open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked Poll - X here is you don't load Station Environment
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.

Pages: first : previous : ... 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 ... : last (53)

Author Topic

Bael Gar
Posted - 2011.06.22 16:59:00 - [691]

[X] Had turned OFF station environment before first login

Tax Evaders Inc.
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:00:00 - [692]

IT's OVER 9000!!!

Zero Excavations
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:00:00 - [693]

oh really I can turn off that blasphemous fps eating-nothing doing-useless-******ed-walking-new *cool* feature?

Damn I am so doing it next time i log!

and big fricin XXXXXXXXX

Posted - 2011.06.22 17:05:00 - [694]

I think pritty much evryone that uses the forums has x'd up. Will CCP listen to it, I'm guessing no, they are all busy cashing out!!! I'm gonna petion them for RMT.


Shikei Furry
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:10:00 - [695]


Give me the old good looking shipview instead or at least as a choice Crying or Very sad

Changes to UI's in games should be for the better, as in, ease of use, lean on the eye, smoothness, added functionality.. etc.

I just dont see the point.. Its rubbish so far. If i wanted to see my spastic moving character I'd go play WoW or something similar, I play EVE because i like SHIPS. Not people, SHIPS!

CCP need to do a check on why people actually play EVE here imo, they have missed something pretty vital it seems.

If they had added spotlights that I could tweak around with to watch my ship in different lightning, colouring to the ships, modularity so I could make my ship look unique..

But no, we can now wear.. BLOUSES! Gee, thanks alot CCP.

wtf guys? Wake up and smell the coffe will ya, you are waay off here. More Sci-Fi. Less.. useless fluff that other games do and will do 100 times better anyhow.

Posted - 2011.06.22 17:11:00 - [696]

Turned it off immediately, always kept with the same idea that EVE just isn't your box standard MMO... keep it that way.

Presumably they implemented CQ as a test stage for DUST 514? Guess work, I don't keep up with the lastest stuffs.


Baron vonDoom
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:11:00 - [697]


My comp runs it just fine, even with multiple clients, but watching a screen to watch a guy watching a screen seems kind of redundant...

Aegis Stormborn
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:11:00 - [698]


Elise DarkStar
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:13:00 - [699]


I can play the actual spaceship game just fine, but their cash-grab, noob-bait station environment kills my comp? No thanks.

Oberon Incorporated
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:15:00 - [700]

X what a monumental waste of time and resources. CCP = clueless computer programers

Kraal Jarik
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:17:00 - [701]

Yeah, rage about pixels on the screen. Rolling Eyes

Buzz Hulbreech
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:18:00 - [702]

X 2 accts. Too slow to do stuff, takes too long to load, and horribly laggy if you have the required 2+ accounts running.

Nice of CCP to show us long standing customers "the door".

The Tzar
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:20:00 - [703]


This is the one thing after 5 long years of faithful 'bug testing' for CCP I have almost quit over.

If people want to play a Sims style game, guess what; THERE's FRACKING LOADS OF THEM!

Del DelVechio
Red Federation
RvB - RED Federation
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:22:00 - [704]


Pentag Blade
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:25:00 - [705]

x --3 accounts
I signed up to an internet spaceship game not a fail sims in space--- this cq is just horrible--i want my ship spinning back

Posted - 2011.06.22 17:26:00 - [706]

Edited by: Lelob on 22/06/2011 17:27:06

edit: 3 accounts

The Hatchery
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:30:00 - [707]

I don't actually mind using it...if it didn't drop my FPS so much. Especially since I routinely dual/tribox, it's just not feasible to have it running.

But at the same time, that stationary backdrop of a door is so boring. At least show our ship please!

Nak hak
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:30:00 - [708]

X - I don't play PvP for flash & texture. Play to melt your ass, or melt trying.

Hikari Kasenumi
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:30:00 - [709]

X - glitches, bad character movement interface and hideous looking toon compared with the character editor. Also no actaul features yet.

True Enlightenment
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:31:00 - [710]

Edited by: Nishachara on 22/06/2011 17:31:25

- and i was looking forward to incarna Sad

Body Count Inc.
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:34:00 - [711]

X - Turned it off. My GFX card is worth more than walking around in a station thanks.

Posted - 2011.06.22 17:34:00 - [712]

[X] Turning off CQ

Agree that going into CQ should be an option, just like the "un-dock" button.

I don't have "TeH Best" computer, but it runs everything else just fine.

Dual Core Athlon 64 - 3ghz
Nividia GeForce 9400 GT (512mb)
(yes Shader 3)

CQ turned on, 2 accounts
CPU Usage 97%-100%
(that's just sitting on the couch doing NOTHING)

Eve turned off
CPU Usage 1%

Entwi De Maila
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:46:00 - [713]

X 3 accounts station lag is crazy takes far too long to refit organize your hanger etc.

Posted - 2011.06.22 17:48:00 - [714]

[x] Turned off.

I like the idea, but the performance is god damn abysmal even on my gaming pc, let alone on a laptop or older pcs

Posted - 2011.06.22 17:49:00 - [715]

I believe you guys are just trolling for the trolling sake.

if you want to spin a ship, spin it in space. attach a button to the leave hangar short-cut and the new CQ don't slow you down. when you have used it a little, you don't really have to walk around if you don't want to.

I really don't see how incarna takes away anything from established players - your gameplay does not change, you just don't like that CCP tries to please other kinds of players than you. You simply love when new players bash the game in the forum and say they will cancell there sunscribtion, because thye don't get it, I guess that makes you feel better than them in some way. But come on, if you can still fly around and do your thing, what the hell does it matter that CCP tries to hit a wider audience

The only part of all your weeping I agree a little with - is that its seem a little expensive with the new currency - but let us see it play out before we judge it.

I think its great and its not much yet, but it will be in the furture, and sure you guys don't get anything this time,but this expansion atleast promisses me some off the gameplay I have been missing.

Donatella D'Tren
Eve Defence Force
Fatal Ascension
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:50:00 - [716]


Obviously Confidential
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:54:00 - [717]


Looks neat and pretty although its useless from a gameplay perspective, I can understand that and take it as and important first step.

However, performance is crappy and it seems like it was done by amateurs.

SUGGESTION: make Aurum totally unrelated to PLEX/ISK so the "monocle vs. Dread" immersion breaking argument goes away. Charge whatever you want for items, price/volume optimization will come over time and depend on what people are willing to pay.

EVIL COMMENT: if I recall, you guys didn't want to put the AT qualifiers on you tube because the low quality would make CCP look amateurish. Please explain my CQ fps because it makes you guys look terribly worse.

Gonzo Dopama
Posted - 2011.06.22 17:54:00 - [718]

X - please make CQ and walkin in station optional.

I want my old Hangar back!

King Rothgar
Autocannons Anonymous
Posted - 2011.06.22 18:02:00 - [719]

Edited by: King Rothgar on 22/06/2011 18:03:42

The new CQ loads fine and is perfectly usable on my rig (~30 fps). But it does add a few seconds to load time and offers zero new functionality. So after looking around and exploring all the stuff, I turned it off. I also miss the ability to admire my ship from any angle I want. It doesn't seem you can rotate the ships so it's really annoying staring at the ass end of your favorite ship with no ability to change the angle. It seems to me CCP put forth a huge investment to give the players basically nothing.

I don't see this new feature adding any new accounts and the old guys like me certainly don't care. They could have done something cool like add bars where we could play poker and such with each other, but they didn't. Instead we have these sterile, lonely garages to sit in that add to load times and offer nothing new aside from the ability to look at my sad mug from any angle I wish.

Posted - 2011.06.22 18:04:00 - [720]

Originally by: Akita T
Edited by: Akita T on 22/06/2011 13:34:19


* MANDATORY - separate the CQ from the non-CQ graphics detail settings into two completely separate groups which you can set differently[/b]
* MANDATORY - keep the ESC menu option to not load any environment at all
* STRONGLY PREFERRED - add some even lower graphics detail levels for CQ
* OPTIONAL BUT HIGHLY DESIRABLE - do not delete the current hangar environments AND make them an alternative (default disabled) via the ESC menu

strongly agreed!

[x] do not load that piece of ***
try CQ with 3 clients :(

Pages: first : previous : ... 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 ... : last (53)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to

These forums are archived and read-only