open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked Petition - WE want CQ as optional - X for support
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: first : previous : ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 : last (23)

Author Topic

Kal Erkkinen
Posted - 2011.08.19 00:35:00 - [631]
 

x
xx

Junky Juke
Gallente
Posted - 2011.08.19 00:37:00 - [632]
 

x

Zela Kahn
Posted - 2011.08.19 00:38:00 - [633]
 

X

Ceelah
Posted - 2011.08.19 00:50:00 - [634]
 

"X" for CQ destruction.

Kryssare
Posted - 2011.08.19 01:10:00 - [635]
 

XXXXX just remove all the station crap

Wacktopia
Sicarius.
Legion of The Damned.
Posted - 2011.08.19 01:24:00 - [636]
 

x /support

Old hanger AND CQ for me please.

Magnus Orin
Minmatar
Wildly Inappropriate
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.08.19 01:37:00 - [637]
 

Originally by: Amarr Maniac
Edited by: Amarr Maniac on 23/06/2011 00:03:38

1. WE as players and paying customers want CQ optional, preferably old hangar view back and CQ as a button on station services just as medics or insurance.


"If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses."
-Henry Ford

Soma Khan
Caldari
Posted - 2011.08.19 02:09:00 - [638]
 

Originally by: Magnus Orin
Originally by: Amarr Maniac
Edited by: Amarr Maniac on 23/06/2011 00:03:38

1. WE as players and paying customers want CQ optional, preferably old hangar view back and CQ as a button on station services just as medics or insurance.


"If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses."
-Henry Ford
and now look at all the polution and all those poor people murdered over control of oil. poaneez are good and produce manure for organic vegetable farms

Martin Skorn
Posted - 2011.08.19 05:12:00 - [639]
 

X

Blutomus Maximus
Posted - 2011.08.19 05:55:00 - [640]
 

x

Distortus
Posted - 2011.08.19 06:16:00 - [641]
 

X

Cave Lord
Posted - 2011.08.19 06:36:00 - [642]
 

X

...but how are they going to make it optional and still cram the NEX store down our throats? We have to figure out a way for them to extract more money out of our pockets.

Jint Hikaru
OffWorld Exploration Inc
Posted - 2011.08.19 08:01:00 - [643]
 

X

I dock to the door now and will continue to do so.

I HATE CQ as it is, but I do thing that WIS (if or when it gets fully realized) will be good for Eve as a whole. As long as its optional.

I am still wondering WHEN we will get a full multiplayer station environment? Because if they are not planning on releasing it for years then why are we being forced into CQ.

Yes I know we can turn it off, but it would have been less work for the developers to add a button to the old hangar saying [Enter CQ}. But they chose to add the Door etc.

Temarn
Posted - 2011.08.19 09:54:00 - [644]
 

X

Originally by: Brooks Puuntai

Because its pointless. CCP won't listen, nor do they care. The more people they have in CQ the higher chance people will buy stuff from the Noble Store. Its all about CCP milking their player base not what the player base wants.


Also this, I fear...

Colt Mitri
Caldari
State War Academy
Posted - 2011.08.19 11:03:00 - [645]
 

X - supporting this.

Billy Endashi
Posted - 2011.08.19 12:36:00 - [646]
 

Edited by: Billy Endashi on 19/08/2011 12:37:35
X! I don't dock up a lot, but when I do, I dont want no crappy CQ slowing me down. We should have proper cq in the trade hubs, like a decent trading floor at jita. that would be cool. no need to have it in bumfark 0.4 system.

H3BANK
Posted - 2011.08.19 14:14:00 - [647]
 

Edited by: H3BANK on 19/08/2011 14:15:46
X - should be optional not forced on us, plus optimise it, its already killed my gpu !! Evil or Very Mad

Miss Rabblt
Posted - 2011.08.19 14:31:00 - [648]
 

Originally by: Soma Khan
and now look at all the polution and all those poor people murdered over control of oil. poaneez are good and produce manure for organic vegetable farms

and those ponyes make nice **** everywhere.... Twisted Evil

Eight Sinn
Posted - 2011.08.19 14:38:00 - [649]
 

"X"

Optional. You have the old hanger code, just put it back in and make new CQ optional.

Ranger 1
Amarr
Ranger Corp
Posted - 2011.08.19 16:35:00 - [650]
 

Originally by: Eight Sinn
"X"

Optional. You have the old hanger code, just put it back in and make new CQ optional.


I remember when I thought life offered solutions this easy...

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron
Legion of xXDEATHXx
Posted - 2011.08.19 16:59:00 - [651]
 

Originally by: Ranger 1
Originally by: Eight Sinn
"X"

Optional. You have the old hanger code, just put it back in and make new CQ optional.


I remember when I thought life offered solutions this easy...
Yeah, have to remember we're talking about CCP here...

Ranger 1
Amarr
Ranger Corp
Posted - 2011.08.19 17:28:00 - [652]
 

Edited by: Ranger 1 on 19/08/2011 17:30:06
Originally by: Razin
Originally by: Ranger 1
Originally by: Eight Sinn
"X"

Optional. You have the old hanger code, just put it back in and make new CQ optional.


I remember when I thought life offered solutions this easy...
Yeah, have to remember we're talking about CCP here...


Laughing Don't be a goof.

You know very well they can't just plug the old code into the new code and expect it to work, software doesn't often work that way.

Should they have taken more time and made the option available as Incarna was being developed? Yeah, it would have been nice.

Should we expect them be able to take an hour and splice back in the old hanger code and have it work seamlessly? Not realistically, no.

Eight Sinn
Posted - 2011.08.19 17:39:00 - [653]
 

Originally by: Ranger 1

Should we expect them be able to take an hour and splice back in the old hanger code and have it work seamlessly? Not realistically, no.



Most likely their programming is object oriented. Docking spawns an action, that currently branches in two possible outcomes: new CQ, or wall image. Replace the branch that takes you to the wall image with the old hangar code.

It's not rocket science or voodoo, it wouldn't be that difficult.

Alayla Nightfall
Posted - 2011.08.19 17:43:00 - [654]
 

XXX All 3 of my accounts endorse this product.

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron
Legion of xXDEATHXx
Posted - 2011.08.19 17:44:00 - [655]
 

Originally by: Ranger 1
Edited by: Ranger 1 on 19/08/2011 17:30:06
Originally by: Razin
Originally by: Ranger 1
Originally by: Eight Sinn
"X"

Optional. You have the old hanger code, just put it back in and make new CQ optional.


I remember when I thought life offered solutions this easy...
Yeah, have to remember we're talking about CCP here...


Laughing Don't be a goof.

You know very well they can't just plug the old code into the new code and expect it to work, software doesn't often work that way.

Very HappyWhy captain obvious, thank you for that gem of wisdom!
Originally by: Ranger 1
Should we expect them be able to take an hour and splice back in the old hanger code and have it work seamlessly? Not realistically, no.

I don’t know who you’re talking to; however this shouldn’t take a competent developer a very long time since all of EVE sans CQ runs on that same code.

Ranger 1
Amarr
Ranger Corp
Posted - 2011.08.19 17:54:00 - [656]
 

Originally by: Eight Sinn
Originally by: Ranger 1

Should we expect them be able to take an hour and splice back in the old hanger code and have it work seamlessly? Not realistically, no.



Most likely their programming is object oriented. Docking spawns an action, that currently branches in two possible outcomes: new CQ, or wall image. Replace the branch that takes you to the wall image with the old hangar code.

It's not rocket science or voodoo, it wouldn't be that difficult.


I think you forget that most of the work that went into Incarna is not visible to you. The bulk of the work went into creating new underlying code.

This means that to get back the old hanger view, the code would have to be created in large part from scratch. The old code can't interface with the new underlying code in the same way as it did before.

In other words, copy/paste won't cut it. It's a wee bit more complicated than that.

Optional Patch
Posted - 2011.08.19 19:53:00 - [657]
 

x

Originally by: Ranger 1

I think you forget that most of the work that went into Incarna is not visible to you. The bulk of the work went into creating new underlying code.

This means that to get back the old hanger view, the code would have to be created in large part from scratch. The old code can't interface with the new underlying code in the same way as it did before.

In other words, copy/paste won't cut it. It's a wee bit more complicated than that.



Obviously copy/paste won't do it, but anyone who has experience with application/game development can tell you that it's not that hard to do based on what we're seeing.

CCP: People x'ing up here are not going to buy your Aurum products. Bury the option to enable the (promised) hanger functionality a few levels down in the config options where your new players are unlikely to find it.

Leisen
Caldari
Interrobang Inc.
Posted - 2011.08.19 20:28:00 - [658]
 

x

Give me back my fukken double click cargo.

Ydnari
Gallente
Estrale Frontiers
Posted - 2011.08.19 20:38:00 - [659]
 

x

Xirin
Posted - 2011.08.19 20:41:00 - [660]
 

x


Pages: first : previous : ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 : last (23)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only