open All Channels
seplocked Crime and Punishment
blankseplocked 
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

Rothgore
Posted - 2011.08.16 09:56:00 - [1]
 

Edited by: Rothgore on 24/08/2011 17:36:22

see new thread

Jake Calceron
Posted - 2011.08.16 10:39:00 - [2]
 

Giving 41 bill to a "trusted" third party with all the power with the customer and the "trusted" third party?

Yeah, lots of people will fall for that accept that contract!

Sakura Mia
Posted - 2011.08.16 10:58:00 - [3]
 

Originally by: Jake Calceron
Giving 41 bill to a "trusted" third party with all the power with the customer and the "trusted" third party?

Yeah, lots of people will fall for that accept that contract!


Are you implying that Darknesss isnt trustworthy?

Darius III
Caldari
Interstellar eXodus
BricK sQuAD.
Posted - 2011.08.16 11:03:00 - [4]
 

Originally by: Jake Calceron
Giving 41 bill to a "trusted" third party with all the power with the customer and the "trusted" third party?

Yeah, lots of people will fall for that accept that contract!

Call me a nob, but before I quoted this-I didn't know how to do the line through

Nathan Jameson
Talocan Vanguard
Talocan United
Posted - 2011.08.16 11:11:00 - [5]
 

Originally by: Darius III
Originally by: Jake Calceron
Giving 41 bill to a "trusted" third party with all the power with the customer and the "trusted" third party?

Yeah, lots of people will fall for that accept that contract!

Call me a nob, but before I quoted this-I didn't know how to do the line through


Took me a while to learn that one myself. >_>

AiIIe
Gallente
Posted - 2011.08.16 11:25:00 - [6]
 

Originally by: Jake Calceron
Giving 41 bill to a "trusted" third party with all the power with the customer and the "trusted" third party?

Yeah, lots of people will fall for that accept that contract!


...you realise it is the customer giving the third party money, not the merc, right?

also interesting fact, the s tag stands for strikethrough.

Jake Calceron
Posted - 2011.08.16 12:41:00 - [7]
 

Originally by: AiIIe
Originally by: Jake Calceron
Giving 41 bill to a "trusted" third party with all the power with the customer and the "trusted" third party?

Yeah, lots of people will fall for that accept that contract!


...you realise it is the customer giving the third party money, not the merc, right?

also interesting fact, the s tag stands for strikethrough.


Misread.. call me a nob

Kill Theory
Minmatar
Progenitor Fleet
Posted - 2011.08.16 17:09:00 - [8]
 

Im looking to help this effort. join "prog fleet" channel or mail me.

Rothgore
Posted - 2011.08.16 17:22:00 - [9]
 


will do; have sent several 'info packs' to interested mercs

ShadowBlazie
Gallente
The Vikings Reborn
Posted - 2011.08.16 19:29:00 - [10]
 

Can you get darknesss to confirm that he is involved?

Kill Theory
Minmatar
Progenitor Fleet
Posted - 2011.08.16 21:37:00 - [11]
 

still awaiting reply

Alekseyev Karrde
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
Posted - 2011.08.16 22:33:00 - [12]
 

I think Roth's been through every merc unit capable of killing a large tower with no luck. Poor guy.

My advice would be alter the contract so mercs arnt in contract violation for something they have no control over (POS owners removing their ****) and offer more money (2b/POS for hitting more than one well fit large tower a week for several weeks in a row is just not worth it)

Propaganda Poster
Posted - 2011.08.17 02:15:00 - [13]
 

Originally by: Alekseyev Karrde
I think Roth's been through every merc unit capable of killing a large tower with no luck. Poor guy.

My advice would be alter the contract so mercs arnt in contract violation for something they have no control over (POS owners removing their ****) and offer more money (2b/POS for hitting more than one well fit large tower a week for several weeks in a row is just not worth it)


This

Rothgore
Posted - 2011.08.17 08:24:00 - [14]
 

Originally by: Kill Theory
Im looking to help this effort. join "prog fleet" channel or mail me.


=> Thx Kill, have send you mails with more details, get back to me in game if your interested

Originally by: ShadowBlazie
Can you get darknesss to confirm that he is involved?


=> Have mailed him this morning and asked him to post 1 or 2 words

Originally by: Alekseyev Karrde
I think Roth's been through every merc unit capable of killing a large tower with no luck. Poor guy....



=> Have had 5 mercenaries write me with their interest. Thanks for your advice Alek.


Sivor Detmen
Pure Evil Warriors
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
Posted - 2011.08.17 14:53:00 - [15]
 

You have to realise that killing a Large POS is almost as "good" as mining, especially a heavy ECM POS. So 2bil for a POS like that is a bit short. The timeframe you ask for taking the full contract is also short. I have serious doubts anyone would be willing to spend 8 weeks shooting at POSes (2-3 per week).

The contract violation because the owners decide to remove the POS is also unfair for the merc party, like Alek said. The mercs don't have control over it so why should they be penalized? At least define a small fee for POS removal without destruction.

Synar Earthoof
Posted - 2011.08.17 16:41:00 - [16]
 

This contract is rather unrealistic. Given the cost of ammunition and time spent trying to take down each large pos... Hardly worth it unless you're using a full amarrian fleet. Even then 20 pos in 8 weeks? Not accounting for reinforcement timers this seems like a bum rap which benefits the customer not paying the mercs in the end.

This contract is set for failure.

Set sail to fail!

Rothgore
Posted - 2011.08.17 21:03:00 - [17]
 


Various sets of towers are currently being checked by interested mercs. Very happy to entertain offers for subsets and flexible on timeframe (I understand that hitting 20 POSes in 8 weeks for mid-sized mercs is not feasible). I hope that some of the mercs I start working with now become 'trusted parties' for continued POS hits

Darknesss
V0LTA
VOLTA Corp
Posted - 2011.08.18 20:54:00 - [18]
 

Hello everyone,

I have been asked if I would secure a mercenary contract for the take down of multiple large POS's in return for ISK.

I do not currently hold this ISK however, if a party does reach an agreement with Rothgore I am more than happy to help secure the contract. Should this go ahead Rothgore has arranged to pay my fee separately.

Regards

Dark

Evolution1979
Posted - 2011.08.19 07:28:00 - [19]
 

Originally by: Darknesss
Hello everyone,

I have been asked if I would secure a mercenary contract for the take down of multiple large POS's in return for ISK.

I do not currently hold this ISK however, if a party does reach an agreement with Rothgore I am more than happy to help secure the contract. Should this go ahead Rothgore has arranged to pay my fee separately.

Regards


Dark


And you are?

Now dont reply with: the trusted third party, cause i dont trust you, nor should any merc really do, also i think you are the alt of roth Very Happy

Khors
El Barco Pirata
Posted - 2011.08.19 07:40:00 - [20]
 

Originally by: Evolution1979
Originally by: Darknesss
Hello everyone,

I have been asked if I would secure a mercenary contract for the take down of multiple large POS's in return for ISK.

I do not currently hold this ISK however, if a party does reach an agreement with Rothgore I am more than happy to help secure the contract. Should this go ahead Rothgore has arranged to pay my fee separately.

Regards


Dark


And you are?

Now dont reply with: the trusted third party, cause i dont trust you, nor should any merc really do, also i think you are the alt of roth Very Happy



Got any other statements based of your complete lack of knowledge you'd like to make?

SpotlessBlade
Trust Doesn't Rust
Ushra'Khan
Posted - 2011.08.19 09:44:00 - [21]
 

Wait... does this guy actually not know who darkness is?

Icer Xx
Tempest Legion
Test Friends Please Ignore
Posted - 2011.08.19 10:12:00 - [22]
 

wtf is a darkness

Drykor
Minmatar
Aperture Harmonics
K162
Posted - 2011.08.19 11:06:00 - [23]
 

Originally by: Evolution1979
Originally by: Darknesss
Hello everyone,

I have been asked if I would secure a mercenary contract for the take down of multiple large POS's in return for ISK.

I do not currently hold this ISK however, if a party does reach an agreement with Rothgore I am more than happy to help secure the contract. Should this go ahead Rothgore has arranged to pay my fee separately.

Regards


Dark


And you are?

Now dont reply with: the trusted third party, cause i dont trust you, nor should any merc really do, also i think you are the alt of roth Very Happy



Dude, GTFO.

MichaelWest
Posted - 2011.08.19 11:17:00 - [24]
 

Originally by: SpotlessBlade
Wait... does this guy actually not know who darkness is?


Hell I don't know who he is either.

That being said if you have two brain cells you can do research and use common sense to see that he is a known player who has a trusted (As much as you can trust in eve) reputation.

Rothgore
Posted - 2011.08.19 16:21:00 - [25]
 


Must say this channel is good for the occasional laugh ;-)

Rothgore
Posted - 2011.08.20 09:56:00 - [26]
 


First 3 towers have been awarded to mercs and cash is sitting with Darknesss


Andramedae
Posted - 2011.08.20 10:34:00 - [27]
 

Originally by: Evolution1979
And you are?

Now dont reply with: the trusted third party, cause i dont trust you, nor should any merc really do, also i think you are the alt of roth Very Happy



Way to embarrass yourself nublet Laughing

Rothgore
Posted - 2011.08.24 14:01:00 - [28]
 


Quite agree, Darknesss is completely reliable.

By the way, payment for 3 towers is with Darknesss, 1st tower has been reinforced... but more contracts are up for grabs, so contact me for work


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only