open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [Proposal] Jamming and Concord {not an offense}
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

Wizlawz
Posted - 2011.08.04 14:37:00 - [1]
 

yeah so Targetting someone is not an offense why should Jamming someone?

1st: a possible Solution for macro mining:

see a possible macro mining op: Jam em without being Corded [ direct jam OR AOE jammers]

2nd: Can Flippers

Being able to know when your jet can is being tageted and 1 of 2 things or both:

get a warning your can is being targeted by so and so and AOE the can to prevent it being targeted if you cant direct jam the flipper {which really makes no sense if others are mining in the AOE radius, but hey if your alone why not}

Direct jam the flipper to prevent the can from being targeted.

of course this could create a whole new chaos but hey it adds to the mix "Miner Wars" sure why not.

at any rate you get the idea.

Seamus Donohue
Gallente
Posted - 2011.08.04 14:48:00 - [2]
 

Removing items from a cargo container does not require a targetlock.

Additionally, I won't support this on the grounds that, with this change, one could keep Logistics cruisers permanently jammed with a large enough force. In an Incursion site, that could get a fleet killed by Sansha, since no ship could possibly fit enough self-repair to survive being primaried by the Sansha without a lot of remote repairs or shield transporters being aimed at them.

Fix Lag
Posted - 2011.08.04 14:57:00 - [3]
 

This thread is dumb and you are dumb.

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
Posted - 2011.08.04 14:59:00 - [4]
 

Anything that has a direct negative impact on another entity currently means 'aggression'.

How do you propose to get around the obvious abuse of Failcons in all high-sec "wars" and on low-sec gates if they were suddenly exempt?
It is more than bad enough with neutral RR's being abused to hell and back as it doesn't "directly" affect the opposition.

In short: You are either delusional/naive, too young to remember LR Failcons or a high-sec griefer who wants even more alt abuse to prove your leet "PvP" skills against babyseals (ie. highsec carebears).


Wizlawz
Posted - 2011.08.04 16:46:00 - [5]
 

nah, it was jest a thought, but ye i see what ya mean.

and no i am not a griefer.



 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only