open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked Poll - X here is you don't load Station Environment
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: first : previous : ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 [51] 52 53 : last (53)

Author Topic

Cajmere
Posted - 2011.07.25 17:39:00 - [1501]
 

X for all three (soon to be two) accounts.

I bought a new spaceship today. I cannot look at it thanks to this horrible, horrible expansion.

Athena Silkwyrm
LV-426 Syndicate
Posted - 2011.07.25 17:56:00 - [1502]
 

[x] for 2 accounts (only way I could get them to run).

Why couldn't CCP at least have waited for Northern Hemisphere winter to release this demo of a future expansion? The heat coming of the video card would be much more appreciated.

Deadeye Devie
Minmatar
Posted - 2011.07.25 19:21:00 - [1503]
 

X


dont see why they took the hangar away, appart from force NeX on us. Also, didnt they say it would be OPTIONAL and wouldnt change anything in the existing game?

Garreth Vlox
Minmatar
Obsidian Inc.
Posted - 2011.07.25 19:25:00 - [1504]
 

X

ka'Sin
Posted - 2011.07.25 19:26:00 - [1505]
 

x - 5 fps on my iMac sitting on the sofa!! :/

Wolf Taron
Posted - 2011.07.25 19:29:00 - [1506]
 

x

Useless expension and poorly executed, not to mention misguided marketed oops.

Chica da'Silva
Posted - 2011.07.25 19:32:00 - [1507]
 

X - otherwise it takes 30-60 seconds to load and frame rate drops to 2-3. good luck doing things fast in station :(

Solhild
Posted - 2011.07.25 19:36:00 - [1508]
 

X

-but I'd happily load it if there was a point!

Another push for Akita's NeX store vanity component/ship paint module and move the Pod to a decanting room Smile

Havok Taurog
Posted - 2011.07.25 19:48:00 - [1509]
 

X here

But CCP won't care if everyone hated it, without an environment to put the NEX stuff they couldn't make money off it. They want to force people to use it so you can see pretty clothes that you can buy for $20!

Timural
Posted - 2011.07.25 19:48:00 - [1510]
 

Fine fps except it hogs resources when alt tabbing or dual boxing.

x

RTSAvalanche
Posted - 2011.07.25 20:02:00 - [1511]
 

Y

I use it, I enjoy how it gives a different view to the eve world. I look forward to when corp members can chill in the same room lol.

If you don't like it, don't use it.. just quit complaining!

Sewer Urchin
Posted - 2011.07.25 20:10:00 - [1512]
 

x, wouldn't mind it so much if it didn't tax the comp so hard. I run three accounts and I can run all three cq's with everything on high, but fps drops down to 20-30.

1 cq up, 2 toons in space, only getting 30 fps, any other combination of the three characters with the CQ off, 60 fps.


Rebbecca Black
Posted - 2011.07.25 20:23:00 - [1513]
 

[X]

Running multiple accounts. It's pretty but not worth the lost FPS you get if one of your toons is sitting in station, and another is out flying spaceships (zomg i know right people do that in this game?)

Zen Sarum
Posted - 2011.07.25 20:49:00 - [1514]
 

Edited by: Zen Sarum on 25/07/2011 20:49:44
x - Turned off until it adds useful content:

Ie
1. Additional easier to use interfaces
2. Additional player customised and created information.
3. In game (ie in space) benefits addition missions, pilot briefing, contraband, isk making content and products new PI cross link/gui and content.
4. Semi in game benefits? (games/ gambling)

Not:
Terrible graphics of some guy looking really bored in a room
Clothes?




Desert Ice78
Gryphon River Industries
R-I-P
Posted - 2011.07.25 20:53:00 - [1515]
 

[x]

Love the idea of Incarna, and will be really excited when it actually arrives....

Coco Caine
Posted - 2011.07.25 21:20:00 - [1516]
 

[x]

... it's a space ship game after all, with space ships.
... also internet space ship science fiction billionaires don't hang out solo in minmatar slave toilets.

Inaki Issier
Posted - 2011.07.25 21:26:00 - [1517]
 

[x]

My little laptop just can't handle it.

Abriael VonRosen
Caldari
Posted - 2011.07.25 22:12:00 - [1518]
 

Edited by: Abriael VonRosen on 25/07/2011 22:13:53
Originally by: Joseph Dredd

Ok maybe 5000 a bit much but well over 2000 if you take into account those you posted with multiple accounts even myself I have turned off on both of mine but only posted one has.
Also you may not know or bothered to read but ccp said that the option to turn of CQ would be there for a while not for ever so the time will come when it is compulsory to have it on.


When it'll be compulsory, we'll see the quality of it, and the features it'll have. Then it may make sense to complain.

Quote:
Also I was not talking about devs rather ccp out of a job if they continue not to take notice of what their customers want or do not like, after all it is the customer that pays their wages and dont for one minute think it cant happen as it has and will again


You seem to think you some kind of ESP ability to be able to relay what "the customers" want. "the customers" are not the forums, and most notably "the customers" are not you :D

On a completely personal note, i'd say that if CCP listened too much to that part of "the customer" that seems to be horribly resistant to any kind of change, they'd be out of a job much faster.

Diana Valenti
Minmatar
The Money Shot Inc.
Posted - 2011.07.25 22:26:00 - [1519]
 

X

Guillame Herschel
Gallente
NME1
Posted - 2011.07.25 22:29:00 - [1520]
 

Another [X] here.

What crime did I commit to deserve the punishment of solitary confinement?

Booby Trap
Posted - 2011.07.25 22:30:00 - [1521]
 

Originally by: Abriael VonRosen
On a completely personal note, i'd say that if CCP listened too much to that part of "the customer" that seems to be horribly resistant to any kind of change, they'd be out of a job much faster.


You seem to be confusing 'resistant to change' with 'being forced to disable a feature which is horribly optimised and less functional'

Even the players that were looking forward to CQ have been forced into not using it because it runs so badly.

There are also multi account holders who have had to disable it because they can no longer run 2 or 3 clients.

It's not just the people who are 'resistant to change'

Tiven loves Tansien
Posted - 2011.07.25 22:32:00 - [1522]
 

Definitely horrible



X

Taniquetil
Caldari
ChicksDigGuns
The Matari Consortium
Posted - 2011.07.25 22:33:00 - [1523]
 

X

Abriael VonRosen
Caldari
Posted - 2011.07.25 22:43:00 - [1524]
 

Edited by: Abriael VonRosen on 25/07/2011 22:56:38
Edited by: Abriael VonRosen on 25/07/2011 22:44:23
Originally by: Booby Trap
Originally by: Abriael VonRosen
You seem to be confusing 'resistant to change' with 'being forced to disable a feature which is horribly optimised and less functional'

Even the players that were looking forward to CQ have been forced into not using it because it runs so badly.

There are also multi account holders who have had to disable it because they can no longer run 2 or 3 clients.

It's not just the people who are 'resistant to change'



You seem to have the penchant for talking on behalf of the people around you. "the players" that were looking forwad to it aren't a mass blob that will unanimously perform the same actions.

Personally CQ run at a stable 50fps for me, with my GTX460 stable at around 54 C with 80% fan speed. Maxxed settings. That's a very decent performance for a graphically intensive engine.

Welcome to the realm of current graphics, that of course require current hardware instead of your grandma's laptop.

Refusing to accept a (much needed i would say) graphics overhaul because you want to continue to play games on massively outdated hardware is, indeed, the by the book definition of "resistant to change".

ARULAG
Posted - 2011.07.25 22:55:00 - [1525]
 

x

grunf Ijonen
Posted - 2011.07.25 23:07:00 - [1526]
 

x - Hardware is running anything but cq.......

centurion zulu
Phantom Squad
Atlas.
Posted - 2011.07.25 23:15:00 - [1527]
 


x

Considering how many people play the game and don't read forums, 51 pages should be a hint.


Booby Trap
Posted - 2011.07.25 23:18:00 - [1528]
 

Originally by: Abriael VonRosen

Welcome to the realm of current graphics, that of course require current hardware instead of your grandma's laptop.

Refusing to accept a (much needed i would say) graphics overhaul because you want to continue to play games on massively outdated hardware is, indeed, the by the book definition of "resistant to change".


Your ignorance on this subject is, quite simply, astounding. If you can be bothered to educate yourself further on the matter you can read through the posts of 100's of people who have posted with system specs that meet the reqirements stated by CCP but still have problems.

You do know that CCP have acknowledged that people are having problems with heat and hardware issues right? In fact they even made a Sticky about it in General Discussion to try and fix the problem.

Abriael VonRosen
Caldari
Posted - 2011.07.25 23:32:00 - [1529]
 

Edited by: Abriael VonRosen on 25/07/2011 23:35:16
Edited by: Abriael VonRosen on 25/07/2011 23:34:47
Originally by: Booby Trap

Your ignorance on this subject is, quite simply, astounding. If you can be bothered to educate yourself further on the matter you can read through the posts of 100's of people who have posted with system specs that meet the reqirements stated by CCP but still have problems.

You do know that CCP have acknowledged that people are having problems with heat and hardware issues right? In fact they even made a Sticky about it in General Discussion to try and fix the problem.



"meeting the requirements" doesn't mean being able to run something at top detail, with good performance.

Also, if I had a penny for every gamer with extremely poor ventilation in his case, i'd be filthy rich.

Finally, demanding to be able to run multiple clients of graphically current game on a single machine with less than top hardware is a tad laughable.

Rhastafan
Posted - 2011.07.25 23:37:00 - [1530]
 

X - I cannot really even think of anything that would make me turn it on.


Pages: first : previous : ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 [51] 52 53 : last (53)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only