open All Channels
seplocked Test Server Feedback
blankseplocked Re-Revision - Doomsday Testing: Sovereignty and Mirrors
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

CCP Shiny

Posted - 2011.08.16 17:11:00 - [1]
 

The pilot project with the goal to reduce the amount of issues caused by supercapitals on Singularity, while still giving players the chance to test them, has not yielded the results hoped for. Therefor, in order to increase the diversity of ships being used on the test server, we have decided to discontinue the part of the programme that involved supercapitals.

This means that as of tomorrow, no supercapitals will be sped up or installed anymore. If you already have one due to the TQ mirror or previous speeding up, or if you decide to build one via the conventional way, you are still welcome to use it though.

Everything else remains the same and follows below.

We have revised some of the rules for the Doomsday Testing alliance on SiSi. You can find the original post here. Due to the rule change and since others details could do with more information, I am replacing the old post.

General outline:

The purpose of this offer is assisting players who want to test sovereignty-related gameplay, like outposts, outpost upgrades and jump bridges. This is not guaranteed and we are under no obligation to assist or fulfill requests. We usually react within 24 hours on working days, but during busy times it can take several days. Please be understanding and patient when asking for assistance with these matters.

All activities within the test alliance have to adhere to the test server rules. As an example, this means that if one corporation in the test alliance has claimed sov, another corporation within the alliance is not allowed to try and take it from them unless this is consensual. However, rule violations need to be reported here as usual.

There will be NO spawning of any items, in particular Motherships or Titans. We will not be able to assist you in setting up your control towers, onlining TCUs or give you skills.

We will create a test alliance that anyone can join - DOOMSDAY TESTING ALLIANCE. You can join with your corp if you are a CEO or as a member of DOOMSDAY TESTING EXECUTOR CORP. The alliance will claim sovereignty in the Cloud Ring region, primarily in the Prelle constellation as it has a seeded station.


Sov bumps

Once you have claimed sov in a system, you can contact CCP Shiny via EVE Mail on SiSi or post in this thread and ask for sov level and indices to be bumped. By default this will be maxed, so if you need a boost to a specific level, please state so explicitly. The rule that only the test alliance can ask for sov levels or development indexes to be boosted is being dropped for now to allow for testing on an inter-alliance level. However, this might change again if the workload gets too high.
Note that sometimes you will not see the sov/indices updated in the sov overview, but it should still be updated.

Information needed: The system that needs to be boosted.


Outposts

You can ask for ownership of an outpost to be given to your corporation. The stipulation is that you need to hold sov in the system, or that sov is not claimed. However, if you do not claim sov and someone else comes along and does so, they may ask for ownership of the outpost to be transferred to them, so it is always advisable to hold sov if you want to keep the station. Please note that by default the stations have restricted access as mirrored from TQ. If you ask for an outpost, you need to set it to unrestricted once ownership has been transferred to adhere to the server rules.

Information needed: The outpost location and the corporation it should be transferred to.


Xynthiar
Gallente
Nulli Secunda
Posted - 2011.08.16 17:25:00 - [2]
 

Edited by: Xynthiar on 16/08/2011 17:25:40
Edited by: Xynthiar on 16/08/2011 17:25:13
Will be interesting to see how this turns out.

FakeEdit: PS: Also, "Sisi Test", where the hell did you go?
RealEdit: (talking about a character)

Sokodo Sanizuku
Posted - 2011.08.16 18:47:00 - [3]
 

I'm Sisi Test!

F41L
Posted - 2011.08.16 21:20:00 - [4]
 

I'm Sisi Test!

BIGthump
Gallente
No.Mercy
Posted - 2011.08.16 21:39:00 - [5]
 

and THIS Trixi is what happens when you build and speed up 15 titans and blob the **** out of everything with said titans.


SUCKS FOR YOU GUYS LaughingLaughingLaughing

Elkif
Posted - 2011.08.16 22:48:00 - [6]
 

Originally by: BIGthump
and THIS Trixi is what happens when you build and speed up 15 titans and blob the **** out of everything with said titans.


SUCKS FOR YOU GUYS LaughingLaughingLaughing


This is why we can't have nice things...

Headerman
Minmatar
Quovis
Shadow of xXDEATHXx
Posted - 2011.08.17 10:07:00 - [7]
 

Edited by: Headerman on 17/08/2011 10:08:20
Originally by: CCP Shiny
This means that as of tomorrow, no supercapitals will be sped up or installed anymore. If you already have one due to the TQ mirror or previous speeding up, or if you decide to build one via the conventional way, you are still welcome to use it though.


THANKS ALOT YOU !$@#$&! RULE BREAKERS ON THE TEST SERVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



To CCP Shiny, if there is any volunteer position open for a rule enforcer on the Sisi server, i would be more than happy to lend a hand when able

Erogo Proxy
Posted - 2011.08.17 16:58:00 - [8]
 

You need to go back to where captals and super caps and sub caps all have their own FFA. Also to the obove comment I also volunteer to help enforce and if they do go back to the old FFA system I would really like to to help there if you need people to enforce staying in certain FFAs.

On second thought I would need sometype of insta pop weapon since it was the titans and super carriers that would sometimes jump into the BS FFA.

Flying Apocalypse
Amarr
Fracture.
Posted - 2011.08.18 04:45:00 - [9]
 

Originally by: Erogo Proxy
You need to go back to where captals and super caps and sub caps all have their own FFA. Also to the obove comment I also volunteer to help enforce and if they do go back to the old FFA system I would really like to to help there if you need people to enforce staying in certain FFAs.

On second thought I would need sometype of insta pop weapon since it was the titans and super carriers that would sometimes jump into the BS FFA.


i like and dislike the way things happen atm,[insert comment against TRIXI], but atleast now you can fight in a BS, against frigs, or against other BS's, or whatever, and not go to the BS and lower FFA and only find BS's >.>

Breadponderer
Gallente
Trixi IFI
Posted - 2011.08.18 22:44:00 - [10]
 

CCP said they wanted the diversity of fights to be more like TQ which is why they made the FFA's suggested. They got their wish and became just like TQ (Capital/Supercap Blobs on everything) and now they don't like what they see.

So much for wanting it to be like TQ Laughing


Flying Apocalypse
Amarr
Fracture.
Posted - 2011.08.19 11:22:00 - [11]
 

Originally by: Breadponderer
CCP said they wanted the diversity of fights to be more like TQ which is why they made the FFA's suggested. They got their wish and became just like TQ (Capital/Supercap Blobs on everything) and now they don't like what they see.

So much for wanting it to be like TQ Laughing




maybe we should do it in a low sec system instead instead of nullsec =p should fix the supercap blobs Cool

Xynthiar
Gallente
Nulli Secunda
Posted - 2011.08.19 13:29:00 - [12]
 

Edited by: Xynthiar on 19/08/2011 13:29:29
Originally by: Flying Apocalypse
Originally by: Breadponderer
CCP said they wanted the diversity of fights to be more like TQ which is why they made the FFA's suggested. They got their wish and became just like TQ (Capital/Supercap Blobs on everything) and now they don't like what they see.

So much for wanting it to be like TQ Laughing




maybe we should do it in a low sec system instead instead of nullsec =p should fix the supercap blobs Cool

We'd lose secstatus upon combat, resulting in gates/stations attacking us... also, supercaps can be in lowsec, titans just can't DD. (Unless I missed something >.>)

Comodore John
Gallente
Trixi IFI
Posted - 2011.08.19 20:36:00 - [13]
 

Stop your whining already FFS. Sisi is like TQ, how CCP wanted it.

Incase you've forgotten, rules are ALWAYS subject to change, that includes super cap construction. I highly doubt CC will cut off supers completely, however I can see them giving everyone a 3 day window where 1 super per account is sped up.

Eccentric HotDog
Posted - 2011.08.20 00:07:00 - [14]
 

Originally by: Comodore John
Stop your whining already FFS. Sisi is like TQ, how CCP wanted it.

Incase you've forgotten, rules are ALWAYS subject to change, that includes super cap construction. I highly doubt CC will cut off supers completely, however I can see them giving everyone a 3 day window where 1 super per account is sped up.

HEY COMODORE!
And uh sisi isnt like TQ

easy e
Posted - 2011.08.21 10:27:00 - [15]
 

request for the developers or ccp shiny, can u give a sov bump for LS-JEP, and also can u change over ownership of the infrastructure hub to the Starblazers LLC, and change the security level -10.0. Thank you

Navigo
Amarr
Posted - 2011.09.02 16:58:00 - [16]
 

Hello
I'd like a sov bumps to max lvls in these systems:
QS-530
VR-YRV
IPX-H5
LG-RO2
Also I'd like ownership of outpost in QS-530 to be transfered to Friends of Xardas corporation
Thank you very much, o/


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only