| Author |
Topic |
Kal Erkkinen |
Posted - 2011.08.19 00:35:00 - [ 631]
x
xx |
Junky Juke
Gallente |
Posted - 2011.08.19 00:37:00 - [ 632]
x |
Zela Kahn |
Posted - 2011.08.19 00:38:00 - [ 633]
X |
Ceelah |
Posted - 2011.08.19 00:50:00 - [ 634]
"X" for CQ destruction. |
Kryssare |
Posted - 2011.08.19 01:10:00 - [ 635]
XXXXX just remove all the station crap |
Wacktopia
Sicarius.
Legion of The Damned. |
Posted - 2011.08.19 01:24:00 - [ 636]
x /support
Old hanger AND CQ for me please. |
Magnus Orin
Minmatar
Wildly Inappropriate
Goonswarm Federation |
Posted - 2011.08.19 01:37:00 - [ 637]
 Originally by: Amarr Maniac
Edited by: Amarr Maniac on 23/06/2011 00:03:38
1. WE as players and paying customers want CQ optional, preferably old hangar view back and CQ as a button on station services just as medics or insurance.
"If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." -Henry Ford |
Soma Khan
Caldari |
Posted - 2011.08.19 02:09:00 - [ 638]
Originally by: Magnus Orin
Originally by: Amarr Maniac
Edited by: Amarr Maniac on 23/06/2011 00:03:38
1. WE as players and paying customers want CQ optional, preferably old hangar view back and CQ as a button on station services just as medics or insurance.
"If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses."
-Henry Ford
and now look at all the polution and all those poor people murdered over control of oil. poaneez are good and produce manure for organic vegetable farms |
Martin Skorn |
Posted - 2011.08.19 05:12:00 - [ 639]
X |
Blutomus Maximus |
Posted - 2011.08.19 05:55:00 - [ 640]
x |
Distortus |
Posted - 2011.08.19 06:16:00 - [ 641]
X |
Cave Lord |
Posted - 2011.08.19 06:36:00 - [ 642]
X
...but how are they going to make it optional and still cram the NEX store down our throats? We have to figure out a way for them to extract more money out of our pockets. |
Jint Hikaru
OffWorld Exploration Inc |
Posted - 2011.08.19 08:01:00 - [ 643]
X
I dock to the door now and will continue to do so.
I HATE CQ as it is, but I do thing that WIS (if or when it gets fully realized) will be good for Eve as a whole. As long as its optional.
I am still wondering WHEN we will get a full multiplayer station environment? Because if they are not planning on releasing it for years then why are we being forced into CQ.
Yes I know we can turn it off, but it would have been less work for the developers to add a button to the old hangar saying [Enter CQ}. But they chose to add the Door etc. |
Temarn |
Posted - 2011.08.19 09:54:00 - [ 644]
X Originally by: Brooks Puuntai
Because its pointless. CCP won't listen, nor do they care. The more people they have in CQ the higher chance people will buy stuff from the Noble Store. Its all about CCP milking their player base not what the player base wants.
Also this, I fear... |
Colt Mitri
Caldari
State War Academy
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 11:03:00 - [ 645]
X - supporting this. |
Billy Endashi |
Posted - 2011.08.19 12:36:00 - [ 646]
Edited by: Billy Endashi on 19/08/2011 12:37:35
X! I don't dock up a lot, but when I do, I dont want no crappy CQ slowing me down. We should have proper cq in the trade hubs, like a decent trading floor at jita. that would be cool. no need to have it in bumfark 0.4 system. |
H3BANK |
Posted - 2011.08.19 14:14:00 - [ 647]
Edited by: H3BANK on 19/08/2011 14:15:46X - should be optional not forced on us, plus optimise it, its already killed my gpu !!  |
Miss Rabblt |
Posted - 2011.08.19 14:31:00 - [ 648]
Originally by: Soma Khan
and now look at all the polution and all those poor people murdered over control of oil. poaneez are good and produce manure for organic vegetable farms
and those ponyes make nice **** everywhere....  |
Eight Sinn |
Posted - 2011.08.19 14:38:00 - [ 649]
"X"
Optional. You have the old hanger code, just put it back in and make new CQ optional. |
Ranger 1
Amarr
Ranger Corp
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 16:35:00 - [ 650]
Originally by: Eight Sinn
"X"
Optional. You have the old hanger code, just put it back in and make new CQ optional.
I remember when I thought life offered solutions this easy... |
Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron
Legion of xXDEATHXx |
Posted - 2011.08.19 16:59:00 - [ 651]
Originally by: Ranger 1
Originally by: Eight Sinn
"X"
Optional. You have the old hanger code, just put it back in and make new CQ optional.
I remember when I thought life offered solutions this easy...
Yeah, have to remember we're talking about CCP here... |
Ranger 1
Amarr
Ranger Corp
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 17:28:00 - [ 652]
Edited by: Ranger 1 on 19/08/2011 17:30:06 Originally by: Razin
Originally by: Ranger 1
Originally by: Eight Sinn
"X"
Optional. You have the old hanger code, just put it back in and make new CQ optional.
I remember when I thought life offered solutions this easy...
Yeah, have to remember we're talking about CCP here...
 Don't be a goof. You know very well they can't just plug the old code into the new code and expect it to work, software doesn't often work that way. Should they have taken more time and made the option available as Incarna was being developed? Yeah, it would have been nice. Should we expect them be able to take an hour and splice back in the old hanger code and have it work seamlessly? Not realistically, no. |
Eight Sinn |
Posted - 2011.08.19 17:39:00 - [ 653]
Originally by: Ranger 1
Should we expect them be able to take an hour and splice back in the old hanger code and have it work seamlessly? Not realistically, no.
Most likely their programming is object oriented. Docking spawns an action, that currently branches in two possible outcomes: new CQ, or wall image. Replace the branch that takes you to the wall image with the old hangar code. It's not rocket science or voodoo, it wouldn't be that difficult. |
Alayla Nightfall |
Posted - 2011.08.19 17:43:00 - [ 654]
XXX All 3 of my accounts endorse this product. |
Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron
Legion of xXDEATHXx |
Posted - 2011.08.19 17:44:00 - [ 655]
|
Ranger 1
Amarr
Ranger Corp
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 17:54:00 - [ 656]
Originally by: Eight Sinn
Originally by: Ranger 1
Should we expect them be able to take an hour and splice back in the old hanger code and have it work seamlessly? Not realistically, no.
Most likely their programming is object oriented. Docking spawns an action, that currently branches in two possible outcomes: new CQ, or wall image. Replace the branch that takes you to the wall image with the old hangar code.
It's not rocket science or voodoo, it wouldn't be that difficult.
I think you forget that most of the work that went into Incarna is not visible to you. The bulk of the work went into creating new underlying code. This means that to get back the old hanger view, the code would have to be created in large part from scratch. The old code can't interface with the new underlying code in the same way as it did before. In other words, copy/paste won't cut it. It's a wee bit more complicated than that. |
Optional Patch |
Posted - 2011.08.19 19:53:00 - [ 657]
x Originally by: Ranger 1
I think you forget that most of the work that went into Incarna is not visible to you. The bulk of the work went into creating new underlying code.
This means that to get back the old hanger view, the code would have to be created in large part from scratch. The old code can't interface with the new underlying code in the same way as it did before.
In other words, copy/paste won't cut it. It's a wee bit more complicated than that.
Obviously copy/paste won't do it, but anyone who has experience with application/game development can tell you that it's not that hard to do based on what we're seeing. CCP: People x'ing up here are not going to buy your Aurum products. Bury the option to enable the (promised) hanger functionality a few levels down in the config options where your new players are unlikely to find it. |
Leisen
Caldari
Interrobang Inc. |
Posted - 2011.08.19 20:28:00 - [ 658]
x
Give me back my fukken double click cargo. |
Ydnari
Gallente
Estrale Frontiers |
Posted - 2011.08.19 20:38:00 - [ 659]
x |
Xirin |
Posted - 2011.08.19 20:41:00 - [ 660]
x |
All Channels
EVE General Discussion
Why captain obvious, thank you for that gem of wisdom!