open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [Proposal] Disable ship swaps at hangar while under aggro
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]

Author Topic

Skex Relbore
Gallente
Red Federation
RvB - RED Federation
Posted - 2011.07.18 16:26:00 - [151]
 

Originally by: Ranka Mei
Originally by: Skex Relbore

It obviously bothered you enough to post this thread then spend 5 pages defending it.

I'd say he spent as much time defending as you guys spent attacking him.


I'm not the one who created the post, I'm just making fun of him.

Quote:

Quote:
(...) you made multiple errors that resulted in your death.

Let me reiterate you lost this fight through your own stupidity not because of the Orca's ship maintenance bay.

Yes, he handled the situation very poorly, like a noob really, and got shot to smithereens. However, try and not fall into the trap I did at first too: mocking him for his gameplay at the expensive of the legit issue he brings up.


You are missing my actual point. It's not that he fell into a trap it's that he's being a hypocrite for complaining about someone shipping up to a more powerful ship after he went and shipped up to a more powerful ship.



Quote:

When you got a player aggro timer on you, you're not supposed to dock up for a while (or jump gate). The Orca offers a way around that, in the form of what clearly appears to be a loophole. The only logical way to deal with this, therefore, is to close the loophole, and suspend the offender's docking privileges to the Orca's ship maintenance bay for the duration of the aggro timer as well.



Such a mechanic wouldn't have changed the outcome in this case if the OP was cleared of aggression timers blocking docking to switch to his interceptor from his mission ship. The Pirate would have been free of any aggression timers to swap a ship from the Orca's maintenance bay.

Quote:

Again, try and separate the logic of this reasoning from thinking about the circumstances of the fight; because they're irrelevant, really. It would, in fact, have been much wiser had the OP not mentioned the fight at all, and just outlined the issue. Alas, he didn't. Doesn't mean you can't strain yourself a little to distill the abstract of the matter at hand here, and base your vote on that.


EVE is rife with imbalances and lopsided mechanics. Knowing those is a part of success/failure in the game.

There are so many things in this game that need attention more than this "issue" things that actually rate developer time and affect more than the occasional mission runner who is stupid enough to try and fight a ninja.

I mean come on there are only two circumstances people engage in combat in this game. When they have an edge they are pretty sure will give them victory or they don't have a choice.

This is a situation where the OP thought he had that edge when he went and got his Inty, only to learn that he did not as his opponent swapped into a strategic cruiser.


Page Starcaster
Gallente
Society of lost Souls
Posted - 2011.07.18 20:33:00 - [152]
 

Edited by: Page Starcaster on 20/07/2011 21:15:22

The only change I could see wanting in this situation is the Orca pilot should have got agro for interacting/supporting him. Would have been really funny if he warped in his orca, got into his loki only to lose the orca.

I agree that the OP only died from his own stupidity, but being able to swap ships at an ORCA ship maintenance bay while under agro without the orca pilot getting agro is not right. This should either not be allowed or the ORCA should gain agro from interacting with the player who has agro. What if the OP had got the loki down into structure and then the aggressor switched to another ship to avoid losing his Loki. That would definitely be an exploit. And probably would have happened if the OP was strong enough. You can not be allowed to support an agroed character without becoming agroed yourself, it is the same principal of getting remote repped by a neutral, they fixed that, now fix this.

Toovhon
Posted - 2011.07.18 22:28:00 - [153]
 

Originally by: Adunh Slavy
Originally by: Toovhon

How many supports have you got, again? :-D Nah, you're not wrong, are you? *snickers*

P.S. If you can't spell, at least use a spellchecker.


ROFL - You've stooped to the lowest level of internet debate, you're now a grammar ****. Classic.


So how many supports was that? :-D

Adunh Slavy
Ammatar Trade Syndicate
Posted - 2011.07.20 07:47:00 - [154]
 

Originally by: Toovhon
So how many supports was that? :-D


LOL, doesn't matter. You prooved you're a complete ass, mission accomplished.

Toovhon
Posted - 2011.07.20 11:30:00 - [155]
 

Originally by: Adunh Slavy
Originally by: Toovhon
So how many supports was that? :-D


LOL, doesn't matter. You prooved you're a complete ass, mission accomplished.


Still no spellchecker, huh?

And wow - no one noticed how you just pretended not to notice that for it's length your thread is just about the worst supported in Eve forum history. Bravo on your excellent misdirection there! Bravo sir! Well played! :-D


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only