open All Channels
seplocked EVE Information Portal
blankseplocked New Dev Blog: Fearless, virtual goods and rage
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.

Pages: first : previous : ... 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 ... : last (102)

Author Topic

Planetary Genocide
White Sail Anarchists
Yarr Collective
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:06:00 - [151]

In almost the same instant as we deployed Incarna - which by the way is one of our more smooth and successful expansions, not to mention absolutely gorgeous


The only reason why it was smooth in terms of downtime and the patch downloading is BECAUSE THERE WAS ALMOST NO ****ING CONTENT IN IT.

Jesus christ on a crutch, I used to like CCP and EVE... All I need now is confirmation that MT's will soon include advantage-giving things and I'm unsubbing my accounts.

Jean Misto
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:06:00 - [152]

You ****ed up big time.

You ****ed up with that blog.

You ****ed up with that newsletter.

You ****ed up with the Incarna release.

You ****ed up with the disconnect from your playerbase.

You ****ed up banning players.

That blog does not cut it, not by a long shot. We want change, you didn't even mention what was said in the newsletter was untrue, much of the newsletter was not a debate, but matter of fact in that there will be AUR for Ammo, AUR for standings, etc.

You didn't address a single damn thing we wanted, and I'm pretty much done caring about eve, and I'll let my subs run out.

Jehvan Sunburnadire
The Forgotten Legion
Redrum Fleet
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:06:00 - [153]

With all due respect...

3 words: Are you serious?

Actually, make that 4: are you ****ing serious?

This is the blog that took you 6 hours to write?

And no, I don't tend to go out buying clothes that cost MORE THAN A ****ING SPACESHIP. I suppose a good comparison here would be clothes that cost MORE THAN A NUCLEAR SUBMARINE. If you do... you're being paid way too ****ing much.

I think, at this point, I'm just going to cancel all my accounts, because, this is just ridiculous.

von Diel
The Tuskers
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:06:00 - [154]

CCP Zulu, are you tripping balls?

Xonus Calimar
CaeIum Incognitum
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:06:00 - [155]

I have a feeling this won't really help.

*looks at Amarr local*

Yeah, didn't think so...

Isis Soryu
Universitas Interimo Research
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [156]

Take your mother****ing devblog, and shove it right up your ****ing asses!

Volatile Nature
White Noise.
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [157]

Dear god you didn't even answer our only question, is ccp going to add non vanity items for aur or keep its word only vanity items?

can we have something from you Zulu to us the players stating what way the game is going

Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [158]

Wait, you're offended that the player base is offended over something they find offensive? Since you chose to use the language then I will too. And you're ****ting on us because of it?

p.s. I choose to buy the $50 pants so I can pay my subscription fees. So far all you're offering us is the $1000 pants.

Might be in CCP's best interest to put someone on the front lines of this who doesn't have their panties in a knot.

Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [159]

This devblog is a piece of ****.

If you want to compare a pair of jeans to something pricey, do it along the lines that actually works.

Comparing the 1.4billion isk monocle to a dreadnought is more realistic. But a dreadnought is the size of a station, takes days to build and requires millions in minerals.

If you want to do jeans : Compare a pair of jeans to a bugatti veyron. Not a 1000 dollars...


Tea Ester Elliot
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [160]

Originally by: Vic Tenrach
I feel the devblog completely failed to address the issue. Sorry, but that's the simple truth.

Please address the issues at hand:

A thousand times this!

Milo Caman
Anshar Incorporated
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [161]


You've said nothing to address the issues bought up by the players.

Guess I'm not resubbing. Neutral

Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [162]

I dont mind vanity [clotheing] I want assurance some ****head with 4000$ to burn, aint gonna be able to close my hard earned [AND PAID] skill gap / ship gap, and just burn the rest of us down.

Senedane Zyremdez
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [163]

Really? First post in all my years in Eve.... no response to the future of MT? No commentary on rather CQ will become optional? No answers to the discontent in your major threadnaught? I hope protestors burn new eden... really....

Boaz Netopalis
Tactical Narcotics Team
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [164]

I just posted to my own blog that I've not really played much since last November and have just been letting skills burn, and so I'm detached enough from the game right now that this whole firestorm isn't really doing anything other than providing amusing reading for me, but that devblog can be TL;DR'd as "To our players: Sit down and shut up!"

And that put me over. My account's canceled too.

Jake McKay
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [165]

We waited 195 pages and like a half mil views on the giant thread for THAT blog as a response?

So that's how CCP says "F*** Y**" to EVE's fans?


Darth Sith
Nulli Secunda
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [166]

Wow, is it just me or was that CCP just flipping us the bird, telling us to just get used to it and not address any of the performance issues / forced officers quarters, or other pressing issues ?

I personally am insulted by this blog. I was fairly neutral in my opinions before this but this just swung me to the rage side of the fence.

Can we get the real blog posted now please ?

Major Stallion
The Money Shot Inc.
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [167]

how much aurum to play as a jedi?

Vincent Gaines
Macabre Votum
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [168]

How in the hell did you use so many words to say absolutely nothing?

Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [169]

So selling super expensive "micro" transaction stuff is ok since we tend to buy expensive stuff in reallife anyway? That is some ****ed up thinking from a game developer running a subscription based model


simple question, which was NOT answered in the blog.

spellbound spirit
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [170]

That blog is a clear insult to paying customers, I think everyone understands why...

One would think that CCP actually did care and that when things heat up that much they would at least try to sort it out with customers(players). They've shown us where is our place :(

Solomon XI
Hidden Souls
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [171]

Edited by: Solomon XI on 24/06/2011 21:09:53
What the **** was that?

You failed to address any of the really controversial topics and concerns. Oh sure, you talked about the magazine and said it was "discussion only". Two points.

You didn't talk about the actual CONCERNS though. Screw it - you just lost my subscription. I won't be renewing it. On any of my accounts.

Mark Hamill
Galactic Waste Management
EVE Trade Consortium
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [172]

We waited 2 days for that.... that... DRIVEL?

Zor Industries
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [173]


CCP, to use your own phrase, we've called bull**** on you (again) and that blog just aint gonna cut it.

Fearless... more like Deathwish!

Melkath Bandrom
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:07:00 - [174]

Just as I predicted. "F*** YOU!! PAY US MORE THAN YOUR MONTHLY PAYMENTS OR GTFO OF OUR GAME." in civilized language


Jasmine Kiri
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:08:00 - [175]

Wow, that response was lamer than I expected. Guess they are hoping for the weekend to cool down the angry masses.

Veto Corp
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:08:00 - [176]

So it took CCP over a day to respond to such a huge issue, and they respond by berating their own playerbase for "not getting the point"?

1) Why put "wild" theories in a lavishly set up internal newsletter when it will never ever be used? I don't buy that. The newsletter is a bad idea all on it's own for that matter, if devs are encouraged to come up with stuff that should never see the light in EVE.

1) Nex prices are too high by at least an order of magnitude. There is no excuse whatsoever so don't pretend to know the market. It's an idea by marketing to see how much us idiots are willing to pay for something we can pick up for real (!) for less than $5.

Bad, bad CCP. The PR department is even worse than i thought.

Tactical Knightmare
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:08:00 - [177]

Awesome dev blog, waited over a day for it to blame the players, and not even answer the chief complaint and worry.

Tippex 1st
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:08:00 - [178]

Worst damage control ever. Now we know where all our money went, drugs. Can I have some?

Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:08:00 - [179]

That devblog blew my mind, and not in the good way.

Constantinus Maximus
Paxian Expeditionary Force
Posted - 2011.06.24 21:08:00 - [180]

Originally by: Zulu

The opinions and views expressed in Fearless are just that; opinions and views. They are not CCP policy nor are they a reliable source of CCP views as a company.

I would like one very simple question answered.

If this is the case then why has it been your company strategy for a few years now?

You had one chance to be open with your customers and save CCPGames as a whole and this is what you have to say?

Pages: first : previous : ... 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 ... : last (102)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to

These forums are archived and read-only