open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked Return Client Side Fittings with no limit
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

Lady Spank
Amarr
In Praise Of Shadows
Posted - 2011.07.29 15:41:00 - [1]
 

Edited by: Lady Spank on 29/07/2011 21:57:11
UPDATE: I am a bad and there is already a thread on this that I missed when scanning for dupes... Please show your support in this thread, the sentiment is the same.

Many people use more than a handful of ships and when you have a couple of different fits for each of these ships it is very easy to exceed the current limit of 50 fittings. This is especially true for those that provide help and advice to groups of pilots and regularly need to have a variety of fittings for a variety of ships on hand to pass on to others. Regardless of ones reason for wanting more slots, the current limit is far too restrictive and there is absolutely no merit to imposing a restriction.

When they moved the fittings server-side it made little sense to anyone. Perhaps for corporate-wide fittings it was logical but certainly not for personal fittings.

When the Fearless internal document was leaked it was indicated that charging for more fittings slots was a possibility. The document has been claimed merely to be a test-bed for controversial opinions and to open debate on some issues but the simple indication that they would be willing to charge extra for what was previously a free feature is just too insulting to ignore.

It is clear that the only way they could justify a limit on fittings is by claiming it was a strain on resources. Something that would not be true were fittings to remain client side. There was NO other reason why this change was necessary.

I am disgusted that this game is being deliberately gimped in order to try and grab more money from our wallets.

Allow us to keep as many client-side fittings as we wish and stop trying to money-grub. It's pathetic, cheap and insulting.

In closing: Return personal fittings to a client-side feature and remove the arbitrary limit of 50 fittings.

Lady Spank
Amarr
In Praise Of Shadows

Posted - 2011.07.29 16:41:00 - [2]
 

oh dear, forgot to support

Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD
Tragedy.
Posted - 2011.07.29 16:53:00 - [3]
 

Another whiny complaint thread from Lady Spank...nothing new here btw...there are already several threads about this very same request.

Lady Spank
Amarr
In Praise Of Shadows
Posted - 2011.07.29 17:14:00 - [4]
 

Originally by: Vertisce Soritenshi
Another whiny complaint thread from Lady Spank...nothing new here btw...there are already several threads about this very same request.

Boo-hoo.

Takamori Maruyama
Amarr
Red Federation
RvB - RED Federation
Posted - 2011.07.29 18:34:00 - [5]
 

Indeed, add a fitting tool incorporated to the game so players can think of which fits he should do.

Pyth2
Tower of Ravens
The Laughing Men
Posted - 2011.07.29 21:17:00 - [6]
 

Edited by: Pyth2 on 29/07/2011 21:18:20
Absolutely support. There was no reason to take that from us other then, as Spank said, grubbing $ off us for extra fitting slots.

There are games in which this sort of thing is acceptable CCP. League of Legends, buying extra rune pages for example. But I don't pay a monthly sub to play LoL.

I do pay a monthly sub for EvE, 3 of them in fact. I don't see how you can possibly justify taking an existing feature from paying customers, and then offering to sell it back to them later.

Remove head from anus CCP. Seriously.

Abdiel Kavash
Caldari
Paladin Order
Fidelas Constans
Posted - 2011.07.30 00:08:00 - [7]
 

Supporting. Removing the feature in the first place was idiotic at best, malicious at worst (regarding "rumors" of it returning, at a price in AUR).

DeftCrow Redriver
Gallente
Best Path Inc.
Cascade Imminent
Posted - 2011.07.30 16:17:00 - [8]
 

Agreed.

Why CCP made it the current way eludes me.
Corp fittings go to servers, personal fittings should be saved locally. Bandwidth and storage space costs CCP money so why not save a couple cents per user per month/year?


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only