open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [CROWD SOURCE] Increase subscription fee as an alternative to MT
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic

Naomi Knight
Amarr
Posted - 2011.06.25 17:38:00 - [61]
 

whats the problem with micro payment?:O

JitaPriceChecker2
Posted - 2011.06.25 17:43:00 - [62]
 

YES but to further fund EVE not games not related to it.

Kaelie Onren
Minmatar
Posted - 2011.06.25 17:54:00 - [63]
 

MICRO.

I really don't see what the problem is with MT.

Cabaster
Posted - 2011.06.25 18:17:00 - [64]
 

NO

are you ppl insane you are all shifting the greed of ccp to the subscription system.
How about not being so f*****g greedy and keep it as it is enough ppl buy plex to sell it for isk as it is and every time they can they brag about more ppl subscribing to eve so i say they're making enough money already.

Kaelie Onren
Minmatar
Posted - 2011.06.25 18:23:00 - [65]
 

Originally by: Cabaster
NO

are you ppl insane you are all shifting the greed of ccp to the subscription system.
How about not being so f*****g greedy and keep it as it is enough ppl buy plex to sell it for isk as it is and every time they can they brag about more ppl subscribing to eve so i say they're making enough money already.


Exactly what is your problem with MT for cosmetic only goods? Is it just that CCP shouldn't make more money? Is it purely just the fact that CCP wants to generate more revenue that is the root of your displeasure?

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
Posted - 2011.06.25 23:03:00 - [66]
 

Edited by: Hans Jagerblitzen on 25/06/2011 23:05:30
Originally by: Mattio11

It is clear that you, yourself, disagree with MT and you have therefore cleverly designed the voting options for this thread so that people will be forced to choose YES or NO which is exactly what you want them to do. This thread is biased and stupid and should be either fixed or deleted.



While I had no intention of cleverly manipulating results, you are correct that the vote needs to include a 4th option for the statistics to accurately represent player opinion. I value these numbers, as quantitative analysis is really all CCP's decision will come down to in the end. Players who have voted previously can edit their posts to reflect the newly added 4th option.

Thank you for keeping any perceived bias out of the poll, and thank you everyone else for your input.

Edit: Remember folks, lets try to keep questions and comments to a minimum, posts in this thread should begin with a vote. Discussion on this topic can be posted in this thread.

Che Biko
Humanitarian Communists

Posted - 2011.06.26 01:34:00 - [67]
 

Yes

Goose99
Posted - 2011.06.26 01:57:00 - [68]
 

And obligatory gold ship and "I win" button for everyone.Laughing


Pages: 1 2 [3]

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only