open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [Proposal] More stations in Venal & Great Wildlands
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

Just Another Toon
Posted - 2011.07.12 10:11:00 - [1]
 

Did CCP forget to finish these off?

For a npc region this severely lacks stations, and what is there are pretty much next to each, thus giving controlling station huggers more control.

Add more stations all over venal and great wildlands please, just like all other NPC regions, then more people can go and live there and have more pew pew to surrounding sov alliances.

Midge Mo'yb
Bat Country
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.07.12 16:11:00 - [2]
 

this is a key feature of these regions, it allows for the region to be split into multiple factions/holdings instead of station games like in syndicate and should not be change imo

Xercodo
Amarr
Xovoni Directorate
Posted - 2011.07.12 23:59:00 - [3]
 

Edited by: Xercodo on 12/07/2011 23:59:36
except that GW has some bottle necks that force you certain areas and the fact it's all NPC means you can't claim sov to put up a JB to avoid the bottle necks or get to the stationless pockets easily

Toovhon
Posted - 2011.07.13 02:49:00 - [4]
 

Edited by: Toovhon on 14/07/2011 02:40:23
I dunno, I wouldn't mind a few more stations in Great Wildlands.

*changed mind* *support withdrawn* Holy ****! Reasoned argument actually worked in Eve forums!!! :-)

Laechyd Eldgorn
Caldari
draketrain
Posted - 2011.07.13 13:48:00 - [5]
 

Edited by: Laechyd Eldgorn on 13/07/2011 13:48:09
Amount of stations makes regions unique like amount of valued moons.

A lot of people hold great value on regions with only few stations because it fits their play style. Adding more stations would just destroy it.

Whole 0.0 is soon going to be full of stations anyway. Why not have these rare natural parks like GW where pirates can still roam free and you can go hiking there to spot few.

Toovhon
Posted - 2011.07.14 02:39:00 - [6]
 

Hmmm, yeah actually you're right - it does kind of add to the Wildland's character. *support withdrawn*

Kaelie Onren
Minmatar
Posted - 2011.07.14 16:02:00 - [7]
 

Edited by: Kaelie Onren on 14/07/2011 16:03:29
This is one of those "every region of space should be the same and equal and balanced" threads again isn't it?

sheeeeesh. You people need to go buy yourself a pair of nice ripped jeans and learn to appreciate that the imperfections in life is what gives things character, and personality. Stop wanting the world to be so digital. It's boring!
Razz

EDIT: oh, and I'm minmatar and love my heritage, and having very few stations fits right into the character of the thukkur tribe BTW. They are nomads. Like mongolians. no permanant homes. It's quite fine the way it is.

Relshar
Posted - 2011.07.17 08:43:00 - [8]
 

The Great Wildlands is owned by the Thukker tribe who are nomadic and so do not need or use that many stations. Consider them tribe meeting grounds rather than stations.

Lady Spank
Amarr
In Praise Of Shadows
Posted - 2011.07.17 10:57:00 - [9]
 

Originally by: Kaelie Onren
I'm minmatar and love my heritage, and having very few stations fits right into the character of the thukkur tribe BTW. They are nomads. Like mongolians. no permanant homes. It's quite fine the way it is.

Very violent Mongolians.


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only