. Would like to see each racial weapon system and having smartbombs as an option would be awesome. Having neuts might be cool, but I could see them being overpowered.

The mid slot could be a AB, MWD, or an ECM.

The low slot could be a speed/agility, weapon tracking/range, weapon damage, or ECM bonus module.

The tank slots could be a mix of active tank, buffer tank, or resistance modules.

Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD
Tragedy.
Posted - 2011.08.23 14:22:00 - [6]
 

Edited by: Vertisce Soritenshi on 23/08/2011 14:22:25
Or you could just introduce modular T3 fighters and bombers and not have to worry about all that crap. Have a lot of variation in the types of fighters and bombers you can have without having to micro manage the mods on each and every fighter.

MissingNo1
Posted - 2011.09.01 11:19:00 - [7]
 

woooo, battlecruiser HP with scramblers on eeeeeeeeeeeevery one of those 15 fighters.

also, webs, jams and damps on some.....

I can see this working /sarcasm.


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only